Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > TV Talk
Reload this Page >

"24" - 5/14 (merged)

Community
Search
TV Talk Talk about Shows on TV

"24" - 5/14 (merged)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-15-02, 03:12 PM
  #51  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 9,866
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally posted by Rypro 525
when did jack and teri get it on. jack did not seemed surprised that she was pregnent even though we all know that she got pregnent from the rape early on, not from jack.
What you talkin' 'bout, Willis?

Terri was raped LESS THAN 24 HOURS AGO?!?! She cannot possibly be pregnant and know about it that fast! I believe it has been alluded to that she must have conceived when she and Jack reconcilled upon Jack's return to the household after his affair with Nina. He had briefly moved out. I'm assuming it happened then. Again - there is no way the rape that occurred earlier in the day could have caused the pregnancy that was detected several hours later in the hospital (this is the same 24 hours, remember). If anything, Terri may have had an affair with her doctor friend during Jack's absence... now that is a remote possibility...
Old 05-15-02, 03:13 PM
  #52  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Rypro 525's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: a frikin hellhole
Posts: 28,264
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally posted by juiio


Jack and Terri didn't have sex during the last 23 hours, but that is irrelevant. Eggs often aren't even fertilized in the first 23 hours after sex. Even if the egg is fertilized, you wouldn't pass a pregnancy test right away. The pregnancy happened long before the series started, not from the rape.
Thanks for clearing that up. But, will teri tell jack that she was raped, or will she keep it to her self.
Old 05-15-02, 03:42 PM
  #53  
Admin Emeritus
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Texas, our Texas! All hail the mighty state!
Posts: 12,842
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally posted by das Monkey
I don't know of a perfect solution to please everyone, but from spending quite a bit of time here, I can say without exception that the largest area of focus is discussion of specific episodes immediately after they air. While we do many things in here, including support of the Funk, bobble, episode discussion is the primary focus. As such, my suggestion would be to build the thread structure around that: individual episode discussion gets its own dated thread; teasers/promos for the next episode can exist in that thread in SPOILER form (the same applies for speculation based on such teasers/promos/foreknowledge); everything else, to ensure safety for the majority, should exist in its own thread (which would include pre-episode speculation).
Good post, das. From what I understand, your suggestion is that we have a dated thread for every episode, and then one continuous thread for speculation. I'm not sure how one would separate speculation based on teasers/promos/foreknowledge that goes in the dated threads from pre-episode speculation that goes in the continuous speculation thread.

Maybe we need to put down the time that each show airs in the Eastern Time Zone in each thread title, so that people can do the math and realize when the speculation period is over? This seems like overkill to me, though. And hopefully this doesn't sound insensitive, but the three lost hours of speculation time for West Coasters that you brought up doesn't seem like a very big deal when you compare it with the seven days of speculation time they've had since the last episode.
Old 05-15-02, 04:53 PM
  #54  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Chicago
Posts: 880
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hoo boy this is getting out of hand.

das Monkey exclaimed:

I am a firm believer that if you don't want to know what happens in an episode, stay the hell out of the thread.
Agreed. I don't go near the thread until I've seen the ep, which is often the next day. It's just common sense. Multiple threads on one episode is just clutter. If it's speculation, say so. If it's a spoiler, tag it. Nuff said.
Old 05-15-02, 05:25 PM
  #55  
DVD Talk Hero
 
das Monkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 35,879
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by Static Cling
Good post, das. From what I understand, your suggestion is that we have a dated thread for every episode, and then one continuous thread for speculation. I'm not sure how one would separate speculation based on teasers/promos/foreknowledge that goes in the dated threads from pre-episode speculation that goes in the continuous speculation thread.
Actually, no. Apologies for the confusion. I was thinking essentially like we've had it - if someone wants to speculate before an episode airs (but days after last week's discussion), then they should start a "speculation" thread for that episode, not one continuous speculation thread. In practice, there are very few shows where people are hellbent on speculating what may happen a few hours before the show airs.

