Basic Instinct 2 --> July 11
04-28-06, 09:35 AM
#1
Moderator
Thread Starter
Basic Instinct 2 --> July 11
Of course, the obligatory Rated and Unrated versions will be available...that and the date are all I know for now.....specs to follow when it announces on May 22nd....did anyone see this?
04-28-06, 11:18 AM
#2
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 1,482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I will be picking this one up for sure, I didn't catch it at the cineplex. And no jokes that I wasn't the only one who didn't, I know this one tanked at the box office. 
04-28-06, 12:33 PM
#5
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Since the R version was said to be practically nudity and sex free with the explicit material shown in the 'unrated trailer' available on the internet missing. I avoided the R version at all costs, and will be curious to see what the unrated version is like. And if the film is any good trashy fun or not.
04-28-06, 01:20 PM
#6
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
I didn't bother with the film in the theatres, as I knew the unrated DVD would be more explicit, and probably better. I can't imagine this movie being that much worse than the original. They're both likely to be "so bad they're good" films.
04-28-06, 05:26 PM
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Europe
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I saw this when it was in cinemas and thought it was OK. I saw the French dubbed version, and don't know if I really want to pay for the DVD to see it in its original language version. Does anyone know if the theatrical version that played in France/Europe was longer than the "R" version in the US? If so, I guess it will be the same as the unrated DVD... but it probably wasn't the longer one, as it was only rated a "12" in France anyway, and I didn't think there was anything too explicit in it -
Dazza
Spoiler:
Dazza
04-28-06, 06:31 PM
#8
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: austria
Posts: 1,009
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mao
Of course, the obligatory Rated and Unrated versions will be available...that and the date are all I know for now.....specs to follow when it announces on May 22nd....did anyone see this?
source?
04-28-06, 09:31 PM
#10
DVD Talk Hero
Originally Posted by Julie Walker
Since the R version was said to be practically nudity and sex free with the explicit material shown in the 'unrated trailer' available on the internet missing. I avoided the R version at all costs, and will be curious to see what the unrated version is like. And if the film is any good trashy fun or not.
04-30-06, 06:54 AM
#11
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Huntington WVA.. but not a back woods country bumpkin
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I too will have to wait to see what type of casing this comes in... have the ice case/ice pick from the first one... they better come out with something similar for this case.... then id have to buy it just for that
04-30-06, 08:26 AM
#12
Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Germany
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
the threesome floating around as mpeg-file on the net was also cut from the European version - maybe re-integrated in the unrated version ?
you also could read in various interviews of director and star that lots of sex scenes had been filmed which haven't been used for the film.
Not sure if that really would have helped as the film sucked. Boring and toothless. Not as 'radical' and explicit as the Verhoeven flick back in 1991.
you also could read in various interviews of director and star that lots of sex scenes had been filmed which haven't been used for the film.
Not sure if that really would have helped as the film sucked. Boring and toothless. Not as 'radical' and explicit as the Verhoeven flick back in 1991.
05-01-06, 11:56 AM
#13
Moderator
Originally Posted by philip74
source?
Originally Posted by Bill Geiger
Here we go again. Trust him, He ain't one to bullshit.
welcome new member; philip74 to DVDTalk
05-01-06, 05:27 PM
#14
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: austria
Posts: 1,009
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
guys guys, easy on me, i fully trust the info as the guy is always right on track. i was just curious were the info is from because nothing has been posted on dvdactive, dvdtimes, or any other major site yet.
05-01-06, 05:40 PM
#15
DVD Talk Hero
Originally Posted by philip74
guys guys, easy on me, i fully trust the info as the guy is always right on track. i was just curious were the info is from because nothing has been posted on dvdactive, dvdtimes, or any other major site yet.
05-02-06, 09:14 AM
#18
DVD Talk Legend
I saw it. It's no where near as bad as the reviews. I think everyone just has it in for Stone. Like the one poster said above, the first one is definitely a "so bad it's good" film. The sequel is o.k. Not great. Slow in parts. And a little boring. I think the unedited version might make it as great as the original. Again, in good trashy fun way. And Stone looks terrific.
05-04-06, 03:11 PM
#20
Mod Emeritus
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Gone to the islands - 'til we meet again.
Posts: 19,053
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by VOODOO1194
This is one of the worst films ever made.
05-04-06, 04:27 PM
#21
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: In a small pocket universe hoping to someday become a Moderator Emeritus at DVDTalk.com!
Posts: 9,380
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by philip74
guys guys, easy on me, i fully trust the info as the guy is always right on track. i was just curious were the info is from because nothing has been posted on dvdactive, dvdtimes, or any other major site yet.
You gotta trust Mao my man.
He's my opposite in the Talk Forum.
As I liken myself as Deep Throat in the Bargain Forum, Mao is like Harry Lime in the Talk Forum....
It's not safe for us to reveal our sources!
Last edited by speedy1961; 05-04-06 at 04:30 PM.
05-04-06, 04:29 PM
#22
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: In a small pocket universe hoping to someday become a Moderator Emeritus at DVDTalk.com!
Posts: 9,380
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by Daytripper
I saw it. It's no where near as bad as the reviews. I think everyone just has it in for Stone. Like the one poster said above, the first one is definitely a "so bad it's good" film. The sequel is o.k. Not great. Slow in parts. And a little boring. I think the unedited version might make it as great as the original. Again, in good trashy fun way. And Stone looks terrific.
I missed it in theaters because of too much work in real life.
05-05-06, 02:14 AM
#24
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Los Angeles , California
Posts: 3,596
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ok, I saw it the other day with about 6 people in the theater. The movie was ok in parts, boring in others. Check it out at your local dollar theater, if you must see it, or wait til July 2nd to rent it. I agree with others, that the unrated version might be better. I also agree that Stone looked great. I think she had a face lift, because her skin was too smoothe for her age and the fact that she's a smoker ( doesn't smoking make you age 
). Her breast job wasn't that great, her right areola is much higher than her left. She's still MILFy to me though.
). Her breast job wasn't that great, her right areola is much higher than her left. She's still MILFy to me though.
Last edited by SPiRAL; 05-05-06 at 02:18 AM.
05-05-06, 03:20 AM
#25
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Rampaging across DVDTalk.
Posts: 4,046
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Originally Posted by SPiRAL
Her breast job wasn't that great, her right areola is much higher than her left.