DVD Talk Forum

DVD Talk Forum (https://forum.dvdtalk.com/)
-   TV Talk (https://forum.dvdtalk.com/tv-talk-14/)
-   -   LOL: You'll never believe who is suing "The Simpsons" (https://forum.dvdtalk.com/tv-talk/198319-lol-youll-never-believe-who-suing-simpsons.html)

Groucho 04-08-02 12:55 PM

LOL: You'll never believe who is suing "The Simpsons"
 

Rio officials irked at "Simpsons" episode
Sat Apr 6, 1:49 PM ET

RIO DE JANEIRO, Brazil - Rio is having a cow over The Simpsons (news - Y! TV).


The city tourism board Riotur plans to sue Fox Cable International for an episode of "The Simpsons" that allegedly denigrates the city's image, Brazilian (news - web sites) media reported Saturday.

The episode is entitled "Blame it on Lisa," a reference to the 1984 movie "Blame it on Rio." It shows the Simpson family flying to Brazil, after an orphan that Lisa has secretly been supporting disappears.

In Rio, the orphanage is threatened by an invasion of monkeys. Homer gets kidnapped and Bart is swallowed by a boa constrictor. Police are portrayed as lazy and unhelpful, and slums as dirty and dangerous.

The O Globo newspaper reported Saturday that Riotur's president, Jose Eduardo Guinle, had instructed lawyers to sue Fox for detriment to the city's image abroad. Riotur spent some dlrs 18 million last year in overseas promotion of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil's main tourist gateway.
Link: http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp...the_simpsons_1

Now this is just silly. The "lazy and unhelpful" police chief was a parody of Chief Wiggum. And since when are slums clean and friendly?

bhk 04-08-02 01:12 PM

And foreign media outlets never parody the US.

Why don't they sue Bill Clinton, instead, since he identified Hernando de Soto as a Brasilian, in a Gore-like effort to look smart. He is Peruvian.

Fanboy 04-08-02 02:03 PM

Perhaps we Torontonians can turn this into a class-action suit. Certainly if the Brazilians felt that "the use of cliches and stereotypes" was a problem then we have a case.

Get us a law-talkin' guy!

ClarkKentKY 04-08-02 02:22 PM

[comic book guy] Worst Lawsuit Ever [/comic book guy]


My antropology professor once told us that before Carnival` the police go through Rio and sytematically kill all the homeless and beggers so that tourists will not be bothered. Not sure if its true, but this story reminded me of that lecture.

"Your honor, I'm Lionel Hutts, I represent the country of Brazil. I'd like to make a motion for a case-thrown-out dealy."

Slumbering Fist 04-08-02 02:54 PM

Hey wait a minute! I live in Knoxville, which the Simpsons made jokes about when Bart got an ID and he and Nelson, Milhouse, and Martin drove here. We should sue!!!!!

They made fun of the sunsphere, saying it ws full of wigs. Milhouse bought a talking Al Gore doll (pull the string and he says, "You are hearing me talk...")... They have made numerous little referaces to Knoxville's 1982 Worlds Fair.

MrN 04-08-02 03:02 PM

I'm guessing they don't know too much about American law.
This case would be laughed out of court.

"Chow-da!"

Eric F 04-08-02 03:33 PM

If anything they should be bringing as little attention to this episode as possible, being that many of the social aspects parodied in the episode are sad, but true.

How they think this is going to help tourism is beyond me.

Nickee 04-08-02 03:56 PM

Remember when the city of New Orleans was horribly offended by the episode where they performed the musical version of Streetcar Named Desire??

They later had Bart writing something on the chalkboard about New Orleans - but I don't remember what he wrote.

". . . Sodom and Gommorah on the Mississip, New Orleans!!!"

bhk 04-08-02 04:01 PM


I'm guessing they don't know too much about American law.
Maybe they do, and that is why they are suing.

Phil L. 04-08-02 04:43 PM

Well...if it was printed in The "O Globo" Newspaper, it's gotta be true.

twikoff 04-08-02 05:39 PM


Originally posted by Fanboy
Perhaps we Torontonians can turn this into a class-action suit. Certainly if the Brazilians felt that "the use of cliches and stereotypes" was a problem then we have a case.

