Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > Movie Talk
Reload this Page >

worst degradation in quality from original to sequel

Community
Search
Movie Talk A Discussion area for everything movie related including films In The Theaters

worst degradation in quality from original to sequel

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-20-18, 12:33 PM
  #51  
Member
 
Brack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: near Cincinnati
Posts: 10,007
Received 61 Likes on 39 Posts
Re: worst degradation in quality from original to sequel

Cocoon to Cocoon:The Return. The sequel makes a joke out of the original film’s poignant ending.
Old 12-20-18, 12:37 PM
  #52  
DVD Talk Godfather & 2020 TOTY Winner
 
Decker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Vegas, Baby!
Posts: 75,745
Received 6,178 Likes on 4,207 Posts
Re: worst degradation in quality from original to sequel

Originally Posted by stvn1974
Batman Begins to The Dark Knight. We go from a good Batman origin story based on the comic books to a low rent Heat rip off.
And there it is!

Old 12-20-18, 12:40 PM
  #53  
DVD Talk Godfather
 
fumanstan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 55,349
Received 26 Likes on 14 Posts
Re: worst degradation in quality from original to sequel

Old 12-20-18, 01:04 PM
  #54  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
PatD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,287
Likes: 0
Received 156 Likes on 96 Posts
Re: worst degradation in quality from original to sequel

Originally Posted by jpcamb
Blues Brothers 2000, although in fairness I absolutely refuse to watch it.

Surprised nobody has tried to pull the latest SW Trilogy into this....
Blues Brothers 2000 is GARBAGE. Yes, this might be the winner of this thread. It's an abominable mess, I was appalled when I first saw it in theaters. All the hip humor, heart and good music of the original is replaced with Aykroyd-Gone-Wild.
Old 12-20-18, 02:10 PM
  #55  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: long island, ny
Posts: 650
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts
Re: worst degradation in quality from original to sequel

American Psycho 2
Old 12-20-18, 02:33 PM
  #56  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Relocated to Bot-Hell
Posts: 11,819
Received 239 Likes on 175 Posts
Re: worst degradation in quality from original to sequel

Originally Posted by fujishig
Highlander to Highlander 2. Threw away all the good parts and made it a sci fi story that recycled the story of the original anyway.
This is what popped into my mind first.
Old 12-20-18, 02:42 PM
  #57  
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Giantrobo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Gateway Cities/Harbor Region
Posts: 63,270
Received 1,793 Likes on 1,121 Posts
Re: worst degradation in quality from original to sequel

How the fuck does IRON MAN -> IRON III not get mentioned til page 3?
Old 12-20-18, 02:44 PM
  #58  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 11,309
Received 289 Likes on 210 Posts
Re: worst degradation in quality from original to sequel

First films that came to mind were "Poltergeist II", "The Sting II", "Caddyshack 2" and "European Vacation". I'm also siding with those who said "Grease 2" is a fun film. Sure, the songs weren't as catchy as the original. But production-wise, it's a far superior film. And as much as I like "Aliens", I thought it's production value looked cheap (compared to "Alien). To me, it looked like it was made on a shoe string budget. And it probably cost more (I don't know).
Old 12-20-18, 02:48 PM
  #59  
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Giantrobo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Gateway Cities/Harbor Region
Posts: 63,270
Received 1,793 Likes on 1,121 Posts
Re: worst degradation in quality from original to sequel

Gojira 54—> almost all Toho G-flims that followed starting with a particularly harsh fall off the high edge with the 2nd film that was the garbage called Godzilla Raids again
Old 12-20-18, 02:52 PM
  #60  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
PatD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,287
Likes: 0
Received 156 Likes on 96 Posts
Re: worst degradation in quality from original to sequel

Why the fuck are people ripping on Aliens? It's not like the characters in Alien were particularly deep ("right.") And the production values were top notch for the time.

