Re: Movies that were supposed to resurrect their franchise, but instead killed it?
 

This is the 1st movie that came to mind when I saw this thread.

Re: Movies that were supposed to resurrect their franchise, but instead killed it?
 

matthew brodwick godzilla.

Re: Movies that were supposed to resurrect their franchise, but instead killed it?
 

Exactly. But there is no gain for Marvel , they proven they can make trillions without Spiderman and with basically unknown characters (Guardians). Putting Spiderman on the MCU only benefits Sony and helps them keep the rights

Re: Movies that were supposed to resurrect their franchise, but instead killed it?
 

Yes. There's a Season 10 monthly comic.

No. It's not good. The comic takes place years after I Want To Believe but they've gone to great lengths to bring back every character who died during the show's run (Lone Gunmen, CSM, Mr. X) as well as re-telling classic stories in modern settings. It's a step backward instead of forward. I dropped it a few months back.

Re: Movies that were supposed to resurrect their franchise, but instead killed it?
 

Jack Ryan: Shadow Recruit. It was a pretty decent movie too.

I want to say The Bourne Legacy too (oh man, that was a shitty movie) but I've heard rumours that Damon and Greengrass are coming back to make another one. Not sure if the actor who looks like a hobbit is going to be in that one or make a standalone sequel.

Re: Movies that were supposed to resurrect their franchise, but instead killed it?
 

I disagree that there's no benefit to Marvel. They'll have to share profits with Sony but Spider-Man is pretty damn popular so having access to that character as well as other characters from that universe could be beneficial. Especially when some of the current actors step away it'd be a benefit to still have Spider-Man at their disposal.

Re: Movies that were supposed to resurrect their franchise, but instead killed it?
 

Alien: Resurrection

And no, Prometheus doesn't count.

Re: Movies that were supposed to resurrect their franchise, but instead killed it?
 

This argument still makes no sense whatsoever to me. It is absolutely in Marvel's best interest to have the Spider-Man series healthy and profitable. Anything that raises the profile of the character and brand in the public conscious is a positive. Would Sony stand to gain more financially in the short term? Sure, but as the licensee of the character, that's always going to be the case. It's not like Sony is losing money on the franchise at this point, so it would probably be a lot of years and crappy movies (and damage to the brand) before Disney would potentially get the rights back anyway.

Re: Movies that were supposed to resurrect their franchise, but instead killed it?
 

My personal theory is that Sony plans on tarnishing the Spider-man franchise to the point where they'll sell the rights back to Marvel when there is literally nothing left to lose. Remember, Marvel owns everything Spider-man but the film rights.

Sony pumped over $200M into production costs of ASM2 and then another $200M into worldwide advertising and distribution. Sony broke even as the film crossed $700M, but they barely made a profit. It's no wonder Sony has zero idea where to move the franchise from here. If the film made decent money, ASM3 would've been already in pre-production to hit 2016 instead of now being in development hell.

Re: Movies that were supposed to resurrect their franchise, but instead killed it?
 

Star Trek: Nemesis

It was supposed to "make up" for Star Trek: Insurrection, but it reached new levels of sucktitude. It was filled to the brim with cliches, plot holes and ripping off whole portions of The Wrath of Khan.

It led to no other Star Trek movies for 7 years where we got the even more horrible JJTrek reboot movies where Trek is now a generic Michael Bay/Star Wars mash-up. They're filled to the brim with cliches, plot holes and ripping off whole portions of The Wrath of Khan.

Thanks a lot for ruining the franchise, Star Trek: Nemesis!

Re: Movies that were supposed to resurrect their franchise, but instead killed it?
 

What Marvel could do if they get a deal with Sony is use random Spider-man movie appearances here and there to boost a Spider-man live action TV show.

Re: Movies that were supposed to resurrect their franchise, but instead killed it?
 

So Marvel has Spider-Man TV rights ? Just make a TV show with Garfield :p

Re: Movies that were supposed to resurrect their franchise, but instead killed it?
 

Re: Movies that were supposed to resurrect their franchise, but instead killed it?
 

This is my theory about Fox and the Fantastic Four. I think they've already decided to give the rights back to Marvel and they are purposely cratering the franchise with the new movie.

Re: Movies that were supposed to resurrect their franchise, but instead killed it?
 

Well considering that any franchise can always be rebooted later, I'm not sure there is really any movie that completely fits this criteria since they are never really dead.

I would use Tim Burton's Planet of the Apes as an example, but it was eventually rebooted again.


The Day the Earth Stood Still and War of the Worlds probably turned Hollywood away from rebooting 50's era sci-fi flicks.

Shaft might fit the criteria. I actually thought it was a pretty good reboot of the 70s era franchise. But Jackson was so disappointed with the film that no sequels were made.

Re: Movies that were supposed to resurrect their franchise, but instead killed it?
 

War of the Worlds cost $132 million...made almost $592 million. That's good.

The Day the Earth Stood Still was for $80 million... got $233 million. That one could be debatable but that's good. Almost 3 times it's budget.

Re: Movies that were supposed to resurrect their franchise, but instead killed it?
 

Silly Solid Snake. Worldwide grosses don't count....;)



Scream IV was an interesting case. I don't think that movie killed the franchise as much as fail to revive it. The time period and audience for those movies had passed when it was released. The actual enforcement of the R rating kept many teens from seeing it, and those who made it a hit back in the day would now require the hiring of babysitters to go and view the new installment. It really was never meant to be for that reboot.

Re: Movies that were supposed to resurrect their franchise, but instead killed it?
 

It's a great idea when you think about it.

The films are still making money and when the franchise bottoms out and there's no more money to be made, you sell the rights back as you'll have successfully fucked over your competition by giving them a franchise you gutted inside and out.

Re: Movies that were supposed to resurrect their franchise, but instead killed it?
 

Those rumors were confirmed last month.

http://forum.dvdtalk.com/movie-talk/...s-s-damon.html

Re: Movies that were supposed to resurrect their franchise, but instead killed it?
 

from a business mentality, this is smart.

I don't know if they're actually doing that or not. You COULD assume they are cuz of how these companies work in the past but... I dunno.

Re: Movies that were supposed to resurrect their franchise, but instead killed it?
 

So what exactly is the constraint/obligation for Sony and Fox to retain their respective movie rights? I am just curious what the time frame would be so that I can brace for these inevitable sequels and/or reboots...

Re: Movies that were supposed to resurrect their franchise, but instead killed it?
 

Star Wars episodes I - III such a stab in the back. Thankfully parts IV - VI are still so incredible awesome that the flop was just temporary. I - III dare not call themselves Star Wars.

Re: Movies that were supposed to resurrect their franchise, but instead killed it?
 

It's doubtful anyone outside Marvel, Sony, Fox, and their lawyers know what the time frame actually is.


The prequel trilogy didn't kill the franchise. They may not have been very good movies, but they most definitely did not kill the franchise.

Re: Movies that were supposed to resurrect their franchise, but instead killed it?
 

Exactly. Regardless of what people think about the Prequels, Star Wars is alive and doing very well.

Re: Movies that were supposed to resurrect their franchise, but instead killed it?
 

No one knows, but since Sony seemed to get a fire lit under its butt for ASM and Spidey 3 came out in 2007, I would assume its around 5 years.

FF 2 came out in 2007 as well, but filming didn't start until this year. So it's likely that had a different window.