Logan (Wolverine 3) (2017, D: Mangold) S: Jackman, Stewart
#151
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Formerly known as "Solid Snake PAC"/Denton, Tx
Posts: 39,239
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Re: Wolverine 3 (D: Mangold) S: Jackman - News, rumors, casting, etc.
Whether or not it's a faithful adaptation (of course it won't be), am I crazy to assume that any movie version of Old Man Logan would presumably feature Logan as an old man? I have no attachment to that story, so I don't really care what they do. I just assumed Jackman was being honest with the crowd.
#153
DVD Talk Godfather
Re: Wolverine 3 (D: Mangold) S: Jackman - News, rumors, casting, etc.
I'd love to seem him back playing the more feral Sabretooth instead of just "Victor Creed."
#154
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Formerly known as "Solid Snake PAC"/Denton, Tx
Posts: 39,239
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Re: Wolverine 3 (D: Mangold) S: Jackman - News, rumors, casting, etc.
I'd like Schreiber back too. I'd prefer more personality than Mane's Creed though.
Last edited by Solid Snake; 09-03-15 at 01:57 PM.
#156
DVD Talk Hero
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Somewhere between Heaven and Hell
Posts: 32,629
Received 447 Likes
on
317 Posts
Re: Wolverine 3 (D: Mangold) S: Jackman - News, rumors, casting, etc.
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/mweeEXhPrpc" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
#157
Banned
Re: Wolverine 3 (D: Mangold) S: Jackman - News, rumors, casting, etc.
Huge Jackedman says the movie will explore the father/son dynamic between Wolverine and Professor X
Originally Posted by Huge Jackedman
"I'll be really honest with you, the actual script in its full form we're up to about Page 60," he shared. "Obviously there's a treatment, so it's not fully done yet, we're not fully there. Patrick does figure in it that's for sure. I think it's a really important relationship but I want to see signs of that quasi-father/son sort of relationship that has not been seen before, and sides of particularly Professor X that have not been seen before. So we have some really, really cool ideas."
"The ultimate plan is let's start shooting next year," he continued. "I'm starting the training, I'm starting the eating and mentally really preparing for it. It's not just me, the studio as well -- I'm trying to do something with this that's a little special, a little different. I've got a very, very strong idea of what that is. I really have known for quite a long time how I want to finish this sort of odyssey that I've been on, this amazing journey. And I won't let it fall anywhere in between. I won't fall short of it."
"The ultimate plan is let's start shooting next year," he continued. "I'm starting the training, I'm starting the eating and mentally really preparing for it. It's not just me, the studio as well -- I'm trying to do something with this that's a little special, a little different. I've got a very, very strong idea of what that is. I really have known for quite a long time how I want to finish this sort of odyssey that I've been on, this amazing journey. And I won't let it fall anywhere in between. I won't fall short of it."
#159
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Wolverine 3 (D: Mangold) S: Jackman - News, rumors, casting, etc.
So sounds like if Singer and Kinberg have their way Wolverine isn't going to be recast in the near future. I'm a bit skeptical as unless they can get Jackman to continue on as the character I don't think I see Fox wanting to go too long without using Wolverine in future X-Men films. Jackman said that the third Wolverine film would be his last time but prior to that he had talked like he didn't necessarily want to step down so I'm curious what will happen.
http://screencrush.com/wolverine-rec...letter_4572277
http://screencrush.com/wolverine-rec...letter_4572277
Wolverine Probably Won’t Be Recast in the ‘X-Men’ Universe When Hugh Jackman Leaves
Britt Hayes
Hugh Jackman has been playing Wolverine for over 15 years. He’s appeared on screen as the iconic X-Men character in seven films, including his uncredited cameo in X-Men: First Class, and by the time The Wolverine 2 rolls around, we can round that number up to eight (and that’s not including the potential for cameos in X-Men: Apocalypse — which he’s denied — and the Gambit movie). Fans have been wondering if Wolverine will be recast once Jackman exits the franchise, but according to Bryan Singer and producer Simon Kinberg, that’s not likely to happen.
