As U.S. Postage Rates Continue To Rise, The USPS Gives The Chinese A 'Free Ride'
03-14-18, 08:38 AM
#1
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: IA Now, From MN
Posts: 5,907
As U.S. Postage Rates Continue To Rise, The USPS Gives The Chinese A 'Free Ride'
https://www.forbes.com/sites/wadeshe.../#b68aaee40ca1
I figured this could easily go political, so I'm posting this here. The article is from November, but I couldn't find any mention of it here.
This drives me insane...I can't even begin to imagine who thought this would be a good idea.
I found this article while reading a story about people receiving unwanted, free items from sellers in China for Amazon reviews.
I figured this could easily go political, so I'm posting this here. The article is from November, but I couldn't find any mention of it here.
This drives me insane...I can't even begin to imagine who thought this would be a good idea.
I found this article while reading a story about people receiving unwanted, free items from sellers in China for Amazon reviews.
03-15-18, 06:49 AM
#2
Political Exile
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,294
Re: As U.S. Postage Rates Continue To Rise, The USPS Gives The Chinese A 'Free Ride'
It says:
I can understand this. I don't necessarily think it's a good idea. But I can certainly understand it.
It also says:
This is true. But at least the U.S. government has an excuse for losing this money - the treaty that was signed a very long time ago.
By comparison, the U.S. government has no excuse for this other example of losing money. They can't blame this one on an international treaty. This is from a different article. I'd love to hear their excuse to try to justify this:
What is the U.S. government's excuse for paying $3.40 per serving of soda when amazon sells it for 75 cents? I would love to hear their excuse for that one.
International postage rates for incoming packages are set by a U.N. agency called the United Postal Union (UPU). This is a body that was established in 1874 -- subsequently being absorbed into the U.N. -- that is currently made up of 192 countries which meets every four years to revise its policy and set new terminal fees, with each country getting one vote a piece. While the voting system of the UPU is egalitarian, the shipping rates that it sets are not. According to Nancy Sparks of FedEx Express (via eCommerceBytes.com), the rate structure of the UPU is a system where the “haves pay the have-nots.” Essentially, countries that it deems to be poorer or less developed pay less for shipping to countries that are categorized as being richer. So someone shipping from, say, China, will pay significantly less to ship to a country like the U.S. than an American shipper will pay to send that same package to China.
I can understand this. I don't necessarily think it's a good idea. But I can certainly understand it.
It also says:
The post office is losing money on every package it delivers from China — costs it has to pass on to its own American customers, not to mention U.S. taxpayers.
This is true. But at least the U.S. government has an excuse for losing this money - the treaty that was signed a very long time ago.
By comparison, the U.S. government has no excuse for this other example of losing money. They can't blame this one on an international treaty. This is from a different article. I'd love to hear their excuse to try to justify this:
Spoiler:
What is the U.S. government's excuse for paying $3.40 per serving of soda when amazon sells it for 75 cents? I would love to hear their excuse for that one.
03-15-18, 10:06 AM
#4
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Palm Springs
Posts: 8,874
Re: As U.S. Postage Rates Continue To Rise, The USPS Gives The Chinese A 'Free Ride'
yeah, this is strange. There's an chinese version of amazon that I buy stuff from every now and then, and shipping is frequently free. It's crazy, you see a lot of that free shipped stuff from china on ebay too. Sure, it takes a month+ to get here, and if it's clothes it rarely fits 
but still, FREE SHIPPING FROM CHINA! 
but still, FREE SHIPPING FROM CHINA!
03-15-18, 10:17 AM
#5
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 21,582
Re: As U.S. Postage Rates Continue To Rise, The USPS Gives The Chinese A 'Free Ride'
Originally Posted by joeblow69
yeah, this is strange. There's an chinese version of amazon that I buy stuff from every now and then, and shipping is frequently free. It's crazy, you see a lot of that free shipped stuff from china on ebay too. Sure, it takes a month+ to get here, and if it's clothes it rarely fits but still, FREE SHIPPING FROM CHINA!
but still, FREE SHIPPING FROM CHINA!