Besides, comparing Alien to Aliens is like comparing Halloween (1978) to Die Hard: they're two different genres.
Old 12-20-18, 02:57 PM
  #61  
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Giantrobo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Gateway Cities/Harbor Region
Posts: 63,270
Received 1,793 Likes on 1,121 Posts
Re: worst degradation in quality from original to sequel

Originally Posted by PatD
Why the fuck are people ripping on Aliens? It's not like the characters in Alien were particularly deep ("right.") And the production values were top notch for the time.
Because Groucho did and made a funny when he did it. It started a stroke fest. I think all that "busy strokin'" is why the IRON MAN franchise didn't get mentioned till page 3. jus sayin...
Old 12-20-18, 03:23 PM
  #62  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Ash Ketchum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 12,627
Received 277 Likes on 212 Posts
Re: worst degradation in quality from original to sequel

Originally Posted by Giantrobo
Gojira 54—> almost all Toho G-flims that followed starting with a particularly harsh fall off the high edge with the 2nd film that was the garbage called Godzilla Raids again
How dare you?!





Old 12-20-18, 03:27 PM
  #63  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Waterford, MI
Posts: 1,263
Likes: 0
Received 38 Likes on 21 Posts
Re: worst degradation in quality from original to sequel

Originally Posted by Sonic
Matrix > Matrix Reloaded
Superman II > Superman Returns
The Never ending Story > The Never ending Story II
Predator > Predator II



Amen.
I know this is probably a very minority opinion...but Superman III to Superman IV was simply aweful. Sure, SIII is considered inferior to SI and II, but it does have some good parts to it - it was one of the earliest films I remember watching in the theater - was terrified for years at some of the ending scenes. But, nothing and I mean nothing could prepare me for seeing SIV in the theater as a kid. I couldn't understand at the time how any movie of Superman's stature could be gone from theaters within a week. I do watch it when I decide to do a Superman marathon and I feel sick every single time. Compared to it, Superman Returns at least had production values
Old 12-20-18, 03:28 PM
  #64  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Waterford, MI
Posts: 1,263
Likes: 0
Received 38 Likes on 21 Posts
Re: worst degradation in quality from original to sequel

Originally Posted by inri222
The Two Jakes
The Crow: City of Angels
The Sting 2
Staying Alive
Blues Brothers 2000
The Lost World
RoboCop 2
Blair Witch 2
The Matrix Reloaded
The Crow City of Angels ranks up there as one of the most jaw-droppingly aweful cinema experiences I've ever had whereas The Crow is one of the best. It deserves to be reviled and, hopefully, never mentioned again ;/
Old 12-20-18, 03:30 PM
  #65  
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Giantrobo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Gateway Cities/Harbor Region
Posts: 63,270
Received 1,793 Likes on 1,121 Posts
Re: worst degradation in quality from original to sequel

Originally Posted by Ash Ketchum
How dare you?!
That's why I said "almost"... But even those compared to G54...well, they don't.
Old 12-20-18, 03:37 PM
  #66  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
PatD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,287
Likes: 0
Received 156 Likes on 96 Posts
Re: worst degradation in quality from original to sequel

Originally Posted by fiver
I know this is probably a very minority opinion...but Superman III to Superman IV was simply aweful. Sure, SIII is considered inferior to SI and II, but it does have some good parts to it - it was one of the earliest films I remember watching in the theater - was terrified for years at some of the ending scenes. But, nothing and I mean nothing could prepare me for seeing SIV in the theater as a kid. I couldn't understand at the time how any movie of Superman's stature could be gone from theaters within a week. I do watch it when I decide to do a Superman marathon and I feel sick every single time. Compared to it, Superman Returns at least had production values
Superman III is where everything went wrong. It went from a relatively serious-minded epic to a mindless farce featuring Richard Pryor acting like an uncomfortable Don Knotts. What were they thinking? As for IV, let me put it to you like this: what's worse: shitting the bed by accident (IV) or on purpose (III)?
Old 12-20-18, 03:39 PM
  #67  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 11,309
Received 289 Likes on 210 Posts
Re: worst degradation in quality from original to sequel

Originally Posted by PatD
Why the fuck are people ripping on Aliens? It's not like the characters in Alien were particularly deep ("right.") And the production values were top notch for the time.

