|
Re: "Can Jazz Be Saved?"
Originally Posted by Dr Mabuse
(Post 9634671)
I've listened to Bill Evans and Chet Baker a couple of hours today already.
Jazz is just fine. |
Re: "Can Jazz Be Saved?"
Originally Posted by wendersfan
(Post 9632961)
AKA, "Are general audiences too stupid to enjoy jazz?"
I love jazz, but I'll be the first to admit that the genre marginalized itself out of mainstream popularity with the advent of bebop. Bebop didn't kill jazz. If it did, jazz would've marginalized itself in the 40s. Getz/Gilberto came out in 1964. No way was jazz dead at that point. (Or think of Time Out five years earlier). I can't recognize when music is complex or hard to play, and I'll be damned if, say, Art Blakey wasn't playing for the other musicians as well as his audience. But I know when music is boring; Interstellar Space is, to me, peppered with moments of pure wankery. I know what does blow... "lite jazz" which unfortunately infests a very large part of today's market, directly or indirectly. If anything, the most popular (for better or worse) form of jazz today is acid jazz, at least if any of the restaurants or bars I sometimes go to pay ASCAP fees. If I had $1 for each time I heard Thievery Corporation, I wouldn't have a mortgage. |
Re: "Can Jazz Be Saved?"
Originally Posted by The Bus
(Post 9635223)
I know what does blow... "lite jazz" which unfortunately infests a very large part of today's market, directly or indirectly.
Jazz usually isn't an easy listen for new people to get into. It can be quite rewarding once someone guides you in to the music. |
Re: "Can Jazz Be Saved?"
Can someone help me out here...
Ive been looking for music in the vein of STP's 'Press Play'. I assume its a type of lounge act jazz. Here is a link to a clip of the song via Deep Discount: http://www.deepdiscount.com/viewprod...ductId=5798462 Anyone know any groups that play music like this? |
Re: "Can Jazz Be Saved?"
See post directly above yours.
|
Re: "Can Jazz Be Saved?"
Originally Posted by wendersfan
(Post 9634709)
Actually playing something worthwhile.
The biggest problem with jazz as a consumable art form is that the ability required to play jazz badly is not that much (compared to playing it well). Like I said, lots of guys can aimlessly play the mixolydian mode, throw in a few flatted fifths, and get a gig in some wedding/bar mitzvah band. But there's nothing very artistically compelling to what they're doing. To play jazz and actually contribute something useful requires a level of talent and originality that few people on the planet have. Compare that with rock or country. The "marginal utility" of increased instrumental prowess is much lower. Once you reach a certain level of competence you're good to go, provided you are able to write songs with something original in them (i.e., playing in a cover band is a different proposition), or you happen to get lucky and end up playing in a band with someone with an original voice. The really talented rock or country musicians are inevitably the studio players, since they can parlay that talent into a steady, predictable income with good hours and working conditions. They have to be good, because they need to come up with parts quickly, in a variety of styles, and perform the correctly in one or two takes. Also, as I pointed out before, the better you get as a jazz musician, the less commercially viable you are, because you end up playing music more complicated than most listeners can appreciate. |
Re: "Can Jazz Be Saved?"
Originally Posted by mndtrp
(Post 9635590)
Unfortunately, this is what a lot of people associate jazz with. I know I certainly did for a long time. Even when I found other forms of jazz, I didn't fully enjoy it until I became more interested in how music in general was created, and the skill behind it all. At that point, jazz became fascinating.
Jazz usually isn't an easy listen for new people to get into. It can be quite rewarding once someone guides you in to the music. Over the years, I've expanded my palate to embrace different jazz forms, but my favorite is Hard Bop, probably because of my Horace Silver exposure. I just picked up a Milt Jackson album from 1964 that I thoroughly enjoy and now I will expand my catalog of his music. I agree that true music appreciation can occur by listening and becoming a student of sorts of jazz. This by no means is meant to detract from other types of music - jazz is simply a different expression of art, and I am very passionate about many different types of music. |
Re: "Can Jazz Be Saved?"
The article says that no one's listening to jazz, but then presents evidence that people aren't attending live jazz performances. Those aren't the same thing. Maybe the problem isn't a lack of listeners but the quality of the modern performers?
|
Re: "Can Jazz Be Saved?"
Originally Posted by RockyMtnBri
(Post 9636420)
I lucked out in this respect - I grew up listening to Horace Silver, Cal Tjader, and others courtesy of my father. My expansion into jazz full-steam happened after a Branford Marsalis concert in 1986, where he played "Deluge" by Wayne Shorter, which prompted me to pick up the original album, Juju. This is a fantastic album if you've never heard it. After that I started to take CDs out of the library to listen to Miles Davis, John Coltrane, Art Blakey, and many others who have now become staples in my music collection.
