Sports Talk Discuss all things Sports Related

RFK - switching between baseball and soccer

Old 04-26-05, 12:46 PM
  #1  
DVD Talk Legend
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: frass canyon
Posts: 16,249
RFK - switching between baseball and soccer

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...042501267.html
D.C. United might have been playing on a lopsided field at RFK Stadium on Saturday night.

According to a report filed by the MLS officiating crew following United's game against the New England Revolution, there appeared to be a six-yard difference between the two diagonal lengths of the field.

Before the game, two officials "very unscientifically walked it off," Joe Machnik, who oversees MLS's on-field competition, said in a telephone interview yesterday. "One of the [lengths] was six yards longer than the other, which could mean the field was not a true rectangle and was more like [another type of] parallelogram.
The MLB and MLS season pretty much overlap completely. I realize the United were playing at RFK for years, but would it be that difficult to have them play in FedEx or Byrd Stadium at the University of Maryland? Especially since the United are supposed to get their own, brand new, "soccer only" facility.
RoyalTea is offline  
Old 04-26-05, 12:47 PM
  #2  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Lyon Estates
Posts: 10,795
I was at last nights Nats game. I couldn't figure out (from the faint lines on the field) how a full soccer fueld would fit.
dick_grayson is offline  
Old 04-26-05, 12:49 PM
  #3  
DVD Talk God
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Directionally Challenged (for DirecTV)
Posts: 122,918
Originally Posted by dick_grayson
I was at last nights Nats game. I couldn't figure out (from the faint lines on the field) how a full soccer fueld would fit.

The seats in one part of the stadium are on rollers and are moved for soccer (and football back in the day).
Red Dog is offline  
Old 04-26-05, 12:50 PM
  #4  
DVD Talk God
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Directionally Challenged (for DirecTV)
Posts: 122,918
I like Tony Kornheiser's idea. Let the United play in Lot 8 of the stadium.
Red Dog is offline  
Old 04-26-05, 12:51 PM
  #5  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Lyon Estates
Posts: 10,795
Originally Posted by Red Dog
The seats in one part of the stadium are on rollers and are moved for soccer (and football back in the day).

ahh, yeah I can see it now.
dick_grayson is offline  
Old 04-26-05, 12:53 PM
  #6  
DVD Talk Legend
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: frass canyon
Posts: 16,249
Originally Posted by dick_grayson
I was at last nights Nats game. I couldn't figure out (from the faint lines on the field) how a full soccer fueld would fit.
baseball:


soccer:
RoyalTea is offline  
Old 04-26-05, 01:17 PM
  #7  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Western NY
Posts: 2,196
We had the same problem in Rochester (N.Y.). Our Minor League baseball team shared Frontier Field with the A-League Rhinos for about nine years. The field ended up getting chewed to pieces. They even imported natural turf from somewhere to patch up sore spots. Didn't work. One team was always defending a penalty area on the right side of the baseball infield. When the field was wet, it was a disaster.

Paetec Park, the new soccer-specific stadium, is set to open this fall (hopefully by playoff time).
Tommy_Harn is offline  
Old 04-26-05, 01:28 PM
  #8  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chicago->D.C.
Posts: 6,524
Originally Posted by RoyalTea
I realize the United were playing at RFK for years, but would it be that difficult to have them play in FedEx or Byrd Stadium at the University of Maryland? Especially since the United are supposed to get their own, brand new, "soccer only" facility.
I can't believe that soccer would require the seating capacity of RFK, or FedEx for that matter. I see no reason why they just do not play at a local college. But I could be wrong.
Flashback is offline  
Old 04-26-05, 01:30 PM
  #9  
DVD Talk God
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Directionally Challenged (for DirecTV)
Posts: 122,918
Originally Posted by Flashback
I can't believe that soccer would require the seating capacity of RFK, or FedEx for that matter. I see no reason why they just do not play at a local college. But I could be wrong.

They actually close off the upper deck at RFK for United games.
Red Dog is offline  
Old 04-26-05, 01:43 PM
  #10  
DVD Talk Legend
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: frass canyon
Posts: 16,249
Chicago plays in Soldier Field
DC plays at RFK
KC plays at Arrowhead
NY/NJ plays at Giants Stadium
NE plays at Foxboro
Colorado plays at Mile High
Dallas plays at the Cotton Bowl
Salt Lake plays at Rice-Eccles

It's not unusual for MLS teams to play in stadiums that hold a lot more people than the teams require, they just don't sell tickets for every single seat.
RoyalTea is offline  
Old 04-26-05, 06:36 PM
  #11  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Bacon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: the 870
Posts: 21,177
Originally Posted by Red Dog
I like Tony Kornheiser's idea. Let the United play in Lot 8 of the stadium.
I agree, it's not like more than a few thousand hundred go to MLS games anyway
Bacon is offline  
Old 04-26-05, 06:40 PM
  #12  
DVD Talk Legend
 
chrisih8u's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: A few miles north of the Cape
Posts: 18,335
Quick fact: This is the first time the word "parallelogram" has been used in the sports forum.
chrisih8u is offline  
Old 04-26-05, 10:51 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Culver City, CA, USA
Posts: 417
Originally Posted by RoyalTea
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...042501267.html The MLB and MLS season pretty much overlap completely. I realize the United were playing at RFK for years, but would it be that difficult to have them play in FedEx or Byrd Stadium at the University of Maryland? Especially since the United are supposed to get their own, brand new, "soccer only" facility.

