Thread: Yeah, I'm a loser: Stupid star trek questions
ok...here are a few things that have me stumped. I know "its
just a show" is the number one answer...but just for the sake of saying there is an answer withing the logic of the fictional star trek universe...These are the ones I can think of off hand, but I am sure there are others. #1-in next generation (or any series with a holo-deck), it has been established that people "created" are not real, and can not exist outside of the holodeck. I don't recall clothing existing outside either. For example, as disxon hill, picard enters the holo-deck in the clothes...So how is when someone gets wet in the holo deck, the water that is absorbed by a person's clothes can leave the deck? I guess it could be argued that the water is replicated, (like most food and beverages are), but then why aren't other holodeck things replicated. Afterall, the water "goes away" in the holo-deck when the program is ended, but the water on a person's clothes remains... #2-In keeping with the idea of number 1, in one next gen episode, Data and Gerordi created a Sherlock Holmes program for data where the villian would be a challenge "for data", as the episode notes. In this episode, the villian gains a knowledge of ones self in the holodeck. Picard decided, this is a sence that the hologram lives and saves the program in hopes of allowing him to leave in the future when it becomes possible to "replicate" (for lack of a better term) a human from a hologram, and allow them to leave the confines of the holodeck... Now, my question is, when the enterprise 1701-D was destroyed in "generations", would the recovery crew have 1-bothered to, 2-known to, and/or 3-actually transfered the holodecks files, a non-vital system, often used for entertainment, to a new computer when the rest of the enterprise would have been destroyed? Would that portion of the memory have even survived when the rest of the ship could not be salvaged? Did they just tell that "person", "yeah sure whatever you say", then end the program and chalk it up to his stupidity that they had no need to ever even save the program? Afterall, with the trouble he caused in that episode, being that he was "a match for data", wouldn't creating a "real" villian who, again would be a match for data, be just a stupid thing to do? last...#3. This is a fun one. At the end of "search for spock", the crew ends up on a bird of prey after setting the enterprise to self descruct. At this point, there is a klingon who asks kirk to kill him rather than take him prisoner. Kirk says he will kill him later, spitting on klingon honor. At the end of "search for spock", they land on vulcan. At the begining of "voyage home", the crew takes off, headed for earth. They never make it, have to go back in time, etc...when the crew brings back the whale, its in the holding cells I beleive. When the crew gets out of the ship (as it is sinking) there is no klingon. Did the writers just assume we forgot? What the heck happened to the klingon? Did kirk end up killing him? Is he on vulcan? did the whale eat him? Its kind of funny to think that that element was in the movie with all of the honor preaching that worf did in next gen... But I can't imagine that kirk would have killed him in the element of the storyline. Perhaps I missed something, but I don't think I did. What happened to that klingon prisoner???? |
star trek answers
i dont know where the thread went but i spent time typing the answers so i'm posting em:
the holodeck is made of holograms and forcefields. this was not clear in season one. in one episode (the pilot?) wesley comes out all wet cuz he fell in water. at that point the creators thought that holodecks would be made using transformer/replicator technology and it would really create stuff out of energy. they changed their minds. wasn't moriarti (i think thats the villian youre talking about) put into a little cube to live in. barcaley wonders if we all are just living in a little cube somewhere. maybe barcaley took the cube with him when he left enterprise. great...now i'm gonna be branded a bigger dork than i'm already branded |
Moving to TV Forum. -ptth-
|
Wow, I watched that tread disappear. I clicked on it, read it, and when I went to respond, it was gone. Well, here's what I wrote.
