![]() |
Re: Gravity (Cuarón, 2013) — The Reviews Thread
Originally Posted by TomOpus
(Post 11865436)
Huge spoiler above me!
|
Re: Gravity (Cuarón, 2013) — The Reviews Thread
Originally Posted by Lara Means
(Post 11865509)
Is this a joke? You judge this entire movie based on 1 minute long teasers and are surprised about the incredible amount of positive feedback? I can explain why.... they actually watched the fucking movie to get an informed opinion. Wonderful 3D effects alone will not get you 98% on Rotten Tomatoes. It's because Gravity happens to be an all around terrific film. How about you get a clue.
As for Rotten Tomatoes...fuck that. You're Next had a high 90% rating after opening weekend and I saw that piece of shit. Enough Said is at 95% but I bet many of us haven't seen that. So how about you get that stick out of your ass and you get a clue. |
Re: Gravity (Cuarón, 2013) — The Reviews Thread
I found the first teaser trailer very intriguing. I was wondering where in the movie the scene was situated. And I had no idea Bullock was in it.
|
Re: Gravity (Cuarón, 2013) — The Reviews Thread
Went to see it for a second time tonight. The first time I caught some of the religious and rebirth overtones but didn't pay much attention to it. After reading some interpretations here and seeing it again, there is a lot of intentional imagery.
One specific was when Ryan was crying after the "woof" scene. One of the tears floats towards the camera and you can clearly see her reflection in the tear (like a child in the womb) and once it's big enough for you to see her reflection you hear a baby crying over the radio.
Originally Posted by fumanstan
(Post 11865415)
Regarding the whole "rebirth" aspect of the movie, from Cuaron himself.
http://io9.com/gravitys-ending-holds...o-c-1442690788 Lastly, someone mentioned her being alone on the shore but there is clearly a house in the background. You have maybe 2 seconds to catch it before the credits kick in. As soon as she stands up, her right leg is blocking it from view but as the camera pans to the right, you can see the house in the distance. |
Re: Gravity (Cuarón, 2013) — The Reviews Thread
Originally Posted by jacob_b
(Post 11865360)
I haven't seen this, but I'm quite surprised how many people like this and how much money it made. The trailer really didn't look interesting, so is Sandra and George still huge draws in the box office or something? I mean, I watched Buried in theaters and loved it. Damn good movie with being in a closed placed and basically being the only actor on screen. It didn't do well in the box office at all. Are the 3D effects that amazing (better than Avatar) to make it a success?
I'd say people are still enthralled by space, but it's rare that we get a smart space film. We're inundated with sci-fi schlock trying to be the next blockbuster. The trailer gives people just enough to whet their appetites and think 'oh, this is something different.' I'm probably not explaining it that well, but I didn't know anything about the director and was indifferent to the casting. All I was going on was the trailer. The concept was intriguing. |
Re: Gravity (Cuarón, 2013) — The Reviews Thread
This was, for me, the first movie that truly put into perspective how incredible it is that we have people floating in space. I understand there are scientific inaccuracies, but if any of them make you wonder about space and want to see more exploration, I figure that's a win.
|
Re: Gravity (Cuarón, 2013) — The Reviews Thread
Originally Posted by Michael Corvin
(Post 11865589)
There are movies and there are films. This is neither. It's an event.
I'd say people are still enthralled by space, but it's rare that we get a smart space film. We're inundated with sci-fi schlock trying to be the next blockbuster. The trailer gives people just enough to whet their appetites and think 'oh, this is something different.' I'm probably not explaining it that well, but I didn't know anything about the director and was indifferent to the casting. All I was going on was the trailer. The concept was intriguing. The first time I saw the trailer/teaser I thought, I need to watch this. I don't think I knew anything about Cuaron directing or Bullock and Clooney starring. Just the trailer. I don't know if this has been mentioned, but the running time may help this movie too, to sell more tickets. We actually watched this on Monday morning, theater was 90% full. For us, wife and I, it was really easy to squeeze this in the morning (11 am showing) before picking up the kids from school. And yeah, at 90 minutes I can see a lot of people going for a second viewing "because it's just 90 minutes". |
Re: Gravity (Cuarón, 2013) — The Reviews Thread
Yeah, this movie is doing killer weekday business so far too ($6m on Monday, $6.6m on Tuesday). Curious to see how it does this upcoming weekend against Captain Phillips. Nobody seems to know how to read it - tracking said $35m - $40m, Warner said "We'd be happy with anything north of $30m", then it came out and did $55.8m.
|
Re: Gravity (Cuarón, 2013) — The Reviews Thread
Originally Posted by jacob_b
(Post 11865529)
You ok bro? Yes, people do base going to see a movie based on a trailer. If the trailer does not look interesting and catch your attention, one won't watch it opening weekend. A trailer like American Hustle makes me count down the days for that film to drop because it simply looks amazing. Gravity, watching Sandra cry and spin around by herself just didn't do it for me to go see it opening weekend. It's like Don Jon. I like both of the actors in the film, but that accent was annoying to listen during the trailer. So with a so-so trailer, I am quite surprised that this movie broke the October record and people packed the theaters for this.
As for Rotten Tomatoes...fuck that. You're Next had a high 90% rating after opening weekend and I saw that piece of shit. Enough Said is at 95% but I bet many of us haven't seen that. So how about you get that stick out of your ass and you get a clue.
