Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > Movie Talk
Reload this Page >

Star Trek Beyond [no colon] (2016, D: Justin Lin)

Community
Search
Movie Talk A Discussion area for everything movie related including films In The Theaters

Star Trek Beyond [no colon] (2016, D: Justin Lin)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-15-14, 04:18 PM
  #251  
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Formerly known as "Solid Snake PAC"/Denton, Tx
Posts: 39,239
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Re: Star Trek 3 (2016, D: Not Orci)

wow. that actually sounds really cool.
Old 12-15-14, 04:41 PM
  #252  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Shazam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Canuckistan
Posts: 10,027
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Re: Star Trek 3 (2016, D: Not Orci)

Well yea there's a billion things they could've done better with that story.

I found that movie just godawful. Didn't make an ounce of sense. Only cool part was Spock fighting Khan.
Old 12-15-14, 04:44 PM
  #253  
TGM
DVD Talk Legend
 
TGM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 16,974
Received 401 Likes on 250 Posts
Re: Star Trek 3 (2016, D: Not Orci)

bring on the Borg
Old 12-15-14, 05:22 PM
  #254  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 39,351
Received 625 Likes on 482 Posts
Re: Star Trek 3 (2016)

Originally Posted by Josh-da-man
My initial dream idea for a Khan story in nuTrek would have been the Klingons finding the Botany Bay, reviving Khan, and then having Khan kick ass all the way up the Klingon hierarchy until he was their leader.

The movie would then involve Khan leading the Klingon Empire in a war against the Federation.

If you're going to bring Khan back, then GO BIG.
Why the hell are you not writing these movies?
Old 12-15-14, 05:22 PM
  #255  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Rosemount, MN
Posts: 43,409
Received 1,658 Likes on 1,034 Posts
Re: Star Trek 3 (2016, D: Not Orci)

Originally Posted by Tracer Bullet
I don't think we're ever going to see Star Trek 3.
Why on Earth would we not see a third? Because Paramount doesn't like money?
Old 12-15-14, 05:44 PM
  #256  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Mike86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 24,744
Received 1,156 Likes on 902 Posts
Re: Star Trek 3 (2016, D: Not Orci)

Originally Posted by DJariya
If they start principal photography by Spring 2015, they can absolutely get this shot and posted for a summer 2016 release. Worst case scenario IMO would be Fall 2016.
I have a bad feeling about this film already to be honest. Not having a director at this point and wanting to start shooting soon to release by 2016 doesn't seem like the best idea to me. Hopefully this film doesn't just turn out rushed to make a release date. I get that Paramount probably wants this out for the 50th anniversary of the franchise but I dunno.
Old 12-15-14, 05:51 PM
  #257  
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Formerly known as "Solid Snake PAC"/Denton, Tx
Posts: 39,239
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Re: Star Trek 3 (2016, D: Not Orci)

Eh. A lot great films have come out w/ short ass production schedules.
Old 12-15-14, 05:53 PM
  #258  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Mike86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 24,744
Received 1,156 Likes on 902 Posts
Re: Star Trek 3 (2016, D: Not Orci)

A big blockbuster like a Star Trek film though I dunno. There's a lot that goes into a film like this and I don't want it done half assed.
Old 12-15-14, 06:22 PM
  #259  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Sean O'Hara's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Vichy America
Posts: 13,533
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Star Trek 3 (2016, D: Not Orci)

Khan leading the Klingons is the sort of fanboy nonsense that ruined Enterprise.

If they had to bring Khan back, they should've kept it simple and straightforward -- Starfleet receives a distress call from a distant colony saying they're under attack, but the transmission is cut off before they can say who's attacking them. The only starship in the vicinity doesn't respond to orders, so Starfleet dispatches the Enterprise to find out what's happening. On the way, the Entprise comes in contact with the other starship, which doesn't respond to voice communications, but uses a signal light to explain that their comm systems are down. Kirk accepts this and decides to lower shields so they can beam spare parts over. Suddenly the other ship opens fire and the Enterprise only barely manages to escape.