Get us a law-talkin' guy!

yea really.. you canucks should sue southpark ;)

Arcade 04-08-02 06:32 PM

These people are crazy. It's just a cartoon. Who in there right mind would cancel travel plans because of the Simpsons. And just what do they expect to get out of it?

I was proud as ever when my home town was mentioned on the Simpsons. I think it was in the "Curse of the flying Hellfish" episode. Millhouse's Dad is at the school looking out of the window at his RV. He tells the kids "We won that at a chili cookoff in Beaumont, TX." I think it is great to have my town forever rememberd on the Simpsons.

Darren Garrison 04-08-02 10:08 PM


Originally posted by Slumbering Fist
Hey wait a minute! I live in Knoxville, which the Simpsons made jokes about when Bart got an ID and he and Nelson, Milhouse, and Martin drove here. We should sue!!!!!

They made fun of the sunsphere, saying it ws full of wigs. Milhouse bought a talking Al Gore doll (pull the string and he says, "You are hearing me talk...")... They have made numerous little referaces to Knoxville's 1982 Worlds Fair.

Saw that one in syndication a week or two ago. :-)

Eric F 04-08-02 10:49 PM


I was proud as ever when my home town was mentioned on the Simpsons.
My town was featured in the Family Guy millenium episode, where they embark on a journey to it to find the "Twinkie" factory to rebuild civilization:D

Giantrobo 04-08-02 11:16 PM

Am I the only one who read the article and thought:

"Yeah, I can see that happening in Brazil"

guildda 04-09-02 12:00 AM


Originally posted by Slumbering Fist
Hey wait a minute! I live in Knoxville, which the Simpsons made jokes about when Bart got an ID and he and Nelson, Milhouse, and Martin drove here. We should sue!!!!!

They made fun of the sunsphere, saying it ws full of wigs. Milhouse bought a talking Al Gore doll (pull the string and he says, "You are hearing me talk...")... They have made numerous little referaces to Knoxville's 1982 Worlds Fair.

I was in Knoxville a few summers back and of course had to visit the sunsphere. My friend and I started making remarks about the Simpsons, and the lady running the visitor's center there was less than amused. Obviously we were the millionth people to comment on that episode asking where the wig shop was, but she obviously hated the whole Simpsons thing. She'd join your lawsuit in a second:)

MrN 04-09-02 03:49 AM


Originally posted by bhk
Maybe they do, and that is why they are suing.

They must have heard that suing can bring you publicity - but seriously, how are they going to prove that they lost business because of this one episode? Also, everyone knows that the Simpsons is satire - take a joke people!

Bandoman 04-09-02 09:42 AM

Monkey invasion?

[Bandoman cancels his planned vacation to Rio.]

bhk 04-09-02 02:48 PM


They must have heard that suing can bring you publicity - but seriously, how are they going to prove that they lost business because of this one episode?
If robbers sue the homeowners who were defending themselves for damages, and win, anything is possible with this legal system.

Jason 04-09-02 03:17 PM


Originally posted by Eric F
If anything they should be bringing as little attention to this episode as possible, being that many of the social aspects parodied in the episode are sad, but true.

How they think this is going to help tourism is beyond me.

But their slums look so nice.

Just look at this Brazilian site

wm lopez 04-09-02 09:22 PM

Only in America do you have a chance on winning a lawsuit like that. Remember the one where they sued McDonld's for serving the hot cup of coffee?
I wonder if other countries are like that?

The Bus 04-09-02 11:09 PM


Originally posted by wm lopez
Only in America do you have a chance on winning a lawsuit like that. Remember the one where they sued McDonld's for serving the hot cup of coffee?
I wonder if other countries are like that?

That older woman got third degree burns from the coffee, if I recall correctly. That means bone was exposed.

Also, the amount she got from the lawsuit was like 10 minutes worth of profits from McDonald's on coffee alone. A few hundred thousand means nothing to a multi-billion dollar company.