In my mind, there's nothing wrong with erring on the side of more threads. A full day can go by before we fill the front page with new posts. In TV Talk, the shows of the past few days dominate discussion and then disappear. At any given time, there really aren't more than 20 active threads. I like the plan of one dated discussion thread for each episode, and then separate threads for other "stuff" people want to talk about in relation to that show, one of which could be speculation for a coming episode. It wouldn't bother me at all if the forum looked a bit like this:
[*] Buffy - 5/14/02[*] The Shield - 5/14/02[*] What Do You Think Will Happen in the 24 Finale?[*] Glory Be, The Funk's On Me, Bobble[*] Contract Information for Buffy 7th Season[*] 24 Format Likely to Remain the Same Next Season[*] Scrumtilescense: A Detailed Analysis[*] 24 - 5/14/02[*] Buffy Finale - Are You Ready?

Sure, there are multiple threads for the same show, but we're a low volume forum, so I don't see a problem.

In any case, I think the main goal should be to maintain the integrity of the episode discussion threads as the highest priority. It's where most of the people post and constitutes the majority of discussion on the forum. The more we can do to accomodate those who want to talk about teasers, those who REALLY don't want to know the content of teasers, those who want to speculate, those who tape/PVR delay, those who live on the Left Coast, etc, the happier I think we'll all be.

The argument I beat to death with teaser spoilers was that it was absurdly simple for someone to SPOILER tag a teaser, yet it helped many forum members enjoy the forum significantly more. I think the same applies here. Keeping speculation out of a thread that discusses the events that the speculation refers to is again a minor inconvenience (if that), but it will drastically improve the experience of many forum members. Keep in mind that I don't see a problem with speculation of a future episode in a thread about a current episode so long as it doesn't involve teaser information - it's when speculation bleeds into discussion of the events that constituted said speculation where the problem arises. It's the same effect as if you put the word *SPOILERS* in every thread title or SPOILER tag every post. No one knows what's really a spoiler and what's oversensitivity, and the SPOILER tag loses all effect.

Hopefully that makes more sense. Again, this isn't an issue that particularly matters to me, so if those who discuss speculation have input, feel free to share. I just figured this was a great opportunity for me to butt my head in where it doesn't belong and hijack a thread.

das
Old 05-15-02, 05:36 PM
  #56  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Fremont, CA USA
Posts: 1,290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Rypro 525
when did jack and teri get it on. jack did not seemed surprised that she was pregnent even though we all know that she got pregnent from the rape early on, not from jack.
Um, it actually takes more than 10 hours to show signs of pregnancy.

And the family is back together again, so of course Jack and Teri are having sex again.

Matt
Old 05-15-02, 06:13 PM
  #57  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: east texas
Posts: 5,473
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
just as an aside, i just read in people magazine that nina is going to be marrying mason. that is to say that those actors will be getting married. in case anyone cares.
Old 05-15-02, 06:38 PM
  #58  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Downers Grove, IL
Posts: 10,470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by kevin75
just as an aside, i just read in people magazine that nina is going to be marrying mason. that is to say that those actors will be getting married. in case anyone cares.
NOO!!! Doesn't he know she's the mole?!
Old 05-15-02, 07:31 PM
  #59  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 1,029
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Spoiler:
I think this writing is just plain poor. The writers have left way too many loose ends to take care of in the one remaining episode. Don't get me wrong... the show is very immersive and entertaining, but there are too many things that don't make any sense. First and foremost, Nina was alone with Jack/Teri/Kim on multiple occasions. If she was working with the Drazens, why didn't she ever do anything? It would have been VERY easy for HER to take out the agents at the safehouse and turn the women over to the Drazens. It also would have been easy for her to kill Jack on multiple occasions, especially after the Drazens had the contingency plan in place for Alexei to kill Palmer... at that point they had no use for Jack. And why did Walsh tell Jack he could trust Jamey? Nina was a suspect once because that card was created at her station... Now it appears that may actually be true... but wasn't Nina on vacation with Jack at that time? And most obviously, why did Nina act alarmed when she saw one of the hired assassins posing as an FBI agent at the hospital? Even if she didn't want to formally acknowledge the recognition so as not to blow her cover, she could have not mentioned it to Jack and subsequently not hastily escorted the women out of the hospital. Nothing makes sense right now. Anyone have any ideas?


