DVD Talk Forum

DVD Talk Forum (https://forum.dvdtalk.com/)
-   Movie Talk (https://forum.dvdtalk.com/movie-talk-17/)
-   -   Looper (Johnson, 2012) — The Reviews Thread (https://forum.dvdtalk.com/movie-talk/605068-looper-johnson-2012-%97-reviews-thread.html)

RichC2 11-26-12 11:55 AM

Re: Looper (Johnson, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
 
I didn't care for the beginning of the movie but enjoyed it once it settled into its plotline.

Giantrobo 11-26-12 02:44 PM

Re: Looper (Johnson, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
 
After seeing this and Abraham Lincoln Vampire Hunter... I really want me a Blunderbuss.

MaximumPower 11-27-12 10:54 PM

Re: Looper (Johnson, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
 

Originally Posted by Giantrobo (Post 11483830)
After seeing this and Abraham Lincoln Vampire Hunter... I really want me a Blunderbuss.

http://www.therpf.com/f13/looper-blu...ld-out-161377/

I'm in the first run.

PopcornTreeCt 12-14-12 09:20 AM

Re: Looper (Johnson, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
 
So, was thinking about this one today...

Spoiler:
Just want to make sure I have this right... Bruce Willis' wife is killed by henchmen dispensed by the big bad guy. After (key word there), after his wife is killed, he goes back to the past to kill the big bad guy as a child and in doing so he creates the big bad guy. The movie proposes that the child only became the big bad guy because Willis killed the child's mother, after the child grew up and sent henchmen to his house which led to his wife's death. This can only lead to two outcomes... 1. that his wife was not killed by the big bad or 2. that no matter what Willis did that the future was unchangeable and that the kid was always going to grow up to be the big bad guy and eventually lead to his wife's demise.


Am I missing some other variable here?

Solid Snake 12-14-12 12:31 PM

Re: Looper (Johnson, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
 
You'd be right. It's fucked up in that plot part. Something had to make the big bad guy. So now we're talking alternate realities.

arminius 12-14-12 02:53 PM

Re: Looper (Johnson, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
 
That's the loop.
Spoiler:
Bruce goes back to kill the big bad guy creating him. The big bad guy is killing loopers because one killed his mom. Bruce the younger kills himself to stop Bruce the elder getting the big bad guy motivated. Everyone, including his wife(now never meeting him) lives happily ever after.

PopcornTreeCt 12-14-12 05:29 PM

Re: Looper (Johnson, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
 

Originally Posted by arminius (Post 11506771)
That's the loop.
Spoiler:
Bruce goes back to kill the big bad guy creating him. The big bad guy is killing loopers because one killed his mom. Bruce the younger kills himself to stop Bruce the elder getting the big bad guy motivated. Everyone, including his wife(now never meeting him) lives happily ever after.

So, which event happened first then?

GatorDeb 12-14-12 10:53 PM

Re: Looper (Johnson, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
 

Originally Posted by The Bus (Post 11402980)
My review:

Doing a concept for a sci-fi movie isn't too difficult. It's probably the easiest part about making the film. Take our world, and just juice it up differently. Let's say currency is now time, and everyone transfer it through their skin. Or we're all batteries enslaved by a machine hive-mind. Or people can enter your dreams.

Which movie is this? I recognize The Matrix and Inception from the other two, so I'm guessing that one is a movie also.

Lastblade 12-14-12 11:36 PM

Re: Looper (Johnson, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
 

Originally Posted by PopcornTreeCt (Post 11507051)
So, which event happened first then?

I think you are going to need some straws.

PopcornTreeCt 12-15-12 03:33 AM

Re: Looper (Johnson, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
 

Originally Posted by GatorDeb (Post 11507370)
Which movie is this? I recognize The Matrix and Inception from the other two, so I'm guessing that one is a movie also.

In Time

GatorDeb 12-15-12 04:42 AM

Re: Looper (Johnson, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
 
Thanks, sounds interesting :)

RichC2 12-15-12 08:06 AM

Re: Looper (Johnson, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
 

Originally Posted by GatorDeb (Post 11507484)
Thanks, sounds interesting :)

If you like Timberlake and like having pun you'll enjoy it.

Why So Blu? 12-31-12 04:50 PM

Re: Looper (Johnson, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
 
Am watching the Blu-ray as I type this and will reiterate that Abe is not Kid Blue. It's clear as fucking day.

Tarantino 12-31-12 09:20 PM

Re: Looper (Johnson, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
 

Originally Posted by Why So Blu? (Post 11522746)
Am watching the Blu-ray as I type this and will reiterate that Abe is not Kid Blue. It's clear as fucking day.

Agreed. Nothing at all leads the audience to believe this.

Why So Blu? 12-31-12 09:31 PM

Re: Looper (Johnson, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
 

Originally Posted by Tarantino (Post 11522914)
Agreed. Nothing at all leads the audience to believe this.

I watched it today and remembered this thread and some of the earlier postings and how some members kept on saying that they were the same person, blah, blah, blah.


I done told y'all.

Tarantino 12-31-12 09:37 PM

Re: Looper (Johnson, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
 

Originally Posted by Tarantino (Post 11416867)
Kid Blue was
Spoiler:
definitely NOT Abe. There's absolutely nothing that supports this, although I do believe he looked up to Abe as a father figure. He was simply a vagrant who was given something of his own, and wanted to impress the boss.

