![]() |
Re: DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide
Don't read too much into the "New" 52.
After all, the COIE to Flashpoint era was called New Earth, and that name never changed. In 2011, it was still "New" Earth despite being 25 years old at that point. http://dc.wikia.com/wiki/New_Earth |
Re: DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide
Did I hear that each new 52 title has 4 issues that month?
|
Re: DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide
Originally Posted by Trevor
(Post 11816472)
Did I hear that each new 52 title has 4 issues that month?
Some titles such as Batman, Superman, Detective Comics, and Action Comics are getting four issues. Some titles such as Teen Titans, Wonder Woman, and Swamp Thing are getting fewer. Some titles such as Batgirl, Nightwing, and Animal Man are getting no issues at all. I have heard that it still adds up to 52 comics (instead of 52 x 4 = 208 comics) but I haven't bothered counting them myself to see if that's true. All of them are however getting that 3D gimmick cover. A full list of the Villains Month issues can be seen here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Villain...onth.22_titles |
Re: DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide
Originally Posted by Travis McClain
(Post 11816404)
I've subscribed to the speculation that the plan is to run The New 52 for 52 months. They use it to distinguish from the non-mainstream DC books (like Batman '66), which suggests that they view The New 52 as the designation for this continuity. As you noted, we're coming up on its second anniversary, so "new" isn't applicable anymore.
I can't remember if they've stuck with it, but I know after the first wave, they added a new book for every one they canceled to maintain 52 books in circulation each month. Seems like an awful lot of fixation on that magic number. If so, then the final issues *should* ship in December, 2015 (depending on whether or not the #0 issues "count" toward the 52 month goal of the launch books still in print). Though, to be honest, I don't see much point trying to guess along with DC these days. |
Re: DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide
Originally Posted by PhantomStranger
(Post 11816637)
That is very interesting speculation.
DC barely plans ahead one year, let alone 4.33 years (i.e. 52 months). If the zero issue month last year messes with his theory, then Villains Month blows it open even more. Some titles are getting four issues for Villains Month, while some titles are getting one or two or three issues instead, and some titles aren't getting an issue at all. Also as I pointed out earlier, the term "new" doesn't really mean much considering "New" Earth was the name of the COIE to Flashpoint continuity for the entirety of its 25 year run. |
Re: DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide
Originally Posted by taffer
(Post 11816656)
Not really.
DC barely plans ahead one year, let alone 4.33 years (i.e. 52 months). If the zero issue month last year messes with his theory, then Villains Month blows it open even more. Some titles are getting four issues for Villains Month, while some titles are getting one or two or three issues instead, and some titles aren't getting an issue at all. Also as I pointed out earlier, the term "new" doesn't really mean much considering "New" Earth was the name of the COIE to Flashpoint continuity for the entirety of its 25 year run. "The New 52" being the formal designation for this continuity - the applicability of "new" not being particularly relevant. Again, though, I've pretty much given up trying to guess along with DC at this point. Speculate away. |
Re: DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide
Originally Posted by Travis McClain
(Post 11816767)
It could be that 52 months of 52 monthly issues is the extent of their planning.
Like for example, Batman #1 and Teen Titans #1 both clearly said Tim Drake used to be Robin. Then a year later in Teen Titans #0 they decide that hey Tim was never Robin at all. Or the whole current thing with Lobo having already appeared in some of the early issues, and now they are retconning that to being an imposter, and that new slim Lobo redesign in the actual real Lobo. There have been lots of retcons like that already, which clearly shows DC didn't have a long term plan for any of this.
Originally Posted by Travis McClain
Firstly, it isn't "my" theory. It's one I heard that made sense to me. As far as the numbering goes, notice that the books shipping multiple issues are 23.1, 23.2, etc., rather than 23, 24, etc. That still allows them to eventually publish issue #52 the 52nd month of this run (depending on what they do about the #0 issues, anyway).
