Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > Movie Talk
Reload this Page >

The Avengers (Whedon, 2012) — The Reviews Thread

Community
Search
Movie Talk A Discussion area for everything movie related including films In The Theaters
View Poll Results: The Avengers (Whedon, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
37.55%
29.60%
18.05%
7.94%
2.53%
1.81%
1.08%
0.36%
0
0%
0.36%
0.36%
Avengers Disassemble!
0.36%
Voters: 277. You may not vote on this poll

The Avengers (Whedon, 2012) — The Reviews Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-07-12, 11:53 AM
  #451  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Indiana
Posts: 5,426
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Re: The Avengers (Whedon, 2012) — The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by Solid Snake PAC
I'd take a Hawkeye/Black Widow film over a film over just one of them. They work well together.
That's funny because
Spoiler:
in the Ultimates comic book Black Widow turned out to be a traitor, and she killed Hawkeye's wife and kids.


But yeah a Hawkeye/Black Widow movie of them doing the Ultimates (or Avengers) undercover black ops missions would be awesome. That's basically what they did in the comics.
Old 05-07-12, 11:53 AM
  #452  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Rosemount, MN
Posts: 43,337
Received 1,638 Likes on 1,025 Posts
Re: The Avengers (Whedon, 2012) — The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by Solid Snake PAC
I'd take a Hawkeye/Black Widow film over a film over just one of them. They work well together. And if they did...I'd hope it'd be a spy thriller of sorts while also having some good action. Which is funny cuz not since The Ultimates has Hawkeye ever been a SHIELD agent, correct? I don't mind it...fits well in the cartoon too.
That movie is already plotted. It could easily be about the past situations they mentioned in this movie. Then it fits right into the continuity too. Hell, we even saw a "scene" from it already in The Avengers, when they were watching their file footage.
Old 05-07-12, 11:58 AM
  #453  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: The Avengers (Whedon, 2012) — The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by Jacoby Ellsbury

The thing that went unanswered for me is how do they get Hulk to fall in line. He was going around smashing everything in sight, good or bad, but all of a sudden with a larger force of enemies at hand he cooperates with the Avengers?
This got me as well too. The way I at least explained it to myself is that when Stark and Banner are at SHIELD, I can't remember the exact line but Stark tells Banner that he has to learn how to control it like Stark and the ARC reactor. When Stark was confident that Banner would return to fight I took that as they came up with a way for Banner to control it. Since they were both in the lab for some time.

Other than that I am as lost as well as Hulk only destroys but when the battle started, Banner could control himself to change into the Hulk when he wanted to without a stresser.
Old 05-07-12, 11:59 AM
  #454  
Banned by request
 
Supermallet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Termite Terrace
Posts: 54,150
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Re: The Avengers (Whedon, 2012) — The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by kgrogers1979
That's funny because
Spoiler:
in the Ultimates comic book Black Widow turned out to be a traitor, and she killed Hawkeye's wife and kids.


But yeah a Hawkeye/Black Widow movie of them doing the Ultimates (or Avengers) undercover black ops missions would be awesome. That's basically what they did in the comics.
I really, really hope they don't do this in the movies. I know that all of these films have taken some inspiration from the Ultimate universe, but the Ultimates was mainly awful. I don't understand why Mark Millar is so popular in comics.
Old 05-07-12, 12:21 PM
  #455  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Indiana
Posts: 5,426
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Re: The Avengers (Whedon, 2012) — The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by Supermallet
I really, really hope they don't do this in the movies. I know that all of these films have taken some inspiration from the Ultimate universe, but the Ultimates was mainly awful. I don't understand why Mark Millar is so popular in comics.
Mark Millar is popular for the same reason Michael Bay is popular.

The Ultimates was basically a Michael Bay movie in comic book form. Big flashy explosions and non-stop ass kicking with a paper-thin plot. It was basically a multimillion-dollar blockbuster movie in comic book form, and the closest thing we had to a big screen adaption of the Avengers... until we actually got one now...

