![]() |
Path to 9/11
anyone watched this?
it's about 3 hours on ABC tonight. my biggest gripe, it's not in HD! |
After all the hubub, I tuned in during a break in Giants Colts and was impressed with the production quality...I'd be very interested to see it if it ever re-runs
|
yup it looks like a good movie. even though its kinda fictionalized it still gives you idea on how bureacracy works in the government.
|
Critically trashed Republican propoganda. Metacritic
Thank God there's nothing good on ABC. I won't be watching the All Bush Channel anymore. |
Discussion going on in the Politics forum: http://forum.dvdtalk.com/showthread.php?t=476758
|
Originally Posted by Tommy Ceez
After all the hubub, I tuned in during a break in Giants Colts and was impressed with the production quality...I'd be very interested to see it if it ever re-runs
|
Originally Posted by cungar
Critically trashed Republican propoganda. Metacritic
Thank God there's nothing good on ABC. I won't be watching the All Bush Channel anymore. Disney and ABC just loves Republicans. |
I've enjoyed it so far, but we had a weather map taking up a fourth of a screen and several interruptions for weather updates (the storm was 200 miles away), so I missed some parts of it.
|
Originally Posted by cungar
Critically trashed Republican propoganda. Metacritic
Thank God there's nothing good on ABC. I won't be watching the All Bush Channel anymore. |
Yet another attempt by the right to take advantage of 9/11 for their own political means. They know that they're in danger of losing many House / Senate seats in the upcoming election, and they know that they are completely incapable of winning a debate when it comes to policies and facts, so they're doing their tried and true trick - hauling out the "blame Clinton" card.
|
Originally Posted by MovieExchange
Yet another attempt by the right to take advantage of 9/11 for their own political means. They know that they're in danger of losing many House / Senate seats in the upcoming election, and they know that they are completely incapable of winning a debate when it comes to policies and facts, so they're doing their tried and true trick - hauling out the "blame Clinton" card.
|
The fact that Disney is in on it shows just how deep the conspiracy is. Diabolical!!!
|
Originally Posted by Tommy Ceez
Yes, because Lost sucks
I agree. |
I tried to watch this, since they advertised it as being commercial-free, but it still wasn't logo-free. I can't watch a serious drama on ABC because that logo keeps reminding me of Schoolhouse Rock. If the FCC were doing their job they would have banned that practice by now anyways.
|
Originally Posted by cungar
I agree.
Everything is going to change. |
Well, luckily for it's detractors, this mini-series sucked so horribly so it's inaccuracies are now a moot point. Can we officialy retire shaky/zoom-cam as a method to convey realism please?
And for the money spent on this, they couldn't spring for HD? I mean c'mon ABC...'According to Jim' is in HD. |
And anyone who said it was Pro-Bush, Pro-Republican without seeing it turned out to be an ass...it was pro-Richard Clark/911 Commission if anything.
|
Originally Posted by Eddie W
Well, luckily for it's detractors, this mini-series sucked so horribly so it's inaccuracies are now a moot point. Can we officialy retire shaky/zoom-cam as a method to convey realism please?
And for the money spent on this, they couldn't spring for HD? I mean c'mon ABC...'According to Jim' is in HD. |
Originally Posted by Eddie W
Well, luckily for it's detractors, this mini-series sucked so horribly so it's inaccuracies are now a moot point. Can we officialy retire shaky/zoom-cam as a method to convey realism please?
The only thing interesting I found out was the story of John P. O'Neill. The fact that the man investigated these series of events for so long, and then eventually was killed as a direct result of terrorist attacks related to his investigation, was more interesting than the fictionalized details accompaning the telemovie. |
Originally Posted by DVD Josh
According to Jim is in HD yet CBS cannot broadcast the NFL in HD. Amazing.
|
yup I agree about John O'Neill. Also, I would expect that due to his large involvement in the counterterrorism activities, his name/legacy would be more prominent. I guess that controversy he had regarding that stolen briefcase damaged his career.
another great story is that of Moussad. so many "what ifs" in there. after enduring 5 hours watching this, I'm kind of dizzy and light headed due to the freakin' camera shots. |
Originally Posted by Tommy Ceez
And anyone who said it was Pro-Bush, Pro-Republican without seeing it turned out to be an ass...it was pro-Richard Clark/911 Commission if anything.
:lol: Sorry. Just find it amazing that Rush gets accused of having "mind numbed robots" and then you see what happens with people coming out of the woodwork on this thing. |
What had my jaw drop while watching the movie was the cast that included a very hard core Hollywood liberal cast. Now of course this movie can't be true, because as the Left-wing liberal Democrats have told us Bush was behind knocking down the Twin Towers along with blowing up the levees in New Orleans to flood all the blacks.
|
Originally Posted by wm lopez
Now of course this movie can't be true, because as the Left-wing liberal Democrats have told us Bush was behind knocking down the Twin Towers along with blowing up the levees in New Orleans to flood all the blacks.
|
Originally Posted by wm lopez
Now of course this movie can't be true, because as the Left-wing liberal Democrats have told us Bush was behind knocking down the Twin Towers along with blowing up the levees in New Orleans to flood all the blacks.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:21 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.