Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > TV Talk
Reload this Page >

Star Trek: Picard (Paramount+) -- News, rumors, etc.

Community
Search
TV Talk Talk about Shows on TV

Star Trek: Picard (Paramount+) -- News, rumors, etc.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-28-19, 02:21 PM
  #126  
DVD Talk God
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Directionally Challenged (for DirecTV)
Posts: 130,262
Received 614 Likes on 493 Posts
re: Star Trek: Picard (Paramount+) -- News, rumors, etc.

Originally Posted by DJariya
Most of the people who I noticed online who are angry about these streaming versions of Star Trek are older people (late 40's or above) who don't stream and are mad why Star Trek isn't on "free TV" And they grew up on the original series, movies and The next generation.

With the Star Trek: Picard trailer, I think it's lightened that stance with the nostalgia factor a little and some more are willing to open up their wallets now.

Bottom line, just put a good show on TV that will make people happy and create buzz and most people (not all) will be more than happy to support it.

I acknowledge that Star Trek: Discovery is divisive among fans. Not everyone likes it. And I accept that. It took a different route with the brand and some people took offense to it. Robert Meyer Burnett, who produced the Star Trek: The Next Generation BD extras and also hosted some of the BD's features is a huge Star Trek fan. He directed Free Enterprise and he watched Discovery and hates it. He criticizes it heavily on his YouTube channel. But he likes the Picard trailer and is looking forward to it.
Meh. I'm in your generalized category and have no problem with streaming. Have Netflix and Amazon. I would venture that Trek fans are more welcome to streaming than most. But you put it behind an essentially stand-alone paywall (where the rest of the world gets it with Netflix), that is obviously a problem. You do that and the show better be awesome. If not, expect the criticism. Heavy criticism.
Old 07-28-19, 02:51 PM
  #127  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
dhmac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Kissimmee, Florida
Posts: 7,422
Received 67 Likes on 58 Posts
re: Star Trek: Picard (Paramount+) -- News, rumors, etc.

Originally Posted by Eric F
Eh. I like Discovery. It's something different- probably why so many fans take issue with it.
No, in general, we have problems with Discovery because the writing is absolutely horrible and the main character is not very likeable. But every longtime ST fan I know really likes Anson Mount as Captain Pike, so if you want to understand what these fans want in a ST show, you can start with him and try to understand why he's a much better character than Michael Burnham.
Old 07-28-19, 03:12 PM
  #128  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Illinois
Posts: 1,672
Received 31 Likes on 24 Posts
re: Star Trek: Picard (Paramount+) -- News, rumors, etc.

Originally Posted by brayzie
Why wasn't it "trek"? I just caught one episode of the Mirror Universe episode and it seemed cheesy like the DS9 portrayals of it.
Spoiler:
Uh because the entire show and ship was ran by an anti trek Captain from the mirror universe, he made soooo many non star trek like choices, it rubbed a lot of people the wrong way
Old 07-28-19, 08:21 PM
  #129  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Traxan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,474
Likes: 0
Received 30 Likes on 20 Posts
re: Star Trek: Picard (Paramount+) -- News, rumors, etc.

Originally Posted by Josh-da-man
There has always been blowback from the Trekkies when there's a new Star Trek series.

A lot of the old school Trekkies didn't like TNG when it debuted in 1987. (I don't really remember this, as I was really young and didin't follow the fandom back then.)

Then a lot of Trekkies were shitting on DS9 because it wasn't set on a ship, and it was morally ambiguous and didn't adhere to Roddenberry's utopian vision of the future. (This I do remember.)

And then, when Voyager debuted, it sort of split a large segment of the fandom between the DS9 camp and Voyager camp. A lot of fans liked one series and hated the other for the durations of their runs.

And then Enterprise came along, and people didn't like it because it was a prequel, and it had a TNG aesthetic rather a TOS aesthetic. And we can't forget the corny theme song.
TNG was boring because of the asinine Roddenbery Box limitations. The show was boring beyond belief because of the restrictions against inter-crew conflicts and every show hit the reset button at the end so nothing changed. When TNG ended its run, Picard and company were the exact same people they were in S1.

