View Poll Results: The Amazing Spider-Man (Webb, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
0
0%
0
0%
Voters: 120. You may not vote on this poll
The Amazing Spider-Man (Webb, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
#26
DVD Talk Legend
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: wandering the earth like Caine in the Kung-Fu
Posts: 19,937
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes
on
5 Posts
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man (Webb, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
And why are we talking crap about Raimi's Spiderman movies? It sounds an awful lot like we're hoping the new one is good so let's point out every single flaw from the previous ones to make us feel better about the crap we'll soon be seeing.
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 738
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man (Webb, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
Spider-Man 3 aside, in reality I didnt really have a problem with how Raimi approached the first 2 movies.
Its just that Tobey and Dunst were just awful, awful as Peter and Mary-Jane. Bad acting and NO chemistry. Sorry, but for me, the most important aspect of Spider-Man is Peter Parker and his interactions with his cast characters, most importantly Mary Jane.
Im glad Webb is starting with Gwen Stacy though. Emma Stone looks like she was ripped straight out of one of the original comic panels featuring her, and she and Garfield seem to already have leagues better chemistry than Tobey and Dunst ever did.
Its just that Tobey and Dunst were just awful, awful as Peter and Mary-Jane. Bad acting and NO chemistry. Sorry, but for me, the most important aspect of Spider-Man is Peter Parker and his interactions with his cast characters, most importantly Mary Jane.
Im glad Webb is starting with Gwen Stacy though. Emma Stone looks like she was ripped straight out of one of the original comic panels featuring her, and she and Garfield seem to already have leagues better chemistry than Tobey and Dunst ever did.
#28
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man (Webb, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
Just got back from a screening. I liked it, it was certainly better than the last Spider-Man film. On par with the first two.
To be honest, I think from a physical standpoint Tobey Maguire is a much more convincing Peter Parker than Andrew Garfield. I thought Garfield had the mannerisms and body language of Peter Parker, but he's too much of a pretty boy to sell the "dorky nerd" aspect. Maguire has that.
I'm glad the action didn't have a bunch of 1st person views as one trailer made it seem. The action was pretty solid and the 3D was good. Reminded me of Prometheus' 3D in that it was subtle, more about giving you the sense of depth rather than having stuff thrown at you.
The script was a little too family friendly. Very corny lines at times.
Finally, I was really annoyed how Dr. Connors was able to build, by himself, a fully functioning, high tech lab in the fucking sewer...a day after he got fired by his boss. Whatever, I guess.
Anyway as stated before, I certainly think it's as good as any of the Maguire films, but I wouldn't feel comfortable saying it's significantly better than them. If we're comparing superhero movies I liked The Avengers a lot more.
Grade: B
To be honest, I think from a physical standpoint Tobey Maguire is a much more convincing Peter Parker than Andrew Garfield. I thought Garfield had the mannerisms and body language of Peter Parker, but he's too much of a pretty boy to sell the "dorky nerd" aspect. Maguire has that.
I'm glad the action didn't have a bunch of 1st person views as one trailer made it seem. The action was pretty solid and the 3D was good. Reminded me of Prometheus' 3D in that it was subtle, more about giving you the sense of depth rather than having stuff thrown at you.
The script was a little too family friendly. Very corny lines at times.
Finally, I was really annoyed how Dr. Connors was able to build, by himself, a fully functioning, high tech lab in the fucking sewer...a day after he got fired by his boss. Whatever, I guess.
Anyway as stated before, I certainly think it's as good as any of the Maguire films, but I wouldn't feel comfortable saying it's significantly better than them. If we're comparing superhero movies I liked The Avengers a lot more.
Grade: B
#29
DVD Talk Hero
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man (Webb, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
"The Amazing Spider-Man" had a decent first act, a bit slow, ok mid-section, but that third act was so choppy and had terrible flow and momentum.
The script is a bit of a mess with getting from one action set piece to the next one with very little "webbing" to connect the scenes together. The script also leaves some dangling plotlines to be addressed in sequels, I guess. The after-the-first-end-credits-section scene was sort of lame, but at least you don't have to wait to the very end (no scene at the very end). Yes, it's a little on the emo side when it comes to Peter's emotions in spots.
I did appreciate the action camerawork, and the use of real stuntmen to do some of the web-swinging, though later on, it's a lot of CGI during the fight scenes between Spider-Man and the Lizard. Marc Webb's direction is not quite there for a full-blown film, and I wasn't as immersed with the 3D, as the depth of field seemed very deep with the camera lens choices, makes for somewhat boring movie-making.
I give it 2.66 stars or a grade of C+/B-, probably sleep on it for a final grade,
The script is a bit of a mess with getting from one action set piece to the next one with very little "webbing" to connect the scenes together. The script also leaves some dangling plotlines to be addressed in sequels, I guess. The after-the-first-end-credits-section scene was sort of lame, but at least you don't have to wait to the very end (no scene at the very end). Yes, it's a little on the emo side when it comes to Peter's emotions in spots.
I did appreciate the action camerawork, and the use of real stuntmen to do some of the web-swinging, though later on, it's a lot of CGI during the fight scenes between Spider-Man and the Lizard. Marc Webb's direction is not quite there for a full-blown film, and I wasn't as immersed with the 3D, as the depth of field seemed very deep with the camera lens choices, makes for somewhat boring movie-making.
