Doctor Who Series 5 Discussion (BBC)
#326
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Thread Starter
Re: Doctor Who Series 5 Discussion (BBC)
Since these were the first two filmed, I'm hoping we'll see more range and development over the next 4 episodes before we get to the final run.
Also a thought on the Doctor wearing the jacket when he came 'back' to talk to Amy. Didn't the Doctor (10) previously say that you can't travel back over your own timeline for fear of messing soemthing up (e.g. Father's Day)? Or if he has done so, does that lend itself to writing/re-writing time?
Are we to assume that the actions at the end of Waters of Mars had no consequences? I assumed the crack was a result of that, but it may be that somebody/thing is behind it.
#327
Re: Doctor Who Series 5 Discussion (BBC)
Thats okay, I guess, but it sorta' takes some of the fun out of it. I mean, if I want a Doc that will karate chop or judo toss I guy, you run straight to Pertwee and no one else. You want a Doc thats a bit nutty, you zoom to Tom Baker. An asshole, Colin Baker. A worrywart Troughton. And so on... But the way the current three Docs behave in times of action or drama, IMO, is more or less the same.
Last edited by Slumbering Fist; 05-04-10 at 04:08 PM.
#328
Moderator
Re: Doctor Who Series 5 Discussion (BBC)
Also a thought on the Doctor wearing the jacket when he came 'back' to talk to Amy. Didn't the Doctor (10) previously say that you can't travel back over your own timeline for fear of messing soemthing up (e.g. Father's Day)? Or if he has done so, does that lend itself to writing/re-writing time?
#329
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Re: Doctor Who Series 5 Discussion (BBC)
Really? To me, he was different but only slightly so. More smiley and spazzy, sure. I'll grant, the one season run of Eccleston necessitated that there not be a huge change-up in personality like the Troughton-Pertwee or Baker-Davison eras. But still, tell me there was as drastic a difference as in the past regenerations, and I'll respectfully disagree. I just dont think they want to go that route for the time being and are sticky closely to a Doc-type that current audiences like.
Thats okay, I guess, but it sorta' takes some of the fun out of it. I mean, if I want a Doc that will karate chop or judo toss I guy, you run straight to Pertwee and no one else. You want a Doc thats a bit nutty, you zoom to Tom Baker. An asshole, Colin Baker. A worrywart Troughton. And so on... But the way the current three Docs behave in times of action or drama, IMO, is more or less the same.
Thats okay, I guess, but it sorta' takes some of the fun out of it. I mean, if I want a Doc that will karate chop or judo toss I guy, you run straight to Pertwee and no one else. You want a Doc thats a bit nutty, you zoom to Tom Baker. An asshole, Colin Baker. A worrywart Troughton. And so on... But the way the current three Docs behave in times of action or drama, IMO, is more or less the same.
If you look past the last 3 actors all of the Doctor's character traits are pretty much the same. With the whole changing of the guard I expected Smith's Doctor to be of a completely different cut than Eccleston and Tennant, but that hasn't happened yet. I'm hopeful he'll become his "own" Doctor, but like you said they will have to stray away from the current character formula.
I like Smith, but I still wish they had gone with someone older, that has a little more screen presence.
#330
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Re: Doctor Who Series 5 Discussion (BBC)
Really? To me, he was different but only slightly so. More smiley and spazzy, sure. I'll grant, the one season run of Eccleston necessitated that there not be a huge change-up in personality like the Troughton-Pertwee or Baker-Davison eras. But still, tell me there was as drastic a difference as in the past regenerations, and I'll respectfully disagree. I just dont think they want to go that route for the time being and are sticky closely to a Doc-type that current audiences like.
Thats okay, I guess, but it sorta' takes some of the fun out of it. I mean, if I want a Doc that will karate chop or judo toss I guy, you run straight to Pertwee and no one else. You want a Doc thats a bit nutty, you zoom to Tom Baker. An asshole, Colin Baker. A worrywart Troughton. And so on... But the way the current three Docs behave in times of action or drama, IMO, is more or less the same.
Thats okay, I guess, but it sorta' takes some of the fun out of it. I mean, if I want a Doc that will karate chop or judo toss I guy, you run straight to Pertwee and no one else. You want a Doc thats a bit nutty, you zoom to Tom Baker. An asshole, Colin Baker. A worrywart Troughton. And so on... But the way the current three Docs behave in times of action or drama, IMO, is more or less the same.
Eccleston was also a bit more standoff-ish, looking distinctly uncomfortable whenever he had to deal with Rose's mum and boyfriend, yet Tennant sat down to Christmas dinner with them.
And the trademark comments...you may think "Fantastic!" is a boring trademark, but I'll take it any day over "Allons-y!" or timey fucking wimey.
And I take issue with calling Colin's Doc an asshole He's my second favorite Doctor! I've always thought that Eccleston's Doctor was just the sixth Doctor, but with a northern accent and without the stupid coat. No, seriously. Doc 6 was always putting down humans in general and in his very first episode, Doc 9 was calling humans "stupid apes".