DS9 has held up best as people realized the balls that show had. It may not have boldly gone somewhere on a ship but it boldly went into things like dictatorship, war, religion, and race. I think it was when Ron Moore was unleashed on BSG and people looked back and saw how he experimented with many of his ideas on DS9. Just "In the Pale Moonlight" alone was more revolutionary than all of TNG or VOY, and none of the other Treks would have had the balls to do what they did on that one episode. And unlike TNG, DS9's characters were all completely different at the end than they were at the start, most notably Nog. He went from reprobate to Star Fleet lieutenant in seven seasons.

Voyager was a sloppy mess, made worse by the premise. The Captain STRANDED her crew 70 years from home. I forget where I read it but someone called it "Gilligan's Island Syndrome," where if the characters get what they want, the show is over, whether it's off the island or back to the Alpha quadrant. And we knew the show would run seven years so any teasing of getting home was a waste. Add to it sloppy writing, blown opportunities for conflict with the Maquis crew and Tom Paris and what many felt was blatant sexual pandering with 7 of 9 and you had a mess.The finale was the final fuck you. We got no closure on what happened to the characters.

Enterprise's main problem besides the Twin Towers of Fail (Berman and Braga) was that Bakula sucks harder than my Dyson. He was absolutely awful. Plus once again we had massive mistreatment of another Vulcan. T'Pol doing drugs to feel emotions? Not to mention repeatedly putting her in as little clothing as possible for more pandering. The final fuck you was that ending, which even Blalock publicly blasted.

For the life of me I don't get what they have against Vulcans. Spock was as popular as Kirk but they have shit on Vulcans ever since. THey were all but omitted from TNG. In DS9 you had a criminal/traitor, a mass murderer, and an unmitigated arrogant asshole. In Voyager, at least once per season Tuvok lost his mind. On Enterprise, T'Pol did drugs to feel emotions, got naked and jumped on a subordinate officer and nearly lezed it up with Hoshi. And don't get me started on JJ's Spock.

Time has made it abundantly clear the only people who should be let near the Trek franchise are Ira Steven Behr and Ron Moore.

Last edited by Traxan; 07-28-19 at 08:44 PM.
The following users liked this post:
adamblast (12-25-19)
Old 07-28-19, 08:24 PM
  #130  
TGM
DVD Talk Legend
 
TGM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 16,973
Received 401 Likes on 250 Posts
re: Star Trek: Picard (Paramount+) -- News, rumors, etc.

TNG was boring.....? it's the best of what Star Trek was meant to represent. gtfo mate.
The following users liked this post:
tanman (12-29-19)
Old 07-28-19, 08:48 PM
  #131  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
PatD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,287
Likes: 0
Received 156 Likes on 96 Posts
re: Star Trek: Picard (Paramount+) -- News, rumors, etc.

This is a long shot hope, but I hope that Star Trek: Picard becomes a smash hit and it inspires a final TNG movie to wrap things up in a satisfying way like Star Trek VI did in 1991 (complete with a signatures-in-the-stars coda). Hey, a Trekkie can dream, right?
Old 07-28-19, 09:12 PM
  #132  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Sonic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 19,353
Received 347 Likes on 247 Posts
re: Star Trek: Picard (Paramount+) -- News, rumors, etc.

Originally Posted by TGM
TNG was boring.....? it's the best of what Star Trek was meant to represent. gtfo mate.
Yeah I'm a bit shocked hearing that comment about boredom.

I'm not a huge Star Trek fan by any means. But damn did I enjoy watching TNG on television. Really fantastic series especially the borg episodes.
Old 07-28-19, 09:18 PM
  #133  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Mike86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 24,737
Received 1,154 Likes on 901 Posts
re: Star Trek: Picard (Paramount+) -- News, rumors, etc.

TNG is far and away my favorite if for no other reason than I feel like it has the best crew. I know that's debatable between it and TOS but I still give TNG the slight edge.

If I were ranking them:
TNG
DS9 (I've actually really come around to it recently)
TOS
ENT
TAS (if it counts)
VOY



DISCO
Old 07-28-19, 09:49 PM
  #134  
DVD Talk God
Thread Starter
 
DJariya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: La Palma, CA
Posts: 78,923
Received 3,634 Likes on 2,607 Posts
re: Star Trek: Picard (Paramount+) -- News, rumors, etc.