First things first, there are tons of discrepancys in the Star Trek universe. Most of them involve the holodeck. If you enjoy this sort of thing, I suggest you pick up a copy of "The Nitpicker's Guide for ....(insert ST series here)". I know the Next Gen books are out of print, but you can still order some of the books. As far as the Klingon is concerned, bare with me as it's been a while since I've seen ST 3 and 4, but is it feasable they left him on Vulcan? I don't remember them leaving with the Klingon, and it would make sense to leave him there instead of taking him back in time to Earth. |
|
my repliy got deleted
some things on the holodeck are actually replicated, like food and simple stuff they touch. so it's possibel for the water to be replicated and therefore 'real' they probably left the klingon(I think it was john larroquette) on vulcan, probably repatriated him through teh vulcan embassy on kronos if they had one in a later episode they put moriarty into a "mini holodeck" basically a laptop with this big memory cube. maybe they gave this to the holo engineering team that dr. zimmerman lead on a space station in orbit of jupiter before the destruction on the ent D |
also, they were on vulcan for months between movies
maybe they put him on another ship either to earth or kronos that could explain the knowledge of the events that the klingon ambassador in st4 had |
After seeing the "moving to tv" posts, I deleted the original
thread. Please post here: http://www.dvdtalk.com/forum/showthr...hreadid=191155 Dvdtalk is so diverse, sometimes I forget how many forums there are covering things other than dvd |
Thanks for the answers...in this thread and the other.
Sorry fot he confusion with that. I posted the questions in the "other" forum, forgetting there was a tv forum. I deleted the original thread and posted here in TV... So the fact that in the pilot westley was able to leave the holodeck wet, was an isolated occurance? That was the episode I was thinking of when I asked the question. I recall in generations, worf fell into the water too, but I don't remember what happened when he left, or if he was even shown leaving. I would think that anything "replicated" in the holodeck would not disappear when the program being run was ended. I think, again in that episode I was mentioning with the villain for data, moliarty, there was talk of using some kind of ray to screw up the holograms somehow, but it would also harm the doctor, whom they were going to attempt to save in the process. I would think that if things were replicated within the holodeck, they would need to be destroyed in a similar way when the program was ended. I could be totally wrong on this, thats why I am asking. Another question, just for time line purposes. Barclay was on the enterprise in first contact. Where does this fit into his appearances on voyager. I forget now how it all happened. I am sure this will be as easy as saying he left after the movie in the time line. Anyone? Just so people know, I started watching star trek only in the last two seasons of next gen, then I picked up a few deap space nines. Now with voager running nightly on upn, the originals on sci-fi, and TNN running next gen and the movies constantly, I am catching up and getting back into it. The only thing is I am seeing everything out of order (next gen) and I am trying to make sence of it all again. Please bare witht he stupid questions (like the one about barclay). |
after first contact Barclay transfered to Earth, where he eventually got on a project that was looking into long range communication, this was after Voyager had made contact with starfleet (there was an episode 2nd or 3rd season, where they tranfered the doc through a wormhole or something into the computer of a starfleet ship that had a emh mark2-andy dick)
what I never got about those "holodeck goes out of control" episodes is: why not just kill the power from outside? |
Holodeck's had "safety protocols" where you could and couldn't get hurt (by a weapon for example)..
In the pilot, wesley gets wet, by falling in the water.. Data jumps in after him, so I guess maybe if "safety protocols" are off, (or didn't exist then) he would have stayed 'wet' ... just babbling, probably wrong here.. |
Originally posted by Venusian and now to merge: http://www.dvdtalk.com/forum/showthr...hreadid=191157 Done... :) |
Originally posted by pilot Holodeck's had "safety protocols" where you could and couldn't get hurt (by a weapon for example).. In the pilot, wesley gets wet, by falling in the water.. Data jumps in after him, so I guess maybe if "safety protocols" are off, (or didn't exist then) he would have stayed 'wet' ... just babbling, probably wrong here.. weapon while it existed in the holodeck. So if you were shot by a bullet, when the program ended, the bullet would be gone, but the wound would remain if the person shot was not generated by the holodeck. That still wouldn't explain the water...again if it wasn't an isolated pilot episode only occurance. I can understand if they realized the "mistake" in their thinking and later changed the "rules". |
Originally posted by pilot In the pilot, wesley gets wet, by falling in the water.. Data jumps in after him, so I guess maybe if "safety protocols" are off, (or didn't exist then) he would have stayed 'wet' ... Oh yeah! I also have the skinny on why the holodeck cannot be shut down externally. It’s against Starfleet Protocol to willfully give fellow crewmembers blueb@lls. |
Originally posted by Kudama Oh yeah! I also have the skinny on why the holodeck cannot be shut down externally. It’s against Starfleet Protocol to willfully give fellow crewmembers blueb@lls. |
The Klingon Maltz (that was his name) actually travelled back in time with the Enterprise crew. With his Klingon honor sullied, he decided to stay in twentieth century Earth. McCoy gave him plastic surgery to look human, and he eventually became a prosecutor for the city of New York.
