|
Re: Star Trek Beyond [no colon] (2016, D: Justin Lin)
Originally Posted by Shazam
(Post 12672135)
Amazing, humans of the future have their colons removed. But how does that affect the movie?
|
Re: Star Trek Beyond [no colon] (2016, D: Justin Lin)
Star Trek Beyond No Colon will be the shit.
|
Re: Star Trek Beyond [no colon] (2016, D: Justin Lin)
I love how people think something very wrong has been done to the larger Trek franchise that wasn't done long before during both the Kirk and Picard movies. A few of those were just as shitty given what people are using as reasons for knocking these new movies.
|
Re: Star Trek Beyond [no colon] (2016, D: Justin Lin)
Originally Posted by hdnmickey
(Post 12672152)
I love how people think something very wrong has been done to the larger Trek franchise that wasn't done long before during both the Kirk and Picard movies. A few of those were just as shitty given what people are using as reasons for knocking these new movies.
|
Re: Star Trek Beyond [no colon] (2016, D: Justin Lin)
Originally Posted by hdnmickey
(Post 12672152)
I love how people think something very wrong has been done to the larger Trek franchise that wasn't done long before during both the Kirk and Picard movies. A few of those were just as shitty given what people are using as reasons for knocking these new movies.
|
Re: Star Trek Beyond [no colon] (2016, D: Justin Lin)
Originally Posted by Timber
(Post 12672159)
I think they're longing for the original series and conveniently forgetting everything post Star Trek 4. The Next Generation movies were big dumb sci-fi movies, not some highbrow entertainment.
It all comes down to what people have decided they like and not like. Much like these newer sci-fi/comic franchises where one is crap because of some critique that is totally ignored in another because they have decided they like it. |
Re: Star Trek Beyond [no colon] (2016, D: Justin Lin)
There's unquestionably a very different tone to the Abrams Trek films though. Not really sure how a person can watch any of the shows or films that came before them and deny that. Whether that's a question of just what fans are used to or if there were bad episodes or films is a different matter entirely. Personally the new films to me just feel like Paramount decided to abandon most things that gave Star Trek its identity to appeal to a broader audience but wanted to keep the characters people know from pop culture around so they can still capitalize on the brand.
|
Re: Star Trek Beyond [no colon] (2016, D: Justin Lin)
I don't think anybody would try and say there isn't a difference in tone. Just like each series and most of the movies had a different tone than those that came before them. Many (including me) would say that is a good thing. Just like there is an obvious difference to the look of these new movies.
|
Re: Star Trek Beyond [no colon] (2016, D: Justin Lin)
Originally Posted by trespoochies
(Post 12672148)
Star Trek Beyond No Colon will be the shit.
|
Re: Star Trek Beyond [no colon] (2016, D: Justin Lin)
Originally Posted by Decker
(Post 12672458)
It's in the bag.
|
Re: Star Trek Beyond [no colon] (2016, D: Justin Lin)
Flick sounds better than a colonoscopy.
|
Re: Star Trek Beyond [no colon] (2016, D: Justin Lin)
Originally Posted by fumanstan
(Post 12671989)
Sounds like the DC comic movie threads.
|
Re: Star Trek Beyond [no colon] (2016, D: Justin Lin)
via /Film...
Lin talking about the trailer: Well, its a minute and a half, you know… And again, there were other versions that were much more traditional and I can see where maybe the hardcore fans could probably see that as, “Oh.” But with trailers you’re putting a two-hour movie into a minute and a half, and the one thing I wanted to make sure is that it hopefully represents that we are trying to be bold and take risks, whether we are successful or not, I don’t know. That was something I was excited to do and with collaborators like Simon [Pegg] and Doug [Jung], passion for the franchise will be there regardless. So however it’s presented, yeah it’s a minute and a half, and my challenge to everyone making the trailer is about saying “let’s not go off course, I’m not afraid to share — share it, I feel like we have the goods in a two-hour run and you really do get to know the characters and hopefully the journey is great. I love it and the cast did an amazing job and the crew… and the inside baseball version of the creation of this Trek was pretty condensed in how you usually make a movie of this size. And I wanted us to be bold, I wanted us to take chances and hopefully in a minute and a half we are able to convey that. |
Re: Star Trek Beyond [no colon] (2016, D: Justin Lin)
Yep, after reading all that I'm definitely out of this one.
The first reboot was ok at best. The last one was mediocre. This looks, and sounds, flat out terrible - like worst movie of the year terrible. |
Originally Posted by Sean O'Hara
(Post 12671114)
It looks like Galaxy Quest.
|
Re: Star Trek Beyond [no colon] (2016, D: Justin Lin)
Originally Posted by dan30oly
(Post 12672683)
Yep, after reading all that I'm definitely out of this one.
The first reboot was ok at best. The last one was mediocre. This looks, and sounds, flat out terrible - like worst movie of the year terrible. And I guarantee you will see this one. :lol: |
Re: Star Trek Beyond [no colon] (2016, D: Justin Lin)
When I was growing up, I had a friend without a colon. All the other kids picked on him. Poor guy. He's probably a millionaire now.
|
Re: Star Trek Beyond [no colon] (2016, D: Justin Lin)
Simon Pegg says "Hang in there" to the Star Trek fans
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/2f4aAwa5wdg" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> |
Re: Star Trek Beyond [no colon] (2016, D: Justin Lin)
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/Yr_1K5YOAq0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
|
Re: Star Trek Beyond [no colon] (2016, D: Justin Lin)
I don't hate the trailer but that was a great mashup.
|
Re: Star Trek Beyond [no colon] (2016, D: Justin Lin)
Originally Posted by alfredog1976
(Post 12674564)
Simon Pegg says "Hang in there" to the Star Trek fans
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/2f4aAwa5wdg" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> |
Re: Star Trek Beyond [no colon] (2016, D: Justin Lin)
Originally Posted by B5Erik
(Post 12676603)
That's actually a good sign - Sadly, the Paramount marketing people may be undermining the movie by trying to appeal to as wide an audience as possible. They really need to release a more classic Trek styled trailer asap.
|
Re: Star Trek Beyond [no colon] (2016, D: Justin Lin)
Originally Posted by B5Erik
(Post 12676603)
That's actually a good sign - Sadly, the Paramount marketing people may be undermining the movie by trying to appeal to as wide an audience as possible. They really need to release a more classic Trek styled trailer asap.
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/3nkegWQe1ZM" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> <iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/lKfkkhEbUlY" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> I'm not holding my breath. |
Re: Star Trek Beyond [no colon] (2016, D: Justin Lin)
Originally Posted by PatD
(Post 12677240)
Something like these?
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/3nkegWQe1ZM" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> <iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/lKfkkhEbUlY" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> I'm not holding my breath. <iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/vOIYaRb6XpQ?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> <iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/qCcf9FBsNVo?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> |
Re: Star Trek Beyond [no colon] (2016, D: Justin Lin)
Take this as one will. It's Wrath of Khan edited like Beyond with "Sabotage":
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:46 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.