![]() |
Originally posted by AGuyNamedMike A semi-high end stereo store in the valley. Buck, dressed in his usual cowboy-digs, is talking to a CUSTOMER about a stereo unit. The manager, a skinny-white guy with a mustache and mustard suit, JERRY (30s) is standing nearby. BUCK: -- so basically you're gettin' twice the base, cause of the TK421 modification we got in this system here. CUSTOMER: I don't know - do I need that much bass? BUCK: If you want a system to handle what you want -- yes you do. See this system here. This is Hi-Fi. "High Fidelity." What that means is that it's the highest quality fidelity. CUSTOMER: It's the price -- BUCK: I have this unit at home. CUSTOMER: . . . really . . . ? BUCK: Yes. But -- I've got it modified with the TK421, which is a bass unit that basically kicks in another two, maybe three quads when you really crank -- lemme put another eight track in so you can get a better idea what I'm talkin about -- Buck ejects the Eight Track that was playing and puts in his own of a country western song. BUCK: Hear that bass? It kicks and turns and curls up in your belly, makes you wanna freaky-deaky, right? If you get this unit as it is -- it won't sound like this without the modification -- and we do that for a small price. |
Originally posted by belboz Joshd, I already addressed that particular myth way back in this thread (towards the bottom): http://www.dvdtalk.com/forum/showthr...highlight=sige Man, first WOWZY refuses to take my word about the NV2A being only a little faster than a Geforce3 and now this. Don't you people realize I am an expert on everything? ;) I figure the new PS3 will have at least 40 Quads more! |
Sony's always been very clear about wanting a set top box, I don't think anyone other than Sony fanboys could argue otherwise.
Both Sony and MS have been clear about their desires to rule the entertainment center. |
I never really thought Sony as going to go the set-top box route. I'm glad to hear that they are though. This will get Nintendo back in the game IMO.
|
Sony was first with the DVD player and made comments around the PS2's release about how they wanted to make a machine that people could do more than play games on.
|
Originally posted by Kellehair I never really thought Sony as going to go the set-top box route. I'm glad to hear that they are though. This will get Nintendo back in the game IMO. |
I'm happy Sony is. I don't see the set-top box being all that popular and I'd like to see Sony's sales drop so the playing field is a bit more even.
|
Originally posted by Kellehair I'm happy Sony is. I don't see the set-top box being all that popular and I'd like to see Sony's sales drop so the playing field is a bit more even. |
Makes me think I wish they did that deal together..
-Jim |
So the only thing that could get Nintendo back in the game is if Sony messes up somewhere?
That's the funniest thing I've ever heard a Nintendo fan say. You made my day and for that, I thank you. |
I was reading an article in on of my TokyoPops and they mentioned a while back about Sony wanting gamers to implant circuits in their fingers for more realistic gaming with vibration control and no need for a controller. It might be a April Fools Joke, I need to dig through the moving boxes but this was before the XBOX and Game Cube came out.
|
So the only thing that could get Nintendo back in the game is if Sony messes up somewhere? Don't be bitter because Sony keeps having sucess. |
Originally posted by Kellehair I'm not bitter. I just don't think it's good for the game industry for one system to have such a big sales lead. |
Are you serious? Nintendo almost killed the video game industry back in the day when they had a monopoly. Also, I think Sony might have churned out a better console than the PS2 if they didn't win the previous generation so convincingly in the end. Sony knew their next console was gonna sell well even if it wasn't too great.
|
Originally posted by Kellehair It appears that way. Both Nintendo and Microsoft put out better hardware but the PS2 is creaming them both. The mere anticipation of the PS2 was enough to kill the Dreamcast as well. Sony's got the mainstream name recognition right now and that's not gonna change unless they put out a product that just can't compare to the competition's. I'm not bitter. I just don't think it's good for the game industry for one system to have such a big sales lead. PS2 is creaming them because it had a year head start. People go to where the games are (not are going to be someday). At launch of Xbox and GCN, the PS2 had several 'must have' titles coming out. This Christmas will have 3 systems with 'must have' software... it should be interesting since the PS2 will be showing age and all 3 will have impressive game libraries (depending on your perspective and tastes). Nintendo used to be the big sales leader. Before that it was Atari. Now it's Sony. At one point it was Sega, but not for long and not by all that much. Someday it may be Nintendo again or it may be Microsoft or maybe the PC will once again rise and dominate the game sales charts (unlikely). Competition is good because it drives these companies to make better products fighting for our money. All 3 systems have enough good games that someone could pick one and be happy for a long time. As for the rest of this thread - Sony makes all sorts of lies up about the power of their chips. Nothing new... maybe they were able to get the speeds they say in laboratory conditions using liquid nitrogen cooling and the processor incinerated in 5 seconds anyway after producing such a clock speed for 2 nanoseconds. :) What we do know for sure is that the PS3 will kick ass and I'll surely get one (as long as I hold off on getting a PS2 for that long). |
Originally posted by Mattalos So the only thing that could get Nintendo back in the game is if Sony messes up somewhere? That's the funniest thing I've ever heard a Nintendo fan say. When Nintendo ruled the gaming world during the SNES era, the only way anyone was going to catch them was for them to make a big mistake. And they did by making the N64 a cartridge system so they could screw developers by charging them huge licensing fees. This pissed off developers and sent most third party games to the playstation. Now Sony is the clear leader and in the same boat. They will be number 1 until they make a big mistake. As long as Sony keeps making quality consoles that are at least in the same league as the competitors, and keeps the killer third party exclusives like GTA and Final Fantasy tied up, nothing Nintendo or MS can do will let them catch up. All they're doing is fighting for 2nd place. |
Interesting comments...but the way I see it as long as Playstation has the GTA series they will be number 1. Unless some other groundbreaking game comes along like 'The Getaway', Oh wait..:)
|
OR the Halo serrise
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:37 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.