#331
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Re: Doctor Who Series 5 Discussion (BBC)
Just saw the Venice episode, the Doctor, Amy and her fiance, Rory travel to 1580 and discover something fishy about a local girls boarding school. After two fairly heavy and scary shows, "Vampires in Venice" takes a slightly more light-hearted bend. After a brief 1580 prologue, we are treated to the Doctor crashing Rory's bachelor party in an unusual way, and it pretty much sets the tone for the rest of the episode. There are some fun bits, and Amy and Rory are game for joining the Doctor in what needs to be done. Overall, a minor episode, although I can see its resolution having some implications down the line, plus a little more about the cracks and the Silence. 3 out of 5 from me.
#332
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 707
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Doctor Who Series 5 Discussion (BBC)
Yeah, it seemed like a throw-away episode but then the Boss Lady started telling the Doctor about the cracks and silence so it turned into one of those "pay attention now" moments.
Rory coming along was fun but I kept thinking how much more fun it would have been if it was Jeff instead.
Rory coming along was fun but I kept thinking how much more fun it would have been if it was Jeff instead.
#334
DVD Talk Legend
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Land of the Lobstrosities
Posts: 10,300
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Re: Doctor Who Series 5 Discussion (BBC)
I could nitpick the hell out of this episode, but it wasn't that bad overall. A little fillerish, but it had some good visuals with the vampire motif and Venice setting.
#336
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Thread Starter
Re: Doctor Who Series 5 Discussion (BBC)
I thought it was a fun episode. Something is very off about Amy though and I can't figure out what's going on.
I feel bad for the father and daughter. She goes through all that and is 1 step away from getting away. Then of course he was just devastated.
I liked the actress that played the countess. I feel like I've seen her somewhere before (MI-5?), but can't place my finger on it. Very prophetic perhaps that she speaks to the Doctor about being responsible for the death of two races. Speaking of which, if Gallifrey is/was outside of time, then how is it that some people hear about the Time Lords as myths, while others know they are gone?
Was that supposed to be a crack in the keyhole of the Tardis, or just a nifty transition to the trailer?
I feel bad for the father and daughter. She goes through all that and is 1 step away from getting away. Then of course he was just devastated.
I liked the actress that played the countess. I feel like I've seen her somewhere before (MI-5?), but can't place my finger on it. Very prophetic perhaps that she speaks to the Doctor about being responsible for the death of two races. Speaking of which, if Gallifrey is/was outside of time, then how is it that some people hear about the Time Lords as myths, while others know they are gone?
Was that supposed to be a crack in the keyhole of the Tardis, or just a nifty transition to the trailer?
#337
Moderator
Re: Doctor Who Series 5 Discussion (BBC)
The Countess looked like she could be Anna Friel's sister (she's not, there's just a strong resemblance).
I thought this was a very strong episode. Witty script, nice pacing, and an interesting story. Much better than the similarly-themed "Witches" episode from Season 3.
I'm not liking how Rory's basically a carbon clone of Mickey Smith, but the actor is likable and his reaction to the TARDIS was good too.
I thought this was a very strong episode. Witty script, nice pacing, and an interesting story. Much better than the similarly-themed "Witches" episode from Season 3.
I'm not liking how Rory's basically a carbon clone of Mickey Smith, but the actor is likable and his reaction to the TARDIS was good too.
#338
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Re: Doctor Who Series 5 Discussion (BBC)
Good episode. Much better than the space whale and Dalek episodes.
Venice and vampires were a good mix and Rory should be a nice addition. Funny how the episode could have been titled Dr. Who vs. the Space Fish.
Venice and vampires were a good mix and Rory should be a nice addition. Funny how the episode could have been titled Dr. Who vs. the Space Fish.
#339
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Doctor Who Series 5 Discussion (BBC)
Gallifrey itself, up to that point, wasn't outside of time. They policed the universe. In a way...
#341
DVD Talk Special Edition
Re: Doctor Who Series 5 Discussion (BBC)
I'm having the same reaction. I like the cast, but something's not clicking for me. The angel episodes came the closest, but so far this season just hasn't been very engaging. But I still have hopes that it will find it's groove somehow.
#342
Re: Doctor Who Series 5 Discussion (BBC)
Agreed. Setting was great but instead of soaking in the atmosphere and making a horrorish ep, it was more of the same run-and-blab business. I mean, the Doc was in a cavern with a torch and besieged by "vamps" yet the spooky meter was on zero. How the Hell does that happen?
I have no idea what to make of the next ep, which in previews looks weird and creepy (kudos to casting Toby Jones!), but, God knows, it will probably be more running around and wisecracking.
