Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > General Discussions > Religion, Politics and World Events
Reload this Page >

It's time to get the money out of politics

Religion, Politics and World Events They make great dinner conversation, don't you think? plus Political Film

It's time to get the money out of politics

Old 12-04-11, 10:01 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's time to get the money out of politics

Let's move beyond the bought-and-paid-for model of Federal government:
http://www.getmoneyout.com/

And a related rant from Dylan Ratigan:
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/gIcqb9hHQ3E" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Old 12-04-11, 10:43 AM
  #2  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Sean O'Hara's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Vichy America
Posts: 13,533
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: It's time to get the money out of politics

So here's their proposed amendment:

No person, corporation or business entity of any type, domestic or foreign, shall be allowed to contribute money, directly or indirectly, to any candidate for Federal office or to contribute money on behalf of or opposed to any type of campaign for Federal office.
So they only want rich people to run for office? No, actually, their gloss of the amendment says that this would include "self-funders," which pretty much makes it impossible to run for office. I suppose someone who's popular on Twitter could do it, if SCOTUS allows that it doesn't constitute an indirect donation, which would limit us to Ellen DeGeneres and Oprah.

Great fucking plan.
Old 12-04-11, 10:49 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: It's time to get the money out of politics

That is not the final proposed amendment; it is one of several alternate drafts. The others are less restrictive (ex., one disallows corporate donations but allows individual contributions up to $100). There is lots of internal debate about draft specifics among supporters, with many folks sharing your view:

http://www.getmoneyout.com/comments_on_amendment_drafts

Last edited by DVD Guy ATL; 12-04-11 at 10:56 AM.
Old 12-04-11, 10:57 AM
  #4  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Th0r S1mpson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 36,438
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: It's time to get the money out of politics

People will still get money out of it if you get the money out of it.
Old 12-04-11, 11:01 AM
  #5  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Sean O'Hara's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Vichy America
Posts: 13,533
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: It's time to get the money out of politics

Originally Posted by DVD Guy ATL View Post
That is not the final proposed amendment; it is one of several alternate drafts.
That's the draft being put forth by the group you linked to. And being a draft doesn't excuse idiocy.

I'm all about getting corporate dollars out of federal politics.
That sounds all well and good until you realize that corporations are groups of people who pool their money for common cause. Consider the following scenarios:

1) I buy an ad in the New York Times urging people not to vote for any candidate who is deeply religious.

2) CRM114 and I pool our money to buy an ad in the New York Times urging people not to vote for any candidate who is deeply religious.

3) CRM114 and I form a corporation to buy an ad in the New York Times urging people not to vote for any candidate who is deeply religious.

Why is (3) any different from the other examples?

For that matter, The New York Times is a corporation, so when their editorial board endorses a candidate, they're injecting their own money into politics.
Old 12-04-11, 11:20 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: It's time to get the money out of politics

Example three above is entirely different from a multi-billion dollar corporation using its funds to buy a political candidate. But you already knew that. And why would you need to create a corporation specifically to buy an ad?
Old 12-04-11, 12:49 PM
  #7  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Sean O'Hara's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Vichy America
Posts: 13,533
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: It's time to get the money out of politics

Originally Posted by DVD Guy ATL View Post
Example three above is entirely different from a multi-billion dollar corporation using its funds to buy a political candidate. But you already knew that.
No, actually I don't. None of the amendments you linked to make any such distinction, so they would apply to my hypothetical corporation as equally as Monsanto. How do you propose distinguishing which corporations are allowed speech and which are not?

And why would you need to create a corporation specifically to buy an ad?
Why shouldn't we? Maybe we want to start a massive campaign to promote atheism and the ad is just the first step?

Note that my third example is pretty much what Citizens United was about in the first place.
Old 12-04-11, 01:03 PM
  #8  
DVD Talk Godfather
 
DVD Polizei's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 53,733
Received 143 Likes on 106 Posts
Re: It's time to get the money out of politics

Politicians really must have nothing to do, except for appearing on a cable news network blabbermouth show.

How about this idea.

Politicians winning an office would be required to actually work 8hrs a week, at a job that pays the standard wage. They would have to deal with the public, and any laws they would pass, well, the public would know where to find them on a particular day.
Old 12-04-11, 01:25 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: It's time to get the money out of politics

Originally Posted by Sean O'Hara View Post
No, actually I don't. None of the amendments you linked to make any such distinction, so they would apply to my hypothetical corporation as equally as Monsanto. How do you propose distinguishing which corporations are allowed speech and which are not?
The proposed amendments would indeed apply to all corporations, as should be the case. I was just pointing out that your example purposely ignores the primary catalyst behind this effort -- unchecked corporate influence in federal politics.