I really doubt the movies will turn Black Widow into a villain though. That only ever happened in the Ultimates, and not the main universe. Plus I don't think Scarlett could play a convincing villain anyway.
Old 05-07-12, 12:22 PM
  #456  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Hokeyboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
Posts: 20,405
Received 696 Likes on 430 Posts
Re: The Avengers (Whedon, 2012) — The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by Supermallet
I really, really hope they don't do this in the movies. I know that all of these films have taken some inspiration from the Ultimate universe, but the Ultimates was mainly awful. I don't understand why Mark Millar is so popular in comics.
What, you didn't think "HULK WANTS FREDDIE PRINZE JUNIOOOOOORRRRR!!!" was the pinnacle of comics writing?

Millar is garbage. His entire shtick is taking existing comics concepts and subverting them with healthy doses extra-rapey violence.
Old 05-07-12, 12:25 PM
  #457  
Banned by request
 
Supermallet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Termite Terrace
Posts: 54,150
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Re: The Avengers (Whedon, 2012) — The Reviews Thread

What's funny is that we managed to get some decent movies out of Millar comics, but only by changing many aspects of the source material. I've never read a Millar comic I didn't hate thoroughly.
Old 05-07-12, 12:32 PM
  #458  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: gloucester, uk
Posts: 2,154
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: The Avengers (Whedon, 2012) — The Reviews Thread

Perhaps I'm alone in thinking this but I didn't particularly like Loki as the villain. He's alright, but nothing that memorable. Certainly not someone I could imagine actually subjugating the entire Earth, and not a villain who will be remembered in the same breath as any of the greats of cinema, such as Darth Vader.
Old 05-07-12, 12:38 PM
  #459  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: gloucester, uk
Posts: 2,154
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: The Avengers (Whedon, 2012) — The Reviews Thread

The greatest thing about the movie, to my mind, was the way the different tones of each character's particular universe were preserved within the context of a single cohesive film. As an example Iron Man is full of self loathing and intelligence which was preserved whenever Robert Downey Junior was on screen. But in contrast Captain America is slower and more "traditional" which was also somehow incorporated. It was somehow possible to view various sections of the movie successfully from the perspective of different characters but the characters then also interacted in a reasonable manner also. Quite some feat, and something which must have taken a good deal of planning.

That being said the plot was fairly basic (Transormers 4, effectively) which I'm guessing must have been necessary in order to accommodate all of the characters and their varied viewpoints.
Old 05-07-12, 12:48 PM
  #460  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Mordred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 12,215
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Re: The Avengers (Whedon, 2012) — The Reviews Thread

So can anyone explain to me why the Hulk is, on the airship, an uncontrollable killing machine who can't distinguish friend from foe, but on the ground he's now Mr. Team Player who only takes out the bad guys?

Please don't say it's because he's angry all the time.
Old 05-07-12, 12:51 PM
  #461  
DVD Talk Reviewer
 
Boba Fett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,283
Received 38 Likes on 30 Posts
Re: The Avengers (Whedon, 2012) — The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by Mordred
So can anyone explain to me why the Hulk is, on the airship, an uncontrollable killing machine who can't distinguish friend from foe, but on the ground he's now Mr. Team Player who only takes out the bad guys?

Please don't say it's because he's angry all the time.
Spoiler:
1.) He was startled into transforming. 2.) Loki's staff was putting everyone on edge.
Old 05-07-12, 12:53 PM
  #462  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Hokeyboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
Posts: 20,405
Received 696 Likes on 430 Posts
Re: The Avengers (Whedon, 2012) — The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by Supermallet
Old 05-07-12, 12:58 PM
  #463  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,097
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Re: The Avengers (Whedon, 2012) — The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by Flatlander
This got me as well too. The way I at least explained it to myself is that when Stark and Banner are at SHIELD, I can't remember the exact line but Stark tells Banner that he has to learn how to control it like Stark and the ARC reactor. When Stark was confident that Banner would return to fight I took that as they came up with a way for Banner to control it. Since they were both in the lab for some time.

