are criterions for douche-bags
#27
DVD Talk Legend
Re: are criterions for douche-bags
Welcome to the world of collectors - any label with spine numbers is going to inspire that sort of thing in a certain segment of the population. Personally speaking, there are a few labels that I used to "cultishly" collect (Criterion, Masters of Cinema, Second Run, Fox Noir, etc.), but nowadays I'm making far fewer blind buys. (Most of Criterion's recent releases have been films I've already seen anyways.)
I think one of the things Criterion (and certain other boutique labels) has done well is marketing itself as a "curated collection of some of the world's greatest films" or whatever. To many, especially those who are first getting into "art films," a Criterion release is like getting a recommendation from a trusted film professor or a film buff friend. Of course, Criterion, as great as they often are, has released its fair share of duds and films that aren't important at all - but the point is that they do a good job of marketing themselves as "the film school" label.
I think one of the things Criterion (and certain other boutique labels) has done well is marketing itself as a "curated collection of some of the world's greatest films" or whatever. To many, especially those who are first getting into "art films," a Criterion release is like getting a recommendation from a trusted film professor or a film buff friend. Of course, Criterion, as great as they often are, has released its fair share of duds and films that aren't important at all - but the point is that they do a good job of marketing themselves as "the film school" label.
I have probably about a dozen - give or take - Criterion DVDs and LDs.
#29
#30
DVD Talk Legend
#32
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Re: are criterions for douche-bags
I don't know about being a douche-bag but chances are if someone owns a fair amount of Criterions they're a bit of a film snob.
#33
DVD Talk Legend
Re: are criterions for douche-bags
Depends. You can own a fair amount and they can all be certified masterpieces from the great directors (Hitchcock, Kurasawa), or you can own a bunch of obscure ones that nobody has heard of.
#34
DVD Talk Legend
#35
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 2,045
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: are criterions for douche-bags
i think if you own a lot of criterions then you are definitely a film snob.
on another note, I think if you post this thread, then you are a douchebag.
on another note, I think if you post this thread, then you are a douchebag.
#36
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Re: are criterions for douche-bags
Just by being someone who cares enough to seek these films out, learn about them and collect them you have to have a certain emotional connection and knowledge about them and generally the people that fit into that category are (even if it's just maybe a little) a snob.
Also, this isn't an indictment of these types of people, I would consider myself one.
#37
Re: are criterions for douche-bags
One personal example I would point to is The Red Shoes. This isn't exactly an obscure movie, but it's one I would say of which the general 21st century movie going public isn't aware. I remember I used to browse through the Criterion catalog that used to come packaged with their dvds looking for something to catch my interest and I would constantly pass over The Red Shoes, because a) I had never heard of it, and b) why would I be interested in a movie about ballet from the 1940's? Well, around the time of it's restoration and subsequent blu-ray release a few years ago I checked it out on Netflix and I LOVED it. I would definitely put it in my personal top 50, and maybe even my top 25. Not only that, but it introduced me to Powell & Pressburger, Jack Cardiff, and Anton Walbrook (among others) and gave me a new appreciation for the 3 strip technicolor process.
I guess the point of all of this is that this story is just one of many that I have and that you never know what you might discover when trying something new. The idea that there's some unknown/unseen (by me anyways) masterpiece out there that may one day become an all-time favorite of mine is really cool. I'm grateful that there are companies like Criterion/Olive/Masters of Cinema/Twilight Time/Kino/etc. that release some of the more "obscure" stuff, because otherwise I'd probably never see them. If all of that makes me a douche bag, or a film snob, then just call me Snobby McDouche.
#39
DVD Talk Legend
Re: are criterions for douche-bags
I still don't understand this mentality that if a mass audience hasn't heard of a particular movie, then that must mean it's only for douche-bags or snobs, or whoever. Like anyone else, I have my old favorites that I go back to again and again, but as movie lovers, shouldn't it be exciting to discover something new and unknown?
#41
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Re: are criterions for douche-bags
Thinking about it more, to me it's kind of hard to define what a film snob is. I think it comes down to someone who is very vocal about their love for movies and articulates that in a passionate manner that some may construe as arrogant or prickly. Like I said it's kind of hard for me to "vocalize" it. I'm sure someone else can do a better job with that.
I love Seven Samurai and Yojimbo and several others that are considered classic Criterions but also Die Hard (which is hardly considered fine art) is one of my favorite movies. I still consider myself a snob but it's difficult to define.
I love Seven Samurai and Yojimbo and several others that are considered classic Criterions but also Die Hard (which is hardly considered fine art) is one of my favorite movies. I still consider myself a snob but it's difficult to define.
#43
DVD Talk Legend
Re: are criterions for douche-bags
I'm a film snob and I never get laid.
Actually I think to be a snob you have to not just be all about obscure criterions and arthouse films, but you must also reject blockbusters and mainstream movies and look down upon them as beneath you.
I'm a fan of the Criterion catalog, but I'm also a fan of Troma's catalog, so I don't think I qualify.
Actually I think to be a snob you have to not just be all about obscure criterions and arthouse films, but you must also reject blockbusters and mainstream movies and look down upon them as beneath you.
I'm a fan of the Criterion catalog, but I'm also a fan of Troma's catalog, so I don't think I qualify.
#44
DVD Talk Legend
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: wandering the earth like Caine in the Kung-Fu
Posts: 19,937
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes
on
5 Posts
Re: are criterions for douche-bags
Thinking about it more, to me it's kind of hard to define what a film snob is. I think it comes down to someone who is very vocal about their love for movies and articulates that in a passionate manner that some may construe as arrogant or prickly. Like I said it's kind of hard for me to "vocalize" it. I'm sure someone else can do a better job with that.
I love Seven Samurai and Yojimbo and several others that are considered classic Criterions but also Die Hard (which is hardly considered fine art) is one of my favorite movies. I still consider myself a snob but it's difficult to define.
I love Seven Samurai and Yojimbo and several others that are considered classic Criterions but also Die Hard (which is hardly considered fine art) is one of my favorite movies. I still consider myself a snob but it's difficult to define.
#45
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Re: are criterions for douche-bags
I don't have even close to all of them, but one reason could be it's just fun, as a collector, to have a complete collection of something. Another reason would be to see movies that aren't what you'd normally pick. It doesn't mean you'll like them all, but you'll probably end up loving some you never would have considered watching ordinarily.
#47
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Northern New Jersey
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: are criterions for douche-bags
It would be snobby to dismiss Die Hard because it's popular. Not to side track, but it was snobby of the Oscars to pick Chariots of Fire over Raiders of the Lost Ark, because Raiders is the better movie and it's a freaking blast to watch.
It's not snobby to love action movies and seek out the roots of those movies by finding stuff like Seven Samurai.
#48
DVD Talk Legend
Re: are criterions for douche-bags
Originally Posted by cnicholls44
i think if you own a lot of criterions then you are definitely a film snob.
#49
Re: are criterions for douche-bags
But you specifically drew a line between the so-called masterpieces (Kurosawa, Hitchcock, etc.) and the more obscure titles in response to RagingBull80's comment as if to imply that "yes, it is possible to own a large number of Criterions and not be a film snob because your collection may include these particular popular titles." If that's not what you were trying to say, then I apologize. My point still stands though, even if not in direct response to what you were saying.
#50
DVD Talk Legend
Re: are criterions for douche-bags
Yeah I wasn't meaning to imply that it definitely made you a snob, just pointing out that having a bunch of Criterions could mean different things.