1) Because "we" (speaking as a season ticket holder while I lived in DC) were there first. We have a lease with DCSEC.

2) UM-College Park does not want a professional sports team there, especially with the pretty crummy infastructure around the stadium in re: transit.

3) FedEx is more expensive to rent, and we have a lease at RFK (see #1).
RMSpuhler is offline  
Old 04-27-05, 01:11 AM
  #14  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Columbia, MD, USA
Posts: 11,140
And the United are four time champs, send the Nats over to Prince William County or something
Jericho is offline  
Old 04-27-05, 08:37 AM
  #15  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chicago->D.C.
Posts: 6,524
Originally Posted by RoyalTea
Chicago plays in Soldier Field
This is the last year for that (pretty sure). They are playing somewhere else with a proper playing field and much smaller.
Flashback is offline  
Old 04-27-05, 09:00 AM
  #16  
DVD Talk Legend
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: frass canyon
Posts: 16,249
Originally Posted by Jericho
And the United are four time champs ...
yeah, but it's SOCCER.
RoyalTea is offline  
Old 04-27-05, 07:50 PM
  #17  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Bacon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: the 870
Posts: 21,177
Originally Posted by RoyalTea
yeah, but it's SOCCER.
Which sadly is more of a sport than the NBA
Bacon is offline  
Old 04-27-05, 11:06 PM
  #18  
Moderator
 
wendersfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Nuova Repubblica di SalÚ
Posts: 32,857
Originally Posted by Canadian Bacon
I agree, it's not like more than a few thousand hundred go to MLS games anyway
And you clearly have no idea what you're talking about, do you?
wendersfan is offline  
Old 04-28-05, 10:02 AM
  #19  
DVD Talk God
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Directionally Challenged (for DirecTV)
Posts: 122,918
Originally Posted by RMSpuhler
2) UM-College Park does not want a professional sports team there, especially with the pretty crummy infastructure around the stadium in re: transit.

The Baltimore Stars played there in 1985 in the USFL. They drew bigger crowds than what the United draw, so I don't see what the issue is.
Red Dog is offline  
Old 04-28-05, 11:23 AM
  #20  
Retired
 
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 27,449
I imagine traffic is worse than it was then, but I still can't imagine it's a big issue. Though it does absolute suck to get into and out of campus during a sporting event or during rush hour, no good way to get from the interstate to campus and vice versa.

UMD might just not want them on Byrd. Hell the UMD soccer team doesn't even play on Byrd, they put bleachers in at the track and a soccer field in the middle of it.
Josh H is offline  
Old 04-28-05, 12:37 PM
  #21  
DVD Talk God
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Directionally Challenged (for DirecTV)
Posts: 122,918
Originally Posted by Josh Hinkle
Hell the UMD soccer team doesn't even play on Byrd, they put bleachers in at the track and a soccer field in the middle of it.

Sounds like Tony K's Lot 8 idea has some precedent.
Red Dog is offline  
Old 04-28-05, 01:20 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Culver City, CA, USA
Posts: 417
Originally Posted by Red Dog
The Baltimore Stars played there in 1985 in the USFL. They drew bigger crowds than what the United draw, so I don't see what the issue is.
You'd be right, if you weren't so wrong.

1985 Baltimore Stars: 14,275
(source: http://www.remembertheusfl.8m.com/attendance.html)

2004 DC United: 17,232
(source: http://www.mlsnet.com/MLS/history/ar...t=stats_league)

What's more likely is what Josh is saying - UM-CP just doesn't want United there, which is fine, because United shouldn't have to move for some baseball experiment.

RS
RMSpuhler is offline  
Old 04-28-05, 01:43 PM
  #23  
DVD Talk God
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Directionally Challenged (for DirecTV)
Posts: 122,918
Originally Posted by RMSpuhler
You'd be right, if you weren't so wrong.

1985 Baltimore Stars: 14,275
(source: http://www.remembertheusfl.8m.com/attendance.html)

2004 DC United: 17,232
(source: http://www.mlsnet.com/MLS/history/ar...t=stats_league)

What's more likely is what Josh is saying - UM-CP just doesn't want United there, which is fine, because United shouldn't have to move for some baseball experiment.

RS

Fair enough. Still, the numbers are close.

Baseball experiment. Here's a prediction - the Washington Nationals will be around longer than DC United and the entire MLS.
Red Dog is offline  
Old 04-30-05, 06:01 PM
  #24  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: The sprawling metropolis of Manassas Park, VA USA
Posts: 3,616
Originally Posted by Jericho
And the United are four time champs, send the Nats over to Prince William County or something

Sure, we'll take em... would be an upgrade over the Prince William Cannons...
Foole is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service

Copyright © 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.