Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > General Discussions > Other Talk > Religion, Politics and World Events
Reload this Page >

Do You Favor Absentee, Remote, or Proxy Voting in the House & the Senate?

Religion, Politics and World Events They make great dinner conversation, don't you think? plus Political Film
View Poll Results: Do You Favor Remote, Absentee or Proxy Voting in the House & Senate?
yes
16
66.67%
no
8
33.33%
Voters: 24. You may not vote on this poll

Do You Favor Absentee, Remote, or Proxy Voting in the House & the Senate?

Old 05-22-08, 03:30 PM
  #1  
DVD Talk God
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Posts: 68,522
Do You Favor Absentee, Remote, or Proxy Voting in the House & the Senate?

I don't.
classicman2 is offline  
Old 05-22-08, 03:34 PM
  #2  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Dimension X's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: The unknown world of the future
Posts: 4,702
No. For the reason I gave in the other thread.
Dimension X is offline  
Old 05-22-08, 03:35 PM
  #3  
DVD Talk God
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Directionally Challenged (for DirecTV)
Posts: 122,467
Absolutely. Here was the inspiration for this thread....

Originally Posted by Red Dog
I've been accused of having a horse & buggy mentality but I for the life of me cannot understand why they have an in-person requirement for casting a vote. A SCt Justice doesn't have to be at an oral argument to participate in a decision - mainly because they realize that the oral argument is mainly show; much like floor debates - the legislators are hamming for the cameras. The President doesn't have to physically be in Washington/WH to sign a bill into law or execute orders. These legislators aren't reading the bills to begin with. Senate filibusters aren't even real filibusters anymore. Nobody's mind is going to be changed with by a floor speech. If minds are changed, it's happening off the floor. So what's the point? We have e-mail, blackberrys, cell phones, fax machines, instant messaging, etc. Let's move into the 21st century and allow remote voting.

If you're a no, can you explain why?
Red Dog is offline  
Old 05-22-08, 03:48 PM
  #4  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Formerly known as "orangecrush18" - still legal though
Posts: 13,846
I do, just so it removes the excuses of travel from voting on an unpleasant issue.
orangecrush is offline  
Old 05-22-08, 03:53 PM
  #5  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 36,980
I think we could end up with a system where people are only in Washington for parties or something and all the voting/debating/arm twisting is done from the congressman's home state where they are busy campaigning year round
Venusian is offline  
Old 05-22-08, 03:55 PM
  #6  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Dimension X's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: The unknown world of the future
Posts: 4,702
Originally Posted by Red Dog
If you're a no, can you explain why?
Okay. Here's what I said in the other thread:

Originally Posted by Me
If they allowed remote voting, most of them would leave it to some underling to vote for them (or blame it on an underling or on the system when their vote wasn't popular). At least if they show up and vote we know who to blame (or praise).
As dork pointed out in that thread, a situation similar to what I described (where an underling was blamed) has been seen recently.
Dimension X is offline  
Old 05-22-08, 04:11 PM
  #7  
DVD Talk Legend
 
wishbone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,500
Why could they not incorporate some kind of video conferencing? If they can set this up in the Iraq desert surely they can set this up for a senator on the move within the continental US or abroad.
wishbone is offline  
Old 05-22-08, 04:17 PM
  #8  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Th0r S1mpson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 36,443
Yes, but with strict limitations. Only a certain percentage of votes, or with prior approval.
Th0r S1mpson is offline  
Old 05-22-08, 04:30 PM
  #9  
DVD Talk God
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Directionally Challenged (for DirecTV)
Posts: 122,467
Originally Posted by wishbon3
Why could they not incorporate some kind of video conferencing? If they can set this up in the Iraq desert surely they can set this up for a senator on the move within the continental US or abroad.

Excellent point. Many private companies and government agencies utilize VTC.
Red Dog is offline  
Old 05-22-08, 04:54 PM
  #10  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 20,679
Originally Posted by orangecrush18
I do, just so it removes the excuses of travel from voting on an unpleasant issue.
Yep.
Ranger is offline  
Old 05-22-08, 07:18 PM
  #11  
DVD Talk God
 
kvrdave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 86,200
I have no problem with them not physically being in DC to vote.
kvrdave is offline  
Old 05-22-08, 11:23 PM
  #12  
DVD Talk God
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Posts: 68,522
Then you would have no problem with them just staying at home in their own states & districts and never coming to Washington D.C. to conduct the business of the country?

I assume you would also have no problem with the continuation of the payment of their salaries.
classicman2 is offline  
Old 05-23-08, 07:17 AM
  #13  
DVD Talk God
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Directionally Challenged (for DirecTV)
Posts: 122,467
They can't conduct "business of the country" via electronic communication? Surely many aspects of their business is already conducted in this fashion.
Red Dog is offline  
Old 05-23-08, 07:25 AM
  #14  
DVD Talk God
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Posts: 68,522
You've told the forum it's all show, and doesn't mean anything.

Why do they even need to come to Washington?
classicman2 is offline  
Old 05-23-08, 07:28 AM
  #15  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: MN
Posts: 23,936
Isn't he arguing that they don't?
starman9000 is offline  
Old 05-23-08, 07:33 AM
  #16  
Enormous Genitals
 
Bandoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: a small cottage on a cul de sac in the lower pits of hell.
Posts: 32,743
Originally Posted by classicman2
Then you would have no problem with them just staying at home in their own states & districts and never coming to Washington D.C. to conduct the business of the country?
Yeah, God forbid that they actually live with the people they serve and see firsthand what effect their policies have on their constituents.

