Person of Interest (S4E15) -- "Q&A" -- 2/17/15
http://wwwimage.cbsstatic.com/base/f...3_wb_0130b.jpg
http://wwwimage.cbsstatic.com/base/f...75_d0785bc.jpg REESE PROTECTS A SOFTWARE PROGRAMMER WITH A MYSTERIOUS SECOND LIFE, BUT IT'S UNCLEAR WHICH SIDE OF HER LIFE THE THREAT IS COMING FROM, ON "PERSON OF INTEREST," TUESDAY, FEB. 17 "Q & A" - Reese tries to protect a software programmer with a mysterious second life, but it's unclear which side of her life the threat is coming from. Meanwhile, Claire, a young hacker who Finch tried to protect from Samaritan, reaches out to him for aid, on PERSON OF INTEREST, Tuesday, Feb. 17 (10:01-11:00 PM, ET/PT) on the CBS Television Network. REGULAR CAST: Jim Caviezel (John Reese) Michael Emerson (Harold Finch) Kevin Chapman (Lionel Fusco) Sarah Shahi (Sameen Shaw) Amy Acker (Root) RECURRING CAST: John Nolan (Greer) Quinn Shephard (Claire) GUEST CAST: Bella Dyne (Anna) Ayana Workman (Receptionist) Nick Westrate (Calvin) Helene Yorke (Lauren) Omar Maskati (Naresh) Kay Tauginas (Alek) Andrew Criss (Referee) Patrick Brana (Gym Front Desk Guy) Derrick Williams (Royce) Kenneth McCoy (Busy Coder) Fiona Choi (Samaritan Tech) Louis Lourens (Samaritan Representative) WRITTEN BY: Dan Dietz DIRECTED BY: Stephen Semel |
Re: Person of Interest (S4E15) -- "Q&A" -- 2/17/15
Decent episode, though the twist could have been more of a surprise. It was pretty easy to tell something wasn't on the up and up.
|
Re: Person of Interest (S4E15) -- "Q&A" -- 2/17/15
My first reaction to Claire was that it was a set up, although they did add more reasonable doubts during the episode.
It's too bad we don't see Helene Yorke in Masters of Sex anymore. |
Re: Person of Interest (S4E15) -- "Q&A" -- 2/17/15
Wasn't that surprised that Claire had ulterior motives.
Good to see Root back. I got a little back logged on episodes and powered through the last 4 episodes including this one. I actually have really enjoyed Amy Acker's work this season. No one talked about last week's episode, but it was good to see Zoe back as well. I was wondering why the heck John didn't ask the therapist out in last week's episode? Could it be not more obvious they were into each other? |
Re: Person of Interest (S4E15) -- "Q&A" -- 2/17/15
They have been very hands-off about pairing Reese up again since season 1. Supposedly Jim Caviezel has declined roles before that involve intimate scenes. It's possibly written into his contract he doesn't have to kiss on screen or something.
|
Re: Person of Interest (S4E15) -- "Q&A" -- 2/17/15
Originally Posted by PhantomStranger
(Post 12399757)
They have been very hands-off about pairing Reese up again since season 1. Supposedly Jim Caviezel has declined roles before that involve intimate scenes. It's possibly written into his contract he doesn't have to kiss on screen or something.
|
Re: Person of Interest (S4E15) -- "Q&A" -- 2/17/15
So Finch is so smart that he knew not to put the flash drive into his laptop. But he is so stupid not to realize he could just go to Best Buy and get a cheap laptop that's never been connected to anything to see what was on the flash drive. Kind of strains the credulity.
|
Re: Person of Interest (S4E15) -- "Q&A" -- 2/17/15
Originally Posted by barelypure
(Post 12399988)
So Finch is so smart that he knew not to put the flash drive into his laptop. But he is so stupid not to realize he could just go to Best Buy and get a cheap laptop that's never been connected to anything to see what was on the flash drive. Kind of strains the credulity.
|
Re: Person of Interest (S4E15) -- "Q&A" -- 2/17/15
Originally Posted by barelypure
(Post 12399988)
So Finch is so smart that he knew not to put the flash drive into his laptop. But he is so stupid not to realize he could just go to Best Buy and get a cheap laptop that's never been connected to anything to see what was on the flash drive. Kind of strains the credulity.
|
Re: Person of Interest (S4E15) -- "Q&A" -- 2/17/15
Originally Posted by actionjackson29
(Post 12399899)
Didn't he have an unscripted kiss with Carter that he initiated? And he has been shown to have flings with Zoe and his former CIA partner.
|
Re: Person of Interest (S4E15) -- "Q&A" -- 2/17/15
Originally Posted by actionjackson29
(Post 12399899)
Didn't he have an unscripted kiss with Carter that he initiated?
|
Re: Person of Interest (S4E15) -- "Q&A" -- 2/17/15
Didn't really care for this episode. Like y'all, I suspected Claire as soon as she got shot and think they did a poor job of Harold vetting her story.
The Reese story was OK, but the CEO and his motivation didn't really work for me. The advertizing monitoring/manipulation idea is a good concept, but it would have worked better if they just had him be less Bond villain and more a desperate exec who didn't want his young startup strangled in the crib due to lawsuits stemming from a software bug that caused the program to go too far during beta testing. I did like both the main guest actresses this week. I'm sure we'll see Claire again, and maybe Anna as well. Having John encourage her to pursue a professional MMA career was unexpected.
Originally Posted by cleaver
(Post 12400197)
It activates a webcam or nearby cell phone camera, Samaritan sees that it's the irrelevant teacher with the flash drive and his cover identity is blown.
Originally Posted by Deftones
(Post 12400445)
they were on the run, hiding in the shadows to prevent Samaritan from finding them. not like he can make a run to the local electronics store to buy a laptop.
|
Re: Person of Interest (S4E15) -- "Q&A" -- 2/17/15
Was that actress a real MMA fighter? She seemed to have very good moves for an actress. Maybe she was a stuntwoman they picked for the role.
|
Re: Person of Interest (S4E15) -- "Q&A" -- 2/17/15
With what's Reese has been through all he needs is his job and Bear.
|
Re: Person of Interest (S4E15) -- "Q&A" -- 2/17/15
Originally Posted by PhantomStranger
(Post 12401052)
Was that actress a real MMA fighter? She seemed to have very good moves for an actress. Maybe she was a stuntwoman they picked for the role.
I especially noted the line about how maybe she could fight somewhere where it's legal since one of the UFC's biggest gripes is that "underhanded tactics" are keeping MMA from being legal in NYC. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:01 PM. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.