Comic Book Talk The Place to talk about Comics

Am I the only one who thinks Marvel 1605 is underrated?

Old 05-23-10, 12:22 AM
  #1  
DVD Talk Reviewer
Thread Starter
 
Boba Fett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,084
Am I the only one who thinks Marvel 1605 is underrated?

This was one of those titles that I was meaning to read a few years back but put off. I went through the original Gaiman miniseries over the course of three days and was blown away.

Fantastic art, an intelligent story that builds slowly and does a great job at keeping readers on their toes, and a fine example of historical fiction.

Has anyone else read this? I'm really shocked I haven't heard anything said about it.

There are three spinoffs, "New World" "Fantastic Four" and "Spider-Man."

I'm picking up the "Fantastic Four" story next and I'm hoping it will retain the same positives from the original "1605."
Boba Fett is offline  
Old 05-23-10, 12:52 AM
  #2  
DVD Talk Legend
 
The Valeyard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Building attractions one theme park at a time.
Posts: 10,545
Re: Am I the only one who thinks Marvel 1605 is underrated?

1602.
The Valeyard is offline  
Old 05-25-10, 02:14 PM
  #3  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,731
Re: Am I the only one who thinks Marvel 1605 is underrated?

I like that story a lot. I think it's rated just about right, though. I don't think it's a "classic", but it is really enjoyable. One of the better "what ifs" of the recent past.
boredsilly is offline  
Old 05-27-10, 11:31 AM
  #4  
DVD Talk Hero
 
davidh777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Home of 2013 NFL champion Seahawks
Posts: 41,864
Re: Am I the only one who thinks Marvel 1605 is underrated?

I dug the concept and thought it was a fun read
davidh777 is offline  
Old 05-09-11, 11:20 AM
  #5  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Travis McClain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Western Hemisphere
Posts: 7,294
Re: Am I the only one who thinks Marvel 1605 is underrated?

I checked out the trade paperback from the library a couple years ago and really enjoyed it. The stuff with Quicksilver being a largely unseen courier of information reminded me of an anecdote in Chronicles of the Crusades about an unseen voice informing a king of events. The king never sees or identifies his informant, but is able to act on the information. Of course, that was alleged to have happened four hundred years before Marvel 1602, but it wouldn't surprise me to learn Gaiman had taken inspiration from it.

I really enjoyed that Gaiman was able to explore the themes at the heart of these characters, while removing them from their natural contexts. Persecution has always been a dominant theme in Marvel Comics, and Gaiman clearly made that a central tenet of Marvel 1602, along with disputes over the proper use of power. My only real complaint was the very end felt too much like the contrived ending of Gangs of New York. On the whole, though, I found it a very thoughtful and enjoyable read. I loved Andy Kubert's art and especially the Scott McKowen scratch board covers.
Travis McClain is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.