How great was..."The Deer Hunter"?
#1
Inane Thread Master, 2018 TOTY
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Are any of us really anywhere?
Posts: 49,448
Received 913 Likes
on
773 Posts
How great was..."The Deer Hunter"?
I put this in again last night because I had an urge after seeing "Rescue Dawn" earlier in the day. I put it in at 11:30pm and just about finished it, and we are talking a 3 hour epic. I was just so engrossed as I had been many times before.
The performances are so fluid and real you just can't believe this is a fictional, theatrical presentation with genuine actors and not real life people. It's 3 hrs, but you'd think it was 1 as it goes so effervescently.
I just laid there amazed at such cinemtatic achievement. I mean I love Robert DeNiro and Chris Walken, but never more so than in this master stroke by Michael Cimino.
Also, I love war movies (mostly Vietnam) and this is such a different, fresh take on the typical grunts in the field war epic. This was all about character and friendship and the devastating toll war takes on the "walking wounded". Emotionally and physically ravaged, Robert, Christopher, and John Savage just embodied these characters and brought them to a very elevated, heart-felt, and crushing level.
Then I wanted to see where it ranked in the AFI's "100" list and to my shock and awe it was 79th!!! Are you kidding me? 79th seemed so squalid for such a classic. I know there was some controversy that originally surrounded this movie, but there is no way this opus ranks at 79.
Thoughts??
The performances are so fluid and real you just can't believe this is a fictional, theatrical presentation with genuine actors and not real life people. It's 3 hrs, but you'd think it was 1 as it goes so effervescently.
I just laid there amazed at such cinemtatic achievement. I mean I love Robert DeNiro and Chris Walken, but never more so than in this master stroke by Michael Cimino.
Also, I love war movies (mostly Vietnam) and this is such a different, fresh take on the typical grunts in the field war epic. This was all about character and friendship and the devastating toll war takes on the "walking wounded". Emotionally and physically ravaged, Robert, Christopher, and John Savage just embodied these characters and brought them to a very elevated, heart-felt, and crushing level.
Then I wanted to see where it ranked in the AFI's "100" list and to my shock and awe it was 79th!!! Are you kidding me? 79th seemed so squalid for such a classic. I know there was some controversy that originally surrounded this movie, but there is no way this opus ranks at 79.
Thoughts??
#3
Inane Thread Master, 2018 TOTY
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Are any of us really anywhere?
Posts: 49,448
Received 913 Likes
on
773 Posts
Originally Posted by KillerCannabis
The Russian roulette scene always makes my (Vietnam vet) father jump up and cheer when DeNiro and Walken clear the hut. It's a powerful film, even if it is slow at times.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Guntersville, AL
Posts: 803
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I enjoyed it alot, but they could've had a better ending than everybody sitting around a table singing. Sure you can argue with me that it was "powerful", but I thought it could've went out a little better.
#5
Inane Thread Master, 2018 TOTY
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Are any of us really anywhere?
Posts: 49,448
Received 913 Likes
on
773 Posts
Originally Posted by project86
I enjoyed it alot, but they could've had a better ending than everybody sitting around a table singing. Sure you can argue with me that it was "powerful", but I thought it could've went out a little better.
#6
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Future World
Posts: 1,048
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The wedding scenes were excrutiatingly long and I have to fast forward through it every time. The pacing is slow, but its still a great movie.
I loved the ending. I usually FF through a lot of this movie. There is a lot of great scenes in the film, but I think they could have trimmed a lot of the movie.
I loved the ending. I usually FF through a lot of this movie. There is a lot of great scenes in the film, but I think they could have trimmed a lot of the movie.
#8
Originally Posted by 7Keys
There is a lot of great scenes in the film, but I think they could have trimmed a lot of the movie.
#9
DVD Talk Limited Edition
It definitely could have been shorter but I see where Scott is coming from. A lot of people love the length and I ususally here the same comments about how it's all done to pull you into their lives further so when the shock finally does come you're not just looking at these guys as people in war, you actually feel connected to them. It does work (it did for me the first time around) but not for mulitple viewings...for me anyway.
I personally really like the ending - thought it was perfect.
I personally really like the ending - thought it was perfect.
#11
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Hawaii, USA
Posts: 3,394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I agree with you Scott1598, as this is one of my favorite films of all time. Saw it 3 times theatrically. It's been years since I've seen it, but many scenes still stick in my mind. Made me a Christopher Walken fan, and he certainly deserved his Oscar.
#13
Inane Thread Master, 2018 TOTY
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Are any of us really anywhere?
Posts: 49,448
Received 913 Likes
on
773 Posts
Originally Posted by wilky61
Does anybody else think that The Deer Hunter and Seven Samurai are more-or-less the same film, just set in different eras?
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 599
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by scott1598
they are not even close in similarity.
#15
Inane Thread Master, 2018 TOTY
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Are any of us really anywhere?
Posts: 49,448
Received 913 Likes
on
773 Posts
Originally Posted by wilky61
Been a long time since I watched either movie, forgive me if my memory's faltering... But they're both three hours in length, spend a long/slow first hour introducing you and attaching you to all of the characters in a non-war setting, the characters go to war during the second hour, there's about an hour-and-a-half of intermittent action scenes, and then both movies come to their really poignant and devastating endings, leaving you to wonder about how pointless war really is.
SS is essentially about elder samurai and them regaining their spirituality and traditions by defending a lowly village from the ravages of a devastating horde.
and TDH really isn't about the pointlessness of war either. the "war/action" scenes maybe total 30 minutes, maybe slightly more and they are anything but typical war scenes. the entire story is about the bonds of friendship, war is kink that hinders their lives but the "pointlessness" of it is not made to be the focus of this particular movie.
see SS again and you'll understand the err of your memory.
Last edited by OldBoy; 07-15-07 at 01:17 PM.
#16
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Originally Posted by scott1598
See that's the thing...I don't think it is slow at all. The length lends itself to that but every single scene is so entrancing and great.
one of the best movies I've ever seen.
#20
I like Cimino. I think "Year of the Dragon" is sorely underrated, even if it does have some pretty bad dialogue. And "Heaven's Gate" is actually pretty good in its full length director's cut.