Jackman has promised that The Wolverine 2 will mark his final time portraying the character, and while we certainly believe him, anything is possible down the line. In an interview with Digital Spy, Singer and Kinberg said they couldn’t imagine recasting Jackman’s role, though they do want to figure out how to keep the character going in the X-Men universe. Kinberg says:
I do think you would want to figure out how to tell more Wolverine stories. So either we would try to entice Hugh to come back and eat more chicken and work out for a few months, or we would have to figure out a creative way to move forward. Honestly, I can’t imagine anybody else playing the part, and there’s not too many characters I can say that for.
So basically at this point, they either have to convince Jackman to stick around past The Wolverine 2, or…that’s it. Singer and Kinberg’s options are limited. If they do recast Wolverine, it would likely be years from now, probably in a new cycle of X-Men movies with an all-new cast. Replacing Jackman so soon after his exit just isn’t happening.
The Wolverine 2 is set to hit theaters in 2017. Meanwhile, we’ll see the next installment of the X-Men franchise when X-Men: Apocalypse hits theaters on May 27.
Britt Hayes
Hugh Jackman has been playing Wolverine for over 15 years. He’s appeared on screen as the iconic X-Men character in seven films, including his uncredited cameo in X-Men: First Class, and by the time The Wolverine 2 rolls around, we can round that number up to eight (and that’s not including the potential for cameos in X-Men: Apocalypse — which he’s denied — and the Gambit movie). Fans have been wondering if Wolverine will be recast once Jackman exits the franchise, but according to Bryan Singer and producer Simon Kinberg, that’s not likely to happen.
Jackman has promised that The Wolverine 2 will mark his final time portraying the character, and while we certainly believe him, anything is possible down the line. In an interview with Digital Spy, Singer and Kinberg said they couldn’t imagine recasting Jackman’s role, though they do want to figure out how to keep the character going in the X-Men universe. Kinberg says:
I do think you would want to figure out how to tell more Wolverine stories. So either we would try to entice Hugh to come back and eat more chicken and work out for a few months, or we would have to figure out a creative way to move forward. Honestly, I can’t imagine anybody else playing the part, and there’s not too many characters I can say that for.
So basically at this point, they either have to convince Jackman to stick around past The Wolverine 2, or…that’s it. Singer and Kinberg’s options are limited. If they do recast Wolverine, it would likely be years from now, probably in a new cycle of X-Men movies with an all-new cast. Replacing Jackman so soon after his exit just isn’t happening.
The Wolverine 2 is set to hit theaters in 2017. Meanwhile, we’ll see the next installment of the X-Men franchise when X-Men: Apocalypse hits theaters on May 27.
#160
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Wolverine 3 (D: Mangold) S: Jackman - News, rumors, casting, etc.
Why does that article keep referring to the movie as Wolverine 2? I guess the writer was not a fan of Origins.
#161
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Wolverine 3 (D: Mangold) S: Jackman - News, rumors, casting, etc.
I'm guessing the upcoming film is more of an actual direct sequel to The Wolverine whereas The Wolverine didn't directly follow X-Men Origins: Wolverine. Either way though it's incorrect as its the third film.
#162
DVD Talk Legend
#163
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Wolverine 3 (D: Mangold) S: Jackman - News, rumors, casting, etc.
So sounds like if Singer and Kinberg have their way Wolverine isn't going to be recast in the near future. I'm a bit skeptical as unless they can get Jackman to continue on as the character I don't think I see Fox wanting to go too long without using Wolverine in future X-Men films. Jackman said that the third Wolverine film would be his last time but prior to that he had talked like he didn't necessarily want to step down so I'm curious what will happen.
http://screencrush.com/wolverine-rec...letter_4572277
http://screencrush.com/wolverine-rec...letter_4572277
.jpg)
#164
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Wolverine 3 (D: Mangold) S: Jackman - News, rumors, casting, etc.
Though it was sort of implied that Wolverine remembered the original timeline at the end of DOFP.
#165
DVD Talk Legend
#166
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Wolverine 3 (D: Mangold) S: Jackman - News, rumors, casting, etc.
True. I think Logan does remember the events as they were before the reset though. As much as I liked Days of Future Past I sort of dislike that it wiped out the timeline entirely. I mean of all the films only two are really bad and I don't dislike X-Men Origins: Wolverine as much as most people.
#167
#168
DVD Talk Godfather
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: City of the lakers.. riots.. and drug dealing cops.. los(t) Angel(e)s. ca.
