re: Snowpiercer (Now on AMC) -- S: Jennifer Connelly, Daveed Diggs
Originally Posted by SteveA
(Post 13743728)
I have the same problem with the TV show as I had with the movie. The basis for the show seems all parable and not at all realistic. That is, why do they have to be on a freakin' train? If there's enough technology to build tracks around the world and power a 1000-car train indefinitely, it would seem there would be enough technology to build a stationary city. The train concept works well in Kim Stanley Robinson's novel 2312, with the moving city on Mercury, staying in the temperate shadow. But it seems to make no sense on earth, even a frozen one. Why does moving help? And if they have to move, why a train? There's nothing else in the way now, so why not a gigantic moving city?
|
re: Snowpiercer (Now on AMC) -- S: Jennifer Connelly, Daveed Diggs
Originally Posted by cdollaz
(Post 13744157)
Have they explained why they haven't just booted all of the tailors off the train? Why did they let them stay on at the beginning? Free labor?
If they threw the tailors off, there would be nobody to alter their suits and dresses. Honestly, I think we’ll find out they “need” them to maintain order through some semblance of a class or hierarchy system. Elites aren’t elite if there is nobody below them. There has to be somebody to blame for problems. Kind of like how the Matrix had to have shitty parts for people to accept it. |
re: Snowpiercer (Now on AMC) -- S: Jennifer Connelly, Daveed Diggs
Probably a bit late with this warning ... but check your DVR.
Golf ran a half hour over, so my recording is going to cut off in the middle of the new episode tonight. Glad I just happened to check this and set it to record the next hour as well. |
re: Snowpiercer (Now on AMC) -- S: Jennifer Connelly, Daveed Diggs
I went to watch it this afternoon. This is the one original program TNT is currently airing, and it gets screwed up by a time overrun. Reset it to record tomorrow night.
|
re: Snowpiercer (Now on AMC) -- S: Jennifer Connelly, Daveed Diggs
can we talk about the ridiculous science of it all... I mean, makes I guess for compelling drama, but can anybody explain to me how the moving train around the world was ever good and sustainable idea?
|
re: Snowpiercer (Now on AMC) -- S: Jennifer Connelly, Daveed Diggs
Originally Posted by Abob Teff
(Post 13746747)
Probably a bit late with this warning ... but check your DVR.
Golf ran a half hour over, so my recording is going to cut off in the middle of the new episode tonight. Glad I just happened to check this and set it to record the next hour as well. Also I still don't understand why more than one person has complained about the feasibility of the central concept. It's a sci fi concept that stands out. It's like going into a show like Supergirl and saying "there aren't any aliens and people can't fly, what's up with this show?" I fully support criticizing inconsistencies in the plot, but you have to suspend your disbelief for at least the central concept of the show. |
re: Snowpiercer (Now on AMC) -- S: Jennifer Connelly, Daveed Diggs
Originally Posted by fujishig
(Post 13755319)
Also I still don't understand why more than one person has complained about the feasibility of the central concept. It's a sci fi concept that stands out. It's like going into a show like Supergirl and saying "there aren't any aliens and people can't fly, what's up with this show?" I fully support criticizing inconsistencies in the plot, but you have to suspend your disbelief for at least the central concept of the show.
That said, the latest episode was pretty cool. Our femme fatale showed herself. ctyankee |
re: Snowpiercer (Now on AMC) -- S: Jennifer Connelly, Daveed Diggs
Haven't watched this week's episode yet ...
My personal rule with sci-fi/fantasy is you get "one concession" from me. That includes tangents. When you start pulling new things out of thin air and asking me for concessions we are going to have a problem. For example: I have no issue with the perpetual motion train and the track maintenance -- I'm giving you that. I'll go with the concept. However, if you get into a bind in season 2 and try to tell me that the train can hover and get over obstacles that way, you blew it. (Looking at you Walking Dead and Star Wars.) The show runners write the rules early in the run and I hold them accountable. As a viewer, if you can't get past the initial conceit, then it probably isn't for you. |
re: Snowpiercer (Now on AMC) -- S: Jennifer Connelly, Daveed Diggs
Yeah, I guess I can understand having a hard time suspending disbelief when you know the science they're peddling is BS and it's set in present times. Like making up network protocols for a "hacker" to seem smart in a show or something. This, however, is a futuristic sci-fi train, so I consider it to run on magic sci-fi pixie dust. Agree with Abob Teff that they have to then keep it consistent in their own universe and not pull things out of their rear, but I can usually overlook the initial concept. Now when characters act inanely and plotlines get convoluted, complain away. :)
|
re: Snowpiercer (Now on AMC) -- S: Jennifer Connelly, Daveed Diggs
The obvious answer to the questions about the train and the tracks is that the train runs on a Galt Motor and the tracks are made of Rearden Metal.
And it also explains why the rich people at the front of the train treat everyone else like shit. |
re: Snowpiercer (Now on AMC) -- S: Jennifer Connelly, Daveed Diggs
So what do people think is the deal with Jennifer Connelly's character? Was Wilfried always a charade, or did she fall into the role to maintain order?
|
re: Snowpiercer (Now on AMC) -- S: Jennifer Connelly, Daveed Diggs
Originally Posted by PhantomStranger
(Post 13756694)
So what do people think is the deal with Jennifer Connelly's character? Was Wilfried always a charade, or did she fall into the role to maintain order?
|
re: Snowpiercer (Now on AMC) -- S: Jennifer Connelly, Daveed Diggs
Ok ... I had an issue. 1,001 cars long ...and that is who he happens to grab? It ended up serving no purpose, so why use that lazy trope?
