Interesting Article Regarding Digital Music
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 773
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Interesting Article Regarding Digital Music
There is an interesting article about downloading digital music written by Janis Ian and posted on her website. The article is quite lengthy, but here is a sample from it.
I have to say that I not only agree with her view (as it is true of myself in particular), I am happy to see another person so intrenched in the music business come forward with these sentiments.
Here is a link to the article. Thoughts? Comments?
http://www.janisian.com/article-internet_debacle.html
One other major point: in the hysteria of the moment, everyone is forgetting the main way an artist becomes successful - exposure. Without exposure, no one comes to shows, no one buys CDs, no one enables you to earn a living doing what you love. Again, from personal experience: in 37 years as a recording artist, I've created 25+ albums for major labels, and I've never once received a royalty check that didn't show I owed them money. So I make the bulk of my living from live touring, playing for 80-1500 people a night, doing my own show. I spend hours each week doing press, writing articles, making sure my website tour information is up to date. Why? Because all of that gives me exposure to an audience that might not come otherwise. So when someone writes and tells me they came to my show because they'd downloaded a song and gotten curious, I am thrilled!
Here is a link to the article. Thoughts? Comments?
http://www.janisian.com/article-internet_debacle.html
#2
Mod Emeritus
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 3,883
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Central Vermont
I wouldn't have as much of a problem purchasing music if the artistss received the larger portion of the check. After all, they're the ones who I'm supporting by purchasing the music. In reality, I'm supporting the record labels and the artists get the shaft.
I have been buying more music lately partly as a support, but at the same time I don't really like that I'm supporting the greedy recording execs even more.
I have been buying more music lately partly as a support, but at the same time I don't really like that I'm supporting the greedy recording execs even more.
#3
Mod Emeritus
http://www.musicsquare.net/news/exclusive/371
Jason Northrup might be interested in the following interesting article regarding digital music....
.... that's quite bargain [not]for the performers: 4.5 cents for them while the record company saves all those distribution expenses. Ho hum!
Sony BMG Sued Over Artists' Digital Rates
In a case that could seismically alter the way labels and artists share download revenue, members of the Allman Brothers Band and Cheap Trick have filed a class action lawsuit alleging that Sony BMG has underpaid artists for digital music transactions.
At issue in the action, filed April 27 in U.S. District Court in New York by Labaton Sucharow & Rudoff and Probstein & Weiner, is whether the label's deal with online services for downloads is a license or a sale.
Sony BMG labels consider that their deals with the services are for sales of records rather than licenses for the recordings. But the suit alleges that Sony BMG is violating contractual obligations to share 50% of the net licensing revenue from digital music transactions with artists.
The two bands claim that from 99-cent downloads, they receive only about 4.5 cents, rather than the 30 cents per track they believe they are owed.
For years, artists have complained that royalties are further cut; many contracts permit a 50% reduction in royalties for music sold through a new technology, as well as a packaging deduction. Many artists say these clauses only made sense in the physical world, when music migrated to CDs from cassettes. Sony BMG declined comment.
"This has been the elephant in the room for a while," says Dave Frey, manager for Cheap Trick. "If you don't dispute the accounting now, that establishes how it's going to be in the future."
The suit, which still has to be certified in federal court as a class action case, follows a similar suit filed by Tom Waits' Third Story Music against Warner Music Group.
Other labels may soon be involved, as well. "I'm surprised that similar actions haven't already been commenced against the other record labels," says Brian Caplan, one of the attorneys bringing the suit.
In a case that could seismically alter the way labels and artists share download revenue, members of the Allman Brothers Band and Cheap Trick have filed a class action lawsuit alleging that Sony BMG has underpaid artists for digital music transactions.
At issue in the action, filed April 27 in U.S. District Court in New York by Labaton Sucharow & Rudoff and Probstein & Weiner, is whether the label's deal with online services for downloads is a license or a sale.
Sony BMG labels consider that their deals with the services are for sales of records rather than licenses for the recordings. But the suit alleges that Sony BMG is violating contractual obligations to share 50% of the net licensing revenue from digital music transactions with artists.
The two bands claim that from 99-cent downloads, they receive only about 4.5 cents, rather than the 30 cents per track they believe they are owed.
For years, artists have complained that royalties are further cut; many contracts permit a 50% reduction in royalties for music sold through a new technology, as well as a packaging deduction. Many artists say these clauses only made sense in the physical world, when music migrated to CDs from cassettes. Sony BMG declined comment.
"This has been the elephant in the room for a while," says Dave Frey, manager for Cheap Trick. "If you don't dispute the accounting now, that establishes how it's going to be in the future."
The suit, which still has to be certified in federal court as a class action case, follows a similar suit filed by Tom Waits' Third Story Music against Warner Music Group.
Other labels may soon be involved, as well. "I'm surprised that similar actions haven't already been commenced against the other record labels," says Brian Caplan, one of the attorneys bringing the suit.