I guess Doctor Who has always gone through tonal phases, times when it had a more action bent, a more high concept sci fi bent, a more horror bent. But one of my problems with the revamp is like this last ep, where a story seemingly suited for a different feel ends up the same jokes/drama/run around mishmash.
I have no idea what to make of the next ep, which in previews looks weird and creepy (kudos to casting Toby Jones!), but, God knows, it will probably be more running around and wisecracking.
I guess Doctor Who has always gone through tonal phases, times when it had a more action bent, a more high concept sci fi bent, a more horror bent. But one of my problems with the revamp is like this last ep, where a story seemingly suited for a different feel ends up the same jokes/drama/run around mishmash.
#343
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Re: Doctor Who Series 5 Discussion (BBC)
Different strokes, I loved this episode. It might be my favorite of this season so far. I see a lot of people call this filler, but I thought it was an incredibly fun hour. Who is a lot of things, but I think the biggest draw for me is the fun adventure aspect of the show, and this had that. Also, I thought there were a lot of really nice character beats that add to the overall tapestry of these travelers.
Things I adored:
-the silly face Amy makes when taking the picture
-the conversation between the dude and the Doctor about people trying to impress the Doctor
-the conversation between the Doctor and the Countess (chemistry like whoa!)
-the Doctor's overall excitement about the situation
I'm going to watch this episode again. Also, to be a show that isn't know for effects, I thought Venice looked remarkable.
Things I adored:
-the silly face Amy makes when taking the picture
-the conversation between the dude and the Doctor about people trying to impress the Doctor
-the conversation between the Doctor and the Countess (chemistry like whoa!)
-the Doctor's overall excitement about the situation
I'm going to watch this episode again. Also, to be a show that isn't know for effects, I thought Venice looked remarkable.
#344
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Doctor Who Series 5 Discussion (BBC)
You mean Croatia?
http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/Vampires_in_Venice
http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/Vampires_in_Venice
#345
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Thread Starter
Re: Doctor Who Series 5 Discussion (BBC)
I think that Moffat has a very large plan for the season laid out in his head. I think we are gradually getting glimpses of that as S5 unfolds. In the Davies era this would normally take place in the last 5 minutes of the penultimate episode, only to have everything resolved in that last hour. I hope that by Moffat taking this approach we'll get more of a reward at the end of S5. If the series does unfold in that manner I think it will have more rewatchability, whereas past series such focus was on individual episodes.
#346
DVD Talk Legend
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: 75 clicks above the Do Lung bridge...
Posts: 18,946
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Re: Doctor Who Series 5 Discussion (BBC)
Just caught up by watching the second angels episode and the Venice one.
Some excellent casting, episode ideas, sets, and somehow it just doesn't draw me in. That thing about 'I kept my courage' was awesome, the dialogue by the headmistress of the Venice school was terrific, the angels are awesome, but somehow it's just not clicking.
The new doctor seems to be almost flat, not able to 'scale it up and then get serious' like Tennant.
Some excellent casting, episode ideas, sets, and somehow it just doesn't draw me in. That thing about 'I kept my courage' was awesome, the dialogue by the headmistress of the Venice school was terrific, the angels are awesome, but somehow it's just not clicking.
The new doctor seems to be almost flat, not able to 'scale it up and then get serious' like Tennant.
#347
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Re: Doctor Who Series 5 Discussion (BBC)
I think some of the things that happened in "Venice" will play a larger part in an overall series arc. Hasn't it been something like 25 years since the Doctor been put on trial and held accountable for his part in the extinction of entire races?
#348
DVD Talk Legend
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Building attractions one theme park at a time.
Posts: 10,800
Received 82 Likes
on
49 Posts
Amy's Choice - May 15, 2010
AMY'S CHOICE - MAY 15, 2010
Really enjoyed this week's episode. The main characters really shined in this one.
I'll wait 'til others have seen it to say more. Good episode IMO!
Really enjoyed this week's episode. The main characters really shined in this one.
I'll wait 'til others have seen it to say more. Good episode IMO!
#349
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Re: Doctor Who Series 5 Discussion (BBC)
Interesting episode, Amy's Choice. I've read elsewhere who the Dream Lord really is, which was supported by a reflection the Doctor saw in the TARDIS console at the end of the ep. Rory continues to be an interesting character, and pregnant Pond was a hoot. Were the aliens Doc and the companions ran into in the village real, or just part of the dream? Pretty creepy making grandma the monster this time around.
#350
Re: Doctor Who Series 5 Discussion (BBC)
What? Aside from that shot, the Doc pretty much explained in gobbledygook detail who "The Dream Lord" was. That was the only problem with the ep (well, aside from "Amy's Choice" being a lame title). The ending and explanation seemed unnecessary and tacked on. Everything else, the concept and interaction, really sung. Its a shame the ep had to end like it did. Rather than be mysterious and continue the eps esoteric tone, "The Dream Lord" is quickly explained away in the end. Otherwise I loved it. Best episode of the season thus far.