Aug 2012 were issues #11. Sept 2012 were the zero issues. Oct 2012 were issues #12. Aug 2013 were issues #23. Sept 2013 is the #23.1, 23.2, 23.3, etc issues. Oct 2013 will be issues #24. In both cases, the normal schedule was delayed a month. If DC keeps that precedent, they will likely repeat it next year as well. Since September is the "anniversary" of the New 52, they may use it as the springboard for annual gimmicks like that for the foreseeable future at least. The theory I've cited doesn't conflict with that point. On the contrary, I see "The New 52" being the formal designation for this continuity - the applicability of "new" not being particularly relevant. Again, though, I've pretty much given up trying to guess along with DC at this point. Speculate away. Another thing I just considered is that Scott Snyder is doing his 11-issue Batman origin currently. If DC planned to only do 52 issues of this continuity, do you really think they would want Snyder spending 11 of those issues on a new origin? That would be over 20% of the run. Plus why would they just now get to Batman's new origin this late in the run when its almost half over if they only plan 52 issues? |
Re: DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide
I wonder how the new 11-issue origin for Batman will compare to Frank Miller's 4-issue origin, or Bob Kane's original 1 page origin.
|
Re: DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide
Originally Posted by taffer
(Post 11816656)
Not really.
DC barely plans ahead one year, let alone 4.33 years (i.e. 52 months). This is the same company where editors do rewrites as the pages are being copied for the printers. This is the company who swore they were planning this new 52 thing way in advance yet none of the old series really wrapped up nicely, and there's no way it was anything but tacked onto the end of Flashpoint. |
Re: DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide
I also remember back in 2008 when Final Crisis was coming out, people were asking if it would be a reboot similar to COIE. DC swore up and down that they had no plans for a reboot. Well, then 3 years later, guess what... Flashpoint reboot...
Yeah, DC definitely doesn't do long term planning. All the sloppy continuity, retcons, last-minute changes, etc clearly demonstrate that. |
Re: DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide
Originally Posted by brayzie
(Post 11817266)
I wonder how the new 11-issue origin for Batman will compare to Frank Miller's 4-issue origin, or Bob Kane's original 1 page origin.
Bill Finger. :mad: |
Re: DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide
I wonder if DC or Marvel could succeed by pretty much bagging the whole concept of continuity between titles. Too busy to flesh this idea out right now, maybe later. I'm sure it's been discussed in places or even here before.
|
Re: DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide
Originally Posted by Trevor
(Post 11817561)
I wonder if DC or Marvel could succeed by pretty much bagging the whole concept of continuity between titles. Too busy to flesh this idea out right now, maybe later. I'm sure it's been discussed in places or even here before.
|
Re: DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide
Originally Posted by taffer
(Post 11816841)
Like for example, Batman #1 and Teen Titans #1 both clearly said Tim Drake used to be Robin. Then a year later in Teen Titans #0 they decide that hey Tim was never Robin at all.
|
Re: DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide
At the beginning of the New 52, Tim Drake was still one of the Robins (along with Dick Grayson, Jason Todd & Damian Wayne). They mention it in Batman #1 and Teen Titans #1. Fans started asking "How can Batman be around for only 5 years (based on New 52 continuity) and go through 4 Robins already?" So when the #0 issues hit a year later, Tim Drake's whole existence as Robin was wiped away. Heck, he wasn't even "Tim Drake" anymore. He has always been RED Robin.
|
Re: DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide
Red Robin =/= Robin
Teen Titans #0 very clearly says he was never Robin, only ever Red Robin. Also, the tpb release of the first Teen Titans arc was changed to reflect this. Yes, DC actually edited out all the mentions of Tim being Robin in the tpb. Check it out: Scan from Teen Titans #1 that calls him Robin: Spoiler:
Pic of the trade edit that changed it to Red Robin: Spoiler:
Source: Retconning Robin out of Teen Titans
Originally Posted by The Valeyard
Heck, he wasn't even "Tim Drake" anymore.
