Who the hell are Good Charlotte and why are they on the cover of Rolling Stone?
#1
DVD Talk Legend
Thread Starter
Who the hell are Good Charlotte and why are they on the cover of Rolling Stone?
I know RS no longer has any thing to do with real music but usually I've heard of the bands on the cover. Is this a Blink 182 wanna be band or a Linkin Park wanna be band?
#2
DVD Talk Hero
I would say they are more like a Blink wannabe, even though I enjoy their music.
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg...glance&s=music
track 1 "little things" gets lots of airplay
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg...glance&s=music
Lifestyles and The anthem get radio airplay.
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg...glance&s=music
track 1 "little things" gets lots of airplay
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg...glance&s=music
Lifestyles and The anthem get radio airplay.
#3
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: the South
Posts: 3,764
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Because RS sucks. Have you seen the documentary on Wilco, IATTBYH? Senior Editor of RS, David Fricke, is on there talking too much. What a brickhead he is.
#4
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 2,847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I pretty much lost all my respect for RS when they rated A perfect Circles debut album a half star lower than Britney Spears new record lol. I still subscribe though, but I enjoy reading their non music related journalism better. You can't really win with these mags though. I get spin too, but it's the complete opposite. They hate anything that is remotely popular or well known, and boost independent garbage (most of it is anyway) or semi more than it should. They are funny though hehe.
#5
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 4,049
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Penny Lane
Because RS sucks. Have you seen the documentary on Wilco, IATTBYH? Senior Editor of RS, David Fricke, is on there talking too much. What a brickhead he is.
Because RS sucks. Have you seen the documentary on Wilco, IATTBYH? Senior Editor of RS, David Fricke, is on there talking too much. What a brickhead he is.
#6
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: the South
Posts: 3,764
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Ergyu
I pretty much lost all my respect for RS when they rated A perfect Circles debut album a half star lower than Britney Spears new record lol. I still subscribe though, but I enjoy reading their non music related journalism better. You can't really win with these mags though. I get spin too, but it's the complete opposite. They hate anything that is remotely popular or well known, and boost independent garbage (most of it is anyway) or semi more than it should. They are funny though hehe.
I pretty much lost all my respect for RS when they rated A perfect Circles debut album a half star lower than Britney Spears new record lol. I still subscribe though, but I enjoy reading their non music related journalism better. You can't really win with these mags though. I get spin too, but it's the complete opposite. They hate anything that is remotely popular or well known, and boost independent garbage (most of it is anyway) or semi more than it should. They are funny though hehe.
#8
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Fascination Street
Posts: 6,521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No American music magazine that is widely distributed is worth consideration.
If you want to read some of the last vestiges of what music journalism should be, look to English mags like Mojo and Q.
If you want to read some of the last vestiges of what music journalism should be, look to English mags like Mojo and Q.
#9
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Your questions are easily answered (with another question):
Who the hell is Good Charlotte? Who cares?
Why are they on the cover of Rolling Stone? See above.
Seriously, I just let my subscriptions to Rolling Stone and Spin run out a few months ago. I don't miss either one. Both pander to a mainstream audience...Spin just as much as RS. However, Spin pretends to be hip and cutting edge. It's not, and its attempt to appear "underground" is even worse to me than RS placing Britney Spears and Shakira on the cover of its "Women in Rock" issue (Britney may be a lot of things, but rock she ain't). I'm agreeing with Alyoshka on this one...the Internet and my friends are a much better source of recommending worthwhile music than any music magazine (no matter which country it's from).
Who the hell is Good Charlotte? Who cares?
Why are they on the cover of Rolling Stone? See above.
Seriously, I just let my subscriptions to Rolling Stone and Spin run out a few months ago. I don't miss either one. Both pander to a mainstream audience...Spin just as much as RS. However, Spin pretends to be hip and cutting edge. It's not, and its attempt to appear "underground" is even worse to me than RS placing Britney Spears and Shakira on the cover of its "Women in Rock" issue (Britney may be a lot of things, but rock she ain't). I'm agreeing with Alyoshka on this one...the Internet and my friends are a much better source of recommending worthwhile music than any music magazine (no matter which country it's from).
#10
DVD Talk Limited Edition
They are the band that sold their soul to MTV. They seem to be getting lots of airplay. I can tolerate the music, it's decent...some stuff. I'm just glad they host the "All things Rock" show on MTV. It's the RARE chance of seeing somewhat rock music since my cable provider took away my MTV Rock station and replaced it with MTV Jamz *ugh*
#11
Member
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: T.O.
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Jepthah
No American music magazine that is widely distributed is worth consideration.
