![]() |
Re: 2017 Oscar Nominations
Loved La La Land. I guess that was expected to get several nominations because its partly about Hollywood.
|
Re: 2017 Oscar Nominations
Originally Posted by nando820
(Post 12995749)
Loved La La Land. I guess that was expected to get several nominations because its partly about Hollywood.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...youcover01.jpg |
Re: 2017 Oscar Nominations
Originally Posted by Decker
(Post 12995654)
At least they won't complain about how White the nominees are.
|
Re: 2017 Oscar Nominations
Hollywood loves nothing better than patting itself on its own back.
|
Re: 2017 Oscar Nominations
Originally Posted by Damfino
(Post 12995778)
Except perhaps that Dev Patel was nominated for supporting actor for a movie he had top billing and was the main character.
|
Re: 2017 Oscar Nominations
Originally Posted by dex14
(Post 12995783)
He isn't in the first 45 minutes of the movie. They knew submitting him as supporting was the only way he'd have a chance at getting nominated.
|
Re: 2017 Oscar Nominations
Originally Posted by dex14
(Post 12995783)
He isn't in the first 45 minutes of the movie. They knew submitting him as supporting was the only way he'd have a chance at getting nominated.
I know it will never happen, but there needs to be some objective way to fairly delineate a Lead performance from a Supporting performance. Viola Davis is probably a lead actress as well. |
Re: 2017 Oscar Nominations
Originally Posted by dex14
(Post 12995783)
He isn't in the first 45 minutes of the movie. They knew submitting him as supporting was the only way he'd have a chance at getting nominated.
|
Re: 2017 Oscar Nominations
Originally Posted by Decker
(Post 12995795)
I know it will never happen, but there needs to be some objective way to fairly delineate a Lead performance from a Supporting performance.
|
Re: 2017 Oscar Nominations
Originally Posted by Decker
(Post 12995795)
Geoffrey Rush isn't in the first 45 minutes of Shine is he? He won the Best Actor Oscar for his role.
I know it will never happen, but there needs to be some objective way to fairly delineate a Lead performance from a Supporting performance. Viola Davis is probably a lead actress as well. |
Re: 2017 Oscar Nominations
And while I liked Dev Patel's performance, Sunny Pawar was just as strong with very few words. His expressions really captured the struggle as young Saroo.
|
Re: 2017 Oscar Nominations
Originally Posted by Decker
(Post 12995795)
Geoffrey Rush isn't in the first 45 minutes of Shine is he? He won the Best Actor Oscar for his role.
I know it will never happen, but there needs to be some objective way to fairly delineate a Lead performance from a Supporting performance. Viola Davis is probably a lead actress as well. |
Re: 2017 Oscar Nominations
Originally Posted by Decker
(Post 12995795)
Geoffrey Rush isn't in the first 45 minutes of Shine is he? He won the Best Actor Oscar for his role.
I know it will never happen, but there needs to be some objective way to fairly delineate a Lead performance from a Supporting performance. Viola Davis is probably a lead actress as well. I think these are the records for least screen time by male and female lead actors who won : Anthony Hopkins 16 minutes of screen time in SOTL Patricia Neal 22 minutes of screen time in Hud |
Re: 2017 Oscar Nominations
OJ: Made in America being nominated for best documentary feature is an interesting choice.
Besides airing at a few film festivals, did it get any additional theatrical distribution? Plus, the movie would be 7 1/2 hours if played straight through. I'm sure most who saw it watched it on TV on ABC and ESPN last summer. |
Re: 2017 Oscar Nominations
Originally Posted by devilshalo
(Post 12995817)
And while I liked Dev Patel's performance, Sunny Pawar was just as strong with very few words. His expressions really captured the struggle as young Saroo.
|
Re: 2017 Oscar Nominations
Originally Posted by Unclejosh
(Post 12995781)
Hollywood loves nothing better than patting itself on its own back.
|
Re: 2017 Oscar Nominations
Yes but if the topic is about Hollywood that is like an awardgasm.