|
Re: DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide
Originally Posted by taffer
(Post 11818654)
Yeah, that was far more offensive than the whole "never Robin" thing. Tim Drake is the name given to him by Witness Protection. His real name was never revealed. http://www.comicbookresources.com/?p...ticle&id=41229 Beyond the reveal of witness protection, it almost seems like there's something fans might have missed in Batman's ending line involving Tim's name -- anything you can tease about that? I'm going to tell you something here -- for CBR fans only -- that I don't think will upset anyone editorially -- but I'll guess we'll find out! After I finished the script and I believed it was sent off to the printers, I got a text from Editorial saying, "Loved the witness protection thing. We think it works better if we reveal Drake was never has last name. Took care of it." Now, some writers fly into a rage when their work is rewritten -- and it only rarely every happens to me! -- but I thought, "Okay, I can see that. I can see all the potential for future storylines that can come from that, mysteries that ultimately need to be revealed." So in some ways, I was as surprised by the last page as everyone else who read it. I dig it. As to the continuity thing: I think that if you were truly going to target new readers, you'd keep a unified universe but keep the crossovers and whatnot to a minimum, which is what DC started out doing. But then you alienate fans, who want the winkwink/nodnod to the past and the interconnected universe. Which makes it impenetrable to new fans. Here's the problem with the superhero industry: there are a handful of characters and groups who will sell by name alone. You can tell who they are because there are multiple books with their name headlining it, and they're on multiple teams. Nobody (I mean readers) tries anything new, unless there's massive critical acclaim or something, and even that takes time to build up. Creative teams in general don't stay on books long enough to get a fan following (though Marvel has been much better about this). Crossovers, gimmick covers, etc kinda force people to buy the smaller titles and maybe get hooked on the characters or the writing or the art. If you go back to standalone stories, where there's not at least an illusion of big changes, the masses will avoid it. That's one of the reasons standalone OGNs tend to not do so well. |
Re: DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide
I find the 52 speculation interesting. Some at DC have this hard-on for the number. I wonder if it means anything long-term. I mean: it's got to mean something, right?
But maybe not, as I remember Dan Didio telling Kevin Smith on "Fatman on Batman" that the post-Flashpoint launch was 48 titles and Jim Lee talked him into doing four more books, so they'd have 52. (^^^I will say I do not follow the comics press, so apologies if that statement was later disproved; just going with what Didio said...) |
Re: DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide
Well, as far as I know 52 started with the weekly series called 52 (obviously that the number of weeks in a year), and when they reintroduced the multiverse after Infinite Crisis, that was the number of alternate realities there were.
|
Re: DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide
I mainly resisted, so far. Went to my local shop this morning and they had 12 of the 3D covers available. I almost bought them all, then almost decided to quit on the new 52 completely. After waffling back and forth on those options for a few minutes, and listening to the owner talk about the messed up system, I finally decided on a compromise and just bought a couple titles, ones that I would buy normally if I go back to buying monthlies. The covers look pretty cool in person I must admit.
|
Re: DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide
I have to say, I'm not sure I've ever seen a line that long in my local comic shop outside of FCBD in the decade or so I've been going there. Everyone seemed to have at least one 'villain' book in their hands, including the 2D covers, so it's not purely a cover gimmick thing. The owner was talking about one guy who stood out in front of the shop before they opened, trying to beat the rush, even though just about all of the lenticular covers were already spoken for by subscribers.
I saw Darkseid and Joker on the racks with the lenticular covers...everything else looked to be 2D, but I only gave things a quick skim. It's not an event for me (I did hold true with my jumping off point stance!), but it definitely does look to be popular. |
Re: DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide
Originally Posted by Adam Tyner
(Post 11820720)
I saw Darkseid and Joker on the racks with the lenticular covers...everything else looked to be 2D, but I only gave things a quick skim. It's not an event for me (I did hold true with my jumping off point stance!), but it definitely does look to be popular.
|
Re: DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide
Comics that self-destruct 30 seconds after you finish reading?
|
Re: DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide
Anyone read any of it yet, particularly the actual Forever Evil book?
|
Re: DC UNIVERSE Reboots in September, Same Day Digital Linewide
Originally Posted by Supermallet
(Post 11820763)
Comics that self-destruct 30 seconds after you finish reading?
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:40 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.