![]() |
Re: When did Jack Nicholson develop his schtick?
Originally Posted by JumpCutz
(Post 11166360)
Pacino was WAY over the top in Scent of a Woman, even though he won the Oscar.
|
Re: When did Jack Nicholson develop his schtick?
Or maybe he just had so much fun with Dick Tracy that he decided to carry some of it over to other performances.
|
Re: When did Jack Nicholson develop his schtick?
I'd say his work in Sea of Love is when he started that whole schtick.
|
Re: When did Jack Nicholson develop his schtick?
Originally Posted by Shannon Nutt
(Post 11166202)
Hoffa and The Pledge. He should have gotten an Oscar noms for both of them.
I haven' seen "Hoffa" but he gave an excellent performance in "The Pledge". Reminded me he could actually act and not rely on his schtick. |
Re: When did Jack Nicholson develop his schtick?
Originally Posted by conscience
(Post 11166659)
Never.
I never understood these "he's playing himself" threads for any actor. All actors have different techniques and not all are the same. Jack Nicholson seems to be in the first category. He does it very well, audiences buy tickets, and everyone is happy. |
Re: When did Jack Nicholson develop his schtick?
Originally Posted by rw2516
(Post 11166649)
King's top choice was Ron Howard.
|
Re: When did Jack Nicholson develop his schtick?
We got to see what King always wanted with that godawful TV movie. Thank goodness that Kubrick didn't listen to him.
|
Re: When did Jack Nicholson develop his schtick?
Originally Posted by Numanoid
(Post 11168924)
We got to see what King always wanted with that godawful TV movie. Thank goodness that Kubrick didn't listen to him.
I like the book and all, but I don't really care what King wanted for the movie. The film stands on its own and works very well with Nicholson. |
Re: When did Jack Nicholson develop his schtick?
Originally Posted by Why So Blu?
(Post 11167218)
Well technically he did have that one scene in Chinatown where tells the joke at the office. That's straight whacky Jack if anything.
|
Re: When did Jack Nicholson develop his schtick?
Originally Posted by Ralph Jenkins
(Post 11169385)
Just the other day, I was watching the interviews on the DVD of Rosemary's Baby, and Polanski mentioned that Jack was considered for the role of the husband, but he thought Jack looked too sinister. The viewer needed to be unsure if Rosemary's husband could be trusted. It's kind of interesting that Stephen King ended up having a similar problem with Jack being cast in The Shining.
|
Re: When did Jack Nicholson develop his schtick?
Originally Posted by William Fuld
(Post 11168643)
I've always heard King wanted Michael Moriarty. Howard would have been too young.
|
Re: When did Jack Nicholson develop his schtick?
Originally Posted by TomOpus
(Post 11169537)
It's the eyebrows!
|
Re: When did Jack Nicholson develop his schtick?
Originally Posted by JumpCutz
(Post 11166360)
Pacino was WAY over the top in Scent of a Woman, even though he won the Oscar.
Pacino started his career with quiet self-contained performances and the last 15 or so years HE GOT LOUD!! Okay back to Nicholson. :) |
Re: When did Jack Nicholson develop his schtick?
Originally Posted by Rypro 525
(Post 11170286)
even though its supposed to be over the top, watch Pacino's performance in Dick Tracy. The random screaming started there
|
Re: When did Jack Nicholson develop his schtick?
Originally Posted by Rypro 525
(Post 11170286)
even though its supposed to be over the top, watch Pacino's performance in Dick Tracy. The random screaming started there
|
Re: When did Jack Nicholson develop his schtick?
Let's not hold up Stephen King as some paragon of casting choices, especially when it comes to adaptations of his own books. This is a guy who wanted Lindsay Lohan (a twenty-something who looks MUCH MUCH OLDER) in the title role of Carrie, over Chloe Moretz (an actual teenager).
|
Re: When did Jack Nicholson develop his schtick?
Regardless of some of his other remarks regarding other movies, I know how I felt when I walked out of the theater. I was confused at the major changes in the book, baffled at the ending and didn't care for Jack. The book affected me in ways other horror books had not. It really scared me. So, I held the book in very high esteem.
Now, having said that, over the years I've softened on the liberties the movie took with the book. I do own it the movie. It IS very Kubrick. I still don't like 1st-act-of-the-movie Jack but he does let out all the stops for the rest of the movie. I might've enjoyed the movie more if I had not read the book. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:28 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.