Originally Posted by Mike86
TNG is far and away my favorite if for no other reason than I feel like it has the best crew. I know that's debatable between it and TOS but I still give TNG the slight edge.

If I were ranking them:
TNG
DS9 (I've actually really come around to it recently)
TOS
ENT
TAS (if it counts)
VOY



DISCO
How many episodes of Discovery did you even watch? 1, 2? Season 1 was a very divisive season (mainly the 1st half). And I don't know if you were even aware, season 2 had received much more acclaim due to the addition of Captain Christopher Pike (Anson Mount) and they introduced a younger Spock as a major part of the story arc. You're selling yourself short by completely writing it off without giving a season, especially season 2 a complete watch and then giving a better assessment. If you really just aren't interested and don't care, so be it.
Old 07-28-19, 09:52 PM
  #135  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Mike86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 24,737
Received 1,154 Likes on 901 Posts
re: Star Trek: Picard (Paramount+) -- News, rumors, etc.

Season one and a couple episodes of season two. I started it after getting All Access for Peele's version of The Twilight Zone. I just felt like I had seen enough by the point I stopped watching and the reviews I've watched lead me to think I wouldn't change my mind on it. If season three gets better reviews I'll consider going back to it, but at this point I just don't have the interest.

Last edited by Mike86; 07-28-19 at 10:09 PM.
Old 07-28-19, 09:53 PM
  #136  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Illinois
Posts: 1,672
Received 31 Likes on 24 Posts
re: Star Trek: Picard (Paramount+) -- News, rumors, etc.

Originally Posted by Sonic
Yeah I'm a bit shocked hearing that comment about boredom.
Not as shocked as I am by this comment " When TNG ended its run, Picard and company were the exact same people they were in S1. " ...dude is off his rocker. Or this comment " DS9 has held up best as people realized the balls that show had. It may not have boldly gone somewhere on a ship but it boldly went into things like dictatorship, war, religion, and race. "....um yea TNG did none of those....dude is talking out his ass. Or never even watched TNG. End of Story.
Old 07-28-19, 10:26 PM
  #137  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Traxan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,474
Likes: 0
Received 30 Likes on 20 Posts
re: Star Trek: Picard (Paramount+) -- News, rumors, etc.

Clearly you are unfamiliar with the Roddenberry Box. He had a policy starting with TNG that there were to be no conflicts between characters and they were to have no internal personal issues to struggle against. This is documented, not to mention I was told about it directly from John De Lancie when I met him at Comdex in 1995. He said it "bound the hands" of the actors because it gave them no challenge to overcome. In TNG, all the conflicts were the result of external, alien influences. And Roddenberry also had a policy of restoring things to the way they were so every episode could be watched out of sequence and you didn't need to know prior events. In other words, the opposite of a serial. The ultimate example was BoBW. I thought it was absolutely asinine that Riker got promoted to Captain of Enterprise and then when it was over, he was demoted to Commander and back in his seat next to Picard.Star Fleet was nearly wiped out by the Borg, he would absolutely be needed as a Captain. But no we have to hit the reset switch.

The only time TNG was interesting was First Contact. Now that was good stuff. Picard lost his marbles and got violent. The sanctified Zephram Cochran was a drunk and a cad. Worf and Picard got into a fight. Data teased betrayal. I love FC but it was done once Gene died and the Box went away. That was also what helped DS9. The best thing Gene did for the franchise was to die.

No show did character development like DS9. Come on, TNG didn't come close.

Sisko: from grieving widower who wanted to kill Picard with his bare hands to a diety
Odo: From exiled from his people to returning to save them
Kira: Former terrorist who came to terms with her violent past
Bashir: Hid his genetic augmentation before it came out unwillingly. His fight with his father is another example of something impossible under Roddenberry.
Jadzia: probably the one solid member of the crew. She was also the most fun.
Ezri: Had to deal with an unplanned joining
Worf: Also separated from his people he returned home a hero and ally of the Chancellor he got elevated to the job.
Garak: The best anti-hero Trek ever had. Also in exile, he went home in the end
Nog: From criminal punk to Star Fleet, had a great episode where he dealt with PTSD
Jake: Not much growth but the Ben/Jake relationship was lauded as one of the best example of a black father/son relationship on TV.

