DVD Talk Forum

DVD Talk Forum (https://forum.dvdtalk.com/)
-   Tech Talk (https://forum.dvdtalk.com/tech-talk-10/)
-   -   Better Anti-virus program AVG vs Trend Micro? (https://forum.dvdtalk.com/tech-talk/495045-better-anti-virus-program-avg-vs-trend-micro.html)

UAIOE 03-12-07 03:11 PM

Better Anti-virus program AVG vs Trend Micro?
 
My Norton is close to running out (thankfully) and I have decided to look into either AVG or Trend Micro anti-virus to replace it.

Aside from AVG being free, which would be better?

jfoobar 03-12-07 04:04 PM

Even among the three most prominent free AV scanners, AVG has been and continues to be the worst based on its ability to accurately detect malicious code. AntiVir and AVAST are both better, with AntiVir being the better choice due to its traditionally lower false-positive rates. In fact, AntiVir has proven itself to be one of the very best scanners period, free or commercial, in many recent tests.

Among commercial scanners, Kaspersky and F-Secure virtually always do well. I personally run F-Secure at home due partially to their excellent products and partially because they are just a great company. Being in the Infosec business myself, their blog is one of my favorite reads.

Here are the results of the last two comprehensive tests from Andreas Cleminti (av-comparatives.org):

http://www.av-comparatives.org/seite...e/report11.pdf
http://www.av-comparatives.org/seite...e/report13.pdf

Here is the PC World summary article on the most recent test:

http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,12...s/article.html

Not sure why Clementi doesn't include Trend Micro/PC-Cillin in his tests. From tests in the past, like those run in 2004-2005 over at www.av-test.org, TM always did very well.

Now for some personal experience, FWIW:

A big part of my job is identifying and analyzing malicious code. One of the tools I have at my disposal is an internally-maintained multi-package AV scanner similar to the ones available online at places like www.virustotal.com and www.jotti.org. To be honest, most of what I end up evaluating is Trojan-installing executable files and Trojans themselves. However, in my testing over the past couple of years, AVG consistently fails to detect at an even reasonable rate. Kaspersky does as well as or better than anyone, but that success rate is only about 75% on objects that are known-malicious.

It should be noted that AV in general is less effective at keeping you "safe" online than it used to be.

UAIOE 03-13-07 12:25 AM

So what would you say is the best home anti-virus program, F-Secure?

Chrisedge 03-13-07 10:56 AM

I'm running AVG free mainly since it doesn't bog down my system. I do have Webroot's new Spy Sweeper and AntiVirus (Sophos) sitting here. I don't want to pay and don't want my systems to slow down. Would AntiVir be better than the webroot software?

4KRG 03-13-07 01:11 PM

:lol: - round 34 of my AV tool can kick your AV tool's butt

Try the free AOL tool, it is Kaspersky minus a few features.

http://www.activevirusshield.com/ant...eav/index.adp?

Shazam 03-13-07 02:09 PM


Originally Posted by 4KRG
:lol: - round 34 of my AV tool can kick your AV tool's butt

Try the free AOL tool, it is Kaspersky minus a few features.

http://www.activevirusshield.com/ant...eav/index.adp?

Whoo hoo! Buh bye Avast!

Shazam 03-13-07 11:26 PM

Stupid AVS won't install on my computer. Stupid piece of AOL poo.

DVD Polizei 03-13-07 11:33 PM

I've been running AVG for over 2 years without any viruses or computer problems. Soooo, not sure why AVG is so bad. But that's just me. I still use it in conjunction with the OS's firewall and exceptions.

Shazam 03-14-07 12:56 AM

Whoo hoo! Got AVS to work. Had to move the install program to a directory with acceptable characters.

4KRG 03-14-07 08:55 AM


Originally Posted by DVD Polizei
I've been running AVG for over 2 years without any viruses or computer problems.

I am sorry, but I see this posted at least 1000 times in these types of threads and I am not singling you out, however, this comment means absolutely noting to anyone reading it and trying to decide on an anti virus program for themselves.

It is possible your machine *IS* infected with something and you just don't know it. It is also possible that MY machine is infected and I just don't know it. Therefore stating you are virus free because of XYZ Anti-Virus tool is meaningless to anyone and everyone that reads it.

covenant 03-14-07 11:41 AM


Originally Posted by DVD Polizei
I've been running AVG for over 2 years without any viruses or computer problems. Soooo, not sure why AVG is so bad.

Same here, we have Anti-Malware installed on over 20 PCs at work without a hitch. We briefly dabbled with PCcillan but it was absolute crap for spyware. Avast is really nice and we're looking at their Server and Professional editions.

Altimus Prime 03-14-07 01:25 PM

Any thoughts on that Active Security Monitor that's also at the aol site?

And - for what it's worth - I use AVG, AdAware and Spybot - and have never had an identified virus or related problem. And I've used them to remove infections from other computers.

jfoobar 03-14-07 09:03 PM


Originally Posted by 4KRG
I am sorry, but I see this posted at least 1000 times in these types of threads and I am not singling you out, however, this comment means absolutely noting to anyone reading it and trying to decide on an anti virus program for themselves.

It is possible your machine *IS* infected with something and you just don't know it. It is also possible that MY machine is infected and I just don't know it. Therefore stating you are virus free because of XYZ Anti-Virus tool is meaningless to anyone and everyone that reads it.

