Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > Movie Talk
Reload this Page >

T2 and T3 mess continuity errors?

Community
Search
Movie Talk A Discussion area for everything movie related including films In The Theaters

T2 and T3 mess continuity errors?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-03-05 | 02:57 AM
  #1  
JZ1276's Avatar
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,911
Likes: 0
Received 27 Likes on 24 Posts
From: Long Island
T2 and T3 mess continuity errors?

Dont know if this has been discussed before, but I just watched T@ and T3 back to back and found a couple of errors. First off, in the beginning of T2, Patrick (t-1000 I believe) looks up John Connors info on the computer in the police car...says he is 10 years old. How can that be? The psychiatrist says that Sarah Connor was 29. That means she was 19 in the first Terminator since T2 takes place in 1995 ( I think).
Second error I noticed , in the end of T2, they show Sarah Connor as an old woman....in T3, John Connor says his mother died of leukemia.
Anyone else notice this?
Old 06-03-05 | 03:04 AM
  #2  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,656
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by JZ1276
Dont know if this has been discussed before, but I just watched T@ and T3 back to back and found a couple of errors. First off, in the beginning of T2, Patrick (t-1000 I believe) looks up John Connors info on the computer in the police car...says he is 10 years old. How can that be? The psychiatrist says that Sarah Connor was 29. That means she was 19 in the first Terminator since T2 takes place in 1995 ( I think).
The ages are a bit off from the casting, but I don't see the continuity error you are pointing out. The character definitely could have been 19 years old during T1.

Originally Posted by JZ1276
Second error I noticed , in the end of T2, they show Sarah Connor as an old woman....in T3, John Connor says his mother died of leukemia.
Anyone else notice this?
The ending you watched was the unused ending, only seen on the Laserdisc and DVD editions, never in the theaters. The ending with her as an old woman could still just be a possible future; which is why the theatrical ending (driving down a dark highway) is more solid way to state that the future is uncertain.
Old 06-03-05 | 08:30 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Eastern PA
I just watched T2 Extreme edition with the interactive mode on, early on in the movie it mentions that the film takes place in 1997 or 1996 (maybe 1998, but it is one of those) that would make Sarah even younger in Terminator, hmmmm.

The psychiatrist says that Sarah Connor was 29.
I don't remember anyone mentioning Sarah's age in any Terminator film, when does this happen? Does anyone remember if the year of The Terminator was ever stated in the movie or in T2?
Old 06-03-05 | 10:20 AM
  #4  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,289
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Jobland
There are a shitload.

http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0088247/goofs
http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0103064/goofs Possibly the longest goofs list on imdb
http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0181852/goofs
Old 06-03-05 | 11:38 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Eastern PA
ok, well that solves this problem. Guess I was wrong about the 97 date too. I didn't even think about the ramifications in Terminator 3 because I only saw it once and was very disappointed in it.
Old 06-03-05 | 02:32 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A wizard did it!
Old 06-03-05 | 03:02 PM
  #7  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 8,756
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Austin, TX
it was definitely discussed here when T3 first came out
Old 06-03-05 | 04:06 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 481
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by redskull
A wizard did it!
Old 06-03-05 | 04:26 PM
  #9  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,509
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: IL
Continuity errors in a movie that depends highly on time travel? Whaaa?
Old 06-03-05 | 06:09 PM
  #10  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,791
Received 377 Likes on 284 Posts
From: Seattle, WA
Geesh...kinda makes the supposed Star Wars errors seem miniscule in comparison... Techinical goofs aside in each film, the dates in T3 have always bothered me. But with these films I'm more than happy to kick back with a few cold ones and watch Arnold blow stuff up.
Old 06-03-05 | 06:40 PM
  #11  
Fok's Avatar
Fok
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,691
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Canada, BC
In my opinion T3 shouldn't of been made, what a way to ruin things.
Old 06-03-05 | 11:24 PM
  #12  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,690
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Pacific NW
Why even get worked up about the smallest details, just enjoy the movies. T2 is one of my favorite movies of all-time, and no minor errors would diminish it any in my book.
Old 06-03-05 | 11:43 PM
  #13  
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 54,199
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: City of the lakers.. riots.. and drug dealing cops.. los(t) Angel(e)s. ca.
It's a time travel movie. You really don't need any other answer than that.
Old 06-04-05 | 12:22 AM
  #14  
Rival11's Avatar
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 8,322
Received 337 Likes on 234 Posts
From: Western N.Y.
Linda Hamilton is fucking hot!!! Except for that error where they show her wrist watch on the wrong arm..........twice.
Old 06-04-05 | 12:40 AM
  #15  
DeanoBKN's Avatar
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 5,404
Received 24 Likes on 19 Posts
From: Connecticut
Originally Posted by Fok
In my opinion T3 shouldn't of been made, what a way to ruin things.
I concur.
Old 06-04-05 | 01:38 AM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Orlando, FL
I kinda dug the ending to T3, but that was it.

L8r
Old 06-04-05 | 08:49 AM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Eastern PA
In my opinion T3 shouldn't of been made, what a way to ruin things.
Someone should go back in time and prevent T3 from being made. Personally, I will not purchase T3 or ever watch it again, it was just bad. Or maybe we could write our own and go back in time and replace the script.
Old 06-04-05 | 09:16 AM
  #18  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 20,187
Received 344 Likes on 220 Posts
From: behind the eight ball
I thought only Star Wars movies had continuity errors.

As for T3, it had to be made to continue the evil-robots-chasing-young-females-around-and-blowing-shit-up franchise that has grown up around the Terminator series.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.