Not to mention Gul Dukat is the best villain in the franchise. Please don't say Khan, he was so overrated. And the sneakiness of Kai Winn.

TNG didn't come close to these characters.

Last edited by Traxan; 07-28-19 at 10:32 PM.
Old 07-28-19, 10:49 PM
  #138  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Illinois
Posts: 1,672
Received 31 Likes on 24 Posts
re: Star Trek: Picard (Paramount+) -- News, rumors, etc.

Ok guy lol.
Old 07-28-19, 11:55 PM
  #139  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
PatD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,287
Likes: 0
Received 156 Likes on 96 Posts
re: Star Trek: Picard (Paramount+) -- News, rumors, etc.

Originally Posted by Traxan
The best thing Gene did for the franchise was to die.
Seriously? Trek was a huge cultural phenomenon before DS9 was created. Gene Roddenberry created 2 of the most iconic television shows ever created.

DS9 (while a fine work of television) and the subsequent shows never touched TOS or TNG for sheer fun, inspirational, escapist fare. There's a reason DS9 and the other shows never got theatrical movies.
Old 07-29-19, 09:10 AM
  #140  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Traxan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,474
Likes: 0
Received 30 Likes on 20 Posts
re: Star Trek: Picard (Paramount+) -- News, rumors, etc.

Originally Posted by PatD
Seriously? Trek was a huge cultural phenomenon before DS9 was created. Gene Roddenberry created 2 of the most iconic television shows ever created.

DS9 (while a fine work of television) and the subsequent shows never touched TOS or TNG for sheer fun, inspirational, escapist fare. There's a reason DS9 and the other shows never got theatrical movies.
Yes, because of how DS9 ended. TNG kept its crew together because movies were in the cards. DS9 scattered its crew to the winds. Odo, Worf, Garak, and O'Brien all left the station to go home and Sisko became a god. All that was left was Kira, Bashir, and Ezri. A movie would require rebuilding the whole crew. As for the fun element, DS9 was not fun. It was a dark show with only the Ferengi (and Morn) for comedy. Ron Moore does not make happy TV.

Voyager's ending just plain sucked. That should have been the next-to-last episode, with the final showing what became of the Maquis, Tom, and Seven. A coda movie would make no sense. You don't make a movie to tie up loose ends, it should have been done in the finale. Another crap ending from Berman and Braga, who topped themselves wth the shitty Enterprise ending that drew criticism from Blalock, who was a big Trek fan. I'm not surprised she never showed up at a single con after the show ended.
Old 07-29-19, 11:59 AM
  #141  
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Jacksonville, FL.
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
re: Star Trek: Picard (Paramount+) -- News, rumors, etc.

Originally Posted by Traxan
I'm not surprised she never showed up at a single con after the show ended.
Can't argue with most of your post, but FYI, this part is not true. Met her myself at a Vulkon in November 2005.
Old 07-29-19, 12:14 PM
  #142  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
PatD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,287
Likes: 0
Received 156 Likes on 96 Posts
re: Star Trek: Picard (Paramount+) -- News, rumors, etc.

Originally Posted by Traxan
Yes, because of how DS9 ended. TNG kept its crew together because movies were in the cards. DS9 scattered its crew to the winds. Odo, Worf, Garak, and O'Brien all left the station to go home and Sisko became a god. All that was left was Kira, Bashir, and Ezri. A movie would require rebuilding the whole crew. As for the fun element, DS9 was not fun. It was a dark show with only the Ferengi (and Morn) for comedy. Ron Moore does not make happy TV.

Voyager's ending just plain sucked. That should have been the next-to-last episode, with the final showing what became of the Maquis, Tom, and Seven. A coda movie would make no sense. You don't make a movie to tie up loose ends, it should have been done in the finale. Another crap ending from Berman and Braga, who topped themselves wth the shitty Enterprise ending that drew criticism from Blalock, who was a big Trek fan. I'm not surprised she never showed up at a single con after the show ended.
And those three shows weren't as popular or iconic as TOS and TNG otherwise they would have left them open-ended.

