DVD Talk review of '9 to 5: Days in Porn'
05-21-10 | 07:34 PM
#1
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Hero
DVD Talk review of '9 to 5: Days in Porn'
I read Cameron McGaughy's DVD review of 9 to 5: Days in Porn at http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/read.php?ID=43853 and...
out of curiosity, when was this doc made? since according to "research", Sasha is almost 23 now. Did it really take 4 years to get this movie finished and released?
out of curiosity, when was this doc made? since according to "research", Sasha is almost 23 now. Did it really take 4 years to get this movie finished and released?
05-21-10 | 09:27 PM
#2
DVD Talk Reviewer
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: DC Metro
Re: DVD Talk review of '9 to 5: Days in Porn'
In the Q&A in the bonus features, Hoffmann mentions how it was nearly a 5-year process, and the actual filming was about 1 to 1.5 years. The 2007 AVN Awards seem to be a central focus, so I'm guessing it was filmed starting maybe mid-way through her first year in the business.
05-22-10 | 07:15 PM
#3
New Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dr.(???) Sharon Mitchell
When they want to impress others, some folks use the title, Dr., without any indication as to what kind of doctor they might be. That's why most licensed Physicians use John Jones MD, not Dr. John Jones.
I doubt she's a MD. ..Chiropractor? PhD?..Doctor of New Age Fellowship of the Universe?
I'm not being technical...some people work many years to earn that title...others get it in the mail. ...btw...it's the law in many states that the type of (Dr.) be specified when the title is used.
I doubt she's a MD. ..Chiropractor? PhD?..Doctor of New Age Fellowship of the Universe?
I'm not being technical...some people work many years to earn that title...others get it in the mail. ...btw...it's the law in many states that the type of (Dr.) be specified when the title is used.