Yup, and for the 1000th time I snickered when I read it. It should be added to the definitive list of logical fallacies as the "Antivirus Fallacy."

Altimus Prime 03-14-07 09:07 PM

OK, I'm running the active security monitor.

My score: 89, Excellent.

Firewall: Excellent
Virus protection: Excellent
Spyware protection: Excellent
Windows & browser: Excellent
Wireless security: NA
PC Utilities: Poor (???)
P2P Software: Excellent

Ran it a second time and got a 93. The breakdown was the same.

PC Utilities is coming up as poor because it says a pc optimization program is not detected on this pc, and a file backup program is not detected on this pc. Hmm.... ???

DVD Polizei 03-14-07 11:40 PM

ASV is highly questionable. My Firewall, Virus, and Windows & Browser rate Excellent, but since I don't have "PC Utilities" or "Spyware Protection", I get a 72. :lol:

ASV says to install MULTIPLE spyware apps to "further prevent infection". That is just nuts and is asking for MORE computer problems.

namja 03-15-07 07:53 AM

My roommate has two computers. No anti-virus on either.
(1) 6 year old PC (it has Pentium II processor): "I don't go to porn sites on that one. I only check e-mail and ESPN and stuff, so I don't need anti-virus."
(2) New Apple MacBook: "It's a Mac. I don't need anti-virus on a Mac, right?"

Mopower 03-15-07 08:17 AM

It's funny because no matter who you talk to any type of antivirus program is going to be the worse one or the best one. Today it's AVG. Supposedly. Go to a different computer forum and ask the same question and all these "computer experts" will chime in about how AVG is the best and how the ones recommended here are the worse. It's like asking what kind of blank DVD media to buy. I've used Symantec Corp and AVG over the past 5 years and have had zero viruses. I even use those online scanners and they find nothing. So it's not AVG not telling me about a virus.

namja 03-15-07 08:32 AM


Originally Posted by JustinS
Here are the results of the last two comprehensive tests from Andreas Cleminti (av-comparatives.org):

http://www.av-comparatives.org/seite...e/report11.pdf
http://www.av-comparatives.org/seite...e/report13.pdf

Here is the PC World summary article on the most recent test:

http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,12...s/article.html

Interesting stuff. I guess I'll try AntiVir on my computer and see how that runs.

4KRG 03-15-07 09:37 AM

I reocmmended the AOl link as good alternative free tool that is using the base Kaspersky engine for detection. It is however missing some very good features the real Kaspersky includes.

As the the ratings from the secutiry monitor, yeah I would even waste my time running it and I never suggested anyone run it.


Antivir will slow your computer down. It's good, but requires resources and since most people complain about symantec for the same reason, I thought I would mention it here.


Virus creation has run a course from kids having fun and trying to reak havoc to organized crime trying to turn a profit from it. Now that serious players with resources are in the game, the AV companies are losing and they know it.

My bigger point is that no AV tool can protect you to the point where you can claim with certainty that you have had no infections while using it. Multiple scanners help, but there are things out there that no AV tool can detect and I wish I didn't know that to be a fact.

bretski 03-15-07 10:05 AM


Originally Posted by 4KRG
Virus creation has run a course from kids having fun and trying to reak havoc to organized crime trying to turn a profit from it. Now that serious players with resources are in the game, the AV companies are losing and they know it.

My bigger point is that no AV tool can protect you to the point where you can claim with certainty that you have had no infections while using it. Multiple scanners help, but there are things out there that no AV tool can detect and I wish I didn't know that to be a fact.

Amen to that. Every time I get a new email from SANS, I want to curl up in the fetal position and cry...

Altimus Prime 03-15-07 01:11 PM


Originally Posted by 4KRG
As the the ratings from the security monitor, yeah I would even waste my time running it and I never suggested anyone run it.

Well, I did ask for thoughts on the value of using that, but no one said anything.

I'm going to uninstall it, because it's annoying.

4KRG 03-15-07 04:30 PM


Originally Posted by bretski
Amen to that. Every time I get a new email from SANS, I want to curl up in the fetal position and cry...

Try living it :) I recently went through a situation where by complete accident we found machines infected with "something".

It was ugly and to this day Symantec can not reliably detect the something and most likely never will.

bretski 03-15-07 06:08 PM


Originally Posted by 4KRG
Try living it :) I recently went through a situation where by complete accident we found machines infected with "something".

It was ugly and to this day Symantec can not reliably detect the something and most likely never will.

Been there, done that. :) When I was sys admin @ an int'l studies grad school, we had a couple of Russian profs who always found a way to pick up some gnarly beasties. I finally resorted to keeping imaged HDDs in my desk just for them...

Diverting back to topic, we used F-Prot/F-Secure back then, and it is a damn good product. I was on a 1st name basis with a few of their techs. Still use it on my home machine.

jfoobar 03-15-07 10:13 PM


Originally Posted by bretski
Amen to that. Every time I get a new email from SANS, I want to curl up in the fetal position and cry...

You want to cry because...Steve Northcutt is such a money-grubbing whore?

bretski 03-17-07 09:41 AM


Originally Posted by JustinS
You want to cry because...Steve Northcutt is such a money-grubbing whore?

rotfl yeah, something like that...


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:47 PM.


Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.