![]() |
Re: Was Batman(89) the start of the modern day blockbuster?
Yes, a throw-back to serials of the 30s and 40s was a modern blockbuster. :rolleyes:
|
Originally Posted by Brack
(Post 12034571)
Yes, a throw-back to serials of the 30s and 40s was a modern blockbuster. :rolleyes:
|
Re: Was Batman(89) the start of the modern day blockbuster?
But they're not modern. Does no one know what the word modern means?
|
Re: Was Batman(89) the start of the modern day blockbuster?
Originally Posted by RichC2
(Post 12034494)
I think the real birth of the mindless big budget blockbuster came with ID4 in 1995. I mean, there have always been stupid movies, but now stupid movies were getting enormous budgets. |
Re: Was Batman(89) the start of the modern day blockbuster?
Either Jaws or Goldfinger is the correct answer.
|
Re: Was Batman(89) the start of the modern day blockbuster?
Originally Posted by Brack
(Post 12034601)
But they're not modern. Does no one know what the word modern means?
|
Re: Was Batman(89) the start of the modern day blockbuster?
Originally Posted by Brack
(Post 12034601)
But they're not modern. Does no one know what the word modern means?
|
Re: Was Batman(89) the start of the modern day blockbuster?
Also, Marvel's Avengers isn't a modern blockbuster considering it's a throwback to the 60s.
Batman and Superman movies are a throwback to the 40s. Therefore, Batman '89 wasn't "modern" even in '89... :lol: This thread needs an enema! |
Re: Was Batman(89) the start of the modern day blockbuster?
Someone is on the wrong side of modern history.
|
Re: Was Batman(89) the start of the modern day blockbuster?
"Blockbuster" is nonexistant, its a bullshit term thought up the moneymen that sounds rad like "flux capacitor" and "truffle shuffle".
|
Re: Was Batman(89) the start of the modern day blockbuster?
Because the correct term is tentpole.
|
Re: Was Batman(89) the start of the modern day blockbuster?
Originally Posted by The Valeyard
(Post 12034665)
So would you classify the Transformers movies as "modern"? Aren't they throwbacks to an 80s cartoon and toyline?
|
Re: Was Batman(89) the start of the modern day blockbuster?
Originally Posted by taffer
(Post 12034669)
Also, Marvel's Avengers isn't a modern blockbuster considering it's a throwback to the 60s.
Batman and Superman movies are a throwback to the 40s. Therefore, Batman '89 wasn't "modern" even in '89... :lol: This thread needs an enema! |
Re: Was Batman(89) the start of the modern day blockbuster?
Originally Posted by hanshotfirst1138
(Post 12034657)
If you mean that they aren't set in the contemporary time, then no, they weren't modern. If you mean that they were period pieces, then no, they weren't modern. But they used special effects technology which was cutting edge at the time and editing techniques which were being developed at the time, eventually leading to trends still being used today. The original Star Trek has tons of hallmarks of the 1960s, despite not being set then. Nothing in 2001: A Space Odyssey would suggest when it was made, it feels perpetually modern. In a sense, the Raiders movies were actually postmodern. But it also depends on how we're defining the word. "Modernism" and "modern" as you're thinking of it mean distinctly different things, IMO. Very, very, very few big blockbusters action movies age well because they're so reliant on trends and what are then cutting-edge but will soon be outdated special FX. But in terms of creating the economics of the blockbuster where the film is the central point in a giant marketing franchise, I think that Spielberg and Lucas were absolutely where it started.
|
Re: Was Batman(89) the start of the modern day blockbuster?
I would think "modern" in terms of when it was produced, budget and the impact on the box office. The correctly incorrect answer would have to be Titanic.
It may have garnered more attention when it was supposed to originally come out, but instead its cost, production and post production overruns pushed it into a different time of year. But it really opened the door for studios to take a chance and open up their checkbook for feature budgets over $200M. |
Re: Was Batman(89) the start of the modern day blockbuster?
Originally Posted by Mr. Cinema
(Post 12034434)
If not Batman, then maybe Terminator 2 or Jurassic Park?
|
Re: Was Batman(89) the start of the modern day blockbuster?
Weird someone actually reviewed that game.
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/6V3hrIkctls" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> |
Re: Was Batman(89) the start of the modern day blockbuster?
"Modern" was the key term here, not "first." At least that's how I read it. At the time, its opening weekend was the biggest ever at $43.6m. The biggest before that was Ghostbusters II with $29.4. I think that's what the OP meant by modern. I loved Jaws and Star Wars, but they're not modern blockbusters. That's not a knock on them at all, since their runs were, for me, more impressive than todays so-called blockbusters. But Batman seems like it kicked off the modern day blockbuster. Among other things it: 1. Started the trend of movies having the "huge opening weekends" 2. Big summer movies merchandising anything they possibly can to gain awareness. 3. Making certain release days for popular movies to be big events. 4. Showing that their is a demand for movies to be purchased and watched post release for cheap prices. 5. Caused people to do advance pre-orders for tickets, and some to even camp out to get tickets. 6. Showed Toy companies the value or making toys for popular summer movies. After Batman came out the following year, Disney did the exact same thing that Batman did with Dick Tracy. In 1991, Terminator 2 followed suit. In 1992 Disney did the same thing with Alladin. In 93 Universal did the same thing with Jurassic Park and it's continued all the way to today. |
Originally Posted by Brack
(Post 12034699)
Not arguing where it started, but they're not modern to today's standards.
|
Re: Was Batman(89) the start of the modern day blockbuster?
Some people take terms like "modern" a little too literally.
|
Re: Was Batman(89) the start of the modern day blockbuster?
Nyet
|
Re: Was Batman(89) the start of the modern day blockbuster?
Originally Posted by Michael Corvin
(Post 12032550)
No. Batman simply managed to replicate everything George Lucas had already done.
Of course, Batman was a well known character, Tim Burton was a hotshot young director, and the dark knight aspect of the character was still fresh. Even without endless marketing tie-ins, it would have been a success. |
Re: Was Batman(89) the start of the modern day blockbuster?
And for what it's worth, I think the "modern blockbuster" era started with Jurassic Park.
|
Re: Was Batman(89) the start of the modern day blockbuster?
Originally Posted by Jason
(Post 12035467)
And for what it's worth, I think the "modern blockbuster" era started with Jurassic Park.
Jaws Star Wars Indiana Jones Batman (89) Terminator 2 Jurassic Park Independence Day poll thread in 3...2... |
Re: Was Batman(89) the start of the modern day blockbuster?
Originally Posted by RichC2
(Post 12035443)
Some people take terms like "modern" a little too literally.
The multiplex wasn't very prevalent when Jaws and Star Wars were released. The multiplex was the standard by the end of the 80s, and still is. It's how the big opening weekends were made possible, and how Batman had the biggest opening weekend at the time. The type of marketing and merchandizing, while originating from Star Wars, was done on such a level that now it's become the standard, not just a once in a while thing, for better or for worse. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:43 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.