'E
Old 05-15-02, 07:33 PM
  #60  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Newberg, OR
Posts: 17,561
Received 52 Likes on 43 Posts
Originally posted by Evolution
Anyone have any ideas?
Yeah. Plot holes
Old 05-15-02, 07:40 PM
  #61  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 1,029
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by juiio


Yeah. Plot holes
Well, I meant ideas that don't leave plot holes. As poor as I think the writing has been so far, I'll give the writers HUGE credit if they can actually explain all their "mistakes" in the last episode. By the way, my dad had the best idea... Jack and Palmer should've taken that call from Drazen right outside the bedroom... Jack should have thrown the phone through the doorway and Lady MacBitch could've been killed in the explosion. I would've laughed my ass off.

'E
Old 05-15-02, 08:13 PM
  #62  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Rypro 525's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: a frikin hellhole
Posts: 28,264
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
also if anyone is interested, lesile hope (who plays teri on 24) was on the loveline radio program last night (or on mon in the west coast.) the show got a call from some kid to try to get info from the last 2 episodes. she told him that they are not alowd to say any spoilers about the show. however, she did say that there were 3 versions of the finalie. she told him also that none of the actors know which episode will be shown.
Old 05-15-02, 09:11 PM
  #63  
Moderator
 
nemein's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: 1bit away from total disaster
Posts: 34,196
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally posted by Rypro 525
however, she did say that there were 3 versions of the finalie. she told him also that none of the actors know which episode will be shown.
I hope all of them are included on the DVD
Old 05-15-02, 10:05 PM
  #64  
DVD Talk God
 
Deftones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Arizona
Posts: 81,013
Received 1,365 Likes on 927 Posts
wow, very friggin cool episode. Nina being the mole was waaaay out in left field. I had a hunch it was Tony, but shows you how much I know.


Next weeks show info from spoiler, read at your own risk!
Spoiler:
Well, watching the preview for next week spoils it. Jack gets back to CTU, so we must assume he gets Kim out and comes back to get Terri. He probably doesn't know that Nina is the mole, but then again, he very well could know.


Damn, this show is hella hard keep up with all these plot twists.
Old 05-15-02, 10:16 PM
  #65  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Madison, WI ("77 square miles surrounded by reality")
Posts: 30,012
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally posted by huzefa
BTW, is next week a 2hr season finale?
"The following two hour finale of 24 takes place between 11:00pm and 12 midnight on the day of the California Presidential Primary. It will run at one-half real-time."
Old 05-15-02, 10:21 PM
  #66  
AJW
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 1,606
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So I guess it's a safe bet that Nina won't be a part of the season 2 cast
Old 05-15-02, 10:29 PM
  #67  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Downers Grove, IL
Posts: 10,470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by movielib


"The following two hour finale of 24 takes place between 11:00pm and 12 midnight on the day of the California Presidential Primary. It will run at one-half real-time."
Okay, okay, no need to beat a dead horse!
Old 05-16-02, 04:16 AM
  #68  
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It just doesn't make sense! Nina was all caring and stuff throughout the entire series and suddenly she acts so cool and uncaring, especially towards Terri. Wasn't Jack forced to kill her off but pushed her off the hill instead? What's up with that?! I sure the heck hope they're going to provide some kinna reasonable explaination. This coming out of the left field stuff is sooooo stupid ... unless it's logical. It just doesn't make any sense otherwise! Surprise for the sake of surprise is just plain stupid!
Old 05-16-02, 08:09 AM
  #69  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Downers Grove, IL
Posts: 10,470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by iawiaw
Wasn't Jack forced to kill her off but pushed her off the hill instead? What's up with that?!
As someone else already explained before in this thread, the whole 'getting jack to kill Nina' thing was Gaines' doing, not Drazen's. Maybe Gaines' did not know Nina was the 2nd mole inside CTU.
Old 05-16-02, 08:18 AM
  #70  
DVD Talk Hero
 
das Monkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 35,879
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by huzefa
As someone else already explained before in this thread, the whole 'getting jack to kill Nina' thing was Gaines' doing, not Drazen's. Maybe Gaines' did not know Nina was the 2nd mole inside CTU.
More likely, maybe the writers didn't know.