Other than that I am as lost as well as Hulk only destroys but when the battle started, Banner could control himself to change into the Hulk when he wanted to without a stresser.
Originally Posted by Mordred
So can anyone explain to me why the Hulk is, on the airship, an uncontrollable killing machine who can't distinguish friend from foe, but on the ground he's now Mr. Team Player who only takes out the bad guys?

Please don't say it's because he's angry all the time.
he was being manipulated by Loki via the scepter on the helicarrier
remember when they (Avengers) are all in the same room together arguing as the camera is panning around .... the image is then flipped upside down showing the group with the glowing scepter in the foreground ... Banner even picks up the scepter without knowing it....

on the ground the staff is not within their vacinity to influence their actions
Old 05-07-12, 01:01 PM
  #464  
DVD Talk Legend
 
d2cheer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 11,476
Received 263 Likes on 191 Posts
Re: The Avengers (Whedon, 2012) — The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by Mordred
So can anyone explain to me why the Hulk is, on the airship, an uncontrollable killing machine who can't distinguish friend from foe, but on the ground he's now Mr. Team Player who only takes out the bad guys?

Please don't say it's because he's angry all the time.
Might as well chime in here, that was the only real fault I had with it too.

After the movie when I was thinking about it and remembered him holding the staff I figured that it probably had something to do with that.

But enjoyed this as much as a person can enjoy a movie and will be seeing it again in the theater at some point. My son has already went twice and wants to see it a third time.
Old 05-07-12, 01:09 PM
  #465  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Mordred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 12,215
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Re: The Avengers (Whedon, 2012) — The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by musick
he was being manipulated by Loki via the scepter on the helicarrier
remember when they (Avengers) are all in the same room together arguing as the camera is panning around .... the image is then flipped upside down showing the group with the glowing scepter in the foreground ... Banner even picks up the scepter without knowing it....

on the ground the staff is not within their vacinity to influence their actions
Except the staff was on top of the building that the Hulk was also on (for part of the time), and he didn't seem to have any problems then.

My other complaint with the movie was the impenetrable portal shield being conveniently penetrable due to a "failsafe" that the scientist built in to sabotage everything while still under Loki's brainwashing power. How does that make any sense?

Anyway, I enjoyed the hell out of the movie, but I wouldn't call it a great movie by any stretch.
Old 05-07-12, 01:20 PM
  #466  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Rosemount, MN
Posts: 43,337
Received 1,638 Likes on 1,025 Posts
Re: The Avengers (Whedon, 2012) — The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by Mordred
My other complaint with the movie was the impenetrable portal shield being conveniently penetrable due to a "failsafe" that the scientist built in to sabotage everything while still under Loki's brainwashing power. How does that make any sense?
Maybe I'm misremembering, but wasn't the "failsafe" Loki's crystal? It was a natural way to get through the shield. Like a diamond can only be scratched by another diamond.

Anyway, I enjoyed the hell out of the movie, but I wouldn't call it a great movie by any stretch.
These kinds of statements make no sense to me. If I enjoy the hell out of a movie, that means I thought it was great. I don't enjoy movies I think are bad.
Old 05-07-12, 01:29 PM
  #467  
DVD Talk Legend
 
joeblow69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Palm Springs
Posts: 11,424
Received 228 Likes on 145 Posts
Re: The Avengers (Whedon, 2012) — The Reviews Thread

So am I the only one that was expecting this movie to flop? My take was "Who cares about a bunch of b-grade superheros getting together?" Apparently, everyone does!
Old 05-07-12, 01:33 PM
  #468  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Hokeyboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
Posts: 20,405
Received 696 Likes on 430 Posts
Re: The Avengers (Whedon, 2012) — The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by Draven
These kinds of statements make no sense to me. If I enjoy the hell out of a movie, that means I thought it was great. I don't enjoy movies I think are bad.
You never enjoyed a movie that you thought was pretty good, but not great?

