Highlander 3 re-issue heads-up.
#1
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: So. Illinois
Posts: 3,019
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Highlander 3 re-issue heads-up.
I don't know how many of you know about or even care, but on April 5th, Dimension re-released Highlander: The Final Dimension as a price cut. It's now only ~$10 discounted price. List price is $15.
Anyway, it seems the former OOP version was non-anamorphic. At least that's what every site that still has it listed says. Just says "Widescreen Letterbox - 2.35:1".
Well, I finally got my copy today. Two weeks after it shipped!!! Damn slow Free Shipping from DDD. Anyway, this copy states on the back that it's now 16x9 enhanced but only in 1.85:1 ratio. I quickly checked on-line for the correct ratio and everywhere says that it's 2.35:1. So I pop it in and it is indeed in 2.35:1. So there's a misprint on the package..
The sound is still just in Dolby Surround 2.0, but it's actually a pretty good mix. Pretty strong mix for just 2.0.
Anyway, it seems the former OOP version was non-anamorphic. At least that's what every site that still has it listed says. Just says "Widescreen Letterbox - 2.35:1".
Well, I finally got my copy today. Two weeks after it shipped!!! Damn slow Free Shipping from DDD. Anyway, this copy states on the back that it's now 16x9 enhanced but only in 1.85:1 ratio. I quickly checked on-line for the correct ratio and everywhere says that it's 2.35:1. So I pop it in and it is indeed in 2.35:1. So there's a misprint on the package..
The sound is still just in Dolby Surround 2.0, but it's actually a pretty good mix. Pretty strong mix for just 2.0.
#2
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
I probably need to get this movie. I own Highlander 2 & 4 but for some reason I've never ever seen the 3rd one. I suppose it can't be any worse than the 2nd. I love the documentary where the director is complaining about how the bond company mucked up the film, and you almost believe him until gets to the end and he talks about how he saved the film by changing the shield color and removing references to the Planet Zeist. Now the movie's perfect!
Too bad the 3rd one didn't get as nice a treatment on DVD as the other 3.
Too bad the 3rd one didn't get as nice a treatment on DVD as the other 3.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 404
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mike Lowrey
Well, I finally got my copy today. Two weeks after it shipped!!! Damn slow Free Shipping from DDD. Anyway, this copy states on the back that it's now 16x9 enhanced but only in 1.85:1 ratio. I quickly checked on-line for the correct ratio and everywhere says that it's 2.35:1. So I pop it in and it is indeed in 2.35:1. So there's a misprint on the package..
the phrase "16x9 endhanced" or the more common "enhanced for 16x9 TVs" actually has nothing to do with the aspect ratio of the film. it is only telling you it has been transferred to DVD using the anamorphic transfer process. the film can be any ratio it wants (though almost always a widescreen ratio, b/c there is no need to use anamorphic transfer on 4x3 material... there is no benefit).
THORN
#5
DVD Talk Legend
So the new edition is Anamorphic? Has the cover art changed?
#6
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: So. Illinois
Posts: 3,019
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by THORN
the phrase "16x9 endhanced" or the more common "enhanced for 16x9 TVs" actually has nothing to do with the aspect ratio of the film. it is only telling you it has been transferred to DVD using the anamorphic transfer process. the film can be any ratio it wants (though almost always a widescreen ratio, b/c there is no need to use anamorphic transfer on 4x3 material... there is no benefit).
THORN
THORN
But like I said, the film is indeed in 2.35:1. Not 1.85 as the back states.
#7
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: So. Illinois
Posts: 3,019
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by stingermck
So the new edition is Anamorphic? Has the cover art changed?
The transfer isn't all that greatly improved if at all. The image seems to have a bit of a old '70s photo reddish faded hue to it. It's obvious that they need to remaster this one.
Last edited by Mike Lowrey; 04-20-05 at 09:52 AM.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 842
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So its from DDD and you were not expeting this new version
problem is as I am sure most online companies may still have old stock to offload 1st, so maybe DDD are te only place?
problem is as I am sure most online companies may still have old stock to offload 1st, so maybe DDD are te only place?
#9
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: So. Illinois
Posts: 3,019
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Romerojpg
So its from DDD and you were not expeting this new version
problem is as I am sure most online companies may still have old stock to offload 1st, so maybe DDD are te only place?
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 842
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hey I didnt know the older version was hard to come by, I thought it was still about
but hope to get the film one day, sure someone will treat it to a special edition one day as hey if they do it for Part 2 they have to do it for 3 as the Sword Making scene and music rule
but hope to get the film one day, sure someone will treat it to a special edition one day as hey if they do it for Part 2 they have to do it for 3 as the Sword Making scene and music rule
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 404
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mike Lowrey
No, you missed my point. The back did indeed say 1.85:1 AND 16x9 enchanced. There's no confusion with what 16:9 enhanced means and 1.78:1.
But like I said, the film is indeed in 2.35:1. Not 1.85 as the back states.
But like I said, the film is indeed in 2.35:1. Not 1.85 as the back states.
sorry i misunderstood the way u said it ...
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 923
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I bought the 16x9 Highlander 3 almost a year ago. The store actually had both. I bought the one without the "Widescreen" banner on the top. Looks like I bought the right one.