Religion, Politics and World Events They make great dinner conversation, don't you think? plus Political Film

Is Energy Star™ an Energy Crock™?

Old 03-28-10, 06:18 AM
DVD Talk Hero
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: MI
Posts: 25,054
Is Energy Star™ an Energy Crock™?

3/4 of phony products submitted to Dept. of Energy receive Energy Star certification? Just an amazing tribute to "government at work."

I disagree with the comment that taxpayers are shortchanged two ways. A third way is paying taxes to support work done so shoddily that it might be better not done at all. In the private sector, this kind of "performance" would lead to firings. Not here, I don't suspect.

Phony products impress federal energy program
Frederic J. Frommer, Associated Press Writer – Fri Mar 26, 4:15 pm ET
WASHINGTON – Fifteen phony products — including a gasoline-powered alarm clock — won a label from the government certifying them as energy efficient in a test of the federal "Energy Star" program.

Investigators concluded the program is "vulnerable to fraud and abuse."

{no, really???}

A report released Friday said government investigators tried to pass off 20 fake products as energy efficient, and only two were rejected. Three others didn't get a response.

The program run by the Energy Department and Environmental Protection Agency is supposed to identify energy-efficient products to help consumers. Tax credits and rebates serve as incentives to buy Energy Star products.

But the General Accountability Office, Congress' investigative arm, said Energy Star doesn't verify claims made by manufacturers — which might explain the gasoline-powered alarm clock, not to mention a product billed as an air room cleaner that was actually a space heater with a feather duster and fly strips attached, and a computer monitor that won approval within 30 minutes of submission.

The alarm clock's size — 1 1/2-feet high and 15 inches wide — and model name "Black Gold" should have raised alarms with Energy Star, but the automated review system didn't catch on to the deception.

"EPA officials confirmed that because the energy-efficiency information was plausible, it was likely that no one read the product description information," GAO said.

In addition, the four phony GAO companies were able to become Energy Star partners, giving them access to the program's logos and other promotional resources. Energy Star didn't call any of the companies or visit the addresses, and sent only four of the 20 products to be verified by a third-party, GAO said.

Sen. Susan Collins of Maine, the top Republican on the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee who requested the study, said that "taxpayers are shortchanged twice" when Energy Star products are not thoroughly vetted — when consumers are willing to pay more for the products, and when taxpayer dollars are spent encouraging the purchases.

The GAO findings were first reported by The New York Times.

According to the GAO, the EPA and Energy Department told investigators in briefings that although the program is based on manufacturers' certifying their products meet efficiency standards, that efficiency is ensured through aftermarket tests and self-policing. The GAO did not look at those efforts.

The GAO did note that the two agencies said they are shifting to a more rigorous upfront screening process. In a news release last week, they announced additional testing of products and an ongoing verification program.

In a joint statement Friday, the agencies said consumers can have confidence in the Energy Star label.
{how exactly, given this story?}

"In fact, a review last year found that 98 percent of the products tested met or exceeded the Energy Star requirements, and last year alone, Americans with the help of Energy Star saved $17 billion on their energy bills."
{Any savings must be based on manufacturers being honest enough that they are afraid to lie to the government, not on the "work" done by DoE.}

But the agencies acknowledge the report raised important issues.

"That's why we have started an enhanced testing program and have already taken enforcement actions against companies that have violated the rules," the agencies' statement said.
OldDude is offline  
Old 03-28-10, 08:21 PM
DVD Talk God
kvrdave's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 86,201
Re: Is Energy Star™ an Energy Crock™?

But we're going to save so much from fixing medicare fraud.
kvrdave is offline  
Old 03-29-10, 02:05 AM
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Illinois
Posts: 2,378
Re: Is Energy Star™ an Energy Crock™? the gas powered alarm clock isn't real? I was hoping to cut back on the electric bill if there was an alternative to my electric alarm clock.
Cory02 is offline  
Old 03-29-10, 07:32 AM
DVD Talk Hero
jfoobar's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 37,812
Re: Is Energy Star™ an Energy Crock™?

My gas-powered toothbrush only takes E85. Friggin' hippies.
jfoobar is offline  
Old 03-29-10, 07:37 AM
DVD Talk Legend
Join Date: May 2004
Location: a mile high, give or take a few feet
Posts: 13,460
Re: Is Energy Star™ an Energy Crock™?

The air purifier is pretty sweet.
mndtrp is offline  
Old 03-29-10, 07:45 AM
DVD Talk Legend
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: MN
Posts: 23,936
Re: Is Energy Star™ an Energy Crock™?

A government agency did something withing 30 minutes of a request? Things are are looking up!
starman9000 is offline  
Old 03-29-10, 02:04 PM
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: US
Posts: 9,629
Re: Is Energy Star™ an Energy Crock™?

the gas powered alarm clock rules.
Dave99 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service

Copyright © 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.