The Enterprise finds the Botany Bay floating in space. Kirk and Spock beam over to investigate and find some members of the other ship's crew. They explain that they found the BB adrift in space and revived its passengers. After that things played out pretty much the same as in Space Seed, except the other ship's captain wasn't as awesome as Kirk and Khan managed to gain control of the ship.

The Enterprise tracks down the other starship in orbit of the colony that sent the distress call. Khan's already taken over the place and is forcing the colonists to join his cause. Kirk's in a tough position because he can't go all out against Khan without killing innocent civilians, but he can't very well let Khan go. Spock comes up with some kind of risky plan that will let them get on board the other ship and fight Khan's people directly. There's a big final battle, Khan quotes classic literature, Kirk kicks his ass, the end.

Originally Posted by Solid Snake
Eh. A lot great films have come out w/ short ass production schedules.
Like what, Alien3?
Old 12-16-14, 12:25 AM
  #260  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
hanshotfirst1138's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Livonia MI
Posts: 9,678
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
When did Khan lead the Klingons?
Old 12-16-14, 09:48 AM
  #261  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Sean O'Hara's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Vichy America
Posts: 13,533
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Star Trek 3 (2016, D: Not Orci)

Originally Posted by hanshotfirst1138
When did Khan lead the Klingons?
That's Josh-da-man's idea for a better Into Darkness.
Old 12-16-14, 11:10 AM
  #262  
DVD Talk Legend
 
milo bloom's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Chicago suburbs
Posts: 18,303
Received 1,410 Likes on 1,033 Posts
Re: Star Trek 3 (2016, D: Not Orci)

Originally Posted by hanshotfirst1138
When did Khan lead the Klingons?
When I was a kid, I thought Khan was a Klingon for the longest time because of his superior strength and that Klingon quote he used.


As for Into Darkness, I also think a redo of Space Seed would have been far better than a redo of Wrath. The idea posted a few posts up about Khan leading colonists also would have been better.
Old 12-16-14, 01:50 PM
  #263  
Enormous Genitals
 
Bandoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: a small cottage on a cul de sac in the lower pits of hell.
Posts: 37,234
Received 583 Likes on 335 Posts
Re: Star Trek 3 (2016, D: Not Orci)

Originally Posted by hanshotfirst1138
When did Khan lead the Klingons?
He didn't, but there was a two-parter in Enterprise where Brent Spiner played an ancestor of Dr. Noonian Soong who revives some genetically enhanced embryos and they go all kick-ass on the Klingons.
Old 12-16-14, 01:57 PM
  #264  
RIP
 
EddieMoney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Paradise, USA
Posts: 9,904
Received 54 Likes on 41 Posts
Re: Star Trek 3 (2016, D: Not Orci)

George Lucas could direct.
Old 12-16-14, 01:59 PM
  #265  
DVD Talk Legend
 
DaveyJoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 19,337
Received 186 Likes on 129 Posts
Re: Star Trek 3 (2016, D: Not Orci)

I'd like to see what Steve McQueen could do with the material, possibly bringing in Fassbender as a Romulan.
Old 12-18-14, 01:09 PM
  #266  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 25,058
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: Star Trek 3 (2016, D: Not Orci)

Originally Posted by Mike86
I have a bad feeling about this film already to be honest. Not having a director at this point and wanting to start shooting soon to release by 2016 doesn't seem like the best idea to me. Hopefully this film doesn't just turn out rushed to make a release date. I get that Paramount probably wants this out for the 50th anniversary of the franchise but I dunno.
Originally Posted by Draven
Why on Earth would we not see a third? Because Paramount doesn't like money?
Originally Posted by DJariya
If they start principal photography by Spring 2015, they can absolutely get this shot and posted for a summer 2016 release. Worst case scenario IMO would be Fall 2016.
A) They don't have a director.
B) They threw out the script.
C) They shut down pre-production.

Not good signs. Shooting in the spring to get it out for summer 2016 is doable but tight and they would need an entirely new shooting script in basically 4 months.

More realistically they start shooting in the fall for a fall/winter 2016 release. That's if they can get all their ducks in a row.