Last edited by PatD; 07-29-19 at 12:23 PM.
Old 07-29-19, 12:27 PM
  #143  
Challenge Guru & Comic Nerd
 
Trevor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: spiritually, Minnesota
Posts: 36,879
Received 676 Likes on 452 Posts
re: Star Trek: Picard (Paramount+) -- News, rumors, etc.

I very much enjoyed TNG, but it’s 4th at best in my rankings.

TOS - by a mile
TAS
DS9
TNG
Discovery - may rise
Voyager


Haven’t watched enough Enterprise to judge.
Old 07-29-19, 01:35 PM
  #144  
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Giantrobo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Gateway Cities/Harbor Region
Posts: 63,270
Received 1,793 Likes on 1,121 Posts
re: Star Trek: Picard (Paramount+) -- News, rumors, etc.

After reading the last page or two...I'll say I'm a BIGGER TREKKIE than ALL you SOB's on here.

I've loved ALL the series. from TOS to DISCO and I'm sure I'll love PICARD and Lower Decks. I love them for the Trek DNA and their attempt to be something new thus giving us new stories. You guys want the same ole shit over and over and that blows my mind that you guy can be so rigid and stuck in your ways. As mentioned, you're all Old Men in this area.

I LOVE that they're trying do new things with the franchise and evolving.
Old 07-29-19, 01:40 PM
  #145  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Mike86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 24,737
Received 1,154 Likes on 901 Posts
re: Star Trek: Picard (Paramount+) -- News, rumors, etc.

I’ve said it before and will say it again. The mark of a true fan isn’t necessarily blindly loving every bit of output from a franchise. It takes being a fan to be able to be critical when something isn’t as good as it could be or up to expectations. I’m not saying you aren’t a fan Giantrobo, but I don’t think those of us who don’t like what modern Trek is represented by are less of fans. Much the same way that because I criticized the DCEU movies for being shit (at least the Snyder era films) I’m no less of a DC fan. Star Trek may be evolving, but Discovery from what I’ve watched is only trying to do so in a way to cater to the non-Star Trek fanbase, because Star Trek has never been cool. They realize they have a property with name recognition and are trying to change it to fit a new mold. That isolates some of the existing fanbase.
Old 07-29-19, 01:58 PM
  #146  
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Giantrobo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Gateway Cities/Harbor Region
Posts: 63,270
Received 1,793 Likes on 1,121 Posts
re: Star Trek: Picard (Paramount+) -- News, rumors, etc.

Originally Posted by Mike86
I’ve said it before and will say it again. The mark of a true fan isn’t necessarily blindly loving every bit of output from a franchise. It takes being a fan to be able to be critical when something isn’t as good as it could be or up to expectations. I’m not saying you aren’t a fan Giantrobo, but I don’t think those of us who don’t like what modern Trek is represented by are less of fans. Much the same way that because I criticized the DCEU movies for being shit (at least the Snyder era films) I’m no less of a DC fan. Star Trek may be evolving, but Discovery from what I’ve watched is only trying to do so in a way to cater to the non-Star Trek fanbase, because Star Trek has never been cool. They realize they have a property with name recognition and are trying to change it to fit a new mold. That isolates some of the existing fanbase.

Shit, I'm a KISS fan, so I know aaaaaall toooooo well that my faves can put out gar-bahj.

That said, you guys hate all the new Trek stuff because it's not the old stuff. You've said it over and over and you can't talk you way out of this. So Yeah, I do question your fandom when all you want is the same ole shit. Wanting the same old shit from 50 years ago and NOT allowing a franchise to do new things doesn't make you true a fan either. If you want that go watch TOS.

Hell, even when they showed much loved Anson/Pike on the Enterprise deck on DISCOVERY ....Old Fans BITCHED AND MOANED about how the deck "wasn't true to TOS"!!! GAAAHHH!AHAHAHAH!

Last edited by Giantrobo; 07-29-19 at 02:04 PM.
Old 07-29-19, 02:02 PM
  #147  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Mike86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 24,737
Received 1,154 Likes on 901 Posts
re: Star Trek: Picard (Paramount+) -- News, rumors, etc.