03-15-18, 10:18 AM
#6
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Palm Springs
Posts: 8,874
Re: As U.S. Postage Rates Continue To Rise, The USPS Gives The Chinese A 'Free Ride'
Originally Posted by creekdipper
And the clothes self-destruct should you choose not to accept them.
03-15-18, 10:56 AM
#7
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 21,582
Re: As U.S. Postage Rates Continue To Rise, The USPS Gives The Chinese A 'Free Ride'
Originally Posted by joeblow69
I tell you, their sizing is crazy small over there. I normally wear large shorts, but in chinese sizes I need XXL. It makes me sad every time I put them on
Just think what an order of jock straps could accomplish.
03-15-18, 11:22 AM
#8
DVD Talk Hero
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Stick out your tongue!
Posts: 39,287
Re: As U.S. Postage Rates Continue To Rise, The USPS Gives The Chinese A 'Free Ride'
Originally Posted by joeblow69
yeah, this is strange. There's an chinese version of amazon that I buy stuff from every now and then, and shipping is frequently free. It's crazy, you see a lot of that free shipped stuff from china on ebay too. Sure, it takes a month+ to get here, and if it's clothes it rarely fits but still, FREE SHIPPING FROM CHINA!
but still, FREE SHIPPING FROM CHINA!
03-15-18, 11:29 AM
#9
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Palm Springs
Posts: 8,874
Re: As U.S. Postage Rates Continue To Rise, The USPS Gives The Chinese A 'Free Ride'
Originally Posted by creekdipper
Or you could look at the bright side and feel amazingly superior!
Just think what an order of jock straps could accomplish.
Just think what an order of jock straps could accomplish.
Originally Posted by D.Pham4GLTE (>60GB)
Alibaba?
Last edited by joeblow69; 03-15-18 at 11:37 AM.
03-16-18, 07:56 AM
#10
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: IA Now, From MN
Posts: 5,907
Re: As U.S. Postage Rates Continue To Rise, The USPS Gives The Chinese A 'Free Ride'
Originally Posted by grundle
I can understand this. I don't necessarily think it's a good idea. But I can certainly understand it.
03-16-18, 09:58 AM
#11
DVD Talk Legend
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: True North Strong & Free
Posts: 12,376
Re: As U.S. Postage Rates Continue To Rise, The USPS Gives The Chinese A 'Free Ride'
Originally Posted by Mikael79
The haves versus the have-nots. Isn't China's GDP close to passing ours, if they haven't already done so? How is China a have-not?
03-16-18, 10:36 AM
#12
DVD Talk Hero
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Stick out your tongue!
Posts: 39,287
Re: As U.S. Postage Rates Continue To Rise, The USPS Gives The Chinese A 'Free Ride'
Originally Posted by joeblow69
Actually those were jockstraps! Only $3 for the same jock that goes for $15 here in the US! I bought 6!
Aliexpress ... i'll have to check out alibaba . *edit, ok I don't get alibaba. Looks like it's meant for retailers to buy multiples? There doesn't seem to be a "buy 1" option on most stuff.
Aliexpress ... i'll have to check out alibaba . *edit, ok I don't get alibaba. Looks like it's meant for retailers to buy multiples? There doesn't seem to be a "buy 1" option on most stuff.
03-16-18, 10:42 AM
#13
DVD Talk Hero
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 39,472
Re: As U.S. Postage Rates Continue To Rise, The USPS Gives The Chinese A 'Free Ride'
In terms of the Amtrak thing, it might be one of those "government procurement is weird" situations. There are all sorts of hoops and checks that need to be followed because we've put regulations in place to make sure some procurement officer somewhere isn't giving a contract to his cousin, or otherwise enriching himself. For the longest time (it changed around 10-15 years ago), government employees weren't even allowed to spend the airline miles they accumulated if they travelled for work. So it may be a situation where the folks at Amtrak want to order off Amazon, but regulations require that they post an RFQ and contract with whichever entity submits the lowest bid.
Does it make sense? From one point of view, no. From another point of view, we spend more than we "should" to make sure we have lots of transparency and lots of checks and balances and redundancies in place so that it's harder to embezzle or misappropriate taxpayer money.