You seem to believe that corporations should be treated under the law as if they were individual citizens, and furthermore that corporate influence over the political process is a free speech issue. I disagree with both assertions.
Old 12-04-11, 01:26 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: It's time to get the money out of politics

Originally Posted by DVD Polizei View Post
How about this idea.

Politicians winning an office would be required to actually work 8hrs a week, at a job that pays the standard wage. They would have to deal with the public, and any laws they would pass, well, the public would know where to find them on a particular day.
I am 100% on board with this!
Old 12-04-11, 01:41 PM
  #11  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Sean O'Hara's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Vichy America
Posts: 13,533
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: It's time to get the money out of politics

Originally Posted by DVD Guy ATL View Post
The proposed amendments would indeed apply to all corporations, as should be the case. I was just pointing out that your example purposely ignores the primary catalyst behind this effort -- unchecked corporate influence in federal politics.
I don't care what the catalyst is; what matters is the outcome.

You seem to believe that corporations should be treated under the law as if they were individual citizens, and furthermore that corporate influence over the political process is a free speech issue. I disagree with both assertions.
No, I believe they should be treated for what they are -- groups of people pooling resources, which is something covered under the First Amendment. If corporations do not have the right to speech, then there is no freedom of the press -- the New York Times, Paramount Pictures and the Huffington Post could not exist in such a situation.
Old 12-04-11, 01:43 PM
  #12  
X
Administrator
 
X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1987
Location: AA-
Posts: 10,871
Received 31 Likes on 26 Posts
Re: It's time to get the money out of politics

Is a PAC a "business entity"? Is a union?
Old 12-04-11, 06:32 PM
  #13  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Lower Gum Curve
Posts: 19,283
Likes: 0
Received 37 Likes on 26 Posts
Re: It's time to get the money out of politics

Originally Posted by Sean O'Hara View Post
That sounds all well and good until you realize that corporations are groups of people who pool their money for common cause.


That sounds wonderful. A flowery world of rainbows and puppy dogs where those kind hearted corporations are only interested in what's good for us.

Now let me tell you how it works in the real world.

Corporate campaign contributions are decided on by top level management to buy politicians who will do what they want, which is solely for the benefit the top level management.
Old 12-04-11, 10:03 PM
  #14  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Sean O'Hara's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Vichy America
Posts: 13,533
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: It's time to get the money out of politics

Originally Posted by Jason View Post


That sounds wonderful. A flowery world of rainbows and puppy dogs where those kind hearted corporations are only interested in what's good for us.

Now let me tell you how it works in the real world.

Corporate campaign contributions are decided on by top level management to buy politicians who will do what they want, which is solely for the benefit the top level management.
No, they make decisions to benefit the shareholders, to whom they are answerable.

Moreover, 501(c)s are corporations as well -- do you think Planned Parenthood or the Electronic Frontier Foundation should be banned from political speech? How about LLCs, which would likely fall within the scope of these proposed amendments?
Old 12-04-11, 10:28 PM
  #15  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Lower Gum Curve
Posts: 19,283
Likes: 0
Received 37 Likes on 26 Posts
Re: It's time to get the money out of politics

Originally Posted by Sean O'Hara View Post
No, they make decisions to benefit the shareholders, to whom they are answerable.

Moreover, 501(c)s are corporations as well -- do you think Planned Parenthood or the Electronic Frontier Foundation should be banned from political speech? How about LLCs, which would likely fall within the scope of these proposed amendments?
Planned Parenthood and EFF are non-profit corporations.
Old 12-04-11, 10:42 PM
  #16  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Sean O'Hara's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Vichy America
Posts: 13,533
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: It's time to get the money out of politics

Originally Posted by Jason View Post
Planned Parenthood and EFF are non-profit corporations.
Yes, that's what 501(c) means. What does that have to do with the discussion?
Old 12-04-11, 11:07 PM
  #17  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Lower Gum Curve
Posts: 19,283
Likes: 0
Received 37 Likes on 26 Posts
Re: It's time to get the money out of politics

Originally Posted by Sean O'Hara View Post
Yes, that's what 501(c) means. What does that have to do with the discussion?
Misinterpreted. Sue me.