Captain Kruge was likewise spared from a fiery fate. Maltz was able to beam him up to the ship before he fell into the lava pit. However, Kruge proved to be less cooperative than Maltz, so McCoy gave him a lobotomy in addition to the facelift. Last reports indicate that he was driving a taxi in New York. |
Originally posted by Josh-da-man But who has to clean up the holodeck afterwards? Never mind. ;) pilot brings up an interesting point. Would the safety protocals prevent someone from drowning? It's not like the water was used as a weapon. Also, what if one crew member decides to kill another with his/her bare hands? andrew_randy, TNN are showing TNG in mostly the correct order. (At least lately.) That is, the Mon-Thur 8:00 shows are in order, the 11:00 shows are in order, but not showing the same episodes. However, the Friday and weekend shows are just lumped together by some common thread that defies reason. These questions may SEEM dumb, but somebody's making money off the "Nitpicker's Guide" books/tapes. Clearly somebody with too much spare time. :D |
Caught part of a TOS episode yesterday and it made me think (rare, occurence). When they go to the big screen to view another ship (thats in space) why are both ships always horozontally alighned to each other? would it be more likely for one ship to rotated the x-axis (x-axis being the one that goes from the view-screen-camera to the other ship)? There is no graivty in space, why do they all fly around in the same orientation?
-daveninja.com |
DaveNinja-- That's probably a rhetorical question, but...
Spaceships in movies and TV almost always have the same "up" orientation because it's visual shorthand -- because it makes most sense to the viewers... Like how in traditional war movies, the opposing forces always kept to their proper side of the screen, with one force moving left and the other moving right... It has nothing to do with realism, just storytelling convenience... |
Originally posted by DaveNinja Caught part of a TOS episode yesterday and it made me think (rare, occurence). When they go to the big screen to view another ship (thats in space) why are both ships always horozontally alighned to each other? would it be more likely for one ship to rotated the x-axis (x-axis being the one that goes from the view-screen-camera to the other ship)? There is no graivty in space, why do they all fly around in the same orientation? -daveninja.com |
Originally posted by Wizdar pilot brings up an interesting point. Would the safety protocals prevent someone from drowning? It's not like the water was used as a weapon. Also, what if one crew member decides to kill another with his/her bare hands? |
DaveNinja, because otherwise it wouldn't look cool? Or maybe more like what adamblast posted. ;)
This was somewhat (but not really) addressed in Wrath of Khan where someone mentioned that Khan was showing "two dimensional thinking." (BTW, x = left/right, y = front/back, z = up/down.) Trek is fond of showing shots where ships will "fly" like an airplane, especially doing banked turns which would be damn_hard to do in space. "Babylon 5", on the other hand, does a much better job of these things. |
as for the ships, I think they rotate to face each other on the same orientation. ST6 shows this after the battlecruiser regains control
|
Yeah, the 2D thinking was mentioned by pointy ears and then Kirk dropped the ship on the Z axis and blew him away.
I seem to remember one episode when Wheaton was on the holodeck with a friend, the holodeck door opened as Picard was walking by and a snowball Wheaton threw hit the captain. That would support the replicating theory. As for Barclay......I liked him better a Howlin Mad on A-Team :) He had a rough life on TNG J |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:11 PM. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.