DVD Talk Forum

DVD Talk Forum (https://forum.dvdtalk.com/)
-   Movie Talk (https://forum.dvdtalk.com/movie-talk-17/)
-   -   Jack the Giant Slayer (2013) dir: Bryan Singer (https://forum.dvdtalk.com/movie-talk/608976-jack-giant-slayer-2013-dir-bryan-singer.html)

Daytripper 03-02-13 09:48 PM

Re: Jack the Giant Slayer (2013) dir: Bryan Singer
 

Originally Posted by achau9598 (Post 11599166)
took my family to see this today (in 3d) and was quite surprised at how much I actually enjoyed it - where the tv trailers made the CG look awful, it wasn't as awkward on screen. Both of my sons enjoyed it as well.

I did get a chuckle when Ewan said "I have a bad feeling about this" - made me think of Star Wars.

Sadly, I wish theaters would police the auditoriums - a group of kids came in late, yelling across to each other the whole way to their seats, then proceeded to continue yelling for no reason. During the film there were bright flashes as they were taking cell phone photos. I told the manager after the show, and they said they were short handed.

For $40 in tickets + concessions, I shouldn't have to get up during the movie and find an employee. I wish the theater (Cinemark) would add something to their app that you could press to send an alert which would be routed to the theater so they could deal with it.

Why didn't you just get up and go down to these punks and tell them to turn their fucking cell phones off? I would have. And if they didn't, then go get whoever was in charge.

Anubis2005X 03-03-13 01:58 PM

Re: Jack the Giant Slayer (2013) dir: Bryan Singer
 

Originally Posted by achau9598 (Post 11599166)
I wish the theater (Cinemark) would add something to their app that you could press to send an alert which would be routed to the theater so they could deal with it.

But then wouldn't you be using your phone during the movie and become part of the problem? ;)

dom56 03-03-13 04:09 PM

Re: Jack the Giant Slayer (2013) dir: Bryan Singer
 
Look like the movie is bombing at the box office. Only made $28 millions.

http://movies.yahoo.com/news/box-off...ml?cache=clear

foofighters7 03-03-13 04:32 PM

Re: Jack the Giant Slayer (2013) dir: Bryan Singer
 
yeah I had a feeling it would fail.

The story is just not right for today's market. It just didn't seem the right time for this kind of film.

It suffers from an identity crisis. It's a children's tale that is trying to lure in the teen to 30 market which is tough.

Perhaps not kiddie enough to be taken as a 'children's movie', not dark/adult enough for more mature viewers.

PenguinJoe 03-03-13 04:39 PM

Re: Jack the Giant Slayer (2013) dir: Bryan Singer
 

Originally Posted by foofighters7 (Post 11599815)
yeah I had a feeling it would fail.

The story is just not right for today's market. It just didn't seem the right time for this kind of film.

It suffers from an identity crisis. It's a children's tale that is trying to lure in the teen to 30 market which is tough.

Perhaps not kiddie enough to be taken as a 'children's movie', not dark/adult enough for more mature viewers.

Plus the title to the movie is a spoiler so why bother? I mean we already know Jack slays the giants why spend $8 to see it then?

foofighters7 03-03-13 05:38 PM

Re: Jack the Giant Slayer (2013) dir: Bryan Singer
 
'Jack the Potential Giant Slayer' doesn't have the same ring to it?

Groucho 03-03-13 06:46 PM

Re: Jack the Giant Slayer (2013) dir: Bryan Singer
 

Originally Posted by foofighters7 (Post 11599815)
yeah I had a feeling it would fail.

The story is just not right for today's market. It just didn't seem the right time for this kind of film.

It suffers from an identity crisis. It's a children's tale that is trying to lure in the teen to 30 market which is tough.

Perhaps not kiddie enough to be taken as a 'children's movie', not dark/adult enough for more mature viewers.