Besides, comparing Alien to Aliens is like comparing Halloween (1978) to Die Hard: they're two different genres.
Geez, calm your tits. No one is ripping on "Aliens". I thought we were talking about quality here, not character development or genres. And you want to compare production values, put "Alien" next to "Aliens". It's 7 years older and looks 10 x better. "Aliens" is still an exciting follow-up.
Old 12-20-18, 03:45 PM
  #68  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 8,983
Likes: 0
Received 246 Likes on 175 Posts
Re: worst degradation in quality from original to sequel

Piranha>Piranha II: The Spawning
Hills Have Eyes (1977)>Hills Have Eyes 2
Magnificent 7> whichever crappy sequel was next
Harper>The Drowning Pool
White Lightning>Gator
Old 12-20-18, 03:45 PM
  #69  
DVD Talk Godfather & 2020 TOTY Winner
 
Decker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Vegas, Baby!
Posts: 75,745
Received 6,178 Likes on 4,207 Posts
Re: worst degradation in quality from original to sequel

Originally Posted by Giantrobo
How the fuck does IRON MAN -> IRON III not get mentioned til page 3?
Um, because there's another movie between them?

Kinda the same reason nobody has said Jaws -> Jaws 3D or Star Wars -> The Phantom Menace.
Old 12-20-18, 03:49 PM
  #70  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Boondock Saint's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Burbank, California
Posts: 1,051
Received 33 Likes on 32 Posts
Re: worst degradation in quality from original to sequel

Teen Wolf Too
Old 12-20-18, 03:53 PM
  #71  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
PatD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,287
Likes: 0
Received 156 Likes on 96 Posts
Re: worst degradation in quality from original to sequel

Harold and Kumar Go to White Castle --> Harold and Kumar Escape from Guantanimo Bay

The first film is a fun, good natured romp the second is completely nasty and charmless.
Old 12-20-18, 03:59 PM
  #72  
DVD Talk Godfather & 2020 TOTY Winner
 
Decker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Vegas, Baby!
Posts: 75,745
Received 6,178 Likes on 4,207 Posts
Re: worst degradation in quality from original to sequel

Originally Posted by PatD
American Graffiti --> More American Graffiti

Few falls from greatness in cinema were as far as this one. While the original is a classic that features interconnected stories that are meaningful, MAG features 4 rotating stories (in distractingly different aspect ratios) that are wholly pointless. If AG is a delicious strawberry milkshake, this one was a soggy 3-day old, roast beef sandwich. This was the biggest cash grab of a sequel that wasn't directed-to-video or a horror movie.
I liked More American Graffiti. Obviously it's a totally inferior sequel but I enjoyed spending some more time with these characters and my 13-year old self, way before Pulp Fiction, Resovoir Dogs (or yet having seen Rashomon) appreciated the non-linear storytelling of several interwoven stories told simultaneously.
Old 12-20-18, 04:28 PM
  #73  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 11,309
Received 289 Likes on 210 Posts
Re: worst degradation in quality from original to sequel

Originally Posted by Decker
I liked More American Graffiti. Obviously it's a totally inferior sequel but I enjoyed spending some more time with these characters and my 13-year old self, way before Pulp Fiction, Resovoir Dogs (or yet having seen Rashomon) appreciated the non-linear storytelling of several interwoven stories told simultaneously.
I need to watch that again because I love the original. Tried once in the mid-80's and turned it off.
Old 12-20-18, 04:38 PM
  #74  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 8,983
Likes: 0
Received 246 Likes on 175 Posts
Re: worst degradation in quality from original to sequel

Poseidon Adventure>Beyond The PoseidonAdventure
Walking Tall(1973)>Walking Tall 2
True Grit>Rooster Cogburn and The Lady
Macon County Line>Return to Macon County
Old 12-20-18, 05:03 PM
  #75  
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Giantrobo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Gateway Cities/Harbor Region
Posts: 63,270
Received 1,793 Likes on 1,121 Posts
Re: worst degradation in quality from original to sequel

Originally Posted by Decker
Um, because there's another movie between them?

Kinda the same reason nobody has said Jaws -> Jaws 3D or Star Wars -> The Phantom Menace.
Uhm...clearly I'm talking about all 3 in terms of going downhill. IM1"best", IM2"not as good as 1", down to IM3"worst of the 3". It's not that hard to figure out...


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.