Dual Core chips in next gen?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Milford
Posts: 989
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dual Core chips in next gen?
I've been reading that as chip makers approach the physical limits of silicon (and quantum computers are far off), some developers are making a push towards dual core chips - two CPUs on one chip; it's supposed to enable more things to happen but it'll be harder for developers to make programs for and it'll have a negative on speed (or something like that); anyone heard of the next gen consoles considering this setup?
sorry for no link, but I read it in the paper a month or so ago (WSJ I believe)
sorry for no link, but I read it in the paper a month or so ago (WSJ I believe)
Last edited by Chaos; 05-04-05 at 11:47 AM.
#2
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Blu-Ray: We Don't Need No Stinkin' Petition
Posts: 6,677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
PS3 and Xbox360 will be using cellular based processing. This is basically a similar idea to dual core. There is a control center which sends out processing requests to different cells, so that the more cells you have, the more different processes you can do at once. Dual core is similar in that you can be running two separate processes, except I think that is more hardware controlled where as cells are software controlled.
The same ideas are there. Multiple processors within one processor.
The same ideas are there. Multiple processors within one processor.
#3
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Decatur, IN
Posts: 1,346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Chaos
I've been reading that as chip makers approach the physical limits of silicon (and quantum computers are far off), some developers are making a push towards dual core chips - two CPUs on one chip; it's supposed to enable more things to happen but it'll be harder for developers to make programs for and it'll have a negative on speed (or something like that); anyone heard of the next gen consoles considering this setup?
sorry for no link, but I read it in the paper a month or so ago (WSJ I believe)
sorry for no link, but I read it in the paper a month or so ago (WSJ I believe)
#4
DVD Talk Special Edition
The xbox is 3 chip core with two being able to work at same time, with the 3rd chip having to wait for the other. Will it make software slower lol, no. Will it make it harder to develope software, yeah maybe at first. But to say it wont be faster when used I believe is just plain wrong. The pc's will probably suffer from this more so, as the xbox360 will be made from ground up with this is mind. Pc will take yrs to fully convert software wise to use dual core. Much in the same as hyperthreading ....sometimes it helps...sometimes you dont gain a thing. But its not killing your performance.
#5
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: HB, CA
Posts: 2,600
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It sort of depends on how you define a multi-core CPU. It's probably fair to call the Cell processor as described earlier this year as a 9 core CPU with the 1 PPC core and the 8 SPE cores. Of course, these cores are much simpler and more specialized than the dual core designs that Intel and AMD have just released.
I don't know that I've seen much aside from rumour regarding the XBox 360 processor architecture. Aside from the fact that it's PPC based, not much else has been officially stated. It's almost certain that they'll be using multiple CPU's and very likely in some kind of multi-core package. We'll know more once they actually announce the thing.
I don't know that I've seen much aside from rumour regarding the XBox 360 processor architecture. Aside from the fact that it's PPC based, not much else has been officially stated. It's almost certain that they'll be using multiple CPU's and very likely in some kind of multi-core package. We'll know more once they actually announce the thing.
#6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Milford
Posts: 989
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I answered my own question, anyway here it is:
http://www.thechannelinsider.com/art...119TX1K0000596
and the original announcement:
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1642729,00.asp
like I said, the chip (as individuals anyway) will operate slower than normal but be capable of much more .. .. or something like that :P
nice quote from the first article:
For example, a dual-core, dual-processor system clocked at only three grades slower than the fastest AMD chip will perform at between 130 to 160 percent of the performance of the base system, McGrath's slide indicated. McGrath's performance figures used synthetic benchmarks, such as SPECint_rate 2000 and SPECifp_rate 2000.
http://www.thechannelinsider.com/art...119TX1K0000596
and the original announcement:
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1642729,00.asp
like I said, the chip (as individuals anyway) will operate slower than normal but be capable of much more .. .. or something like that :P
nice quote from the first article:
For example, a dual-core, dual-processor system clocked at only three grades slower than the fastest AMD chip will perform at between 130 to 160 percent of the performance of the base system, McGrath's slide indicated. McGrath's performance figures used synthetic benchmarks, such as SPECint_rate 2000 and SPECifp_rate 2000.