I enjoyed the hell out of, say, 21 Jump Street, but I wouldn't call it a great movie...
Old 05-07-12, 01:33 PM
  #469  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Puyallup
Posts: 16,430
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Re: The Avengers (Whedon, 2012) — The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by Draven
That movie is already plotted. It could easily be about the past situations they mentioned in this movie. Then it fits right into the continuity too. Hell, we even saw a "scene" from it already in The Avengers, when they were watching their file footage.
Budapest?
Old 05-07-12, 01:34 PM
  #470  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,097
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Re: The Avengers (Whedon, 2012) — The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by Mordred
Except the staff was on top of the building that the Hulk was also on (for part of the time), and he didn't seem to have any problems then.

My other complaint with the movie was the impenetrable portal shield being conveniently penetrable due to a "failsafe" that the scientist built in to sabotage everything while still under Loki's brainwashing power. How does that make any sense?

Anyway, I enjoyed the hell out of the movie, but I wouldn't call it a great movie by any stretch.
yeah sorry I don't have the spec sheet with the range of Loki's fictional scepter
I guess listing the range in the dialogue would have made this superhero movie much more realistic
Old 05-07-12, 01:36 PM
  #471  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Puyallup
Posts: 16,430
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Re: The Avengers (Whedon, 2012) — The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by Mordred
So can anyone explain to me why the Hulk is, on the airship, an uncontrollable killing machine who can't distinguish friend from foe, but on the ground he's now Mr. Team Player who only takes out the bad guys?

Please don't say it's because he's angry all the time.
Maybe it is the Godzilla story..when there is no greater threat..he picks on the poor citizens of Japan. When Gamora shows up, he kicks Gamora's ass.
Old 05-07-12, 01:38 PM
  #472  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Puyallup
Posts: 16,430
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Re: The Avengers (Whedon, 2012) — The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by joeblow69
So am I the only one that was expecting this movie to flop? My take was "Who cares about a bunch of b-grade superheros getting together?" Apparently, everyone does!


Yes you were the only one. And B-Grade superheros? huh? Avengers is a A-list team.
Old 05-07-12, 01:41 PM
  #473  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Rosemount, MN
Posts: 43,337
Received 1,638 Likes on 1,025 Posts
Re: The Avengers (Whedon, 2012) — The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by Hokeyboy
You never enjoyed a movie that you thought was pretty good, but not great?

I enjoyed the hell out of, say, 21 Jump Street, but I wouldn't call it a great movie...
If I genuinely "enjoyed the hell" out of something, then I think it's a great movie. If I liked it or thought it was OK, I say it that way instead. And for the record, I thought 21 Jump Street was a great movie too. Way better than it had any right to be.

Originally Posted by superdeluxe
Budapest?
I know they mentioned that but I couldn't remember if they'd mentioned more.
Old 05-07-12, 01:49 PM
  #474  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Mordred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 12,215
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Re: The Avengers (Whedon, 2012) — The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by Draven
Maybe I'm misremembering, but wasn't the "failsafe" Loki's crystal? It was a natural way to get through the shield. Like a diamond can only be scratched by another diamond.
There was this bit of dialog I'm paraphrasing:

Black Widow: Loki had brainwashed you. You didn't know what you're doing.
Stellan: But I think I did. I built in a failsafe.
[Exaggerated look at the staff down below]

These kinds of statements make no sense to me. If I enjoy the hell out of a movie, that means I thought it was great. I don't enjoy movies I think are bad.
I didn't say it was a bad movie... just a light weight enjoyable film that didn't always make sense, but had snappy dialog that I enjoyed, even if I thought the finished product dragged on a little long. It was immensely entertaining and had several awesome/hilarious scenes, but I wouldn't pay money to see it again in theaters.
Old 05-07-12, 01:54 PM
  #475  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Mordred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 12,215
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Re: The Avengers (Whedon, 2012) — The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by joeblow69
So am I the only one that was expecting this movie to flop? My take was "Who cares about a bunch of b-grade superheros getting together?" Apparently, everyone does!
I didn't think it would flop, but I didn't expect it to do much better than Iron Man.


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.