das
Old 05-16-02, 09:46 AM
  #71  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Rosemount, MN
Posts: 43,347
Received 1,639 Likes on 1,026 Posts
Lame.

BEYOND lame.

Nina has had so many opportunities to do something "mole-like" and she hasn't taken a single one.

The first thing that came to mind was that she could have easily killed the two agents at the safehouse and taken Kim and Teri back to the Drazens.

Instead, she's helped Jack screw with their plans all day. She helped him with the maps so he could stop the Drazens from getting Dennis Hopper back! How is this person a mole? She had NO idea that Jack would be unable to stop them from getting Dennis Hopper out.

At least Jamey was ACTIVELY doing things to hinder CTU (the keycard, sneaking off to talk to Gaines). Nina has been Lil Miss Helpful all day and NOW she's a bad guy? It's so obvious they HAD to make it someone we "trusted" and OH MY GOD IT'S NINA!?!?!

Whatever. I've stuck with this show all season, but it has truly been painful to watch since mid-season. I'll check out an ep or two next season, but I think I'm done with it.

Last edited by Draven; 05-16-02 at 09:49 AM.
Old 05-16-02, 10:50 AM
  #72  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Duluth, GA, USA
Posts: 37,797
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Check out this USA Today article, and you'll see that the writers didn't decide to make Nina the mole until 7-8 episodes ago. Pretty lame is right.

On some other news, Xander Berkeley (George Mason) and Sarah Clarke (Nina) are engaged to be married in September. Way to go, Xander!
Old 05-16-02, 11:26 AM
  #73  
Moderator
 
nemein's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: 1bit away from total disaster
Posts: 34,196
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally posted by draven-x
[B]
Nina has had so many opportunities to do something "mole-like" and she hasn't taken a single one.
Not that they've shown but that was supposed to be the "big surprise".

The first thing that came to mind was that she could have easily killed the two agents at the safehouse and taken Kim and Teri back to the Drazens.
Actually she did, she left the safe house before it as hit so as to keep her cover but still allow Kim/Terri to be captured. Tony just happened to come by and screw it up. IIRC

Instead, she's helped Jack screw with their plans all day. She helped him with the maps so he could stop the Drazens from getting Dennis Hopper back! How is this person a mole? She had NO idea that Jack would be unable to stop them from getting Dennis Hopper out.
Actually this is one reason I thought Mason was it too. The mole put Jack in the situation where he could be picked up by the Drazens again.

Probably reaching in some aspects but w/o going back and rewatching everything it's hard to remember exactly how consistantly this all fits in JMO
Old 05-16-02, 12:42 PM
  #74  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
dgmayor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Holly Springs, NC
Posts: 2,036
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by Patman
Check out this USA Today article, and you'll see that the writers didn't decide to make Nina the mole until 7-8 episodes ago. Pretty lame is right.

As dissappointed as I am with them making Nina the second mole, I have to say that at no point in that article does it indicate that the writer's decided to do that 7 or 8 episodes ago. All it states is that she was TOLD 7 or 8 episodes ago. That doesn't mean they just decided it then. I tend to agree that they probably came up with it on the fly, but you can't make a statement of fact about it, because it doesn't say so in the article. >
Old 05-17-02, 03:43 AM
  #75  
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I first thought the same too but read on ....

"Clarke says Nina's character turn tracks well with earlier plot developments, although producers didn't decide to make her the mole until Christmas."


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.