CaptainMarvel 04-09-02 11:14 PM


Originally posted by The Bus


That older woman got third degree burns from the coffee, if I recall correctly. That means bone was exposed.

Also, the amount she got from the lawsuit was like 10 minutes worth of profits from McDonald's on coffee alone. A few hundred thousand means nothing to a multi-billion dollar company.

Thank you. I'm tired of people citing that case as an example of how flawed our system is. There are plenty of GOOD examples of that, but the McDonald's-Coffee case isn't one of them. Anybody at all familiar with the facts of the case realizes that.
  • The 79 year old woman had 3rd degree burns on 6% of her body, including her genitals, groin, and buttocks.
  • The coffee wasn't merely 'hot'; it was scalding, to the point where it could instantly destroy muscle and flesh
  • She wasn't driving the car; she was in the passenger seat, trying to take the lid off when it spilled
  • She tried to settle with them while in the hospital for $20,000. McDonald's refused,
  • They showed that in a ten year period, they'd had 700 more similar injuries at McDonald's, and McDonald's was aware of it.
  • McDonald's admitted that its coffee wasn't fit for consumption at the temperature they sold it... 180 degrees

The jury awarded her punitive damages of $2.7 million as well as compensatory damages of $200,000. The damages were reduced later on, so she ended up getting $160,000 compensatory and $480,000 punitive.

The $2.7 million punitive damages award was 2 days worth of coffee sales for McDonalds, so the $480,000 is like a third of a day's worth of coffee sales.

ClarkKentKY 04-09-02 11:34 PM


Originally posted by CaptainMarvel


Thank you. I'm tired of people citing that case as an example of how flawed our system is. There are plenty of GOOD examples of that, but the McDonald's-Coffee case isn't one of them. Anybody at all familiar with the facts of the case realizes that.
  • The 79 year old woman had 3rd degree burns on 6% of her body, including her genitals, groin, and buttocks.
  • The coffee wasn't merely 'hot'; it was scalding, to the point where it could instantly destroy muscle and flesh
  • She wasn't driving the car; she was in the passenger seat, trying to take the lid off when it spilled
  • She tried to settle with them while in the hospital for $20,000. McDonald's refused,
  • They showed that in a ten year period, they'd had 700 more similar injuries at McDonald's, and McDonald's was aware of it.
  • McDonald's admitted that its coffee wasn't fit for consumption at the temperature they sold it... 180 degrees

The jury awarded her punitive damages of $2.7 million as well as compensatory damages of $200,000. The damages were reduced later on, so she ended up getting $160,000 compensatory and $480,000 punitive.

The $2.7 million punitive damages award was 2 days worth of coffee sales for McDonalds, so the $480,000 is like a third of a day's worth of coffee sales.

Wow. Nice post.

Three Day Delay 04-09-02 11:37 PM


Originally posted by CaptainMarvel


Thank you. I'm tired of people citing that case as an example of how flawed our system is. There are plenty of GOOD examples of that, but the McDonald's-Coffee case isn't one of them. Anybody at all familiar with the facts of the case realizes that.
  • The 79 year old woman had 3rd degree burns on 6% of her body, including her genitals, groin, and buttocks.
  • The coffee wasn't merely 'hot'; it was scalding, to the point where it could instantly destroy muscle and flesh
  • She wasn't driving the car; she was in the passenger seat, trying to take the lid off when it spilled
  • She tried to settle with them while in the hospital for $20,000. McDonald's refused,
  • They showed that in a ten year period, they'd had 700 more similar injuries at McDonald's, and McDonald's was aware of it.
  • McDonald's admitted that its coffee wasn't fit for consumption at the temperature they sold it... 180 degrees

The jury awarded her punitive damages of $2.7 million as well as compensatory damages of $200,000. The damages were reduced later on, so she ended up getting $160,000 compensatory and $480,000 punitive.

The $2.7 million punitive damages award was 2 days worth of coffee sales for McDonalds, so the $480,000 is like a third of a day's worth of coffee sales.

Now THIS is how to make a point, people. I hope some of you guys are taking notes!


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:15 AM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.