Yes, that was unbelievable. :D I think she actually created the train and bilked an old man into paying for it. Or she is his daughter. |
re: Snowpiercer (Now on AMC) -- S: Jennifer Connelly, Daveed Diggs
No bees and now no cows. What other food have they lost due to the extreme conditions. I guess the good news is there are still trees, ice covered but trees.
At 1 point it was mentioned to disconnect the tail. They really can't do that unless there is a side track. Otherwise when they come back around the tail would be on the tracks. In S2 I wonder if we'll start to see parts warming up, like in the movie, where some want to get off the train. Their adventures could be S3. |
re: Snowpiercer (Now on AMC) -- S: Jennifer Connelly, Daveed Diggs
Originally Posted by barelypure
(Post 13758057)
No bees and now no cows. What other food have they lost due to the extreme conditions. I guess the good news is there are still trees, ice covered but trees.
At 1 point it was mentioned to disconnect the tail. They really can't do that unless there is a side track. Otherwise when they come back around the tail would be on the tracks. In S2 I wonder if we'll start to see parts warming up, like in the movie, where some want to get off the train. Their adventures could be S3. In the Graphic novel, which the movie is (kind of loosely) based on, there's stuff like a second train, but I think this tv series is more based on the movie which is it's own thing, so we'll see. I think you start to jump the shark once you get off the train unless that's the final moments of the show. |
re: Snowpiercer (Now on AMC) -- S: Jennifer Connelly, Daveed Diggs
Some thoughts - think we saw a 2nd train in the "coming this season" trailer at end of Ep1?
One would assume they have multiples of a) Cow cars b) Locomotives - usually you'd have front, mid and potentially rear (but then the tailies could take it over?) but if the concession is to hand-wave the train itself, no worries |
re: Snowpiercer (Now on AMC) -- S: Jennifer Connelly, Daveed Diggs
Originally Posted by PhantomStranger
(Post 13756694)
So what do people think is the deal with Jennifer Connelly's character? Was Wilfried always a charade, or did she fall into the role to maintain order?
Murder plot closed but there's whatever they're using the drawers for. Seems like the "missing frozen body" thing gets taken care of in this next episode so I'm curious if we fast forward through a lot of plot coming up. Interesting that Connelly's character was less concerned about a mutiny (from either side) and more about the secret of the drawers getting out... you'd think logically she'd be better off putting the girl on ice anyway because she has the loosest lips of anyone anyway. |
re: Snowpiercer (Now on AMC) -- S: Jennifer Connelly, Daveed Diggs
That was a very... convenient way to fix the problem, I guess. Also a gratuitous sex scene to pad the run time just like HBO but without being able to show anything. At least we kind of found out what the drawers are for (if she's telling the truth) and I think they finally answer the question of what they're going to do to boost their engineering count.
|
re: Snowpiercer (Now on AMC) -- S: Jennifer Connelly, Daveed Diggs
Anyone else find most of Snowpiercer's sex scenes randomly inserted without any sense of pacing or feel for the plot?
|
re: Snowpiercer (Now on AMC) -- S: Jennifer Connelly, Daveed Diggs
Originally Posted by PhantomStranger
(Post 13761465)
Anyone else find most of Snowpiercer's sex scenes randomly inserted without any sense of pacing or feel for the plot?
|
re: Snowpiercer (Now on AMC) -- S: Jennifer Connelly, Daveed Diggs
Originally Posted by PhantomStranger
(Post 13761465)
Anyone else find most of Snowpiercer's sex scenes randomly inserted without any sense of pacing or feel for the plot?
|
re: Snowpiercer (Now on AMC) -- S: Jennifer Connelly, Daveed Diggs
I don't remember if they told us: they restrict the ability to have children (you have to win a lottery, etc.) but is that done on the male side or the female side as far as restrictions go? If it's the female side then I assume that's Andre's baby.
|
re: Snowpiercer (Now on AMC) -- S: Jennifer Connelly, Daveed Diggs
I finally realized why I'm enjoying this show more than it perhaps merits. Since it's set on a train all of the action occurs in a tightly confined space so there are lots of close-ups and not nearly as many fast-cuts as most TV shows and movies these days. The camera can linger on an actor long enough for some actual acting to come through so the whole production is elevated above what one would expect given the admittedly nonsense premise.
|
re: Snowpiercer (Now on AMC) -- S: Jennifer Connelly, Daveed Diggs
This show is interesting enough that I keep watching it, but not interesting enough that I'd care if it was cancelled.
And it looks like I'm not the only one wondering about the lack of track maintenance, and about what the heck happened to Jennifer Connelly's boobs. Maybe Andre can investigate that next. ;) |
re: Snowpiercer (Now on AMC) -- S: Jennifer Connelly, Daveed Diggs
Jennifer Connelly has lost so much weight and boobs always seem to be the first thing that goes with that. She’s still very attractive, and basically the only reason I’m tuning in to this mediocre show, but I wish she would put some weight back on.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:46 AM. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.