If you want to read some of the last vestiges of what music journalism should be, look to English mags like Mojo and Q.
No American music magazine that is widely distributed is worth consideration.
If you want to read some of the last vestiges of what music journalism should be, look to English mags like Mojo and Q.
I think the former editor of Maxim recently took over the position at Rolling Stone and that is why they have sunk to having cover shots of half naked women who really don't have that much musical talent but just look really good half naked.
I can't believe Good Charlotte are on the cover, who next, Avril Lavigne?
#12
DVD Talk Legend
Aren't Good Charlotte the band where the singer uses a fake British accent while singing? Man, there is nothing more stupid than singers using fake accents.
#13
Retired
Originally posted by Ergyu
I like their non music related journalism better.
I like their non music related journalism better.
That said, even their good non-music stories have been few and far between in recent months and I'm not renewing this time.
#14
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
There are PLENTY of independent, American zines that spread the word of good music. Hit List, Carbon 14, Razorcake, Under the Volcano and the Big Takeover are the first few that immediately come to mind. Available at any Tower Records or Borders Books.
The Big Takeover would be the one that would most appeal to the people who enjoy the more lengthy articles that are found in Mojo & Q.
Carbon 14 is great! Porn, punk rock, and pro-wrestling. Can't go wrong with those!
I agree with the comments about Q and Mojo. Both are great informative reads.
The Big Takeover would be the one that would most appeal to the people who enjoy the more lengthy articles that are found in Mojo & Q.
Carbon 14 is great! Porn, punk rock, and pro-wrestling. Can't go wrong with those!
I agree with the comments about Q and Mojo. Both are great informative reads.
#15
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 4,681
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Penny Lane
brickhead
brickhead
Blender is OK as far as mass-market magazines go, at least they actually review a fair number of records each issue.
#18
Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Good Charlotte are a fake ass wannabe poser punk band.
God,i hate that dude in the band with the tattoos & the Hot-Topic Hair Dye.That dude is such a damn poser.
He is trying WAY to hard.
God,i hate that dude in the band with the tattoos & the Hot-Topic Hair Dye.That dude is such a damn poser.
He is trying WAY to hard.
#19
DVD Talk Hero
Lovin' the music snobs in this forum.
GC is good if you don't try to take them for any more than playful mall-pop-punk. Not every CD has to be this mind-blowing pinnacle of artistic merit.
#20
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 2,847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by El Scorcho
Not every CD has to be this mind-blowing pinnacle of artistic merit.
Not every CD has to be this mind-blowing pinnacle of artistic merit.
However, Spin pretends to be hip and cutting edge. It's not, and its attempt to appear "underground" is even worse to me than RS placing Britney Spears and Shakira on the cover of its "Women in Rock" issue (Britney may be a lot of things, but rock she ain't).
#21
DVD Talk Reviewer/ Admin
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Greenville, South Cackalack
Posts: 28,851
Received 1,891 Likes
on
1,242 Posts
...'cause there's nothing like a band singing an anti-conformity song on TRL...
#22
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,560
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by El Scorcho
Lovin' the music snobs in this forum.
GC is good if you don't try to take them for any more than playful mall-pop-punk. Not every CD has to be this mind-blowing pinnacle of artistic merit.
Lovin' the music snobs in this forum.
GC is good if you don't try to take them for any more than playful mall-pop-punk. Not every CD has to be this mind-blowing pinnacle of artistic merit.
If artistic merit is a factor for musical taste, then it is perfectly reasonable that someone would tear down a dull band like GC. However, if you don't care about that and you are into the instinctual hooks (albeit boring hooks if you ask me), then that is fine too. Let's not resort to slapping everyone with a tag though, hmm?
-Edited to add-
As a sidebar, I go to college with a girl that dated the two singers in GC. That "Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous" song is idolizing lower-class life (?, I'm not sure I haven't paid too much attention to it), but she told me that they grew up in the decidedly upper-class area of town in a huge house. Down and out, indeed!
Last edited by fallow; 04-14-03 at 08:33 AM.
#23
Member
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: T.O.
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by MFRONE
Q is a terrible magazine, if it's not British rock it's crap to them.
Q is a terrible magazine, if it's not British rock it's crap to them.
#24
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Originally posted by El Scorcho
Not every CD has to be this mind-blowing pinnacle of artistic merit.
Not every CD has to be this mind-blowing pinnacle of artistic merit.
No, but why would I waste my money buying their cd (and supporting bad art at that) or waste my time listening to their music? There are hundreds of bands I still haven't got to hear which could blow this music away. I'd rather support those artists, thanks.