Over the years, I've expanded my palate to embrace different jazz forms, but my favorite is Hard Bop |
Re: "Can Jazz Be Saved?"
Originally Posted by Sean O'Hara
(Post 9636424)
The article says that no one's listening to jazz, but then presents evidence that people aren't attending live jazz performances. Those aren't the same thing. Maybe the problem isn't a lack of listeners but the quality of the modern performers?
|
Re: "Can Jazz Be Saved?"
Originally Posted by The Bus
(Post 9636279)
See post directly above yours.
So I ask again, anyone know any? Oh and I like Thievery Corporation. I NEVER considered them jazz though. |
Re: "Can Jazz Be Saved?"
Originally Posted by The Bus
(Post 9635223)
I don't consider myself a "jazz connoisseur" although I know more about it than any of my non-musician peers (which, admittedly, is very, very easy to do).
Bebop didn't kill jazz. If it did, jazz would've marginalized itself in the 40s. Getz/Gilberto came out in 1964. No way was jazz dead at that point. (Or think of Time Out five years earlier). I can't recognize when music is complex or hard to play, and I'll be damned if, say, Art Blakey wasn't playing for the other musicians as well as his audience. But I know when music is boring; Interstellar Space is, to me, peppered with moments of pure wankery. I know what does blow... "lite jazz" which unfortunately infests a very large part of today's market, directly or indirectly. If anything, the most popular (for better or worse) form of jazz today is acid jazz, at least if any of the restaurants or bars I sometimes go to pay ASCAP fees. If I had $1 for each time I heard Thievery Corporation, I wouldn't have a mortgage. I stick with older dead jazz artists and humorously enough really enjoy the experimental Coltrane things like Stellar Regions and Meditations. I need to dig up Interstellar Space to give it another listen before i could comment on the wankery. :lol: I probably have 75 or 80 jazz CDs and records at them moment. |
Re: "Can Jazz Be Saved?"
Here are some "newer" artists. The YouTube videos aren't necessarily representative, since I just picked one of the first that came up. Also, they are not all "jazz" in the traditional sense.
Soulive Medeski Martin & Wood (I'm not a big fan of them) Breakestra Charlie Hunter Greyboy All-Stars Jazzanova Keith Jarrett (who's been around a while but AFAIK is still performing) Again, these artists are not all jazz — a lot of them just have a big jazz influence, which is apparent to me on the songs I have of them. The YT videos are just examples. |
Re: "Can Jazz Be Saved?"
Good list of modern jazz. Soulive is fantastic - saw them live at a small venue a few months ago. Very good show. Keith Jarret is another favorite of mine. His solo improv concerts are so amazing and beautiful.
Charlie Hunter can be good - but his music kind of bores me. I'd also add The Bad Plus there. They have a really unique, cerebral sound and do a great job building unique covers of popular music, jazz standards, and original material. Pat Metheny is another great. He's been around for a while, but he's still releasing new albums and the group is still touring - better than ever. Antonio Sanchez is stunning in his role as the new drummer. Good solo in this video. <object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/CmZjHh1sWfQ&hl=en&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/CmZjHh1sWfQ&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object> Also check out Kenny Garrett, one of the best young horn players out there today. Beyond the Wall is an amazing album - as are his more traditional outings. <object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/chlXZsO9_uI&hl=en&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/chlXZsO9_uI&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object> Marc Carey on piano is putting out some really fresh sounds still firmly rooted in tradition. Check out the albums Focus or The Tonic. And last but certainly not least. My favorite, Chris Potter on sax. He's truly truly one of the best ever. Check out the live album Chris Potter Underground Follow the Red Line - one of my top 5. Great cover of Radiohead's Morning Bell. <object width="560" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/yvT7hrmGSJg&hl=en&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/yvT7hrmGSJg&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object> I think there's still a great deal of quality jazz being performed and produced these days - although there isn't a ton of young talent. It's clearly not as culturally relevent as it was five decades ago, but who cares? I still know a lot of people who are into jazz or jazz fusion music. And it continues to have a heavy influence in newer styles of music like eletronica and hip-hop. In terms of local talent, if you live in or near an urban area, I think there's ample opportunity to see quality live shows. I've never felt like there's a dearth of jazz music to see in Chicago. |
Re: "Can Jazz Be Saved?"
I dont know what the fuck is wrong with my java. I just updated it and installed everything, but I cant see a thing! :mad:
|
Re: "Can Jazz Be Saved?"
YouTube is flash, not Java, IIRC. Or maybe not.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:04 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.