|
Re: 2017 Oscar Nominations
I'm glad LIFE, ANIMATED got nominated for Best Documentary Feature. It was one of the best films I saw last year. It's about an autistic child who could only communicate through dialogue from Disney animated features and how he became a somewhat functioning adult. The boy's father, Ron Suskind, wrote a book about it and is, of course, in the film. He has some connection to Disney, since he's interviewed a lot in the Walt Disney episode of "American Masters." Disney co-produced the documentary, which includes a lot of clips from Disney movies.
https://c1.staticflickr.com/1/659/31...bc36ee6f27.jpg |
Re: 2017 Oscar Nominations
Not very many surprises in there, aside from Adams' snub. The Academy needs to stop putting Streep up for everything she does.
I am exceedingly happy to see so many people of color represented, though, because now every asshole with a Twitter account can't pretend Oscar nominations are the crux of race relations and only white people get to attend the party. See what happens when people of color make great films that resonate? They get nominated. |
Re: 2017 Oscar Nominations
Originally Posted by islandclaws
(Post 12995871)
I am exceedingly happy to see so many people of color represented, though, because now every asshole with a Twitter account can't pretend Oscar nominations are the crux of race relations and only white people get to attend the party. See what happens when people of color make great films that resonate? They get nominated.
There's already a few who noticed there are no Hispanics. But to agree with you somewhat, I hope it's not blatantly pointed out and made a story. If you're an actor/actress in a great role giving your best performance, it shouldn't matter what your ethnicity/gender/sexual orientation is.. nor should it need to be pointed out. |
Re: 2017 Oscar Nominations
Originally Posted by DVD Josh
(Post 12995745)
There really aren't alot of Pixar films in actuality. And truthfully, none of those films deserved a nom.
Then again, maybe in a less strong year, it would've gotten a nod, but as others have noted, this was a strong year for animation. |
Re: 2017 Oscar Nominations
I'm in the same boat with the other guy that doesn't really care for Pixar movies all that much, but I do think The Incredibles and Ratatouille deserved their wins, and Cars wasn't as bad as it was made out to be.
Originally Posted by Mr. Flix
(Post 12995913)
Well, there have been 17 total. Not sure how you define "a lot." But anyway, the trend is definitely that Pixar films get at least one nod, and usually win Best Animated Picture. So Dory scoring no noms is noteworthy, and underscores the notion (IMO, anyway) that it ranks closer to Pixar's lesser efforts, in spite of mostly good reviews. I wanted to love it when it first came out, but over time I've come to realize it's not that good.
Then again, maybe in a less strong year, it would've gotten a nod, but as others have noted, this was a strong year for animation. |
Re: 2017 Oscar Nominations
Originally Posted by RichC2
(Post 12995920)
Yeah this is a super competitive year, 27 eligible animated pics (25 April, Angry Birds, April and the Extraordinary World, Bilal, Finding Dory, Ice Age: Collision Course, Kingsglaive FF XV, Kubo and the Two Srings, Kung Fu Pand 3, The Little PRince, Long Way North, Miss Hokusai, Moana, Monkey King: Hero is Back, Mune: Guardian of the Mune, Mustafa and the Magician, My Life as a Zucchini, Phantom Boy, Ratchet and Clank, The Red Turtle, Sausage Party, The Secret Life of Pets, Sing!, Snowtime!, Storks, Trolls, Your Name, Zootopia)
|
Re: 2017 Oscar Nominations
Originally Posted by Mr. Flix
(Post 12995913)
Well, there have been 17 total. Not sure how you define "a lot." But anyway, the trend is definitely that Pixar films get at least one nod, and usually win Best Animated Picture. So Dory scoring no noms is noteworthy, and underscores the notion (IMO, anyway) that it ranks closer to Pixar's lesser efforts, in spite of mostly good reviews. I wanted to love it when it first came out, but over time I've come to realize it's not that good.
Then again, maybe in a less strong year, it would've gotten a nod, but as others have noted, this was a strong year for animation. |
Re: 2017 Oscar Nominations
Originally Posted by islandclaws
(Post 12995871)
The Academy needs to stop putting Streep up for everything she does.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:00 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.