View Poll Results: The Dark Knight Rises (Nolan, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
0
0%
0
0%
Voters: 276. You may not vote on this poll
The Dark Knight Rises (Nolan, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
#1426
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#1427
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3,586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: The Dark Knight Rises (Nolan, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
#1428
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: A far green country
Posts: 5,960
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: The Dark Knight Rises (Nolan, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
#1429
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Re: The Dark Knight Rises (Nolan, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
Yeah, I would be all for a live action TV show. "Fantastical" elements/characters would be fine as long as the show would write them well and treat them seriously. I'd especially love it if the "world's greatest detective" aspect to Batman was explored in more depth, which a TV series would certainly allow.
#1430
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: A far green country
Posts: 5,960
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: The Dark Knight Rises (Nolan, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
"I am vengeance. I am the night. I am Batman!"
#1431
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3,586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: The Dark Knight Rises (Nolan, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
Did you notice there was a link to a different article also about TDKR there, titled "Due To IMDb Policy Change, ‘The Dark Knight Rises’ Is The 10th Greatest Film Of All-Time"?
Bitching about this film is a serious affair, it seems.
#1432
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: A far green country
Posts: 5,960
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#1433
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3,586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: The Dark Knight Rises (Nolan, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
see revised post.
Also, I bought into it because a lot of it is true - the majority of problems addressed in that article are pretty obviously explained. It's funny, because these kinds of things just aren't worth getting upset over but people do anyway. If they don't (like me, who doesn't have these issues with the film so many have) then they're looked at as the 'turn off your brain' types.
The reality (again for me, I can't speak for anyone else) is I have enough problems and a film like this to dive into and enjoy is just what I need right now, and it's a great conclusion to the trilogy.
Also, I bought into it because a lot of it is true - the majority of problems addressed in that article are pretty obviously explained. It's funny, because these kinds of things just aren't worth getting upset over but people do anyway. If they don't (like me, who doesn't have these issues with the film so many have) then they're looked at as the 'turn off your brain' types.
The reality (again for me, I can't speak for anyone else) is I have enough problems and a film like this to dive into and enjoy is just what I need right now, and it's a great conclusion to the trilogy.
#1435
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Re: The Dark Knight Rises (Nolan, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
P.S.: Don't go looking for pictures of Kevin Conroy. You will be disappointed by what you find. The voice and the face do not match.
#1436
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3,586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: The Dark Knight Rises (Nolan, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
He's quite haggard, yes.
Older pictures of him are a different story. He might've worked as a Bruce Wayne depending on how old he was at the time photos of him much younger were taken.
Amazing show, and I've been revisiting it recently. Funny the parts I remember, even the music in certain episodes.
Older pictures of him are a different story. He might've worked as a Bruce Wayne depending on how old he was at the time photos of him much younger were taken.
Amazing show, and I've been revisiting it recently. Funny the parts I remember, even the music in certain episodes.
#1437
DVD Talk Hero
#1438
DVD Talk Hero
Re: The Dark Knight Rises (Nolan, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
Damn right it is. Actually, they both are. The animated series was epic, but most of the people on this forum weren't even alive during the initial run, which started in 1992, the weekend Batman Returns hit theaters.
#1439
Banned
#1440
DVD Talk Legend
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Behind the Orange Curtain
Posts: 20,085
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
7 Posts
Re: The Dark Knight Rises (Nolan, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
36 pages and over a week later, I finally saw this in IMAX today.
And I loved it.
This entry, more than the other two, felt like an emotionally engaging, serious film that took Bruce Wayne places that most superhero films don't. I loved the redemption of going from a broken man at the beginning, to literally being a broken man when he foolishly tried to just jump right back into the game without properly assessing his opponent. It reminded me of some Rocky III shit, and Bane was Mr. T.
Nothing was easy for Bruce here. That first fight with Bane was incredibly draining, and the desperation on Batman's part was palpable. He was so easily deconstructed by Bane, reduced to nothing.
I almost wish the film had been longer so his time in the prison could have been expanded a bit more. It's not like those scenes didn't cover all the ground they needed to, but I was particularly fascinated by his journey back to civilization. Having to essentially rebuild himself like he did in the first film, only this time it was in a stronger way.
I loved Hardy as Bane, but it bothered me when he was reduced to just a fangless henchman at the end. I knew the twist would be coming, since I knew who Tate really was, but it made Bane seem more vulnerable than he'd been set up to be. Still, he was an enigmatic and powerful figure, and I really love how Hardy tackled the role.
Hathaway has an incredible ass. She was also much better than I expected here. Great character, smart, sharp, cunning. I don't think she needs a spin-off film or anything, but she was a solid addition to the cast.
JGL continues to prove he's one of the top young actors working today. I can't say a bad thing about Blake, and I had no problem at all with the reveal of his name at the end. I thought he did exactly what a "Robin" should in this film, and that's do everything to aid Batman without becoming the hokey sidekick everyone is familiar with.
Zimmer's score was excellent. I've always liked his themes for the series, and this one was the high point of them for me.
The ending. Is anyone surprised this is how Nolan would end it? I really don't know what to think - or what I want to think - but that's what's so great about an ending like this. It's divisive, and either you love what he did or you think it stinks. Could Batman have dropped out at the last second and lived? I guess, but that's a helluva blast radius he'd have to get clear of in less than 3 seconds. And what are the odds of Alfred sitting down in the same cafe, in the same city, at the same time Bruce is there at some point int he future? Exactly. I think it was done to give fans a glimmer of hope, but Bruce Wayne did what he set out to do as Batman, and he died doing it.
