![]() |
Re: Looper (Johnson, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
I didn't care for the beginning of the movie but enjoyed it once it settled into its plotline.
|
Re: Looper (Johnson, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
After seeing this and Abraham Lincoln Vampire Hunter... I really want me a Blunderbuss.
|
Re: Looper (Johnson, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
Originally Posted by Giantrobo
(Post 11483830)
After seeing this and Abraham Lincoln Vampire Hunter... I really want me a Blunderbuss.
I'm in the first run. |
Re: Looper (Johnson, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
So, was thinking about this one today...
Spoiler:
Am I missing some other variable here? |
Re: Looper (Johnson, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
You'd be right. It's fucked up in that plot part. Something had to make the big bad guy. So now we're talking alternate realities.
|
Re: Looper (Johnson, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
That's the loop.
Spoiler:
|
Re: Looper (Johnson, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
Originally Posted by arminius
(Post 11506771)
That's the loop.
Spoiler:
|
Re: Looper (Johnson, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
Originally Posted by The Bus
(Post 11402980)
My review:
Doing a concept for a sci-fi movie isn't too difficult. It's probably the easiest part about making the film. Take our world, and just juice it up differently. Let's say currency is now time, and everyone transfer it through their skin. Or we're all batteries enslaved by a machine hive-mind. Or people can enter your dreams. |
Re: Looper (Johnson, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
Originally Posted by PopcornTreeCt
(Post 11507051)
So, which event happened first then?
|
Re: Looper (Johnson, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
Originally Posted by GatorDeb
(Post 11507370)
Which movie is this? I recognize The Matrix and Inception from the other two, so I'm guessing that one is a movie also.
|
Re: Looper (Johnson, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
Thanks, sounds interesting :)
|
Re: Looper (Johnson, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
Originally Posted by GatorDeb
(Post 11507484)
Thanks, sounds interesting :)
|
Re: Looper (Johnson, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
Am watching the Blu-ray as I type this and will reiterate that Abe is not Kid Blue. It's clear as fucking day.
|
Re: Looper (Johnson, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
Originally Posted by Why So Blu?
(Post 11522746)
Am watching the Blu-ray as I type this and will reiterate that Abe is not Kid Blue. It's clear as fucking day.
|
Re: Looper (Johnson, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
Originally Posted by Tarantino
(Post 11522914)
Agreed. Nothing at all leads the audience to believe this.
I done told y'all. |
Re: Looper (Johnson, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
Originally Posted by Tarantino
(Post 11416867)
Kid Blue was
Spoiler:
|
Re: Looper (Johnson, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
I watched it again and it still feels like they're alluding to some sort of relationship between the two.
Although Rian Johnson flat out said they're not the same person, but some of the scenes to still seem to point to some other more personal connection. |
Re: Looper (Johnson, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
You can even watch the deleted scenes, which were about 80% about Kid Blue, and there's nothing there.
|
Re: Looper (Johnson, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
Blah, blah, blah, I have no fucking imagination so Kid Blue isn't Abe. Also, spoonfeed me everything.
|
Re: Looper (Johnson, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
Originally Posted by Jules Winfield
(Post 11523471)
Blah, blah, blah, I have no fucking imagination so Kid Blue isn't Abe. Also, spoonfeed me everything.
|
Re: Looper (Johnson, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
Originally Posted by Why So Blu?
(Post 11523477)
Imagine it all you want, but the facts are there and you'd be wrong.
|
Re: Looper (Johnson, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
Originally Posted by Jules Winfield
(Post 11523490)
The facts are there in the movie? List them. Now, we're talking facts here in the movie. Not something Rian Johnson said in a talk show or deleted scenes. Those are deleted. A fact would be something like Abe saying I am not Kid Blue or something to that effect. Okay, go!
How about continuity? I'm not gonna go through the earlier threads where I talked about how Abe had NO residual injuries from Kid Blue. Even when Abe smashed his fucking hand with the hammer - if they were the same person then Abe would have crippled himself on the spot. Some folks on here, maybe you were one of them, said that since Abe came from the future maybe he had himself heeled from the limp and broken hand at some point. You know, because in the future they can cure shit like that. In watching the Blu-ray yesterday - 5 minutes after Abe smashes Blue's hand with the hammer, we have the scene of Emily Blunt's character shooting young Joe with the rock salt and right on cue we have old Joe walking and then stopping and he pulls his shirt down a bit to reveal the rock salt scarring that was not there seconds before. He felt the fucking shotgun blast when young Joe was hit. It's as clear as day and CONFIRMS that Abe and Blue are not the same person, because you cannot apply the same rules to both Joes (since they're the same person) and not have them apply to Abe and Blue (if they were the same person). And not to fucking mention what they had already established with Paul Dano's character. They chopped him (young Dano) up and old Paul Dano felt the effects instantly. |
Re: Looper (Johnson, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
Originally Posted by Why So Blu?
(Post 11523506)
In watching the Blu-ray yesterday - 5 minutes after Abe smashes Blue's hand with the hammer, we have the scene of Emily Blunt's character shooting young Joe with the rock salt and right on cue we have old Joe walking and then stopping and he pulls his shirt down a bit to reveal the rock salt scarring that was not there seconds before. He felt the fucking shotgun blast when young Joe was hit.
So the fact that Abe didn't feel Blue's injury isn't a sign that Abe isn't Blue. It's possible that Abe remembered the injury the moment after doing it Blue. That said, the possibility that Kid Blue is a young Abe isn't really confirmed or denied by the film, so there's no correct answer. It just depends on your interpretation. |
Re: Looper (Johnson, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
:lol: It was denied by the director/writer of the film. I'd say that is the correct answer.
|
Re: Looper (Johnson, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
Originally Posted by Tarantino
(Post 11524105)
:lol: It was denied by the director/writer of the film. I'd say that is the correct answer.
Rian Johnson's own words: http://screencrush.com/rian-johnson-...ansformations/ One of the things I picked up on in ‘Looper’ is the relationship between Kid Blue and Abe. It’s very much like a son trying to win his father’s love. I think a big question for a lot of people watching it is whether or not they’re related. I know! Or some people have asked… Are they the same person? Are they the same person, which is interesting to me. I never thought that they were. I don’t think that would work, but I think it’s really cool that people’s heads go there. That’s definitely the dynamic I was reaching for with it, to see that kind of older/younger, a different variant on that — a sort of variant on the same theme between them. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:48 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.