Oh, yeah, the sketches aren't all that funny, but everything else was firing on all cylinders, so I forgive the sketches being so-so.

and we didn't even get to see Coddry's lobster sketch...aww shucks.

I'm glad Lauren Graham

The only reason for this show to be an hour long or to employ such an extensive fake show cast is for them to show us something funny each week. I'm starting to agree with those who wondered why this wasn't a half hour show. It might actually work better with less time and NO effort to ever show us the show they're making.

Oh, I forgive it too. It's just painful to watch.

das

There can't be much more than 5 minutes of actual show material, if that.

das

Jordan still reminds me of what a grown-up Rory Gilmore could be.

Yeah, I'd say that's about right. How much does it cost, though? I'd submit that they have to fill a whole hour to justify the budget for it. Without that cost, you get a tighter show that hits mostly the same plot points. That's just my sense of it.

it would be weird to have this type of show in a 30 minute format...it just would.

and it's funny how Patman posts the exact same comments in the HTForum :lol:

Yeah, the syndication rights are a killer, too.

Hopefully they will have a "crustacean of the week" wandering around in costume - the lobster almost stole the show!

you have nothing to worry about :P

I actually thought the Nancy Grace thing was pretty funny, so hooray! Real comedy on Studio 60! I also thought Matt nailed it in his description of the baby sketch -- that it was close to funny, or whatever he said.

Solid episode.

I liked the scene with DL's character letting lose all the secrets with the live mic.

Decent episode not great though. The most tiring part for me is Matt/Harrietts "relationship" the most boring part of the show. YES I get they still have feelings for eachother, do I have to keep seeing/hearing about it week after week after week. That shit is annoying. But since America loves there drama, I guess we will continue to put up with it.

The Nic Cage thing was funny.
Lobster was good.

IMO this show doesn't seem to have much depth, the character developement is going ok, but the depth is lacking. I will keep with it a little longer though :)

Sarah Paulson is killing this show for me.

Lahti's pomposity annoyed the shit out of me.

good episode otherwise ...

I'll just say that I loved this show and love everyone on it. I could care less that the sketches arn't hillarious, thats not the point of the show.

This thread reminds me of why I stop reading TV Talk here after about 2 or 3 months into the new season. The majority of people here expect every single show to be perfect, and generally pick them to death to the point where I start enjoying a show less and less not because of the show, but because of all the complaints about the show here. *shrug*

I liked the episode.
I thought the Nic Cage impression was good.
I thought the Nancy Grace thing wasn't bad either.
Sad not to see more of Lauren Grahm..

Small side note:
What was the name of the Sting song and is he really putting out an album like that (with the instrument he played, forgot the name)?

I thought the Nancy Grace sketch was pretty funny, too. :sad:

It seems to me that if Aaron Sorkin has a few months to write the sketches, he does a good job (musical number in the second episode). Otherwise, yikes. They really need to show less of them. Unless this is part of some grand plan and they're showing the worst sketches deliberately.

The last song was "Fields of Gold". Not sure of the first song's title. The instrument was a lute.

Decent ep last night, though not as strong as the previous three.

Is this show taking place 3-4 years ago? Has Sorkin been watching any network TV the last few years? There is no way (I hope) a show like "Search and Destroy" would be a hot property today. There are so many current and juicier targets (the FCC, for example) in the TV business that could be focused on, that it's a letdown to see a show with this much talent behind it attack such an overused, easy, and dated topic like reality TV.

The "Nations" subplot (the Sorkin-esque writer with the show he wanted on HBO) could have set up an interesting Cable TV vs. network TV debate. Maybe we haven't heard the last of it, but it seems like a wasted opportunity right now.

The album is already out; it was released last week. It's called "Songs from the Labyrinth, and has songs for the lute by King James I's favourite musician John Dowland.

http://www.amazon.com/Songs-Labyrint.../dp/B000HXDESU

It doesn't feature "Fields of Gold," the second song played.

$12.95 with free shipping at CD-WOW:
http://www.cd-wow.us/detail_results....ct_code=380139

To me it isn't even so much that the skits aren't funny, it's that the show is almost pompous in its insistence that they are. Several posts here have argued "But it's supposed to representative of SNL and that's not funny, etc.", but SNL in reality has far from the glowing overall praise that the 'Studio 60' in-show is getting. If they were intentionally attempting to represent the skits as sub-par, why hasn't there been any 'this show isn't funny' backlash shown? They make it seem like the only people who don't love their show-within-a-show are either offended conservatives or just too stupid or classless to 'get' the jokes.

I have to agree here. To me there is are multiple levels of "suspension of disbelief". Even within a sci-fi/fantasy/horror movie or show there are different levels. It's like accepting the idea that aliens could invade the earth but still being able to roll your eyes that they are ultimately brought down with a virus uploaded from an iMac.

I know humor is subjective, and I know the jokes aren't "the point" of the show. But shouldn't a show, especially one that is ultimately a real world drama despite its humorous touches, be authentic to real life? If we can take shows like Prison Break or 24 to task for their unrealistic elements, why is this show above criticism?