Originally Posted by Raul3
(Post 11865743)
I don't know if this has been mentioned, but the running time may help this movie too, to sell more tickets. We actually watched this on Monday morning, theater was 90% full. For us, wife and I, it was really easy to squeeze this in the morning (11 am showing) before picking up the kids from school. And yeah, at 90 minutes I can see a lot of people going for a second viewing "because it's just 90 minutes".
|
Re: Gravity (Cuarón, 2013) — The Reviews Thread
Originally Posted by The Bus
(Post 11865663)
This was, for me, the first movie that truly put into perspective how incredible it is that we have people floating in space. I understand there are scientific inaccuracies, but if any of them make you wonder about space and want to see more exploration, I figure that's a win.
Agreed. This film also reminded me of how dangerous Space Travel is; and how Earth is still in the very early stages. We get spoiled by Sci Fi films making Space Travel look routine. |
Re: Gravity (Cuarón, 2013) — The Reviews Thread
The one problem with Gravity is that the plotting never quite matches its visual imagination. Even so, this is a film that, at its best, really does induce a sense of wonder.
|
Re: Gravity (Cuarón, 2013) — The Reviews Thread
Yeah, it would have been much better if it had been like Sunshine and
Spoiler:
|
Re: Gravity (Cuarón, 2013) — The Reviews Thread
This film is gorgeous, one of the few to really demonstrate how minuscule we are in relationship to the vast space around us while also illustrating our innate will for life and how far it can take us
Bravo Cuaron Bravo |
Re: Gravity (Cuarón, 2013) — The Reviews Thread
Originally Posted by dconev
(Post 11867539)
The one problem with Gravity is that the plotting never quite matches its visual imagination.
|
Re: Gravity (Cuarón, 2013) — The Reviews Thread
Originally Posted by davidh777
(Post 11867579)
Yeah, it would have been much better if it had been like Sunshine and
Spoiler:
|
Re: Gravity (Cuarón, 2013) — The Reviews Thread
I still think Sunshine is a solid movie. I love it. Though its last act changes to something we may not have wanted, it doesn't kill the quality for me.
|
Re: Gravity (Cuarón, 2013) — The Reviews Thread
Gravity is making a killing at the box office in its second weekend. Great news for a great movie.
|
Re: Gravity (Cuarón, 2013) — The Reviews Thread
Wow, $12 mil on Friday. Word of mouth on this is incredible.
|
Re: Gravity (Cuarón, 2013) — The Reviews Thread
I'll remember these last couple of weeks at the B.O. as warm memories the next time a shithole movie like Grown Ups 2 wins the box office. It'll probably happen sooner rather than later since Bad Grandpa opens in just a couple of weeks.
|
Re: Gravity (Cuarón, 2013) — The Reviews Thread
Your presumptions are spot on, don't waste your time with a film so well regarded by critics and the populace. Not sure why anyone would want to see such a finely crafted film.
As for Moon, I love it, but did it ever get a wide release? Also Gravity is a visual treat. Moon almost completely takes place inside a base. It's kind of a dull and dreary setting. |
Re: Gravity (Cuarón, 2013) — The Reviews Thread
Loved it. Saw it yesterday and went back again today. Saw it on a larger screen (UltraScreen for those of you who know Marcus Theatres) and in Real3D. Thought the 3D was great (and I typically avoid 3D) but I think 2D would work very well too; nothing major other than some shots with debris coming at you (I flinched more than once).
The visuals were amazing (especially in the really destructive shots where we see our main character in the foreground, and shit's going down behind her), the music was great. I could have done with fewer of the increasing-volume noise and then the "pop" before silence, but that's a nitpick; didn't detract from anything. I enjoy Clooney quite a bit in general, and I think he was perfectly cast here. Bullock is more hit-and-miss for me, but I think this may have been her best performance. As some have complained, the characterization was a little light, but Bullock kept me invested in her character through her performance. |
Re: Gravity (Cuarón, 2013) — The Reviews Thread
Originally Posted by LosingMyMind
(Post 11869782)
So this is basically Open Water in space, with presumably one or both cast members dying by the end? Yawn.
It amazes me that this is doing so well, yet Moon didn't get much theatrical exposure at all. I'll pass on this one and go give Moon another watch :up: While Gravity's remise is simple it is executed with masssive complexity and tense drama for great storytelling. I'm actually really amazed this cost $100 million but at the same time I'm not. We better get a damn good BD for this. Is it 2001? No, and it doesn't want to be for all the right reasons. It is easily the best big studio film of the year. And thankfully it's damn good as a generality too. |
Re: Gravity (Cuarón, 2013) — The Reviews Thread
What does Moon have to do with anything? Good flick, but it's 4 years old and as much promise as Duncan Jones shows, he's no Cuaron. Not yet at least (And I'm slightly amazed he's 42, thought he was younger for some reason.)
|
Re: Gravity (Cuarón, 2013) — The Reviews Thread
Originally Posted by LosingMyMind
(Post 11869849)
I would prefer a unique story with lesser acting and/or directing, over strong direction/performances.
|
Re: Gravity (Cuarón, 2013) — The Reviews Thread
Originally Posted by LosingMyMind
(Post 11869849)
Just doing the space comparison and Moon seemed to have a more unique story, compared to this. It's just unfortunate that the more unique movie didn't get as much exposure.
The majority of the praise I'm seeing is for the acting and direction. While that's fine and dandy, I would prefer a unique story with lesser acting and/or directing, over strong direction/performances. :shrug: |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:19 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.