DVD Talk Forum

DVD Talk Forum (https://forum.dvdtalk.com/)
-   Store Forum (https://forum.dvdtalk.com/store-forum-7/)
-   -   My letter to Amazon.com. (https://forum.dvdtalk.com/store-forum/215741-my-letter-amazon-com.html)

GatorDeb 06-18-02 07:40 PM


Originally posted by calhoun07
Hmmmm...maybe if we visited the electronics and homewares stores more frequently, and never or rarely ordered books and DVDs, we would be getting books and DVDs in our gold box!


In a weird kind of Amazon way, that makes sense!

GatorDeb 06-18-02 07:42 PM


Originally posted by batjann
that wierd looking rolling yawning head was suppsosed to be a sideways smiley with a cute little button nose. oh well :)
That's the "O" face - the resident face of the Other forum :)

:0)

jimmywong 06-20-02 12:21 PM

I think the whole point is that these Gold Boxes are supposed to be something we are interested in given our ordering history. I don't really check it anymore. There is no incentive because they keep offering rice cookers and silverware sets that I have no interest in. I believe that the intent of the original poster was along these lines --- if you don't give me an incentive to check the Gold Box, it is pretty much useless.

bardevious 06-20-02 01:36 PM


Originally posted by MrN
Maybe they're trying to push the stores you've never shopped before? We shouldn't assume that there isn't an inverse relationship to your history.

Possibly the people getting the DVD offers don't have enough of an order history or they've only shopped for books etc.?


Excellent point, and it makes perfect sense in light of what everyone seems to be saying about the items they're getting in their box.

vaporware 06-21-02 03:30 PM

Let's see, i've never bought any appliences or kitchen utensils from them but that's what my gold box has everytime i check.

Josh-da-man 06-21-02 04:42 PM


Originally posted by vapoRware
Let's see, i've never bought any appliences or kitchen utensils from them but that's what my gold box has everytime i check.
What's with Amazon pushing so many things like kitchen appliances, tools/hardware, toys, and lawn furniture?

Isn't this the kind of stuff people are just going to buy at Target or Wal-Mart? And they're bigger and heavier than books/CDs/DVDs, so it has increased warehousing/shipping costs added in, too.

There's a certain novelty in buying books, music and movies from someplace like Amazon, where there are reviews and bestseller lists, and the listmania stuff and wishlists features are kind of neat, too, but if I'm shopping for a blender or patio furniture, I'm going to shop at a brick and mortar store where I can actually see what I'm getting, rather than just seeing a little JPG or GIF of it. I'm assuming returns are easier, too.

It seems like Amazon is wasting their time expanding into areas where there probably isn't a lot of interest, or a need to be filled. It looks to me like they're just blowing a lot of money to expand into areas that aren't going to be profitable.

It sounds like the "Gold Box" is just a way to promote these Amazon "stores" that nobody is interested in.

calhoun07 06-21-02 07:33 PM


Originally posted by Josh-da-man


What's with Amazon pushing so many things like kitchen appliances, tools/hardware, toys, and lawn furniture?

Isn't this the kind of stuff people are just going to buy at Target or Wal-Mart? And they're bigger and heavier than books/CDs/DVDs, so it has increased warehousing/shipping costs added in, too.

There's a certain novelty in buying books, music and movies from someplace like Amazon, where there are reviews and bestseller lists, and the listmania stuff and wishlists features are kind of neat, too, but if I'm shopping for a blender or patio furniture, I'm going to shop at a brick and mortar store where I can actually see what I'm getting, rather than just seeing a little JPG or GIF of it. I'm assuming returns are easier, too.

It seems like Amazon is wasting their time expanding into areas where there probably isn't a lot of interest, or a need to be filled. It looks to me like they're just blowing a lot of money to expand into areas that aren't going to be profitable.

It sounds like the "Gold Box" is just a way to promote these Amazon "stores" that nobody is interested in.

Well, there is nothing wrong with that. It's been known that Amazon.com has been losing money on those stores. So they came up with the "gold box" as a marketing plan. Yeah, they say it's based on your purchase history and blah blah blah, but we all know good and well that's PR. I never believe anything I hear in advertising, so why should amazon.com be any different? I can't believe people are still complaining about this, personally. And as for who might be interested in things like this...well, maybe people who don't have the means to go out shopping, either due to physical problems or what have you. I am not defending amazon.com, as I would also rather them cut these dead weight stores and focus on offering better prices on the stuff we are attracted to their site for, but I would not waste my time complaining about the gold box either.

And I am sure there must be customers out there who would order from these stores. Maybe single people or people with money or people with physical limitations that would make it hard for them to get these kinds of products from b&m's.

Maybe if we ignore the gold box, it will just go away. I think ignoring it has more of an effect anyway, since they will see not many people are clicking on it and buying things from there. But til then you can't blame them for trying.

pd071 06-25-02 09:36 PM

just as a note for future reference, don't ever expect a personal response from amazon. its company policy to not send a personal response. anyone doing so can be fired on spot.

batjann 06-26-02 09:37 AM

Why would they not be able to send a personal responce? I understand sending out mostly pre-written standard responces, as with getting hundreds to thousands of e-mails a day, if they were to answer each one personally they would never get through the mails and e-mail responces would take forever. But every once in a while a question warrants a personal responce. Can they really be fired? what gives? that doesn't make any sense.

GatorDeb 06-26-02 03:22 PM


Originally posted by batjann
Why would they not be able to send a personal responce? I understand sending out mostly pre-written standard responces, as with getting hundreds to thousands of e-mails a day, if they were to answer each one personally they would never get through the mails and e-mail responces would take forever. But every once in a while a question warrants a personal responce. Can they really be fired? what gives? that doesn't make any sense.
Uh, that was sarcasm... :)

dave955 06-26-02 11:08 PM

The only time I've written Jeff Bezos I got a personal reply from the head of the DVD store along with a $20 promotional coupon, since my letter was about pricing problems.

dablueguy 06-27-02 01:50 AM

Did you write or e-mail? If e-mail, please post it as I have a problem I'd like to get taken care of.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:10 PM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.