Community
Search
Book Talk A Place To Discuss Books and Audiobooks

"Satanic Verses"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-05-02 | 03:53 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 29,850
Received 23 Likes on 16 Posts
From: Bartertown due to it having a better economy than where I really live.
"Satanic Verses"

Anyone ever read it?
what's it about?
is it fiction? It was in what I think is the fiction section of the school library. I paged through it but got a Harry Turtledove book instead
Old 02-05-02 | 04:12 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hard to summarize

it's that scary magical realism stuff, in this case having to do with immigration mostly... its fiction
Old 02-05-02 | 09:12 PM
  #3  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: My apartment
I've always meant to read it - mainly because of the hit out on Rushdie. He must be saying some pretty extreme things to get a hit put out on him.
Old 02-06-02 | 12:16 PM
  #4  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 8,210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Arch City
A book I have never read and, while the junk surrounding it and its author was/is interesting to me, I can't get up any desire to go read it.

Am I missing out?
Old 02-06-02 | 01:13 PM
  #5  
Josh-da-man's Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 49,193
Received 4,420 Likes on 2,913 Posts
From: The Bible Belt
I've always meant to read this one, myself.

One thing, though. Everyone's aware of the controversy surrounding this title. I've heard that, unless you are or ever have been a Moslem, you probably won't understand what was so offensive about the book that caused a fatwa to be placed on the author.

Anyone who knows care to elaborate on what was so offensive to certain sectors of the Islamic world? Spoiler tag in necessary.
Old 02-06-02 | 02:18 PM
  #6  
Uber Member
 
Joined: Mar 1999
Posts: 16,232
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Overlooking Pearl Harbor
Originally posted by Josh-da-man
Anyone who knows care to elaborate on what was so offensive to certain sectors of the Islamic world? Spoiler tag in necessary.
From Justin Torres' review of another of his books (Fury) in the 10-1-01 Weekly Standard magazine.

Spoiler:
With much more deadly results, the same charges of novelistic plunder of cultural riches would be lodged against The Satanic Verses (1988) by Muslim fundamentalists, who objected to Rushdie’s reimagining of the birth of a religion that sounds a great deal like Islam.

In the offending section of the book, the prophet “Mahound” (a name for Mohammed used in medieval Christian morality plays) is a weak and bumbling fool, surrounded by a ragtag group of thieves and prostitutes (whom Rushdie, in a nice inflammatory touch, gives the names of Mohammed’s wives). Mohammed’s flight from Medina is reworked as the hasty retreat of a con artist staying one step ahead of his debts.
From what I understand, after briefly skimming the article again, the Satanic Verses is one of his best books, but he tends to be a writer of brilliant moments, rather than brilliant books. But the Verses is said to be very good except for certain sections (like the one referenced above) that fall somewhat flat and seem out of place. Also, his style is one of "reimagining" historical events.

-David
Old 02-06-02 | 03:56 PM
  #7  
benedict's Avatar
Mod Emeritus
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 10,674
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Outside of the U.S.A.
:-)

Look out for his latest: "I Hate That Fat Guy, Buddha"

FWIW I've read one or two Rushdie's in my time and enjoyed them.

IIRC Midnight's Children won the Booker Prize and was a fascinasting read based on lives of children born at the exact time of India's independence and its split from what became Pakistan.

I never got around to reading The Satanic Verses.

I believe the title refers to certain verses linked with the origin of the Koran but which were later said to have been dictated by Satan rather than by Gabriel. They were deemed to be blasphemous and not part of the official scripture.
Old 02-06-02 | 05:03 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
posted by benedict
I believe the title refers to certain verses linked with the origin of the Koran but which were later said to have been dictated by Satan rather than by Gabriel. They were deemed to be blasphemous and not part of the official scripture.
I believe Rushdie's treatment of this moment, his re-creation of the events, is what caused the fatwa. But he based this moment on scepticism that had existed for centuries. (At least I think I read that somewhere, Islam is a bit foreign to me.)

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.