It might also be the case that this is one of those weird accounting stories like the $57 Pentagon hammers and toilet seats from the 90s. It turned out that there were some fixed overhead costs that were being added to every contract on a straight dollar basis, so the hammer actually cost $7 and had $50 of overhead built in, but Humvees also had that same $50 overhead built in. In reality, the overhead is a lot higher on the Humvees and lower on the hammer, but rather than spend time and money try to calculate out an accurate overhead amount for each purchase, they just averaged it out for everything.
Does it make sense? From one point of view, no. From another point of view, we spend more than we "should" to make sure we have lots of transparency and lots of checks and balances and redundancies in place so that it's harder to embezzle or misappropriate taxpayer money.
It might also be the case that this is one of those weird accounting stories like the $57 Pentagon hammers and toilet seats from the 90s. It turned out that there were some fixed overhead costs that were being added to every contract on a straight dollar basis, so the hammer actually cost $7 and had $50 of overhead built in, but Humvees also had that same $50 overhead built in. In reality, the overhead is a lot higher on the Humvees and lower on the hammer, but rather than spend time and money try to calculate out an accurate overhead amount for each purchase, they just averaged it out for everything.
03-16-18, 11:13 AM
#14
DVD Talk Godfather
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 52,456
Re: As U.S. Postage Rates Continue To Rise, The USPS Gives The Chinese A 'Free Ride'
The USPS is a failing organization, bloated with US taxpayer dollars, and needs to be decommissioned and a new organization created. In the meantime, hire FedEx and UPS to deliver mail.
03-16-18, 11:41 AM
#15
DVD Talk Hero
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 39,472
Re: As U.S. Postage Rates Continue To Rise, The USPS Gives The Chinese A 'Free Ride'
Counterpoint: the amount of money that FedEx or UPS would charge to deliver mail to rural America would make you wish you had the "bloated" USPS back.
03-16-18, 11:48 AM
#16
DVD Talk Legend
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Cygnus
Posts: 12,524
Re: As U.S. Postage Rates Continue To Rise, The USPS Gives The Chinese A 'Free Ride'
Any actual solution to the US postage cost issue would have to include outlawing "junk" mail. Pretty much the only reason carriers have to deliver mail to virtually every mailbox on a daily basis.
Last edited by hdnmickey; 03-16-18 at 11:53 AM.
03-16-18, 11:50 AM
#17
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Berkeley, CA
Posts: 1,145
Re: As U.S. Postage Rates Continue To Rise, The USPS Gives The Chinese A 'Free Ride'
Originally Posted by JasonF
Counterpoint: the amount of money that FedEx or UPS would charge to deliver mail to rural America would make you wish you had the "bloated" USPS back.
Expenses for retiree health benefits and workers compensation declined by $4.8 billion and $3.5 billion, respectively, but were partially offset by $2.4 billion in higher expenses for the amortization of unfunded retirement benefits, the result of statutory mandates effective for 2017 and changes in Office of Personnel Management actuarial assumptions. Expenses for compensation and benefits and transportation also added $667 million and $246 million, respectively, to 2017 operating expenses.
The Postal Service reported a net loss for the year of $2.7 billion, a decrease in net loss of $2.8 billion compared to 2016. Of this decline in net loss, $2.4 billion was the result of changes in interest rates, outside of management's control, that reduced workers’ compensation expense compared to last year.
The Postal Service reported a net loss for the year of $2.7 billion, a decrease in net loss of $2.8 billion compared to 2016. Of this decline in net loss, $2.4 billion was the result of changes in interest rates, outside of management's control, that reduced workers’ compensation expense compared to last year.
03-16-18, 12:25 PM
#18
DVD Talk Hero
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Rosemount, MN
Posts: 31,461
Re: As U.S. Postage Rates Continue To Rise, The USPS Gives The Chinese A 'Free Ride'
Originally Posted by DVD Polizei
The USPS is a failing organization, bloated with US taxpayer dollars, and needs to be decommissioned and a new organization created. In the meantime, hire FedEx and UPS to deliver mail.
And I've had far fewer problems with USPS than I have with Fed Ex or UPS.