Also Bad Robot is still producing, so they'd need writers and directors that are palatable to them.

In short, I don't see how any movie without a director, without a script, and that has shut down pre-production can in any way be seen as a sure thing to ever get made.
Old 12-18-14, 09:24 PM
  #267  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Defiant1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,456
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Re: Star Trek 3 (2016, D: Not Orci)

They pretty much have to release Star Trek 3 in 2016 for the 50th anniversary of the franchise. They could aim for a November 2016 release to give them more time. December is a no-no as they have to avoid being trampled by Avatar 2.
Old 12-20-14, 01:05 PM
  #268  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
PatD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,287
Likes: 0
Received 156 Likes on 96 Posts
Re: Star Trek 3 (2016, D: Not Orci)

I think they the third film should bring back the Talosians from the original series (with their looks more updated and streamlined, of course) and involve a the Romulans wanting to possess their power of illusion, which leads the Klingons and the Federation to follow suit. Vina could try and romance Captain Kirk but also warn him of the extreme danger in pursuing this power.

It could be really trippy and thought-provoking sci fi film and a great thematic tie-in to the pilot episode that started it all.
Old 12-22-14, 05:53 PM
  #269  
DVD Talk God
 
DJariya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: La Palma, CA
Posts: 78,972
Received 3,640 Likes on 2,613 Posts
Re: Star Trek 3 (2016, D: Not Orci)

Just announced. Paramount hired Justin Lin who directed the Fast and Furious movies to direct.

http://deadline.com/2014/12/star-tre...er-1201333753/
Old 12-22-14, 05:57 PM
  #270  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Defiant1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,456
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Re: Star Trek 3 (2016, D: Not Orci)

Can't wait to see what a Star Trek car chase looks like! And no, that abysmal scene in ST: Nemesis doesn't count.
Old 12-22-14, 06:02 PM
  #271  
DVD Talk Legend
 
TheMovieman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Oregon
Posts: 13,287
Received 211 Likes on 178 Posts
Re: Star Trek 3 (2016, D: Not Orci)

Originally Posted by DJariya
Just announced. Paramount hired Justin Lin who directed the Fast and Furious movies to direct.

http://deadline.com/2014/12/star-tre...er-1201333753/
Seems to be a fine choice.
Old 12-22-14, 06:14 PM
  #272  
DVD Talk Godfather
 
fumanstan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 55,349
Received 26 Likes on 14 Posts
re: Star Trek Beyond [no colon] (2016, D: Justin Lin)

Sounds good, we know he can do action and the banter between characters; it will be interesting how he handles a bigger universe like Star Trek.
Old 12-22-14, 06:19 PM
  #273  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Mike86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 24,744
Received 1,156 Likes on 902 Posts
re: Star Trek Beyond [no colon] (2016, D: Justin Lin)

Seems like a decent enough choice. All of the films in The Fast & The Furious franchise he's directed have been pretty well done. Not sure how he'll do with sci-fi but I think he can pull off a decent film at least.

Originally Posted by Tracer Bullet
In short, I don't see how any movie without a director, without a script, and that has shut down pre-production can in any way be seen as a sure thing to ever get made.
All the things you mentioned aren't good signs for a film obviously, but its no question that Paramount would eventually do a future entry in the franchise. This isn't just some no name film but one of the biggest money makers and iconic franchises they have. Plus now they have a director hired at least. Like I said I think it is iffy as to whether or not the film gets released in 2016 or how good it'll turn out if it is released by then.
Old 12-22-14, 06:23 PM
  #274  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Shazam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Canuckistan
Posts: 10,027
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
re: Star Trek Beyond [no colon] (2016, D: Justin Lin)

If anyone knows how to use a stick, it's Kirk.
Old 12-22-14, 06:23 PM
  #275  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
PatD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,287
Likes: 0
Received 156 Likes on 96 Posts
re: Star Trek Beyond [no colon] (2016, D: Justin Lin)

That's appropriate in so many ways. Putting aside the ADD-style editing, the previous two movies have about as much depth as a Fast and Furious movie.


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.