This is a good analysis. The movie is very much a kid's movie in terms of plot, simplistic one-note characters, and the theme. At the same time, you could add just a few minutes of footage (the film quickly cuts away from several gruesome deaths) and this would suddenly be a hard R. It's surreal.

foofighters7 03-03-13 07:33 PM

Re: Jack the Giant Slayer (2013) dir: Bryan Singer
 
Unrated Directors Cut here it comes! (DC version features no extra violence just tons of frontal male nudity)

Giles 03-03-13 11:06 PM

Re: Jack the Giant Slayer (2013) dir: Bryan Singer
 
I actually quite enjoyed it, but I though the 3D was hit or miss, most of it works, although there are some instances where I thought the Director and the DP could have done more (notably the 'bee sequence')

also I thought it was really dumb to shoot this in scope (2.35), it should have been in 1.85 since the majority of new theater screens are 1.85/horizontal masking - the giant's should have looked tall and wide screen imagery doesn't convey this to it's best effect - it would have been cool, if Singer had shot the beginning of the movie in 2.35 and then the film shifts to 1.78 for the beanstalk raising the house towards the sky during the storm and the rest of the film 'fullscreen'

PenguinJoe 03-04-13 12:29 AM

Re: Jack the Giant Slayer (2013) dir: Bryan Singer
 
I can't believe the guy who did The Usual Suspects, Apt Pupil, and X2 directed this. I really use to like Bryan Singer too.

Groucho 03-04-13 09:01 AM

Re: Jack the Giant Slayer (2013) dir: Bryan Singer
 

Originally Posted by PenguinJoe (Post 11600180)
I can't believe the guy who did The Usual Suspects, Apt Pupil, and X2 directed this.

It's worse than that. Christopher McQuarrie is one of the credited screenwriters!

RichC2 03-04-13 09:07 AM

Re: Jack the Giant Slayer (2013) dir: Bryan Singer
 

Originally Posted by PenguinJoe (Post 11600180)
I can't believe the guy who did The Usual Suspects, Apt Pupil, and X2 directed this. I really use to like Bryan Singer too.

Was it that bad?

Brent L 03-20-13 09:06 AM

Re: Jack the Giant Slayer (2013) dir: Bryan Singer
 

Originally Posted by Groucho (Post 11599910)
This is a good analysis. The movie is very much a kid's movie in terms of plot, simplistic one-note characters, and the theme. At the same time, you could add just a few minutes of footage (the film quickly cuts away from several gruesome deaths) and this would suddenly be a hard R. It's surreal.

That's a really good way to put it. As it is, this is really a children's flick through and through. But yeah, there are a few crazy kills that do cut away right before it happens, so it leaves a lot of awfulness to the imagination. Heck, there are a few scenes where giants bit the heads off of people and it pretty much shows it.

Now that said, I enjoyed it for what it was. Me and my grown nephew saw it last night and it was WAY better than I anticipated. I never would have gone to see it had he just wanted to go out to waste some time. Heck, the only real reason we saw this one was because it started the earliest after I got off work.

If you would remove a bit of the childish antics, like farts and the overly stupid antics of the second head of the main giant, and just the weird acting style of some of the characters that were flat out pandering to kids, and insert the violence that seemed to want to be there so badly and expand on some of the characters a bit more and just overall make it a little more "adult" and you would have a pretty cool dark twist to this tale.

There were two scenes that really stood out to me...

Spoiler:
-When the giants make it to down below here on the surface, and the king and his men are on their way to the castle unknowing that the giants are coming. Jack is running towards the king and his men screaming the giants are coming and there is an edge of a forest behind them and out of nowhere the trees explode with the giants rushing towards them from behind. I thought that was really well done.

-I also loved when Jack tossed the last bean down the throat of the main giant and he literally EXPLODED. It was actually a pretty disturbing sight, and I was actually shocked that it was even shown as it was in the flick. He swallowed the bean and started to choke, and the stalk just started shooting out of his head and torso popping his eyes and everything out and then pretty much severing his entire body with the parts landing everywhere.

The entire storming of the castle though was pretty well done for the most part.


Part of the problem is not knowing what to expect when you watch it. It wants to be both a very kiddy children's movie but also a violent adult film at the same time, and there is very little middle ground. Something like the Toy Story flicks walks that line much better, but then again you can't really compare the two since Toy Story and things like that are in an entirely different class of film. You know what I mean though.