03-16-18, 01:15 PM
#19
DVD Talk Legend
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: True North Strong & Free
Posts: 12,376
Re: As U.S. Postage Rates Continue To Rise, The USPS Gives The Chinese A 'Free Ride'
Originally Posted by JasonF
Counterpoint: the amount of money that FedEx or UPS would charge to deliver mail to rural America would make you wish you had the "bloated" USPS back.
Originally Posted by Draven
And I've had far fewer problems with USPS than I have with Fed Ex or UPS.
03-16-18, 01:51 PM
#20
Banned by request
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Termite Terrace
Posts: 54,156
Re: As U.S. Postage Rates Continue To Rise, The USPS Gives The Chinese A 'Free Ride'
Originally Posted by hdnmickey
Any actual solution to the US postage cost issue would have to include outlawing "junk" mail. Pretty much the only reason carriers have to deliver mail to virtually every mailbox on a daily basis.
03-16-18, 03:06 PM
#21
DVD Talk Legend
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Cygnus
Posts: 12,524
Re: As U.S. Postage Rates Continue To Rise, The USPS Gives The Chinese A 'Free Ride'
Originally Posted by Supermallet
Junk mail advertisers are the biggest customer of the USPS.
And just for the record, others must have much better postal workers and far worse UPS/Fedex drivers in their area than I do. Most people in my neighborhood (we have a site where we share experiences) have far more issues with the USPS than UPS/Fedex. The USPS is far slower and incorrectly delivers mail far more often than the other services.
Last edited by hdnmickey; 03-16-18 at 03:27 PM.
03-16-18, 06:44 PM
#22
Political Exile
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,294
Re: As U.S. Postage Rates Continue To Rise, The USPS Gives The Chinese A 'Free Ride'
Originally Posted by PerryD
$8.94 / 24 is actually 37 cents which is probably closer to what a can of pop costs at places like Target and Walmart too.
I should have noticed that, but I was too lazy to check their math.
.
Originally Posted by Mikael79
The haves versus the have-nots. Isn't China's GDP close to passing ours, if they haven't already done so? How is China a have-not?
China's GDP is second to ours, but it's not that close. And on a per capita basis, they are still way, way poorer than us.
.
Originally Posted by JasonF
In terms of the Amtrak thing, it might be one of those "government procurement is weird" situations. There are all sorts of hoops and checks that need to be followed because we've put regulations in place to make sure some procurement officer somewhere isn't giving a contract to his cousin, or otherwise enriching himself. For the longest time (it changed around 10-15 years ago), government employees weren't even allowed to spend the airline miles they accumulated if they travelled for work. So it may be a situation where the folks at Amtrak want to order off Amazon, but regulations require that they post an RFQ and contract with whichever entity submits the lowest bid.
Does it make sense? From one point of view, no. From another point of view, we spend more than we "should" to make sure we have lots of transparency and lots of checks and balances and redundancies in place so that it's harder to embezzle or misappropriate taxpayer money.
It might also be the case that this is one of those weird accounting stories like the $57 Pentagon hammers and toilet seats from the 90s. It turned out that there were some fixed overhead costs that were being added to every contract on a straight dollar basis, so the hammer actually cost $7 and had $50 of overhead built in, but Humvees also had that same $50 overhead built in. In reality, the overhead is a lot higher on the Humvees and lower on the hammer, but rather than spend time and money try to calculate out an accurate overhead amount for each purchase, they just averaged it out for everything.
Does it make sense? From one point of view, no. From another point of view, we spend more than we "should" to make sure we have lots of transparency and lots of checks and balances and redundancies in place so that it's harder to embezzle or misappropriate taxpayer money.
It might also be the case that this is one of those weird accounting stories like the $57 Pentagon hammers and toilet seats from the 90s. It turned out that there were some fixed overhead costs that were being added to every contract on a straight dollar basis, so the hammer actually cost $7 and had $50 of overhead built in, but Humvees also had that same $50 overhead built in. In reality, the overhead is a lot higher on the Humvees and lower on the hammer, but rather than spend time and money try to calculate out an accurate overhead amount for each purchase, they just averaged it out for everything.
You may very well be correct on one or the other of those two things, or perhaps even both.