I was right there with ya.

fumanstan 01-01-13 03:43 PM

Re: Looper (Johnson, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
 
I watched it again and it still feels like they're alluding to some sort of relationship between the two.

Although Rian Johnson flat out said they're not the same person, but some of the scenes to still seem to point to some other more personal connection.

Why So Blu? 01-01-13 04:24 PM

Re: Looper (Johnson, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
 
You can even watch the deleted scenes, which were about 80% about Kid Blue, and there's nothing there.

Jules Winfield 01-01-13 05:44 PM

Re: Looper (Johnson, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
 
Blah, blah, blah, I have no fucking imagination so Kid Blue isn't Abe. Also, spoonfeed me everything.

Why So Blu? 01-01-13 05:56 PM

Re: Looper (Johnson, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
 

Originally Posted by Jules Winfield (Post 11523471)
Blah, blah, blah, I have no fucking imagination so Kid Blue isn't Abe. Also, spoonfeed me everything.

Imagine it all you want, but the facts are there and you'd be wrong.

Jules Winfield 01-01-13 06:08 PM

Re: Looper (Johnson, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
 

Originally Posted by Why So Blu? (Post 11523477)
Imagine it all you want, but the facts are there and you'd be wrong.

The facts are there in the movie? List them. Now, we're talking facts here in the movie. Not something Rian Johnson said in a talk show or deleted scenes. Those are deleted. A fact would be something like Abe saying I am not Kid Blue or something to that effect. Okay, go!

Why So Blu? 01-01-13 06:27 PM

Re: Looper (Johnson, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
 

Originally Posted by Jules Winfield (Post 11523490)
The facts are there in the movie? List them. Now, we're talking facts here in the movie. Not something Rian Johnson said in a talk show or deleted scenes. Those are deleted. A fact would be something like Abe saying I am not Kid Blue or something to that effect. Okay, go!


How about continuity? I'm not gonna go through the earlier threads where I talked about how Abe had NO residual injuries from Kid Blue. Even when Abe smashed his fucking hand with the hammer - if they were the same person then Abe would have crippled himself on the spot. Some folks on here, maybe you were one of them, said that since Abe came from the future maybe he had himself heeled from the limp and broken hand at some point. You know, because in the future they can cure shit like that.

In watching the Blu-ray yesterday - 5 minutes after Abe smashes Blue's hand with the hammer, we have the scene of Emily Blunt's character shooting young Joe with the rock salt and right on cue we have old Joe walking and then stopping and he pulls his shirt down a bit to reveal the rock salt scarring that was not there seconds before. He felt the fucking shotgun blast when young Joe was hit. It's as clear as day and CONFIRMS that Abe and Blue are not the same person, because you cannot apply the same rules to both Joes (since they're the same person) and not have them apply to Abe and Blue (if they were the same person).


And not to fucking mention what they had already established with Paul Dano's character. They chopped him (young Dano) up and old Paul Dano felt the effects instantly.

Jay G. 01-02-13 08:48 AM

Re: Looper (Johnson, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
 

Originally Posted by Why So Blu? (Post 11523506)
In watching the Blu-ray yesterday - 5 minutes after Abe smashes Blue's hand with the hammer, we have the scene of Emily Blunt's character shooting young Joe with the rock salt and right on cue we have old Joe walking and then stopping and he pulls his shirt down a bit to reveal the rock salt scarring that was not there seconds before. He felt the fucking shotgun blast when young Joe was hit.

I think you might be wrong: Old Joe didn't feel the shotgun blast, he remembered it. It's already established in the film that Old Joe remembers everything that happens to Young Joe, but he doesn't remember it until it happens to Young Joe. So after Young Joe gets shot with the shotgun, Old Joe "remembers" seconds later the incident, and checks himself for the "new" scars. Note that when Young Joe carved the waitress's name into his arm, Old Joe didn't feel the pain from the carving, but only noticed the scar. He even casually comments to Young Joe that the carved name "must hurt" when they sit down for their chat.

So the fact that Abe didn't feel Blue's injury isn't a sign that Abe isn't Blue. It's possible that Abe remembered the injury the moment after doing it Blue.

That said, the possibility that Kid Blue is a young Abe isn't really confirmed or denied by the film, so there's no correct answer. It just depends on your interpretation.

Tarantino 01-02-13 11:23 AM

Re: Looper (Johnson, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
 
:lol: It was denied by the director/writer of the film. I'd say that is the correct answer.

Jay G. 01-02-13 11:30 AM

Re: Looper (Johnson, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
 

Originally Posted by Tarantino (Post 11524105)
:lol: It was denied by the director/writer of the film. I'd say that is the correct answer.

The director isn't the sole arbiter of what a film means. Regardless of what Rian Johnson intended, the film suggests it as a possibility, and doesn't explicitly deny it.

Rian Johnson's own words:
http://screencrush.com/rian-johnson-...ansformations/

One of the things I picked up on in ‘Looper’ is the relationship between Kid Blue and Abe. It’s very much like a son trying to win his father’s love. I think a big question for a lot of people watching it is whether or not they’re related.

I know! Or some people have asked…

Are they the same person?

Are they the same person, which is interesting to me. I never thought that they were. I don’t think that would work, but I think it’s really cool that people’s heads go there. That’s definitely the dynamic I was reaching for with it, to see that kind of older/younger, a different variant on that — a sort of variant on the same theme between them.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:48 AM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.