Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > Music Talk
Reload this Page >

Robin Thicke Blurred Lines Music Video with T.I. & Pharrell

Music Talk Discuss music in all its forms: CD, MP3, DVD-A, SACD and of course live

Robin Thicke Blurred Lines Music Video with T.I. & Pharrell

Old 01-13-16, 02:37 PM
  #126  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Why So Blu?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 28,461
Re: Robin Thicke Blurred Lines Music Video with T.I. & Pharrell

Originally Posted by DVD Josh View Post
I don't practice IP law but I believe the statute gives them the right to seek it.
And they should.
Why So Blu? is offline  
Old 01-13-16, 02:52 PM
  #127  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 37,964
Re: Robin Thicke Blurred Lines Music Video with T.I. & Pharrell

6033 hours to prove a new song sounds like your old one?
RichC2 is offline  
Old 01-13-16, 02:58 PM
  #128  
DVD Talk Hero
 
TomOpus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 32,122
Re: Robin Thicke Blurred Lines Music Video with T.I. & Pharrell

Originally Posted by RichC2 View Post
6033 hours to prove a new song sounds like your old one?
It's a catchy tune
TomOpus is offline  
Old 01-13-16, 08:08 PM
  #129  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Troy Stiffler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Under an I-10 Overpass
Posts: 20,824
Re: Robin Thicke Blurred Lines Music Video with T.I. & Pharrell

So how does sampling work? I listen to a handful of artists that takes samples everywhere. If it doesn't make money, nobody cares. But if it's a hit, then you have to deal with lawsuits?
Troy Stiffler is offline  
Old 01-13-16, 08:29 PM
  #130  
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Supermallet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Termite Terrace
Posts: 54,048
Re: Robin Thicke Blurred Lines Music Video with T.I. & Pharrell

If I were paying my lawyers $441 an hour, I'd want someone else to pay them too!

Also, anything that hurts Robin Thicke is good for the earth. It's like anti-global warming.
Supermallet is offline  
Old 01-13-16, 09:27 PM
  #131  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Why So Blu?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 28,461
Re: Robin Thicke Blurred Lines Music Video with T.I. & Pharrell

Originally Posted by Supermallet View Post
If I were paying my lawyers $441 an hour, I'd want someone else to pay them too!

Also, anything that hurts Robin Thicke is good for the earth. It's like anti-global warming.
Why So Blu? is offline  
Old 03-22-18, 01:21 PM
  #132  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Somewhere between Heaven and Hell
Posts: 29,789
Re: Robin Thicke Blurred Lines Music Video with T.I. & Pharrell

‘Blurred Lines’ Verdict Upheld in Favor of Marvin Gaye Family – But T.I. Is Off the Hook
By Variety Staff @Variety Variety Staff

The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals mostly affirmed a jury’s 2015 $5.3 million verdict that decided Robin Thicke and Pharrell Williams’ 2013 hit “Blurred Lines” infringed upon Marvin Gaye’s 1977 composition “Got to Give It Up” — but it did clear rapper T.I., who appears on Thicke’s song, as well as Interscope Records, which released it. The news was first reported by The Hollywood Reporter.

The majority opinion from Judge Milan D. Smith Jr. rejected Thicke’s team’s argument that Gaye’s copyright is only entitled to “thin” protection, stating that “Musical compositions are not confined to a narrow range of expression.

“We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the Thicke Parties’ motion for a new trial,” he continued.

However, T.I (real name: Clifford Harris Jr.), who was cleared by a jury before being punished by the trial judge, is once again off the hook, as is Interscope.

“Harris and the Interscope Parties contend that the district court erred in overturning the jury’s general verdicts finding in their favor,” writes Smith. “We agree. First, the Gayes waived any challenge to the consistency of the jury’s general verdicts. Second, even had the Gayes preserved their challenge, neither Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50(b) nor our decisions in Westinghouse and El-Hakem v. BJY Inc., conferred authority on the district court to upset the jury’s verdicts in this case. Third, as to Harris specifically, the district court erred for the additional reason that no evidence showed Harris was vicariously liable.”

Smith, however, was unmoved. “[T]he dissent prophesies that our decision will shake the foundations of copyright law, imperil the music industry, and stifle creativity,” he wrote. “It even suggests that the Gayes’ victory will come back to haunt them, as the Gayes’ musical compositions may now be found to infringe any number of famous songs preceding them. Respectfully,hese conjectures are unfounded hyperbole. Our decision does not grant license to copyright a musical style or ‘groove.’ Nor does it upset the balance Congress struck between the freedom of artistic expression, on the one hand, and copyright protection of the fruits of that expression, on the other hand. … Far from heralding the end of musical creativity as we know it, our decision, even construed broadly, reads more accurately as a cautionary tale for future trial counsel wishing to maximize their odds of success.”

The 2015 verdict has had a strong effect on subsequent cases, with many parties shying away from jury trials and electing to settle out of court, as has been the case with Sam Smith, Ed Sheeran and Mark Ronson compositions.
devilshalo is offline  
Old 03-22-18, 02:19 PM
  #133  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Hokeyboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
Posts: 18,694
Re: Robin Thicke Blurred Lines Music Video with T.I. & Pharrell

Good.
Hokeyboy is offline  
Old 12-13-18, 11:22 PM
  #134  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Sonic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 17,283
Re: Robin Thicke Blurred Lines Music Video with T.I. & Pharrell

'Blurred Lines' suit against Robin Thicke, Pharrell ends in $5 million judgment

(CNN)A five-year legal battle over the copyright of the hit song "Blurred Lines" has ended with Marvin Gaye's family being awarded a final judgment of nearly $5 million against Robin Thicke and Pharrell Williams.

The pair had been accused of copyright infringement for their 2013 single because of the similarities to Gaye's 1977 hit "Got to Give It Up."

Gaye died in 1984 after being shot to death by his father, Marvin Gay Sr. (the singer added the "e" to create his stage name).

Thicke and Williams were ordered in 2015 to pay Gaye's estate more than $7 million, but that judgment was reduced to $5.3 million and the pair appealed the verdict.

Source
Sonic is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.