Posts: 54,199
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Re: Wolverine 3 (D: Mangold) S: Jackman - News, rumors, casting, etc.
Basically marvel kept on getting hate mail from fans who felt a little bit gay after jerking off to wolverine for so long. So they created a female version of him.
#169
DVD Talk Godfather
Re: Wolverine 3 (D: Mangold) S: Jackman - News, rumors, casting, etc.
I'd love to see X-23, I enjoyed her origin comics quite a bit and actually just read her as the "All New Wolverine" recently.
#171
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Wolverine 3 (D: Mangold) S: Jackman - News, rumors, casting, etc.
While X-23 would be kind of cool to see I don't think she'd be a good permanent replacement for the actual character. I'd think Fox would push to recast if Jackman doesn't return whether Singer likes it or not.
#172
Re: Wolverine 3 (D: Mangold) S: Jackman - News, rumors, casting, etc.
20th Century Fox revealed at Toy Fair 2016 that they would be targeting an R-rating for Hugh Jackman's final run as Wolverine next year.
This news follows the massive success of Fox's first R-rated standalone super hero movie, as Deadpool absolutely killed the box office this weekend. They previously dabbled with R-rated comic book movies earlier in 2015 with Kingsman: The Secret Service, which also turned out to be a surprise hit, though not as big a success as the world's new favorite merc.
The news comes from a pamphlet or catalog Fox handed out to guests at their Toy Fair presentation. The logo for Wolverine 3 is featured above the theatrical release date, home entertainment release date, and anticipated MPAA rating. See it below.

The move is an interesting one by 20th Century Fox. There was no doubt they would pursue R-rated movies in the future as they explored the Deadpool and X-Force corners of their X-Men universe but to take a character who has been established as PG-13 for over 15 years now is bold. That said, they could be banking on telling an accurate representation of the Old Man Logan story and Wolverine fans having grown past the age of R-rating admittance.
One has to wonder if these plans were made and revealed today following the success this weekend or if the R-rating was already planned prior to Deadpool's box office explosion. Let's bet on the former. In any case, what are your thoughts on an R-rated finale to Hugh Jackman's run as Wolverine?
We have reached out to FOX for comment, and will let you know as soon as we hear back.
The Wolverine sequel, which will be Hugh Jackman's last, is set for release March 3, 2017.
This news follows the massive success of Fox's first R-rated standalone super hero movie, as Deadpool absolutely killed the box office this weekend. They previously dabbled with R-rated comic book movies earlier in 2015 with Kingsman: The Secret Service, which also turned out to be a surprise hit, though not as big a success as the world's new favorite merc.
The news comes from a pamphlet or catalog Fox handed out to guests at their Toy Fair presentation. The logo for Wolverine 3 is featured above the theatrical release date, home entertainment release date, and anticipated MPAA rating. See it below.

The move is an interesting one by 20th Century Fox. There was no doubt they would pursue R-rated movies in the future as they explored the Deadpool and X-Force corners of their X-Men universe but to take a character who has been established as PG-13 for over 15 years now is bold. That said, they could be banking on telling an accurate representation of the Old Man Logan story and Wolverine fans having grown past the age of R-rating admittance.
One has to wonder if these plans were made and revealed today following the success this weekend or if the R-rating was already planned prior to Deadpool's box office explosion. Let's bet on the former. In any case, what are your thoughts on an R-rated finale to Hugh Jackman's run as Wolverine?
We have reached out to FOX for comment, and will let you know as soon as we hear back.
The Wolverine sequel, which will be Hugh Jackman's last, is set for release March 3, 2017.
#173
DVD Talk Godfather
Re: Wolverine 3 (2017, D: Mangold) S: Jackman - News, rumors, casting, etc.
That just seems dumb. It's Jackman's last turn as Wolvie, wait until they recast the character. No sense alienating younger fans this far into his run.
Also, maybe it's because I haven't seen what an R-rated Wolverine would look like, but he works fine as a PG-13 character... at least Jackman's version.
Also, maybe it's because I haven't seen what an R-rated Wolverine would look like, but he works fine as a PG-13 character... at least Jackman's version.
#175
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Re: Wolverine 3 (2017, D: Mangold) S: Jackman - News, rumors, casting, etc.
Having him slash dudes chests open and not show any blood at all is stupid
Hopefully this last one is an R
Hopefully this last one is an R