Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > General Discussions > Tech Talk
Reload this Page >

Will Windows 98 run on a 486?

Tech Talk Discuss PC Hardware, Software, Internet and Other Technology

Will Windows 98 run on a 486?

Old 10-02-01, 09:08 PM
  #1  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 4,030
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Will Windows 98 run on a 486?

I'm trying to set it up on a Packard Bell that currently has Windows 3.11 on it. This is just a computer for my in-laws to check e-mail with but I am running into problems.
Old 10-02-01, 09:14 PM
  #2  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,865
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
not sure about 98, but I know 95 runs decent on a 486 as long as it's not a super slow 486(like an SX 25mhz) and as long as you have around 16mb of ram. Don't know about 98 though.
Old 10-03-01, 12:02 AM
  #3  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: MN
Posts: 1,558
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It will run, but not well. Try WIN95 and strip it down as far as you can.
Old 10-03-01, 12:23 AM
  #4  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 16,173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From MS
Before you purchase Windows 98, make sure that your computer meets the minimum hardware requirements for running Windows 98. The minimum hardware requirements include:

486DX 66 megahertz (MHz) or faster processor (Pentium recommended)


16 megabytes (MBs) of memory (24 MB recommended)


120 MB of free hard disk space (typical installation requires approximately 195 MB of free hard disk space, but the required space may vary from 120 MB to 295 MB, depending on your computer's configuration and the options that you choose to install)


CD-ROM or DVD-ROM drive


3.5-inch high-density floppy disk drive


Video adapter and monitor that support video graphics adapter (VGA) or higher resolution


Microsoft Mouse or compatible pointing device
But in my experience, a Pentium I 166mhz with 64MB of ram, was WAY TOO SLOW to use with Win 98, but perfectly fine with Win 95
Old 10-03-01, 01:10 AM
  #5  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Fascination Street
Posts: 6,521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you've got a BUTTLOAD of RAM maybe, otherwise forget it.
Old 10-03-01, 03:21 AM
  #6  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Arizona, USA
Posts: 23,460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes and No.

Yes - it will run if you really want.

No - I would not recommend it because you should use the OS that your PC hardware was built for. Upgrading your OS is for suckers. j/k. Well your 486 would be much better off with a less-robust OS like Win95osr2.1 which was the last version of Windows 95 to come out before Win98. It's got many features that Win98 has, but it isn't going to choke your system. Plus - I've found Win95 sr2.1 to be more stable than any subsequent Windows OS (except for 2000).
Old 10-03-01, 04:04 AM
  #7  
Stealth Moderator
 
namja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: In Transit, HQ
Posts: 25,006
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
depends on your definition of "run" ...

if taking 5 minutes to start up, taking 30 seconds for the mouse click to respond, freezing every other time you turn on the computer counts as "running" then yes.

otherwise no.

try Windows 95. it's much better on slower computers.
Old 10-03-01, 10:47 PM
  #8  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: MN
Posts: 1,558
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A bit OT, but one of my old clients put Win 2K on a Pentium 120 with 16MB of RAM. Now that was one slooooooooow machine.
Old 10-03-01, 10:59 PM
  #9  
X
Administrator
 
X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1987
Location: AA-
Posts: 10,763
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally posted by Scarecrow
A bit OT, but one of my old clients put Win 2K on a Pentium 120 with 16MB of RAM. Now that was one slooooooooow machine.
Hell, I put it on a 75MHz notebook with 24MB. Not very impressive performance, but then I used to run NT4 server along with SQL Server on it.
Old 10-03-01, 11:11 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Section 529, Wrigley Field
Posts: 884
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I tried to put it on my 486 SX a few years ago and it didn't work. The fact that the SX lacked the math co-processor is what caused my problem if I remember right. So if you are setting it up on 486 SX that may be your problem. I put an older version of 95 on mine and it worked out fine.
Old 10-03-01, 11:29 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Canadaaaa
Posts: 839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
.
Originally posted by 4KRG
From MS


But in my experience, a Pentium I 166mhz with 64MB of ram, was WAY TOO SLOW to use with Win 98, but perfectly fine with Win 95
I have/had (I gave it to my syster) a Pentium 166 with 64 megs of RAM running Win98 and had no problems. Well configured it is about the same speed as win95 (which I was running with 32 megs of RAM, at that time Pentium200 was the fastest you could get...). The P166 65 megs RAM is now running WinME without problems (with crappy stuff like system restore disabled).

I won't install WinXP on it tho
Old 10-04-01, 12:27 AM
  #12  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 16,173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Real Boba Fett
.

I have/had (I gave it to my syster) a Pentium 166 with 64 megs of RAM running Win98 and had no problems. Well configured it is about the same speed as win95 (which I was running with 32 megs of RAM, at that time Pentium200 was the fastest you could get...). The P166 65 megs RAM is now running WinME without problems (with crappy stuff like system restore disabled).

I won't install WinXP on it tho


Some people tolerate slow better than others

I would rather not use a computer than use a p166 with 64mb of ram and win98.


Now the same computer with 128mb of ram and windows NT is much faster....
Old 10-04-01, 02:22 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Canadaaaa
Posts: 839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by 4KRG




Some people tolerate slow better than others

I would rather not use a computer than use a p166 with 64mb of ram and win98.


Now the same computer with 128mb of ram and windows NT is much faster....

He he he

I have to agree with you, that is why I gave it to my sister and got an Athlon

But I would have to say that I didn't really see a speed decrease from the P166 32 megs of RAM running Win95 (that system cost me an arm at the time, it was about the best you could get) and the same P166 with 64 megs of RAM running Win98.

Last summer, I worked (summer job, I am a student) for Bell Canada and I had a P166 32 megs of RAM running NT4... now that is slow, a real pain! They were replacing their older P166-P2 300 with newer computers... but of course this was after I left!

I am just glad to be back at university and use nice Athlon 1.3 Ghz with 22' Samsung Flat screen monitor... ahhhh
Old 10-04-01, 09:47 PM
  #14  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: South Surrey, BC
Posts: 3,990
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I gave someone a 486-133 with 16mb of RAM , and it worked OK. It was slow, but she couldn't argue with the price. More RAM would speed such a machine up a lot .

I found a P133 in the garbage a while back. Just for my own curiosity, I upgraded it to modern components (AGP mobo, ATA/66 HD, 128mb RAM) to see how well it would work with WinME and W2K. The answer proved to be, suprisingly well. I would suspect the main bottlenecks with these machines is the lack of RAM.

RD

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.