Religion, Politics and World Events They make great dinner conversation, don't you think? plus Political Film

The UN's Global/International Tax?

Old 03-30-06, 11:11 PM
  #1  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,032
The UN's Global/International Tax?

This was brought up in conversation today. Just wondering if anyone here knows anything about...whether or not it's actually a real concept for just more ramblings from the black helicopter crowd.

If it were/is a real thing, I'd have to say, "NO WAY!!!11!!" The next thing they'd do is take away my guns, and we can't be having that.
MartinBlank is offline  
Old 03-30-06, 11:14 PM
  #2  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 22,995
I think Chirac is strongly behind this. I'd like to see him put it to the test on his fellow citizens. There was a thread a long time ago regarding this.
Myster X is offline  
Old 03-31-06, 12:01 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 620
http://www.house.gov/paul/tst/tst2006/tst030606.htm
sjrab16 is offline  
Old 03-31-06, 05:56 PM
  #4  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: puckland
Posts: 745
I'm not sure how this would be a whole lot different than simply collecting dues from member nations as the U.N. currently does. Rest assured, whether it's dues or taxes, the U.S. will evade them.
Nutter is offline  
Old 03-31-06, 06:12 PM
  #5  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,032
If I remember correctly, the US accounts for 70%+ of the UN's budget.
MartinBlank is offline  
Old 03-31-06, 07:55 PM
  #6  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 22,995
Nope.

1. US
2. Japan
3. Germany

US, Japan, and Germany pays nearly half of the UN's budget.
Myster X is offline  
Old 04-01-06, 07:48 AM
  #7  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Lower Gum Curve
Posts: 18,881
Originally Posted by MartinBlank
If I remember correctly, the US accounts for 70%+ of the UN's budget.
We probably make up 70%+ of outstanding or delinquent payments...
Jason is offline  
Old 04-01-06, 08:23 AM
  #8  
DVD Talk God
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Posts: 68,522
The US 'dues' to the UN is 25% of the total.

There was/is a move in congress to reduce that to 20%.
classicman2 is offline  
Old 04-01-06, 09:38 AM
  #9  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 25,062
A tax on all currency transactions, huh? Interesting. I assume that American companies would refuse to collect this tax. So, if they have an office in, say, France, who will enforce it? The French police on behalf of the U.N.? This seems fraught with problems.

The U.N. is not a government.
Tracer Bullet is offline  
Old 04-01-06, 04:05 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 866
Originally Posted by TracerBullet
The U.N. is not a government.

Tell that to Kofi.
Binger is offline  
Old 04-01-06, 04:07 PM
  #11  
DVD Talk God
 
kvrdave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 86,200
Originally Posted by Jason
We probably make up 70%+ of outstanding or delinquent payments...
With determination, we can get that to 90% but we don't seem to have the will.
kvrdave is offline  
Old 04-01-06, 04:12 PM
  #12  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Downers Grove, IL
Posts: 10,470
Originally Posted by TracerBullet
The U.N. is not a government.
LOL, I don't think we'll ever know what it really is.
huzefa is offline  
Old 04-01-06, 04:57 PM
  #13  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,032
Originally Posted by TracerBullet
The U.N. is not a government.
Not yet.
MartinBlank is offline  
Old 04-01-06, 05:17 PM
  #14  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 28,966
Originally Posted by huzefa
LOL, I don't think we'll ever know what it really is.
It's a bit like the Inter Galactic Council.
eXcentris is offline  
Old 04-07-06, 12:52 AM
  #15  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 22,995
Excellent move.
Looks like China's currency manupilation is coming back to bite them.

http://www.washtimes.com/world/20060...0637-7074r.htm

U.S. eyes sharing of U.N. budget

NEW YORK -- The United States has proposed a new method of apportioning U.N. dues that would mean sharp increases for countries including China, Russia and India.
Other rapidly developing countries also would be hit by the proposal, which has been making the rounds in the U.N. budget committee and on Capitol Hill. The U.S. contribution would drop only slightly, from 22 percent to 21.5 percent.
The proposal was promptly rejected as "unfair" by a representative of China, who complained that its assessment would increase sixfold, making its share second only to that of the United States.
Currently, each country's share of the $1.9 billion annual U.N. budget is based on its Gross Domestic Product, while the poorest nations pay a flat rate of .001 percent of the budget -- roughly $19,000 a year.
The United States, whose contribution is capped by U.S. law at 22 percent of the regular budget, has suggested that contributions be calculated instead according to a World Bank scale called "purchasing power parity," or PPP.
"While the United States remains a strong supporter of a more effective, streamlined and efficient U.N., we do feel that other member states can and should contribute more," U.N. Ambassador John R. Bolton said in Washington yesterday.
"PPP is the numbers of units of a country's currency needed to buy in the country the same amounts of goods and services in a different country," he told the House Appropriations Committee's subcommittee on science, state, justice and commerce.
Mr. Bolton said the GDP numbers now in use "can be greatly skewed ... by distortions introduced into the marketplace by currencies which are nonconvertible and by other factors, as well."
China, for example, has a per capita GDP of about $1,500 based on its current exchange rate, which economists think has been kept artificially low. But using the PPP method, the average Chinese has a purchasing power equal to an American with an income of about $6,200, according to one assessment.
The United States repeatedly has criticized China for holding down its exchange rate, blaming the action in part for America's soaring international trade deficit.
China, Russia and other developing countries reject the PPP as a way to calculate U.N. dues, saying the World Bank developed the model as a way to assess countries' consumption, not their wealth.
"We do hope that by the end of the day the capacity to pay will be [retained]," said China's ambassador to the United Nations, Wang Guangya, whose country currently pays 2.05 percent of the budget, or $38 million.

"To calculate GDP with PPP is ... unfair to a large number of developing countries," said Wang Xinxia, the Chinese delegation's budget specialist. Under the formula, she said, China would pay more than France, Germany or even Japan -- all of which would see their assessments drop.
She also said the data that Beijing submitted to the World Bank for the calculation of the PPP was taken from just 11 cities and did not accurately represent the whole country.
Mr. Bolton acknowledged to the committee that many nations do not collect PPP statistics annually.
The apportionment of U.N. assessments is reviewed every three years, and must be completed by the end of December so the organization can send the bills to governments in early January.
The U.S. plan is one of nearly a dozen put into circulation by eight countries, say diplomats, who have begun to sift through competing proposals before sending them on for analysis by the U.N. Committee on Contributions.
The U.N. peacekeeping budget, which fluctuates each year with the number and complexity of the missions under way, is funded separately, although nations pay in similar proportions. The same is true of the U.N. tribunals for Rwanda and the former Yugoslavia.
The United States is assessed at 27 percent of peacekeeping, but pays only 25 percent of the budget because of a congressional cap imposed in 1998.
Myster X is offline  
Old 04-07-06, 03:00 AM
  #16  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: AtlantA
Posts: 283
Originally Posted by classicman2
The US 'dues' to the UN is 25% of the total.

There was/is a move in congress to reduce that to 20%.
They should move to make that 0%..if not they fail again just like with immigration.
Nonhosonno is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.