The non-profit corporation was designed partially to distinguish advocacy groups from profit chasing businesses. Sort of a conflict of interest thing. Manipulating the government to increase your business isn't the same as working for a common cause.

I know you're not going to like it or agree with it, but there's a clear difference between the two activities. Pick one or the other.
Old 12-05-11, 12:11 AM
  #18  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Sean O'Hara's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Vichy America
Posts: 13,533
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: It's time to get the money out of politics

Originally Posted by Jason View Post
Misinterpreted. Sue me.

The non-profit corporation was designed partially to distinguish advocacy groups from profit chasing businesses. Sort of a conflict of interest thing. Manipulating the government to increase your business isn't the same as working for a common cause.

I know you're not going to like it or agree with it, but there's a clear difference between the two activities. Pick one or the other.
And yet the proposed amendments DVD Guy ATL linked to in the first post don't make any such distinction. The first one bans all money in campaigns, period, so advocacy groups are out. The second limits contributions to $100 per citizen of the United States. The third says:

People, person, or persons as used in this Constitution does not include corporations, limited liability companies or other corporate entities established by the laws of any state, the United States, or any foreign state, and such corporate entities are subject to such regulation as the people, through their elected state and federal representatives, deem reasonable and are otherwise consistent with the powers of Congress and the States under this Constitution.
So, again, 501(c)s are included, along with LLCs.
Old 12-05-11, 01:53 AM
  #19  
DVD Talk God
 
kvrdave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 86,189
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Re: It's time to get the money out of politics

I think this is just much ado about nothing. You won't ever get a president and congress to put forth a constitutional amendment that restrains their power. Just won't happen. Makes for an interesting discussion, I suppose, but it is like day dreaming about winning the lottery.
Old 12-05-11, 11:28 AM
  #20  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: It's time to get the money out of politics

Originally Posted by Sean O'Hara View Post
And yet the proposed amendments DVD Guy ATL linked to in the first post don't make any such distinction. [...] So, again, 501(c)s are included, along with LLCs.
I have no issues with this... special interests come in many different forms.
Old 12-05-11, 11:46 AM
  #21  
Enormous Genitals
 
Bandoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: a small cottage on a cul de sac in the lower pits of hell.
Posts: 34,367
Received 86 Likes on 53 Posts
Re: It's time to get the money out of politics

Originally Posted by kvrdave View Post
I think this is just much ado about nothing. You won't ever get a president and congress to put forth a constitutional amendment that restrains their power. Just won't happen. Makes for an interesting discussion, I suppose, but it is like day dreaming about winning the lottery.
I always wait for the Powerball jackpot to get big enough so that, if I won, I could buy my own Congressman, or maybe even a Senator.
Old 12-05-11, 11:53 AM
  #22  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Dr Mabuse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: 75 clicks above the Do Lung bridge...
Posts: 18,946
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Re: It's time to get the money out of politics

Originally Posted by kvrdave View Post
I think this is just much ado about nothing. You won't ever get a president and congress to put forth a constitutional amendment that restrains their power. Just won't happen. Makes for an interesting discussion, I suppose, but it is like day dreaming about winning the lottery.
The states could do it without the assistance of the federal powers.

That won't happen either of course, I'm just sayin...
Old 12-05-11, 12:08 PM
  #23  
DVD Talk God
 
kvrdave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 86,189
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Re: It's time to get the money out of politics

Originally Posted by Dr Mabuse View Post
The states could do it without the assistance of the federal powers.

That won't happen either of course, I'm just sayin...
Exactly. Much ado about nothing.
Old 12-15-11, 07:07 AM
  #24  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: frass canyon
Posts: 16,249
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: It's time to get the money out of politics

I think it's obvious that we need some sort of committee to differentiate between "good" corporations that should be allowed to spend money to achieve a political end, and "bad" corporations that should not be allowed to spend money to achieve a political end.
Old 12-15-11, 11:38 PM
  #25  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Nick Danger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Albuquerque
Posts: 25,277
Received 231 Likes on 170 Posts
Re: It's time to get the money out of politics

Originally Posted by RoyalTea View Post
I think it's obvious that we need some sort of committee to differentiate between "good" corporations that should be allowed to spend money to achieve a political end, and "bad" corporations that should not be allowed to spend money to achieve a political end.
The corporate lobbyists would surround your committee twelve deep. But on the bright side, the congressmen on the committee will be set for life on re-election funds.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.