|
Re: Interstellar (Nolan, 2014) — The Reviews Thread
Originally Posted by RichC2
(Post 12438451)
In defense of that, the entire part of the film revolving around Affleck and Damon sort of made me cringe. So much didn't work.
Wasn't as bad in replay though. |
Re: Interstellar (Nolan, 2014) — The Reviews Thread
Originally Posted by Why So Blu?
(Post 12438471)
Affleck was the bomb in Phantoms, yo!
|
Re: Interstellar (Nolan, 2014) — The Reviews Thread
As someone who thought it was a mediocre film, I liked the honest trailer.
|
Re: Interstellar (Nolan, 2014) — The Reviews Thread
Originally Posted by inri222
(Post 12438479)
As someone who thought it was a mediocre film, I liked the honest trailer.
|
Re: Interstellar (Nolan, 2014) — The Reviews Thread
"Hans Zimmer fell asleep on his organ". :lol:
|
Re: Interstellar (Nolan, 2014) — The Reviews Thread
Originally Posted by TheMovieman
(Post 12438487)
As someone who thought it was a great film, I also liked the honest trailer.
|
Re: Interstellar (Nolan, 2014) — The Reviews Thread
Yep, despite some issues, I loved the film. I also thought that Honest Trailer was great.
|
Re: Interstellar (Nolan, 2014) — The Reviews Thread
Don't give a f what anyone says Zimmers score is the shit
|
Re: Interstellar (Nolan, 2014) — The Reviews Thread
He's so talented all he has to do is fall asleep on his organ and bam, Oscar nomination.
|
Re: Interstellar (Nolan, 2014) — The Reviews Thread
Originally Posted by Solid Snake
(Post 12438405)
<iframe width="660" height="415" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/lZMzf-SDWP8" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
"It's not that we don't understand it. It's just really stupid." |
Re: Interstellar (Nolan, 2014) — The Reviews Thread
I liked PAL9000.
|
Re: Interstellar (Nolan, 2014) — The Reviews Thread
Like many of those Honest Trailers, this one is filled with deliberate misunderstandings and oversimplifications, for the sake of comedy. Sometimes it's funny. I didn't find this one very funny, since most of the points were easily refuted (you'd think someone who reviews films would understand what a jump cut is).
|
Re: Interstellar (Nolan, 2014) — The Reviews Thread
Originally Posted by RocShemp
(Post 12438423)
Yeah, it did bug me that he didn't give two shits about his son. And I did think of Event Horizon during that particular scene. :lol:
|
Re: Interstellar (Nolan, 2014) — The Reviews Thread
Originally Posted by Groucho
(Post 12438982)
Of course, that analogy originates back to A Wrinkle in Time (first published in 1962).
|
Re: Interstellar (Nolan, 2014) — The Reviews Thread
Originally Posted by RocShemp
(Post 12438423)
Yeah, it did bug me that he didn't give two shits about his son. And I did think of Event Horizon during that particular scene. :lol:
|
The folded paper analogy? I always assumed it was even older than that, I've heard it in way more sci-fi stories over the years than I could name.
Originally Posted by stvn1974
(Post 12439023)
The bending of the paper scene should have been in the DK films to explain Batman constantly materializing out of thin air.
|
Re: Interstellar (Nolan, 2014) — The Reviews Thread
Originally Posted by stvn1974
(Post 12439023)
The bending of the paper scene should have been in the DK films to explain Batman constantly materializing out of thin air.
|
Re: Interstellar (Nolan, 2014) — The Reviews Thread
Originally Posted by RocShemp
(Post 12439047)
I can't wait for the Law & Order: SVU episode that is based on your tragic past with Christopher Nolan.
|
Re: Interstellar (Nolan, 2014) — The Reviews Thread
Originally Posted by RocShemp
(Post 12439047)
I can't wait for the Law & Order: SVU episode that is based on your tragic past with Christopher Nolan.
|
Re: Interstellar (Nolan, 2014) — The Reviews Thread
I'm not a huge sci-fi fan, but is this movie slow moving?
Would your average film fan be bored by it with the long running time? |
Re: Interstellar (Nolan, 2014) — The Reviews Thread
Nah'. It's one of those universally appealing drama-adventure movies.
Movie people got bored with a 15-20 minute part. But that was about it. |
Re: Interstellar (Nolan, 2014) — The Reviews Thread
Originally Posted by Troy Stiffler
(Post 12439958)
Nah'. It's one of those universally appealing drama-adventure movies.
Movie people got bored with a 15-20 minute part. But that was about it. |
Re: Interstellar (Nolan, 2014) — The Reviews Thread
Originally Posted by Throwing Copper
(Post 12439942)
I'm not a huge sci-fi fan, but is this movie slow moving?
Would your average film fan be bored by it with the long running time? |
Re: Interstellar (Nolan, 2014) — The Reviews Thread
So far it seems that Solid Snake got the best cell.
|
Re: Interstellar (Nolan, 2014) — The Reviews Thread
Excellent movie. Was drawn into it big time - this flick reminded me of when I was a kid and really just couldn't wait to see what happened next....I mean, I was just so into it and was really hoping the payoff (that you knew was coming) would work and it did.
This flick is definitely not for idiots - if you pay attention and grasp what is being told to you...you will have a good understanding of how it all came full circle. Sure, there were a few parts that I just did not care for or buy Spoiler:
I also liked Spoiler:
I've been thinking about this flick since watching it a few days ago - just loved how you could "feel" how far away they were at times. Anyway, definitely worth watching even if you're not into these types of flicks. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:51 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.