I have no problem with remote voting. I dislike proxy voting because it gives an air of "plausible deniability" to those who are challenged on their votes.

Last edited by Bandoman; 05-23-08 at 07:39 AM.
Bandoman is offline  
Old 05-23-08, 07:35 AM
  #17  
DVD Talk God
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Directionally Challenged (for DirecTV)
Posts: 122,467
Originally Posted by classicman2
You've told the forum it's all show, and doesn't mean anything.

Why do they even need to come to Washington?

Thank you.
Red Dog is offline  
Old 05-23-08, 07:37 AM
  #18  
DVD Talk God
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Directionally Challenged (for DirecTV)
Posts: 122,467
Originally Posted by Bandoman
Yeah, God forbid that they actually live with the people they serve and see firsthand what effect their policies have on their constituents.

I have no problem with remote voting. I dislike proxy voting because it gives an heir of "plausible deniability" to those who are challenged on their votes.

Exactly, it's supposed to be about constituent service, so wouldn't more time spent in their district or state be a good thing? When they are in DC, it becomes far more about party and lobbyist service.
Red Dog is offline  
Old 05-23-08, 07:48 AM
  #19  
DVD Talk God
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Posts: 68,522
[QUOTE=Bandoman: I have no problem with remote voting. I dislike proxy voting because it gives an air of "plausible deniability" to those who are challenged on their votes.[/QUOTE]

The same thing can occur with remote voting.

There have been instances in the House when members gave their 'vote cards' to other members and staff members to vote for them.
classicman2 is offline  
Old 05-23-08, 08:58 AM
  #20  
Moderator
 
wendersfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Nuova Repubblica di SalÚ
Posts: 32,247
I wonder how it would affect lobbying if members of Congress didn't have to visit/be in/reside in DC very much? Breaking it down, I can think of the following things that take up their time:

Voting on the floor
Debating on the floor
Attending committee meetings, voting in them, etc.
Drafting legislation
Making "deals" - negotiating, arm twisting, etc.
Constituency service
"Fact-finding" outside of committee hearings

Many of these things could be done without the members ever setting foot in DC. Some would be much harder to do. I guess it all breaks down by how much you want Congress to do, and in what areas. That means for some, this is an easy question to answer. For others, not so much. Obviously it would be nice if a Senator could vote on the passage of a bill while at the same time not leaving the hospital bedside of a spouse, parent, or child. On the other, we pay these people to do a job and it would be nice to see them show up at the office a bit more. I doubt it if my employer would like it if I took most of the summer off, with pay, to look for a more prestigious and higher paying job, even if I could telecommute and get most of my duties accomplished.
wendersfan is offline  
Old 05-23-08, 09:14 AM
  #21  
Enormous Genitals
 
Bandoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: a small cottage on a cul de sac in the lower pits of hell.
Posts: 32,743
Originally Posted by classicman2
Originally Posted by Bandoman
I have no problem with remote voting. I dislike proxy voting because it gives an air of "plausible deniability" to those who are challenged on their votes.
The same thing can occur with remote voting.
Not if they have to say "I vote yes on H.R.1034" or "I vote no on H.R.1034" instead of just pressing a button. Maybe they would need to enter a code to access the sytem and then speak to a clerk who records the vote? I'm sure there are myriad ways the voting could be done to make sure that the vote is accurately recorded.
Bandoman is offline  
Old 05-23-08, 09:19 AM
  #22  
DVD Talk God
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Directionally Challenged (for DirecTV)
Posts: 122,467
Originally Posted by Bandoman
Not if they have to say "I vote yes on H.R.1034" or "I vote no on H.R.1034" instead of just pressing a button. Maybe they would need to enter a code to access the sytem and then speak to a clerk who records the vote? I'm sure there are myriad ways the voting could be done to make sure that the vote is accurately recorded.

That's the way I would envision it happening.
Red Dog is offline  
Old 05-23-08, 09:30 AM
  #23  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 11,747
Originally Posted by wendersfan
On the other, we pay these people to do a job and it would be nice to see them show up at the office a bit more.
Yeah, I don't see why it's up to me to make it easier for these guys to run for re-election. Let them do that on their own time.
dork is offline  
Old 05-23-08, 09:58 AM
  #24  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Working for Gizmonic Institute
Posts: 10,430
Originally Posted by Bandoman
Not if they have to say "I vote yes on H.R.1034" or "I vote no on H.R.1034" instead of just pressing a button. Maybe they would need to enter a code to access the sytem and then speak to a clerk who records the vote? I'm sure there are myriad ways the voting could be done to make sure that the vote is accurately recorded.
Needs more boilerplate to give less weasel room.

To the Bandoman Cave!
crazyronin is offline  
Old 05-23-08, 10:03 AM
  #25  
DVD Talk God
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Posts: 68,522
Well - the Red Dog crowd will be happy. Next week is the Memorial Day recess. Congress won't be in session.

btw: Do you see how time consuming Bandoman's idea (speaking to a clerk) would be in the House?

If you're going to do that - why not just return to the old way of voting - the way the Senate currently does it?

btw: They don't press a button now.

J
classicman2 is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service

Copyright © 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.