Where to go from here? No reboot, not necessarily. Same universe and characters, have Blake take up the cowl, fight like a bastard to get his skills up. I don't think just anyone can be Batman; it's not some populist position, but maybe Blake could be the right guy.
I'll try to see this again, and if I do it'll definitely be in IMAX because Nolan really made the most of that format. It looked gorgeous.
p/s - I don't even understand anyone comparing this to The Avengers. They're so far removed from each other that it's retarded to even try.
And I loved it.
This entry, more than the other two, felt like an emotionally engaging, serious film that took Bruce Wayne places that most superhero films don't. I loved the redemption of going from a broken man at the beginning, to literally being a broken man when he foolishly tried to just jump right back into the game without properly assessing his opponent. It reminded me of some Rocky III shit, and Bane was Mr. T.
Nothing was easy for Bruce here. That first fight with Bane was incredibly draining, and the desperation on Batman's part was palpable. He was so easily deconstructed by Bane, reduced to nothing.
I almost wish the film had been longer so his time in the prison could have been expanded a bit more. It's not like those scenes didn't cover all the ground they needed to, but I was particularly fascinated by his journey back to civilization. Having to essentially rebuild himself like he did in the first film, only this time it was in a stronger way.
I loved Hardy as Bane, but it bothered me when he was reduced to just a fangless henchman at the end. I knew the twist would be coming, since I knew who Tate really was, but it made Bane seem more vulnerable than he'd been set up to be. Still, he was an enigmatic and powerful figure, and I really love how Hardy tackled the role.
Hathaway has an incredible ass. She was also much better than I expected here. Great character, smart, sharp, cunning. I don't think she needs a spin-off film or anything, but she was a solid addition to the cast.
JGL continues to prove he's one of the top young actors working today. I can't say a bad thing about Blake, and I had no problem at all with the reveal of his name at the end. I thought he did exactly what a "Robin" should in this film, and that's do everything to aid Batman without becoming the hokey sidekick everyone is familiar with.
Zimmer's score was excellent. I've always liked his themes for the series, and this one was the high point of them for me.
The ending. Is anyone surprised this is how Nolan would end it? I really don't know what to think - or what I want to think - but that's what's so great about an ending like this. It's divisive, and either you love what he did or you think it stinks. Could Batman have dropped out at the last second and lived? I guess, but that's a helluva blast radius he'd have to get clear of in less than 3 seconds. And what are the odds of Alfred sitting down in the same cafe, in the same city, at the same time Bruce is there at some point int he future? Exactly. I think it was done to give fans a glimmer of hope, but Bruce Wayne did what he set out to do as Batman, and he died doing it.
Where to go from here? No reboot, not necessarily. Same universe and characters, have Blake take up the cowl, fight like a bastard to get his skills up. I don't think just anyone can be Batman; it's not some populist position, but maybe Blake could be the right guy.
I'll try to see this again, and if I do it'll definitely be in IMAX because Nolan really made the most of that format. It looked gorgeous.
p/s - I don't even understand anyone comparing this to The Avengers. They're so far removed from each other that it's retarded to even try.
Last edited by islandclaws; 07-31-12 at 09:38 PM.
#1441
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Re: The Dark Knight Rises (Nolan, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
It ran from 92-95, so you're saying most people on this forum are younger than 17?? Sorry, but that's way off.
#1442
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3,586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: The Dark Knight Rises (Nolan, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
Batman: The Animated Series premiered (as a Fox prime-time debut) in September 1992.
I was born in 1981, and remember seeing both as they first arrived vividly.
#1443
Banned
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 3,503
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: The Dark Knight Rises (Nolan, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
I'm pretty sure most of the people in this forum were already working their first or second job when the animated series premiered.
#1444
Banned
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 3,503
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: The Dark Knight Rises (Nolan, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
And it wouldn't exactly be difficult for him to figure out Alfred's flight schedule, even if he didn't already know when Alfred would be there, which he does.
In short, he's not dead. Stop overthinking it.
#1446
DVD Talk Hero
Re: The Dark Knight Rises (Nolan, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
You're right, technically. That weekend, they did premiere a Catwoman story arc featuring Red Claw and then Sunday night they premiered The Man-Bat episode. Then it started in the Fall on a regular basis.
#1447
DVD Talk Hero
Re: The Dark Knight Rises (Nolan, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
Yeah, that's a stretch.
#1448
Banned
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 3,503
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: The Dark Knight Rises (Nolan, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
#1449
DVD Talk Hero
#1450
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: The Dark Knight Rises (Nolan, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
I just can't understand how anyone could get worked up over any of these "plot holes" in a movie that is "a blatant fantasy," as the author put it. Its like getting bent out of shape over the "errors" in time-travel movies.
I really feel that audiences have changed. If Jaws came out today, people would probably be debating just how the shark got that big. Or in Raiders, how did Indy get off that sub? Or why isn't E.T. wearing clothes?
These types of movies, ESPECIALLY comic book movies, are tall tales or camp-fire stories. If they keep you on the edge of your seat, they did their job. They don't need to hold up in a court of law.