AEROSMITH, VAN HALEN, GUNS N' ROSES Members On ROLLING STONE' Top Feuds Of All Time List - Nov. 29, 2010
AEROSMITH, VAN HALEN and GUNS N' ROSES are featured in Rolling Stone magazine's top feuds in rock and roll history. The entire list is as follows:

01. Mick Jagger and Keith Richards - THE ROLLING STONES
02. Paul Simon and Art Garfunkel - SIMON & GARFUNKEL
03. Steven Tyler and Joe Perry - AEROSMITH
04. Pete Townshend and Roger Daltrey - THE WHO
05. Ray and Dave Davies - THE KINKS
06. John Lennon, Paul McCartney and George Harrison - THE BEATLES
07. David Gilmour and Roger Waters - PINK FLOYD
08. Don and Phil Everly - THE EVERLY BROTHERS
09. Liam and Noel Gallagher - OASIS
10. Axl Rose and Slash - GUNS N' ROSES
11. Eddie Van Halen and David Lee Roth - VAN HALEN

I'm trying real hard to figure out that abominably misused apostrophe in the subject header.

Its common for people to have problem's with proper punctuation placement.

Poor Ringo. Even gets left out of the Beatle's fueds.

Hopefully the actual article elaborates...are we supposed to guess what feuds were about?

Left out very nasty one between the Fogerty brothers.
Eagles
Alice Cooper band
Paul Rodgers/Mick Ralphs
Jefferson Starship
Amuch bigger stink between Jagger/Richards with Mick Taylor than they've ever had between themselves.

This is one of those Rolling Stone puff pieces you feel like you've read a hundred times.

http://www.rollingstone.com/music/photos/53622/235943

Mick Taylor? I just read Keith's autobiography and he really had nothing bad to say about Mick Taylor who was quite a quiet and reserved fellow. He did devote quite a few pages to how much of an asshole Brian Jones was.

I don't ever recall hearing any problems with Pete & Roger in The Who.

Really left out Mustaine/Metallica?

Nigel Tufnel and David St. Hubbins should be at least Top 5.

For sure yeah

They haven't been able to stomach the sight of each other for two decades now. But it's a mutual understanding: nobody can sing Pete's songs like Roger, and Roger without Pete's songs is functionally useless.

Come on. Who can forget Ride a Rock Horse?

I guess I was assuming there would be some fueds between bands listed, such as Blur/Oasis and Rapper A vs. Rapper B.

More of a financial riff than personal. When Taylor replaced Jones he was made a full member of the band, all earnings split 6 ways(including Jones estate). Since he was made a full member Taylor has received an equal share of all earnings to this day. Taylor receives just as much money for the albums and tours since he left in '75 as the other members. Even thougfh he retired, Wyman got paid just as much for the tours without him as the members who toured did. All full members of the band split profits equally. This rubs Jagger and Richards the wrong way. That is why they never made Ron Wood a member of the band. They pay him to play on the records and tour for a flat fee like other highed help. Taylor also took them to court for money owed.

Mike Love vs. Brian Wilson not being #1 renders the list invalid.

I'd much rather see a list of feuds between Rolling Stone magazine and bands they trash for no reason.

Rolling Stone puts these lists out so people will discuss "Rolling Stone" for 5 minutes, and hopefully forget that the magazine hasn't been relevant since the last time Guns N' Roses was on the cover.

A magazine whose primary circulation consists of people who get the magazine because of a link they followed on the "Hot Deals" forum, is a joke.

Apparently only white people do the feudin'.

Seriously...shouldn't 2Pac vs Biggie be the top feud of all time in music, you know, considering it led to them both being killed? (Allegedly, of course...)

Hey now, let's be fair, most magazines are hurting for subscriptions these days.

That being said, Rolling Stone is a total joke.

What do you think this is, Ebony?

What am I going to do with these 40 subscriptions to Vibe?

Well it is a liberal magazine.