![]() |
Thor: Ragnarok (11/3/2017, D: Waititi) - News, rumors, etc.
|
re: Thor: Ragnarok (11/3/2017) - News, rumors, etc.
Worst franchise in the Marvel universe.
Keep Thor out of Earth and away from Portman, Dennings, and Skarsgård and this will be the best Thor entry yet. |
re: Thor: Ragnarok (11/3/2017) - News, rumors, etc.
Oddly, Earth was the only time I enjoyed the first Thor. The stuff on his home planet was just painfully hokey. I should probably watch Thor 2 sometime.
|
re: Thor: Ragnarok (11/3/2017) - News, rumors, etc.
I could have swore we had started a Thor 3 thread... but could not find. Maybe we didn't. If someone stumbles across, shoot me a PM to merge.
|
re: Thor: Ragnarok (11/3/2017) - News, rumors, etc.
Yeah this is my least favorite of all the announcements. I'm sure Marvel is just going to hit the trilogy mark because they have to and then no more solo Thor.
|
re: Thor: Ragnarok (11/3/2017) - News, rumors, etc.
Quote:
|
re: Thor: Ragnarok (11/3/2017) - News, rumors, etc.
Quote:
|
re: Thor: Ragnarok (11/3/2017) - News, rumors, etc.
I guessed that Ragnarok would be the only way to go to up the ante. Thor is the weakest solo film hero. They really need to hone down a solid script. Somehow they're very wishy washy in quality. Thor REALLY has go up in quality now.
|
re: Thor: Ragnarok (11/3/2017) - News, rumors, etc.
I like the fish-out-water Earth stuff in the Thor movies. The scenes with Thor asking for a horse at the pet store, and Thor hanging Mjolnir on the coat rack crack me up every single time. The only thing I don't like is the Darcy character, but she is a minor part.
|
re: Thor: Ragnarok (11/3/2017) - News, rumors, etc.
Quote:
That's just the right balance to me. |
re: Thor: Ragnarok (11/3/2017) - News, rumors, etc.
Quote:
|
re: Thor: Ragnarok (11/3/2017) - News, rumors, etc.
Quote:
|
re: Thor: Ragnarok (11/3/2017) - News, rumors, etc.
Quote:
|
re: Thor: Ragnarok (11/3/2017) - News, rumors, etc.
Quote:
I agree with your second part. |
re: Thor: Ragnarok (11/3/2017) - News, rumors, etc.
The Thor films seem to get some hate, but even though they're not as great as some of the other MCU movies I find them fun and entertaining, and round out the universe pretty well.
Raganarok is interesting; that's also the name they gave the fake Thor robot from Civil War. |
re: Thor: Ragnarok (11/3/2017) - News, rumors, etc.
They also had their own Ragnarok in the comics. Which I never read but I was excited about it cuz that's a big deal in the Norse text.
|
re: Thor: Ragnarok (11/3/2017) - News, rumors, etc.
If I remember right, Ragnarok is actually the Norse version of the Apocalypse. End of the world kind of crap. Maybe Thanos gets all the Infinity Stones in the movie?
|
re: Thor: Ragnarok (11/3/2017) - News, rumors, etc.
Ragnarok is also a big influence on the Game of Thrones novels.
|
re: Thor: Ragnarok (11/3/2017) - News, rumors, etc.
Love the Thor films. No hatin' here!
|
re: Thor: Ragnarok (11/3/2017) - News, rumors, etc.
Bold statement: I love all the MCU movies.
|
Re: Thor: Ragnarok (11/3/2017) - News, rumors, etc.
Quote:
|
Re: Thor: Ragnarok (11/3/2017) - News, rumors, etc.
Damn. Taffer was the last person who posted before the bump. That long ago?
|
Re: Thor: Ragnarok (11/3/2017) - News, rumors, etc.
I was surprised too. Don't start though!
|
Re: Thor: Ragnarok (11/3/2017) - News, rumors, etc.
I really enjoyed Thor 2. Better than Thor 1 by far (Thor on Earth is painfully, dreadfully ponderous! "Look! Watch Thor as he tries to order a cheeseburger!!"). I wish he would lose the entire Earthbound supporting cast. Just terrible.
Both Cap films were still better though. As was Iron Man 1. But I'd put Thor 2 above IM 2 and 3. I'm hoping for Beta Ray Bill in part 3... |
Re: Thor: Ragnarok (11/3/2017) - News, rumors, etc.
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:30 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.