Originally Posted by Giantrobo
Shit, I'm a KISS fan, so I know aaaaaall toooooo well that my faves can put out shit.

That said, you guys hate all the new Trek stuff because it's not the old stuff. You've said it over and over and you can't talk you way out of this. So Yeah, I do question your fandom when all you want is the same ole shit. Wanting the same old shit from 50 years ago and NOT allowing a franchise to do new things doesn't make you true a fan either. If you want that go watch TOS.

Hell, even when they showed Pike on the Enterprise deck on DISCOVERY ....Old Fans BITCHED AND MOANED!!!
I don’t hate all the new stuff. I’m one of the few who regularly tries to defend Enterprise in spite of it not being loved by a majority of Trek fans. I also liked the first Abrams film to an extent (though it didn’t exactly feel like Star Trek to me).
Old 07-29-19, 02:15 PM
  #148  
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Giantrobo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Gateway Cities/Harbor Region
Posts: 63,270
Received 1,793 Likes on 1,121 Posts
re: Star Trek: Picard (Paramount+) -- News, rumors, etc.

Originally Posted by B5Erik
Up through Voyager Star Trek has always been about the people. It's been about humanity, even when the characters weren't human.

It wasn't about big, bold special effects. It wasn't about action. It wasn't about being cool. It was about people. Babylon 5 was better than Star Trek at the BIG stuff when it came to the series spanning, galaxy wide plots, but Star Trek always had that kinder, gentler, more human side that made it different from any other Science Fiction show.


Discovery doesn't hit the marks when it comes to the humanity of the series. Not the way a Star Trek show is supposed to.



That bolded part alone tells me you don't know what you're talking about.

DISCOVERY has tons of humanity both in humans and aliens. You guys claim you want humanity in ST but when they give it to you in a character like Burnahm you hate her...you hate her being in touch with her human emotions....you hate her being in touch with Vulcan lack of emotions...You HATE HER. I saw post after post bitching that DISCOVERY was being too emotional/Human.

Last edited by Giantrobo; 07-29-19 at 03:13 PM.
Old 07-29-19, 02:38 PM
  #149  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Why So Blu?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 38,208
Received 1,191 Likes on 917 Posts
re: Star Trek: Picard (Paramount+) -- News, rumors, etc.

Originally Posted by Giantrobo
That bolded part alone tells me you don't know what you're talking about.

DISCOVERY has tons of humanity both in humans and aliens. You guys claim you want humanity in ST but when they give it to you in a character like Burnahm you hate her...you hate her being in touch with her human emotions....you hate her being in touch with Vulcan lack of emotions...You HATE HER. I saw post after post bitching DISCOVERY being too emotional/Human.

Old 07-29-19, 09:13 PM
  #150  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 7,114
Received 78 Likes on 63 Posts
re: Star Trek: Picard (Paramount+) -- News, rumors, etc.

Originally Posted by Giantrobo
You guys want the same ole shit over and over and that blows my mind that you guy can be so rigid and stuck in your ways. As mentioned, you're all Old Men in this area.

I LOVE that they're trying do new things with the franchise and evolving.
Originally Posted by Giantrobo
That said, you guys hate all the new Trek stuff because it's not the old stuff. You've said it over and over and you can't talk you way out of this. So Yeah, I do question your fandom when all you want is the same ole shit. Wanting the same old shit from 50 years ago and NOT allowing a franchise to do new things doesn't make you true a fan either. If you want that go watch TOS.
Yeah, but can' the argument be made that some of these shows aren't necessarily doing something new, but just hopping on the trends that are currently popular. Wasn't the criticism of the Kelvin Stark Trek films was that too much emphasis was placed on action and less on exploration?

Another argument could be made that maybe not everything needs to be a franchise with films and television shows coming out so often.

I'm not a die hard fan. I like the original series, love TNG, and think the Star Trek films with Shatner are awesome. Galaxy Quest was great. The Orville is great fun and despite being a parody, plays up the sci-fi angle well.
DS9 could be pretty good at times.
The ST:TNG films, the JJ reboot films, Voyager, and Enterprise are so-so at best.


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.