I'd give it a rating of something along the lines of a 6 or 6.5 out of 10 or so.

I enjoyed it a hell of a lot more than Superman Returns, but that may say more about my hatred of that flick than my enjoyment of Jack the Giant Slayer. I'm not sure on that one. I'll put it another way - if there was a sequel (which isn't likely at all, at least not now) then I would go watch it.

BambooLounge 03-20-13 09:35 AM

Re: Jack the Giant Slayer (2013) dir: Bryan Singer
 

Originally Posted by PenguinJoe (Post 11599820)
Plus the title to the movie is a spoiler so why bother? I mean we already know Jack slays the giants why spend $8 to see it then?

I wonder how many people have stayed away from Buffy the Vampire Slayer for that very same reason.

As opposed to just not being into gothic/supernatural teen soap operas.

GatorDeb 03-21-13 06:21 PM

Re: Jack the Giant Slayer (2013) dir: Bryan Singer
 
Saw it in 3D and I honestly don't get the hate for this one, found it entertaining. Was gonna watch it in IMAX 3D but by the time I realized all theaters in the area only play ONE IMAX 3D at a time, the latest one, Oz was in and Jack out.

Why So Blu? 05-31-13 08:28 PM

Re: Jack the Giant Slayer (2013) dir: Bryan Singer
 
Spoiler:
Just saw this one recently and thought it was dull until the last 45 minutes. As soon as the leader of the giants freefalls down and catches the vine it was on. Loved that and the final battle(s).

Original Desmond 06-02-13 01:18 AM

Re: Jack the Giant Slayer (2013) dir: Bryan Singer
 
This was not terrible but didn't see the 200 mil budget

disaster at the box office

TheMovieman 07-04-13 07:39 PM

Re: Jack the Giant Slayer (2013) dir: Bryan Singer
 
Really didn't care for this at all. The characters are thinly written, the action was so-so (albeit I did enjoy the one giant kill at the end) but the visual effects were at least decent, although I'm not sure how the budget was nearly $200m with no big pay stars. However, I just have a hard time getting into movies where the villains are CGI-generated.

2/5

Daytripper 07-04-13 08:21 PM

Re: Jack the Giant Slayer (2013) dir: Bryan Singer
 
Called this in tonight on Pay Per View HD and enjoyed it much more than I expected. I'm actually a huge fan of Singer's body of work ("Superman Returns" and Valkyrie" included), but thought the trailers for this looked mediocre at best. Mainly because of the CGI. But it wasn't overkill the way the trailers indicated. And honestly, the CGI was not bad at all (IMO). For those on the fence, it's a really fun rental at the very least. But it's definitely not for younger kids. It's just way too violent for anyone under 8-10 years old.

TGM 01-11-14 04:59 PM

Re: Jack the Giant Slayer (2013) dir: Bryan Singer
 
I caught this thanks to the free HBO/Cinemax weekend. I really kind of enjoyed it. I thought Ewan McGregor looked like he was having a blast, and the story was surprisingly quite vicious at times.

DieselsDen 01-11-14 09:54 PM

Re: Jack the Giant Slayer (2013) dir: Bryan Singer
 

Originally Posted by TGM (Post 11974124)
I caught this thanks to the free HBO/Cinemax weekend. I really kind of enjoyed it. I thought Ewan McGregor looked like he was having a blast, and the story was surprisingly quite vicious at times.

I saw it recently too and enjoyed it very much. As another poster pointed out, the last 45 minutes or so were really fun and even thrilling at times. While not wonderful, I certainly liked it more than say MAN OF STEEL or even INTO DARKNESS.

JumpCutz 01-11-14 10:01 PM

Re: Jack the Giant Slayer (2013) dir: Bryan Singer
 
Better than I thought it would be. :thumbsup:

1.5/5

d2cheer 01-13-14 03:00 PM

Re: Jack the Giant Slayer (2013) dir: Bryan Singer
 

Originally Posted by JumpCutz (Post 11974442)
Better than I thought it would be. :thumbsup:

1.5/5

:lol:


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:45 AM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.