I give it 2.66 stars or a grade of C+/B-, probably sleep on it for a final grade,
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 738
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man (Webb, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
Just came back.
Andrew Garfield and Emma Stone so thoroughly own this movie. By that virtue alone this is better than all of Raimi's films.
Andrew Garfield and Emma Stone so thoroughly own this movie. By that virtue alone this is better than all of Raimi's films.
#31
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: So Cal
Posts: 7,071
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man (Webb, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
If you think of Spider-man 3 as a comedy, it's a great movie. I was laughing so fucking hard during the movie, and everyone in the theater was staring at me.
I mean seriously, there's no way in hell they did any of that movie with any seriousness.
Oh, and the broadway play is fucking great. Go see it if you have the chance.
I mean seriously, there's no way in hell they did any of that movie with any seriousness.
Oh, and the broadway play is fucking great. Go see it if you have the chance.
Last edited by Superboy; 07-03-12 at 05:31 AM.
#32
DVD Talk God
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man (Webb, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
Seeing this Saturday afternoon for free with the Sony Movie Cash coupon from the Spiderman BD I bought.
I know the origin story is tired, but for the record I thought the 4 1/2 minute trailer I saw looked good.
hey, can't beat seeing it for free?
I know the origin story is tired, but for the record I thought the 4 1/2 minute trailer I saw looked good.
hey, can't beat seeing it for free?
#33
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man (Webb, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
Taking the kids, 10 and 7 to see this thing.
So I ask:
Does Lizard have any scenes where he pops out and scares us?
So I ask:
Does Lizard have any scenes where he pops out and scares us?
#35
DVD Talk Legend
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man (Webb, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
Went to a midnight screening (first time) and enjoyed the film. For those asking about a post credits scene, it actually appears a minute or so into the closing credits. After that, there's nothing else. There was a collective groan from the audience last night who stayed to the very last credit hoping for something more.
#36
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man (Webb, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
Spoiler:
Peter goes to a Science High School. Is Flash Thompson really a science type? Would have been better just to have him at a regular school. It sure seemed like it was.
#37
DVD Talk Hero
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Somewhere between Heaven and Hell
Posts: 34,101
Received 728 Likes
on
532 Posts
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man (Webb, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
We have schools where its one campus but split into regular and AP levels. Not just classes, but the actual school is divided.
#39
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man (Webb, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
Saw it last night with my friends. I was just OK with it. I liked the action sequences better in this one, I think Spidey was more spider-y when fighting. But it just didn't have that "hero moment" for me. Something along the lines of:
Superman the movie: "You've got me? who's got you?"
Batman: "I'm Batman"
Avengers: "I'm always angry"
In the same way that Green Lantern never had a similar moment.
I loved Emma Stone's Gwen Stacy. I'm really not as familiar with the Spiderman lore than most people here.
Superman the movie: "You've got me? who's got you?"
Batman: "I'm Batman"
Avengers: "I'm always angry"
In the same way that Green Lantern never had a similar moment.
I loved Emma Stone's Gwen Stacy. I'm really not as familiar with the Spiderman lore than most people here.
Spoiler:
#40
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Formerly known as "Solid Snake PAC"/Denton, Tx
Posts: 39,239
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man (Webb, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
How scared do kids get nowadays? Seems like kids are becoming "weaker" in a way.
#41
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 738
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man (Webb, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
lol at how divided the site reviews are.
This movie has such a better emotional core, acting and action than any of Raimi's movies. The only thing I would put over this movie from Raimi's is the depiction of Doc Ock from SM2, obviously a better villain. Otherwise everything about this slays those other ones.
This movie has such a better emotional core, acting and action than any of Raimi's movies. The only thing I would put over this movie from Raimi's is the depiction of Doc Ock from SM2, obviously a better villain. Otherwise everything about this slays those other ones.
#42
DVD Talk Godfather
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man (Webb, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
7 is still pretty young(I have one turning 6 and another turning 8 soon). That's second grade. 10 is different and probably depends on the child. I saw Gremlins at 9, when it came out, and it freaked me the fuck out for weeks.
#44
DVD Talk Hero
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man (Webb, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
Saw it this morning and it is my favorite of the Spiderman flicks. Part 2 was the best, but this one is much better. Tone, acting, and characterizations. In fact, this one took bits and pieces of part 2 and made it its own. Garfield is nowhere near the pussy that Toby was and Emma is hot. Great casting all the way around.
I fucked up and saw it in 2-D, though. I didn't know the film was actually shot in 3-D, so I dropped the ball on that one.
I fucked up and saw it in 2-D, though. I didn't know the film was actually shot in 3-D, so I dropped the ball on that one.
Last edited by Why So Blu?; 07-03-12 at 04:35 PM.
#45
DVD Talk Hero
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man (Webb, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
Went to a midnight screening (first time) and enjoyed the film. For those asking about a post credits scene, it actually appears a minute or so into the closing credits. After that, there's nothing else. There was a collective groan from the audience last night who stayed to the very last credit hoping for something more.
#47
New Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man (Webb, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
Those that have seen it...would you take a 5 year old? He did fine with Avengers, although I covered covered his eyes on a couple scenes.
#50
DVD Talk Legend
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man (Webb, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
We saw it today and thoroughly enjoyed it. As far as the hero moment goes I don't think that there was one particular moment but then again how many teenage characters would give us that type of moment? I thought that the movie was very emotional though and I'm looking forward to the next one and seeing where they go from here.